Advertisement
« Previous | Main | Next »

Bed company still up to its old tricks

Post categories:

Rob Unsworth - editor | 18:17 UK time, Thursday, 10 September 2009

A BBC Rogue Traders investigation has discovered that adjustable bed company Craftmatic UK Ltd is still using bullying and pressure-selling techniques, despite appearing on the programme in 2005.

Craftmatic even signed undertakings with the Office of Fair Trading in 2006 agreeing to improve selling practices, but despite this Rogue Traders is still receiving complaints about the company. The 2005 investigation caught Craftmatic salesman Saleem Pasha upsetting an elderly actress posing as a potential customer. When trying to explain the consequences of old age, Pasha said, "Are you going to say damn it, I'll just go to the nursing home, where basically somebody's going to wipe your bottom for you. Is that what you would like?"

veronica_toms.jpgThree years on, the company visited Veronica Toms. Even though she'd been diagnosed with memory loss the Craftmatic salesman persuaded her to buy an adjustable bed. Veronica thought she'd bought the bed for £800 but had actually signed up to a finance agreement and the bed would have ended up costing her nearly £4,500. Her son Chris wrote to Craftmatic and the finance company and after a six-month wait Veronica was eventually told Craftmatic had cancelled her contract. However, Craftmatic have not refunded the deposit of £300 and the bed has yet to be collected from her home. 

To see if the company was still employing dubious sales techniques, last month Rogue Traders asked an actress to pose as an elderly lady interested in an adjustable bed. Craftmatic told the actress a salesman would call and on the day of the appointment Saleem Pasha turned up with a trainee.

Pasha made some bold claims about the bed's health benefits. Consumer lawyer Denise Nurse found problems with Pasha's pitch in relation to The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 that aim to ensure traders act honestly and fairly towards their customers. "I can't see how he could substantiate claims about her health and he's not a doctor," she said. "It's a very clear prohibited act to make false claims that you can improve or cure an illness." Not only that, but the undertakings Craftmatic made to the OFT also seem to have been breached.

secret_filming.jpgRogue Traders wanted a closer look at the company's training. An undercover reporter applied for a job as a Craftmatic salesman and was invited to attend a training session. It was led by the same man from 2005, Julian Farley. Closing the deal was a key focus and trainees were urged to tell customers to keep their bed purchase from their family. Julian told his trainees to say to their customers, "Do you want to fall out with your son? Course you don't tell him. Now after a couple of weeks you might feel guilty. Then you can say to him, do you know what I did, I've bought a Craftmatic bed."

As Craftmatic's cooling-off period is 10 working days this delay in telling the family could pose problems if they wanted to cancel.

Craftmatic is owned by Stanley Kraftsow who resides in Miami, but Rogue Traders discovered that one of Craftmatic's American chiefs, Mark Ostrov, recently hosted a sales conference for the Craftmatic sales force. Despite being convicted of fraud in June 2000, Ostrov is one of Stanley Kraftsow's right-hand men. He's deeply involved in running the UK side of the business and is the brains behind the Craftmatic sales pitch.

Rogue's undercover trainee salesman was invited to Ostrov's sales conference. Rogue Traders presenter Matt Allwright tried to meet Ostrov to pose a few questions about the sales pitch but when he approached him, Ostrov hid behind a door and asked Craftmatic staff to call for the hotel security.

Rogue Traders approached Saleem Pasha to ask him about his sales presentation. Pasha insists that he has been retrained, is doing no wrong in his pitches and has hundreds of happy customers.

Statement from Craftmatic UK Limited to BCB Watchdog Rogue Traders 4 September 2009

craftmatic_logo.jpgWe are disappointed that you should wish to feature Craftmatic in your programme. We wish to reassure your viewers that we take good customer service and fair dealings very seriously. We have in place procedures devised by leading psychologists to exclude visits to the potentially vulnerable. We also provide customers with the right to cancel without reason in the 10 business days after sale, twice the statutory minimum period.

The case of Mr Pasha will be reviewed when we view the evidence, pending which he is not conducting visits. It is not our policy to dissuade customers from seeking advice from third parties and steps are being implemented to ensure such an incident does not occur. To ensure calls to head office are not misconstrued separate calls for delivery dates and surveys registration are now not made.

We apologise to Mrs Tom and her family if any distress has been caused. Our staff did not perceive Mrs Toms to have any mental impairment but we responded to cancel the sale when a doctor's letter was received by us. We have no record of having received this earlier. As a matter of policy we do not take customers' old beds away. We have refunded all monies to Mrs Toms and have left her the bed as a goodwill gesture.

We have 75,000 customer appointments annually and complaints made are a very small fraction (0.16%). We believe we address all complaints fairly. Craftmatic is successful because it has a good product, testimony to which is the exceptionally high level of repeat business.

This blog is now closed. However you can still contact us by emailing Got a story?

Comments

or register to comment.

  • 1. At 9:01pm on 10 Sep 2009, shepnic wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 2. At 9:25pm on 10 Sep 2009, Nikkia27 wrote:

    Dreadful company and terrible business practices. Very similar (but even more deceitful) style to the awful double glazing sales - discount phone calls, wanting to get to know family members and consistent pestering. Awful. Thanks to Watchdog for following it up.

    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 9:37pm on 10 Sep 2009, Fubar-UK wrote:

    Don’t know about you but I’m getting a bit fed up of cold callers and sales calls etc......

    It died off for a while but now appears to have exploded in our area again – despite having numerous ‘Privacy Requests’ in place?

    What we should all start doing is upon a sales call lets say from your Broadband provider for example – when they try to up sell, reply “No I’m fine for now but whilst your on could you run through your Lower Packages with me please, because I was thinking of Down Grading and you have saved me a phone call!”

    On a serious note - when you have vulnerable/elderly people within your Family who you cannot watch 24/7 – then these so called sales people are a real worry!

    Complain about this comment

  • 4. At 10:09pm on 10 Sep 2009, MrsAntonia wrote:

    I have never before felt the need to respond to a programme but after this episode of Watchdog I felt obliged to do so.

    I would certainly agree that the sales techniques employed by Mr Pasha are unethical and entirely inappropriate. However, upon ascertaining that these were methods taught by the company I think he became the unfortunate victim of a witch hunt and somewhat a scapegoat. Infact by adhering to his training he proved to be an exemplary employee and therefore his suspension seems unjust.

    It would surely be preferable to challenge and change the process which made him an aggressive salesman at a higher level.

    Complain about this comment

  • 5. At 10:27pm on 10 Sep 2009, Martin-Bristol wrote:

    There is little doubt that Craftmatic are a bunch of cowboys, (your shoddy report did not so much as touch upon the dubious clinical/therapeutic reputation that their beds have), but when their salesman described the BBC's approach to the "story" as a joke, he hit the nail on the head. This was the cheapest of cheap journalism at its worst.

    Complain about this comment

  • 6. At 10:31pm on 10 Sep 2009, amazingIanCooper wrote:

    I work in Field Sales and was shocked & disgusted at the way this company pressured customers in to buying. My company would sack me I if I did that and rightly so!!!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 7. At 10:45pm on 10 Sep 2009, Scattycaffee wrote:

    I like the guys that present this programme, who wouldn't? But I thought they were a bit harsh on the salesman. I hated him on the previous programme but this time I found myself feeling quite sorry for him. I think he genuinely did not get it that he was pest. A bit like those blokes in foreign lands who won't take no for answer from young English female tourists. It may have been a cultural thing. He seemed to very much believe in his product. The training programme clearly didn't help, particularly the dodgy phone calls and fake pricing. I think the same practices are used by double glazing sales people. I think there needs to be a legal requirement for such doorstep sales companies to have clearly published pricing that can be viewed in advance of any visits by sales people.

    Complain about this comment

  • 8. At 07:14am on 11 Sep 2009, newjacquih wrote:

    My father inlaw was also pressurised into buying 2 of these beds. He is dixlexic and can not read, so he did not know that getting a double and single bed from these people would cost him thousands of pounds. He could not read what he was signing for The fact they say a 10 day cooling off period is rubbish as the beds were delivered in 5 days and the paper work followed after. Had i known at the time these would have been cancelled as he is a pensioner living on his own and is disabled. Surley somthing can be done so he does not have to pay all this money he has been paying them for 4 years

    Complain about this comment

  • 9. At 10:03am on 11 Sep 2009, JanekP wrote:

    In all my dealings with Craftmatic from the management down, I have found them to be trustworthy and honourable.

    Complain about this comment

  • 10. At 10:09am on 11 Sep 2009, rosg-r wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

View these comments in RSS

Explore the BBC

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.