|
This page features 'selected' letters and emails from the BBC
listeners like you. Please write your comments about our coverage on international
and Burmese news, and features. We may edit any published materials in order to comply with the BBC's editorial guidelines. Send your opinion to burmese@bbc.co.uk .
Can Razali Ismail help with the substantial democratic change in Burma? BBC News: The Burmese military government is reported to have approved the first return visit in six months by the United Nations envoy to Burma, Razali Ismail. The inability of the U.N. to restrain the United States from
attacking Iraq proves that Razali Ismail can not significantly help with substantial
democratic change in Burma. He has waited for some more times even to get permission
for coming visit from SPDC. I don't think so, because Burmese dictators are fond of power
and luxury. They can do everything at this time. I never believe democratic
change will happen. Razali Ismail is U.N.'s envoy, and a Malaysian, not United
States of America. Without using force like in Iraq and Afghanistan, or a military
coup among the generaals, things will never change. Trust me. I don't think Mr. Razali's negotiation can bring success without
the help of U.S and E.U sanctions. The gov. of Myanmar allow Mr. Razali only
when U.S and E.U are going to make more tough sanctions. Mr. Powell also give
promise to the Congress that he will find way to put pressure on Gov. of Myanmar
at ASEAN Ministers' meeting. Only then, the military gov. allows Mr. Razali
in. I think and am sure that if the world, U.S,wants to see the reform in Myanmar,
Mr. Bush may need to send Aircraft carriers to the Myanmar sea at the time of
Mr. Razali's coming to Myanmar. If not, Mr. Razali will go back again with nothing
in his hands.
It depends on the will of SPDC because it is the regime which
do not want a change. In terms of international role,
Razali's effot is the best at this point. He tries his level best. His participation
in Tokyo close door consultation is important. However as dialogue means of
two sides' decision, a third party has very limited role to influence.
National reconciliation in Burma can be brought
about by the current government who have the authority to do anything. As long
as the SPDC cannot take criticism and do not discuss with NLD or any other organisations,
there won't be any national reconciliation in Burma regardless of whatever the
NLD or other organisations do. The only means to bring national reconciliation
in Myanmar is to broadcast more information about the activities of the military
government especially on Human Rights issues. We should have the Security Council in Burma. Let
the generals be in it as members together with some civilians. Then, we should
also have an interim government for necessary democratization. The other very
important issue is to learn from the U.S.A and Thailand where people from various
origins can live together as 'citizens' of a modern country. There should be
no discrimination on race or origins. Return to BBC Burmese Front Page
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| burmese@bbc.co.uk |
About UsContact Us Privacy Statement |
||