World Cup 2006 Blog

From our reporters in Germany

How to get a head (shot)

In his latest guest post, Getty Images photographer Ross Kinnaird reveals how he tries to liven up stock media conferences with a more creative approach.

DavidBeckamGetty140606_2.jpg


I’ve been attending quite a few press conferences and training sessions in the build-up to the next England match tomorrow (Thursday) and this image is just one of many I’ve been having some fun with – capturing static head shots can be quite soul-numbing for a sports photographer after a few days so I always like to experiment!
It took me four or five attempts to get this effect, using a 70 - 200 mm lens, shot at a 15th of a second F8 (no flash allowed at the conference). My biggest challenge was to get the camera to swivel on a central and static point. Any lateral movements blur the whole image.

Comments  Post your comment

  • 1.
  • At 03:46 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Thomas Coulson wrote:

omg how do you get it to do that, it's effective, but I'm not sure many newspapers will be printing it!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 2.
  • At 03:57 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Atom Ant wrote:

Absolutely fantastic shot, Ross.

Love it.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 3.
  • At 04:01 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Oliver wrote:

It looks interesting, though to me it looks more like you've been going mad with photoshop...

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 4.
  • At 04:15 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • brendan wrote:

its a crazy picture, makes my eyes go all blurry.......cool pic though:)

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 5.
  • At 04:16 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • brendan wrote:

its a crazy picture, makes my eyes go all blurry.......cool pic though:)

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 6.
  • At 04:16 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Sharon wrote:

Clever use of a camera

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 7.
  • At 04:21 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • stuart moore wrote:

effective way of capturing and varying the effect of a static image
Did you use a special tripod?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 8.
  • At 04:22 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • brian wrote:

is this a joke? i could have done better myself in photoshop... and i bet i wouldnt get paid for it

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 9.
  • At 04:35 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Dan wrote:

The thing is, is that it's not in Photoshop, it's a natural photo.

Bloody Photoshop.

Nice one.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 10.
  • At 04:41 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Paul D wrote:

Nice picture but couldn't you have got the same effect using photoshop?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 11.
  • At 04:50 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Jonny wrote:

It looks good but its just photoshoped with a radial blur i think

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 12.
  • At 04:57 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • JamesK wrote:

I can get the same effect if I use a bear glass attached to my lens.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 13.
  • At 05:06 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • P wrote:

What's a "bear glass"?

A glass for a bear?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 14.
  • At 05:07 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Dan wrote:

What's all this photoshop talk?! It's a relatively simple technique of rotating the camera while your shutter is open, with a slightly longer exposure than in good light conditions. Getty photographers do not photoshop images thank you very much!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 15.
  • At 05:09 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Alan wrote:

Cool effect, similar to a German photographer called Schlegelmilch? who does shots of F1 cars using much the same technique. Easy when you know how, takes lots of practice and a steady hand though...

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 16.
  • At 05:15 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Adam wrote:

Bloody sceptics!
That's really cool, how did you prevent lateral movement and why is is face not twisted?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 17.
  • At 05:28 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Claire Stocks, assistant editor wrote:

We will get Ross to give you the definitive answer at some point but my information is - absolutely no Photoshop was involved in creating the image.
In the process of adding it to this blog I cropped it to 430 px x 310 px (to reduce k size) and a black border added (as is our style). C'est tout.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 18.
  • At 05:31 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • mk1 wrote:

Whats the point? Doesn't look that great either... (I'm honestly not trying to be offensive here).

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 19.
  • At 05:32 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Mark Palms wrote:

That really is not a very good photo. Waste of time if you ask me. You weren't asking me? Oh, ok. I'm off to take photos of Zinadine Zidane's bald-spot from outer space then.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 20.
  • At 05:33 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Mark Palms wrote:

That really is not a very good photo. Waste of time if you ask me. You weren't asking me? Oh, ok. I'm off to take photos of Zinadine Zidane's bald-spot from outer space then.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 21.
  • At 05:35 PM on 14 Jun 2006,
  • Nick wrote:

Cool picture, but why does the subject not get distorted, as well as the background?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 

Post a comment

Please note name and email are required.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Required
Required (not displayed)
  Your email address will only be held by the BBC and will be used for the purpose of administering this blog site. The BBC may also contact you to further inquire about issues raised in mails posted to the blog. If you would like further information, please read the BBC's privacy policy
    

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk