Monday 8 August 2011, 15:35
Back in April this year I was called to a brainstorm with the Horizon production team to discuss the science of colour.
It seemed like such a fun and compelling idea and addresses the kind of questions we've all asked ourselves. Do you see the same colours that I see? What if what I see as yellow, you really see as blue? And why do I fancy you more in red?
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions
Scientists and contributors answer the question "What is your favourite colour?"
Clearly the intelligent questions of a scientific mind... but these really are some of the questions that scientists all over the world are asking. And, as the show's director, I jumped at the chance to make this episode and find some answers.
As we looked deeper into the scientific research, the more we found that this is a world which is just beginning to be properly explored. The scientists were bright, curious, often rather quirky, and full of fascinating discoveries.
One of the first people we met was neuroscientist Beau Lotto - a master of illusions who wanted to do an experiment to find out whether people of different ages, gender and nationality see colours in the same way.
Eight weeks later, there we were with 150 people, filming the Beau Lotto colour experiment bonanza.
The volunteers took part in eight different experiments veering from whether colour had an impact on time passing, to looking at how people made different colour patterns in mosaics, to what emotions people associated with different colours - red for anger, blue for tranquillity?
The results shocked even the scientist involved. Beau found that colour really can impact the passing of time.
Volunteers were asked to stand in three different colour pods bathed in either blue, red or white light, and Beau found that blue light made time pass more quickly and red seemed to slow it down.
"Red makes us highly aware of our environment and so time slows down in your mind," he says.
Another experiment found that women who are made to feel more psychologically powerful and in control were more sensitive to spotting changes in colour illumination.
Overall it seemed that depending on the experience we bring with us, our perceptions of colour can vary from person to person.
Beau says, "In thinking about 'do you see what I see', the answer depends on what it is we're looking at. If it's something that's shaped by our own individual experiences, then we can see the world very differently."
We really do perceive colours differently depending on experience, age and state of mind.
Something else we found was that there were scientists looking at whether language can influence the way we perceive colour. Could the number of words you have for colour affect the way you perceive it?
The only way to find out was to go to a civilisation far from the technicolour world we live in, to a tribe who have only five words for colour, compared to the 11 essential colour categories.
The Himba of northern Namibia - who had never even set foot in a local town - call the sky black and water white, and for them, blue and green share the same word.
In having fewer words than us for colour, it seems that their perception of the world is different to ours - it takes them longer to differentiate between certain colours, and so we can determine from this that they see the world a little differently.
The tribe found us a bit of an oddity - they hadn't been filmed before - so when I played them back the footage we had filmed they thought it was the most hysterical thing they had every seen.
And what about the effects colours might have on us?
Scientists Russell Hill and Iain Greenlees were looking into the 'winning effect' of the colour red. They organised an experiment to see if wearing red might have an impact in sport.
They set up a penalty shoot out with 48 footballers looking at whether it was wearing red or seeing red that made the difference.
They found that the men wearing red had lower levels of cortisol, the hormone for stress, than those in blue or white. This in turn makes them more confident in their game.
These are just a few examples of the people we met and filmed. The whole thing was a technicolour experience that made us see the world through different eyes - and more than that, made us realise there's more to come.
This, for once, is a relatively new subject in the world of science, so there are many more discoveries to be made.
So when you get up tomorrow, look around you. Think about what colours you are going to wear and think about the colours you see - do you really see what I see? Probably not.
Sophie Robinson is the director and producer of Horizon: Do You See What I See?
Horizon: Do You See What I See? is on BBC Two and BBC HD at 9pm on Monday, 8 August.
Beau Lotto has written about how we perceive colour for BBC News.
Comments made by writers on the BBC TV blog are their own opinions and not necessarily those of the BBC.
All posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
Friday 29 July 2011, 12:04
Wednesday 10 August 2011, 12:55
Comment number 1.
Matti Lamprhey8th August 2011 - 16:33
There's a mistake in the accompanying article headed "Do You See What I See?" posted today on the BBC's Science and Environment pages at 11:31am. About halfway down there's a colour persistence demo of a desert scene to be viewed after staring at green & red blocks -- you see inverse colour casts, of course, a red cast where you were staring at green and vice versa. But the 'Results' button above the images shows the result the wrong way round, and the paragraph purporting to explain the effect is utterly garbled! Please check and correct, BBC!
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
Luke8th August 2011 - 17:22
Sophie, in the related news article, there was a picture of a supposed optical illusion. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14421303
In it was are told that the tiles in the left and right hand pictures are the same colour despite looking blue and yellow for each different picture. In the top two images, the tiles all looked identical colours, so I assumed it was meant the corresponding tiles in the bottom two pictures which do look blue and yellow. I didn't believe that these really were the same colours, so I opened up the picture in Photoshop, zoomed right in and used the colour picker tool. And as my eyes told me, they were indeed quite different shades, one set distinctly blue and one distinctly yellow. Am I missing the point here, or is the picture a big mistake ?
BTW, this is the most stunning colour optical illusion that I have ever seen.
http://www.planetperplex.com/en/item/pacman-illusion/
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
Aaron8th August 2011 - 17:44
There's a basic logical mistake in the accompanying article, "Do You See What I See?". The article makes the argument that since the colours we see do not correspond one-to-one with the light reflected from or transmitted through surfaces, therefore "colour does not exist", i.e., that our brains create colour and therefore it has no reality in itself. This conclusion is a non sequitur. All the experiments show is that colours are not "made from" light. But no-one ever thought that colours are "made from light", anyway. It is a pretty basic belief that surfaces remain coloured even in the dark. My red car might be parked in my windowless garage with the lights off, but no-one, not even a child, would think that it has suddenly stopped being red. So there is nothing new in the idea that colours are not "made from" light. What the experiments do show is that there are all sorts of *interesting ways*, many now known before, in which colours are not "made from" light. The basic idea, though, is not new. It is a huge (and fallacious) step to conclude that colours are "not real" just because they are "not made from" light. Different surfaces may in fact have lots of different colours, i.e. be coloured in many different ways at the same time, whether there is light around or not. It could just be a *limitation* of our brains that we can only see one at a time. The writers and producers of the Horizon programme, and the journalists who write on the BBC website, and perhaps even the scientists themselves, would clearly probably benefit from some basic logic and philosophy classes!
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
anselm688th August 2011 - 17:48
'Colour does not exist' is a statement made in the original article. For us to have the variety of 'colour-experiences' we have there surely is a variety in the cause. We may have misunderstood how our experience of colour is produced but all this means is that we need to change our views as we do regularly in the face of better science. We can still talk about colour and believe it exists just the details of that existence have changed.
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
anselm688th August 2011 - 17:51
Aaron , although your post precedes mine in posting time we both must have been posting at the same time otherwise I would have simply posted the following:
Aaron, exactly!
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 66