What next for the Lib Dems?
Imagine you're in a small boat, heading towards what you know will be a fearsome storm. Your young captain assures you that it'll all be fine, and that on the other side of the storm, the seas are calm, the sky is blue and the sun shines brightly.
Out in front is a much bigger boat - you're following it because your captain is determined that it knows where it's going as it ploughs through the heavy seas. "I've discussed it with their captain," he tells you. "We've agreed on the course we've set and I'm committed to it."
Now you know what it feels like to be a Liberal Democrat. Captain Clegg tells you to hold your nerve as the clouds gather - but how brave are you? When I spoke to Lib Dem delegates at their party conference in Liverpool this week, it wasn't fear that I saw in their eyes, but I'm not sure it was bravery either.
For now, most of them are prepared to trust Captain Clegg. He's convinced them, for now, that he knows what he's doing. But how fierce will the storm be when the public spending cuts begin to bite? And will their supporters on the quayside still be there, waving their flags and cheering, when the good ship Lib Dem limps into port?
(I'm not sure how much longer I can keep this metaphor going, but bear with me for one more paragraph.) And what about the big Labour ship, which hasn't left port for months? Once one of the Captains Miliband takes control, will it head off in an entirely different direction - or at least at a much slower speed - avoiding the storm and making it back home long before you do, and in much better shape?
End of metaphor. In fact, I found the Lib Dems in Liverpool to be in pretty good heart. They like being in government at a national level, even though many of them already have experience of being in office either at a local level or in Scotland. Lib Dem ministers making policy announcements from the conference platform are an exciting novelty in a party that hasn't had a taste of national power for 65 years.
And yet. They look at the opinion polls and they fear what's coming. In local elections (and Scottish and Welsh elections) next May, perhaps in the midst of strikes by public sector workers furious about job cuts, will the Lib Dems lose hundreds of council seats? Will they even lose the referendum on a new voting system, that glittering prize which Nick Clegg won in return for signing up with the Tories?
And will they then ask themselves what they're getting out of this coalition deal? Yes, they can tell voters that they have played a part in government at a national level, but what if that government becomes deeply unpopular, and Labour basks in the sunshine of opposition under a new and energetic leader?
Here's what top Lib Dems say in response. First, we can already show that we have done good things in government (tax concessions for the low paid; an end to ID cards and DNA data base records; a bank levy; a Freedom Bill); second, remember that the spending cuts will be phased in over five years, so it won't be as if a mammoth sword of Damocles comes smashing down immediately after George Osborne's spending announcement next month.
And third, in the handful of local council by-elections they have contested since they entered the coalition, they haven't been slaughtered.
But are they at risk of losing their identity? Could Nick Clegg's speech to the party conference on Monday have been delivered by David Cameron, as some delegates grumbled? A lot of it probably could have been, although not the line when he said that he still thinks that the war in Iraq was illegal.
So what do the Lib Dems want? Nick Clegg is telling them that in government they can make a real difference. ("I still believe in our commitments to the developing world. The difference is I get to make those commitments at a UN summit and make them happen. I still campaign for political reform. The difference is I'm now legislating for it as well.")
That's the nice bit. The nasty bit is what voters might think if the Osborne Plan for reviving the UK economy doesn't work. Before the election, Nick Clegg said he didn't believe that the spending cuts the Conservatives were planning would be justified. "Do I think that these big, big cuts are merited or justified at a time when the economy is struggling to get to its feet? Clearly not."
The big question over the coming months is whether voters decide he was right then - or is right now.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~10~RS~)
Comments
Sign in or register to comment.
What if you were one part of a siamese twin with two heads, two brains. Two bodies joined inseparably, neither able to survive without the other but you were the smaller and weaker of the two. Weaker physically and therefore less able to get your way when there are differences. You'd be forced to do what the other brain demanded most of the time unless you could persuade it to see your view. Now imagine that the other brain is a macaroon. Will there come a point where you are so unhappy with your existance and the compromises you must make that you will demand surgery to separate you even though you know it will almost certainly result in your demise? It seems to me that is a far more apt metaphor for the situation the lib-dems find themselves in. They are remarkably lucky to be near the seat of power at all. It only happend as the result of circumstances Britain hasn't seen in 200 years.
Complain about this comment
Two brains can often be better than one if by doing so most of the population is on the same boat and the Captain not Captain Bligh.
Britain still has its class struggle and few workers will accept the Lib Dems as their spokesperson --especially when they feel the full force of the approaching storm.
Both percentage representation and a change in `The Oath of Allegiance´ to the country, will help Britain out of its vicious and society dividing circle, but time will be needed.
The fear that future EU laws will do it for them has resulted in a buttoning down of hatches and the continuing ´Them and us´ mentality being protected by a faked nationalism.
Complain about this comment
The real pity is that the UK did not contrive the party political situation for a National Government to be formed of all of the parties. We need a National Government because many of the necessary decisions are very painful, but economically they must be taken as the market will force these decisions.
There is a substantial cross-party coalition that exists between all three parties that generally agrees what has to be done - this is why Labour is finding it so hard to challenge the Conservatives and Liberals.
The problem fro both Conservatives and Liberals is that the decisions that they are being forced to take will so damage them in the eyes of the public that there is a high probability that they will be out of power fro a generation of more at the next election. The Conservatives and Liberals need Labour in the coalition!
Complain about this comment
"So what do the Lib Dems want?" and "But are they at risk of losing their identity?" are the questions that puzzle me about the coalition government running Britain after the recent general election. Recently, I have been listening to a set of lectures at the website of the UC Berkeley course lectures on modern British political sociology given by a lecturer educated in Britain but now living in the US. The Lib Dems if I am not mistaken came from the Liberal party tradition of the 19th and early 20th century but has roots in the reform movement that emerged from the early turmoil of the first industrial revolution. One of the results of that movement for example was the incremental changes that finally resulted in universal suffrage in the mid-20th century. This proud record as you suggested has nevertheless not brought the Lib Dems much political success though it continues to attract followers. But what is it that Lib Dems have in common with the Conservative party and how do they feel more comfortable with the Tories and not the Labour party. This identity puzzle needs to be thrashed out before the coalition goes much further in its austerity drive in my opinion if the coalition is to survive for a long period.
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS