LEDs (Light emitting diodes)
Last updated Wednesday 30 April 2008
Play it cool with a bright alternative to halogen spotlights
LEDs are about 90% more energy-efficient than the standard incandescent bulb, and about twice as efficient as Compact Fluorescent Lightbulbs. Thanks to efficiency, LEDs cost more upfront than their tungsten rivals but win back huge savings in the long run.
They don't flicker and last five times longer than conventional bulbs - and because they produce a powerful, focused light they are an ideal substitute for halogen spotlights, indoors or out.
They also come as dimmers, recessed 'cove' lights and translucent tiles, and can even change colour to match your mood. (Hot tip: the colour blue is almost as effective as coffee at waking you up in the morning.)
Read more below
Saves 300kg of CO2 a year (30kg per bulb)
477 Bloomers are doing this
CO2 reduction ![]()
Cheapness ![]()
Popularity ![]()
Cost £18
In this article:
- How do they work?
- How will it make a difference?
- What's the debate?
- What's stopping me?
- How do I do it?
How do they work?
Pub Fact
- There are 3.2 billion conventional lights in use
- Homes currently account for 27% of the UK's greenhouse gasemissions at around 40 million tonnes of CO2 a year
- Europeans buy about 2.1bn traditional light bulbs every year
- When incandescent bulbs first hit the market, people didn't like them because they had difficulty adapting to the glare of the light
Basically, LEDs are just tiny light bulbs that can be screwed directly into the fittings used by conventional bulbs. But unlike ordinary incandescents, they don't have a filament that will burn out, and they don't heat up much. Light is produced solely by the rush of electrons in a semiconductive material.
LEDs are available with Edison (screw-in type) bases to retrofit existing fixtures, strips that can be used in the floor - and even in outdoor landscaping fixtures.
How will it make a difference?
Traditional incandescent light bulbs are ovens in disguise, releasing about 95% of their energy as heat. LEDs are far more efficient than normal bulbs and have a far longer lifespan - so although they cost a little more up front, they are money savers too.
LEDs use very little energy - retrofit bulbs use about one to seven watts, which is less than CFLs.
As a result, all things considered, LEDs cost significantly less to run than conventional bulbs and produce half as much CO2. (See below for an explanation of why LEDs tend not to cut your emissions as much as they could.)
In fact, if every household in Britain switched from traditional festive lights over Christmas to coloured LEDs, we'd save over £44m on electricity bills and about 200,000 tonnes of CO2. That's the equivalent of taking 70,000 cars off the road, according to the Local Government Association.
Plus, LEDs last much longer than other bulbs - on average about 50,000 hours according to the Alliance for Solid-State Illumination Systems and Technologies (ASSIST).
In addition, LEDs are also fully dimmable unlike the majority of CFLs - and they don't change their colour tint when dimmed like incandescent lamps (which turn yellow). Significantly, LEDs are also free of the toxin mercury, unlike CFLs.
What's the debate?
LEDs are made of complex alloys of exotic metals like indium and gallium, so require a lot of energy to manufacture. However, their superb energy-efficiency easily outweighs these embodied emissions over the light's lifetime.
Individual LEDs are considerably more efficient than rival light bulbs, but when they are incorporated into a lamp or fixture that efficiency is markedly reduced. That said, LEDs in any form still use less energy than conventional bulbs.
You may not save as much CO2 as expected from switching to LEDs or CFLs if you end up turning the heating up to compensate for their lack of waste heat. Energy-saving lamps make your home cooler because they don't waste as much heat as incandescents - but it's worth noting that heating your home with light bulbs is much less efficient than leaving the central heating to do its job. The EST estimates that due to the 'heat replacement effect', a 100W incandescent replaced by a 20W CFL would save around 26kg CO2 per year per bulb while replacing it with a 10W LED would save around 29kg CO2 per year per bulb.
What's stopping me?
"I can't afford fancy LED lighting"
Although LED light bulbs are more expensive than incandescent bulbs, they save money in the long run because they use much less electricity and last much longer. Plus, manufacturers claim LED production is increasing rapidly, lowering prices: by 2011 the LED market is expected to have jumped by 20% according to Strategy Analytics.
How do I do it?
- Buy some LED bulbs. Online supplies are available. Look on the Ban the Bulb website for suppliers
- Get the right fixture. LEDs generate heat internally, which, if not drawn away from the light fixture, can cut their useful life and cause colour shifts
- Expect a bit of variation in colour. Devices from the same batch can vary slightly in colour due to the manufacturing process
- If you have the money, go for an LED installation - intelligent lighting can change the way a room looks with the flick of a switch
or
If you like this action send it to a friend
Share this
Comments
Why hasn't the government taken action against halogens? They put out adverts encouraging us to replace incandescents, ignoring the fact that people are busily installing halogens often tripling the wattage in a room. If the halogens are dimmable and ceiling recessed, then there are no low energy alternatives.
LED lights are great and I have successfully replaced most of my halogens but at the moment the market is complex with a large range of bulbs and still developing and it is easy to make a mistake when buying and some sellers over-claim on the wattage equivalence.
LED light technology also has other green applications. For instance back lighting for TVs potentially halving the wattage used by a large TV. When such TV's come down in cost that will surely deserve a bigger bean than at present.
The efficiency , or should I say efficacy of these devices is very good, the goal of the manufacturers appears to be around 180 lumens of light foe each Watt of electricity. this compares very well with a typical CFL at 60 lumes / Watt or an incandecent lamp at 13 to 21 Lm/W. Once again we must factor into our calculations any losses in the control gear for these devices, if they can be run from a 12 volt DC supply, perhaps a wind generator or solar voltaic array, losses will be small compared with a 230 volt unit. On the down side, some of the materials used in the LED may be toxic, but they are encased in sealed package, so exposure is unkikely. The light output is very directional and some commentators believe it does not travel well, so it would appear that the applicaton for this technology should be carefully considered before purchase. LED's are well established in automotive applications, the rear lights anr AUDI front sidelights use LED's. Dimming is usually achieved using pulse width modulation, some of us are aware of the flash rate in PWM. Overall, it,s a technology I have embraced




Tell us how you got on
You need to log-in to leave a comment