|
Should EU change its Burma policies? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An independent report to the European Commission urges the European Union to overhaul its policies on Burma in favor of an approach that would boost the economy and improve governance. The report was written by long-time Burma researchers Robert Taylor, currently a fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore, and Morten Pederson, an analyst for the International Crisis Group. Mr Taylor and Mr Pederson's 12 proposals to the EU include recognising Myanmar instead of Burma as the official name of the country; resuming regular high-level visits; revising the use of sanctions; and restoring some aid programmes aimed at easing or crushing poverty and improving basic education. Their findings are due to be presented at a Burma/Myanmar Day meeting in Brussels on 5th April. The EU imposed sanctions on the Burmese military government in 2003, and tightened them in September 2004, after Rangoon failed to meet its demands including the release of pro-democracy leader and Nobel peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi. Should EU review its hardline policies? What is the best way for EU to deal with Burma? How can EU help Burmese people in achieving democracy? Should EU revoke sanctions on Burma? |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||