|
|
 |
 |
|
The
War Memorial
|
What
began as an anti-war march through the streets of Cambridge on Thursday
20th March, ended as a sit-in protest at the junction of Hills Road
and Regent Street.
Marchers moving away from the War Memorial brought chaos to streets
around the city centre as police closed roads to traffic in the
middle of a busy weekday afternoon.
The
protest in words and pictures >>
Peaceful
protest or civil disobedience? Have your say >>
The protesters are certain that participation in anti-war marches
is the only way to ensure that their voices are heard, but does
everyone agree? Numerous calls to BBC Radio Cambridgeshire seem
to suggest otherwise.
Here's what you have to say about the Cambridge
anti-war protest marches...
Phil (on BBC Radio Cambridgeshire)
"Why do the police allow these people to seize a major crossroads
and disrupt 100,000 people? If they'd been football fans, the police
would probably have drawn their sticks and got the dogs out - and
that's what they should have done on Thursday. The war has already
started and the only way it's going to stop now is if we have a
victory. So get real - use your loaf, what's the point of demonstrating?
I also see that these people have made their mark on the War Memorial
with chalk, and I'm surprised that the police allowed them to use
that as a focal point of their demonstration."
Richard Cunning - taxi driver
Richard was driving his Panther cab around the city centre during
the protests. Luckily for him, he knows all the short cuts: "It
was annoying, but still fairly easy to get around if you know what
you're doing. The police spoke to taxi and bus drivers before deciding
where to put the protesters, ensuring they caused a minimum of disruption
to city centre traffic. I think the police did an excellent job
of keeping Cambridge moving."
 |
|
Cab
driver Richard Cundell
|
On
the subject of the marchers themselves, he agreed that most of the
youngsters should not have been there. "I've got three children
myself, and my eldest boy is used to football crowds, but I wouldn't
have wanted him in that march. Things could easily get nasty and
youngsters wouldn't have a clue what to do in that situation."
Does Richard agree with the sentiments of the marchers? "Well,
I've nothing really against laying white flowers on the War Memorial,
but hanging posters from it is just desecration."
Reg (on BBC Radio Cambridgeshire)
"The police should sell their helicopter so they can have more
people on the ground, and buy a water cannon so that they can blast
the protesters off the streets."
 |
|
Anti-war
graffiti on Cambridge's War memorial
|
Simon
(on BBC Radio Cambridgeshire)
"I went on the demonstration on the 20th March and I'm over
50 years of age. Is anyone thinking that the £2 billion we're
spending on this war could be better used for things we really need?
"I think the police were really sensible. They weren't confrontational.
They did something about the very, very marginal trouble. Basically,
people don't use civil disobedience unless they feel something very
very strongly. If people had just walked through Cambridge, the
radio wouldn't be covering it in this way - it would have just been
a footnote.
"I don't think civil disobedience should be used lightly, but
in any democratic society, it is something that has to be used if
you feel really strongly. I don't think the young people are using
this as a bit of a jolly. I'm very impressed that for the first
time in years they've become really engaged in an issue in public
life and I think that bodes well for the future of this country."
Bob (on BBC Radio Cambridgeshire)
"I agree that everyone has a right to demonstrate in our democratic
society, but the thing that incensed me was when I drove past the
War Memorial and saw a placard placed on there in memory of the
Iraqi people that will be killed by the US and the UK.
 |
| Red
flowers left in protest at the influx of white poppies |
"As
this is a memorial to soldiers who gave their lives to save democracy
in this country, I was absolutely incensed. Churchill said that
we're a nation with short memories and I think it's terrible that
people can put that type of placard on a memorial to the Cambridgeshire
Regiment and others who gave up their lives. I have torn that poster
up and if I'd had the time, I'd have removed the white flowers as
well."
 |
|
White
poppies on the memorial
|
Stuart
(on BBC Radio Cambridgeshire)
Stuart was one of the organisers of the demonstration and his wife
was one of the women carrying the wreaths of white poppies. "They
very carefully placed a banner around the memorial saying 'Never
Again' and I understand that has caused a furore. I'd like to say
that I served for five years in the RAF and I did not regard what
was done yesterday as a desecration. The people who fought and died
in WW1 and WW2 fought for that very reason - never again.
And so, far from desecrating that memorial, the people who are desecrating
the memory of the dead are the people who continue to go to war
and think that war is the solution.
"What we were pointing out was that the right way to honour
the people who laid down their lives is to seek and maintain peace.
The white poppies represent the civilian casualties of wars. Over
85% of deaths in wars are civilian deaths and I say that we are
honouring the memory of the dead by focusing people's minds on what
these people died for. They died that we should suffer war no more."
What do you think about the Cambridge anti-war
marches and demonstrations? More are planned daily, with larger
demonstrations due to take place at weekends for the duration of
the conflict.
Do you agree with the sentiments of the marchers and their methods,
or do you think this is purely civil disobedience and that we should
now support our troops as the government suggests?
The
protest in words and pictures >>
Peaceful
protest or civil disobedience? Have your say >>
|