Steelmaker to cut 2500 in UK
Corus is poised to announce job cuts of 3,500 from its global workforce of 42,000.
A majority of these, more than 2000, will come from the British workforce of 24,000 (see below for update, saying that job cuts in the UK will be about 2,500 in total).
The formal announcement could come as soon as tomorrow morning.
If there's good news here, it's that (as the Sunday Times points out today) the Anglo-Dutch steelmaker is not planning to close any of its substantial manufacturing or processing plants.
Its main sites in the UK are at Port Talbot, in South Wales, Scunthorpe and Teesside.
Corus - which was acquired in 2007 by Tata Steel of India - has been hit hard by the recession. Its order book has fallen a third, global demand for steel has dropped 40 per cent from its peak of last year and steel prices have plunged a staggering 50 per cent since last September.
That said, these cost-cutting measures might well have taken place whatever the economic climate.
They are the result of a substantial review of the efficiency of the business by its soon-to-retire chief executive, Philippe Varin, for the business's Indian owner.
I understand that the cuts at Europe's second largest steelmaker have been brought forward as a result of the downturn, but it was clear to Mr Varin that Corus needed to become more efficient in any case.
Corus has started to temporarily reduce its output to cope with a massive decline in demand from the construction, automotive and assorted manufacturing industries.
This means there isn't full-time work for the majority of the UK workforce who are not being made redundant.
The company wants to use this semi-idle period - which it expects to last for six months - to retrain its employees.
It has requested financial help from the British government for a rolling programme of providing new skills to its entire workforce. This would take the form of a state top-up for the wages of employees.
Corus feels it will have to reduce the pay of employees for six months or so, until demand for steel recovers. The company feels it's fair to request support from taxpayers for an increment to staff pay, because the alternative of making more employees redundant would lead to a rise in social security payments.
A wage subsidy along these lines is provided by the government of the Netherlands, where Corus has substantial operations.
Ministers have not yet decided whether to provide a retraining subsidy of this sort.
UPDATE 17:54 Job cuts in the UK will represent about 10 per cent of the workforce, so around 2,500.
I'm 
© MMX~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~10~RS~)
Comments
Sign in or register to comment.
This article looks like a kite-flying exercise to test public reaction before GB makes an decision/announcement.
Complain about this comment
Yet another example of how the reession will hit us all. Unfortunately the Government will run out of options to help us soon as it runs out of money.
Complain about this comment
Alvin apprentices to the local blacksmith, Nearly completed with apprenticeship, Alvin begins work on his journeyman piece, a plow which he intends to turn to gold.
Complain about this comment
A foreign company losing jobs in this country should come as no shock.No doubt they will be shutting major plants if they dont get government help.
Be an interesting fight as all the remaining plants are in Labour heartlands.
Just another once core industry that we will have to import the products for in a few years when things pick up.
Complain about this comment
Not a surprise, the asset bubble reached metals too, and now the industry is suffering all over the world. Like it or not, there will be reduced demand for years and that means overcapacity. Other countries more reliant on mining and smelting are having a much worse time of it.
Complain about this comment
Next the BBC will be denying charity airspace for an appeal for donations for Corus workers who have lost their jobs - as this could use similar footage to that used by the BBC and confuse viewers over whether it was supporting worker rights or not. Why not ban all charities from air time if they may actually help to rectify some of the humanitarian problems revealed in BBC news programs as each case might be misconstrued as the BBC supporting measures to help resolve the problem?
Complain about this comment
Supply has to match demand so what is the problem.
Complain about this comment
''The company wants to use this semi-idle period - which it expects to last for six months - to retrain its employees.''
Why 6 months, what is the order book, or is it a guess. And if only 6 months what is the problem.
Complain about this comment
Direct support to industry (what is left of it) is absolutely essential.
The house is burning down and to date we have only saved the arsonist who started it from the flames (the bankers).
We desperately need to save the real skills and industries that will be needed for re-construction from the flames as well. Otherwise we will have no house and nothing left to build a new one with.
I fully support this initiative.
Maybe it could be part paid for by a windfall tax on the arsonists bonuses over the past 8 years say?
Sound fair?
Jericoa
Complain about this comment
#2 The government never runs out of money because it can make it, or ask the Bank of England to make it.
We're still not getting to grips with this downturn. As long as the money supply can only be added to by creating new debt then we are in a cycle of always having to borrow to keep going. When the confidence goes that is it. If the government intends to keep spending its way out of the recession then we'll see the pound become less valued and go into an inflationary cycle, while still not creating more jobs!
Britain either has to be prepared to run an unbelievably massive deficit which may not work, or the government has to take over the power of money creation without saddling the economy with debt. Why not? The banks do it, but take no responsibility for the massive power they wield.
It's my feeling that the British people do not like massive borrowing. It unsettles them deeply, and that alone will see the Conservatives return to office. Savers will be protected and workers will suffer.
I don't believe that Corus can keep all of these plants open in the future because demand is going to slump further as the latest figures work their way through the system, and that re-training is a prelude to the sack.
Complain about this comment
If there is going to be any propping up of businesses (which I'm not sure there should be) it should be British businesses.
Ok, jobs would go at foreign-owned companies like Corus but jobs would remain at British businesses. We've seen so many UK brands disappear off the face of the Earth in the past few months - let's try not to have any more.
Complain about this comment
They're quite lucky at Corus . I read that an Indian owned plant in Bulgaria the Indian management just walked out and left it in the hands of an engineer with no further instructions and no contact number.
Complain about this comment
I suppose that this is as close as we get to 'good news' now. It's limited to a small section of the population and the owner is trying (it would seem) to protect as many jobs as possible in this very hostile business climate.
Looks as though those in power have moved from 'global crisis' 'started in America' 'Britian well placed' slogans to 'we are very angry with bankers for pay/risk/business model/loan provision' (select as appropriate). The only persons entirely removed from blame are them (after all they only run the country - and ceratinly claimed the credit from the past successes) plus the regulators (who they put in place).
Complain about this comment
9 jericoa
The issue is that this business, a matter of weeks ago proposed a 10 percent cut or some other similar action on wages as a solution to their problem. Rejected by the workforce because they could not apparently see it working as a solution and possibly that adopting it would reduce redundancy payouts. Now a short time later it is clear that a 10 percent cut of the wage bill would not have saved the situation. So if the management perception has shifted in weeks. So where is this business going to be in 6 months. On what basis do they feel that if they get taxpayer money they will be okay in 6 months time. The question is not taxpayer money the question is where are they going to be. There is no reason to believe the 6 months figure is right on the managements judgements todate.
Note - The Netherlands situation has been discussed before. It is not a straightforward comparision and the Netherlands has a different arrangements.
Complain about this comment
post 7
Demand
Complain about this comment
#1 I agree
a 40% drop in demand, so Corus cuts workers they were going to anyway, and then put the rest on short time.
I'm presuming that the steel processes need a certain number of staff to be viable and keep blast furnaces etc working. Just switching those off will save them rather a lot.
I would appreciate some reflection on the number of jobs being lost across the Tata groups and whether the EU countries are actually bearing the majority of the redundancies in the hope that our states will prop up and subsidise their other operations
Complain about this comment
Glad to see that we've finally decided to stop flogging the dead horse which is the banking and financial story, at least for a while
Shame you didn't get out of the City of London and go down to Port Talbot a week ago, though, instead of noticing the story in your Sunday Times this morning and repeating parts of it verbatim
For those of you interested in some background to the Corus situation you can find the original story with more detail at:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article5580987.ece
PS: was irresistably drawn to the yoghurt section at Morrisson's yesterday and picked up a 6-pack of Muller fruit corners
Complain about this comment
these are proper jobs...people making things...i despair at this country brown has a lot to answer for..he is a disaster. i bet he celebrates burns night...i bet he does.
Complain about this comment
I agree with #1, this is appears blatant kite flying given it's not especially dramatic or unsurprising news that warrants a special post on a Sunday unless Comical and Mandy have to decide tonight and Mori are closed for the afternoon.
RP seems to be slipping further from impartiality and more into Labour policy tester than usual.
However if the powers want my opinion.
The basic concept is a no brainer from the basic financial aspect. Better to support as many as are retained in a job and are retrained than consign them to the dole queues. Better for them and better for us.
So long as the support given is less than the amount which the dole would pay out then it is net benefit and worthwhile.
It may in the end make no difference to whether these plants survive the depression or the 'saved' jobs last only another 6 months. But it is an occasion where doing something is better than nothing.
The only other caveat would be a written commitment from Tata to announce their intentions for the remaining jobs/plants for minimum 18 months immediately the next election is called.
It would be very unfortunate to hear them closing one just after we had voted. Not to say a little suspicious.
Complain about this comment
THE REAL SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP
I see that Gordy managed to get through to the new Prez, allegedly being the first European leader to speak to him by 'phone; bet Obama really enjoyed that....... oh and apparently it confirms and reinforces the special relationship ha ha ha
In my opinion the real special relationship for the past 20+ years has been between Wall Street and the City of London, their respective Masters of the Universe who were united by unlimited greed and duplicity, and abetted by the craven political leaders and regulators on both sides of the pond: Clinton and Major; Bush and Blair; Brown and Greenspan etc etc; a lot of Lets Come Dancing pairings there!
CHINESE COAL MINES AND CITY OF LONDON OPERATING SAFELY
The blatant promotion of 'light-touch regulation' became more extreme as time passed and more and more of the safeguards were removed or dismantled. The quotes from Blair and Brown speeches at Mansion House and close relationships to people like Fred Goodwin tell us all we need to know I think.
Our financial regulation ended up looking similar to Chinese Health & Safety regulation in their coal mines (latest stats 20-30,000 killed per year but lots of coal dug out)
News from Port Talbot and all points outside of the City of London are a direct result of all that 'healthy free-market deregulation' over the years.
Could be as big a scandal as the fabricated WMDs if there was ever a proper investigation, but you can bet your bottom dollar that there won't be one here and there will be a lot of people sweating it if the new US administration shows any signs of having one.
6 THINGS THAT SHOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED
Here's an interesting link to a little NY Times op-ed piece about the 6 main mistakes leading to the slump.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/business/economy/25view.html?_r=1
The list for the UK would be very similar I think but would be nice to have one which also names the names - go on Robert, have a bash.
Complain about this comment
Rather than give direct financial help to Corus, the government should redouble its efforts to stimulate demand by bringing forward projects requiring steel. Even if it is difficult to increase demand in the short term, the prospect of orders in the medium term would encourage Tata to use its own resources to minimise the run down of UK capacity.
The argument, that projects initiated now will not help in what it is hoped will be a short recession because of long lead time, should be ignored. Even if the recession is short lived, if the government does not compensate for low private activity by putting projects into the pipeline now, recovery after the recession will be slow.
There are plenty of construction projects, that will be needed in the future, which will consume steel. The construction industry, which is also severely hit, would also be best helped by initiating some of these.
Complain about this comment
Does this proposal also mean that a financial or retaining subsidy could be provided to keep Brown and his muppets employed, too? As the taxpayer already keeps them off the streets, a further subsidy would mean higher taxes. There you go Gordon: it's just so easy when you think it through.
Complain about this comment
I find it amazing that Varin who has been in charge for quite a few years now decides that he is going to cut 10% of the workforce.
Perhaps his farewell wish to loyal people is tainted by a lucrative payoff.
Complain about this comment
As per usual the UK takes the brunt of these cuts as it is so much easier for comapnies to get rid of our workers than those in Europe because they have social laws in place to make it more difficult. As our manufacturing diminishes even further so it will become harder to get out of this recession... Unfortunately IT Consultants and Financial Advisors are not the way out of this one.
When will a Government buy into the fact that we need to be self sufficient in order to survive. We cannot and should not be a nation of service providers.
Complain about this comment
Number 9 ...good post .
Complain about this comment
Very object report.
But what really can you do to retrain skilled Steel Workers? I do not know if service skills or IT skills could really help here.
As we have no real mosaic of a National Plan in the UK, but have been converted to the Holy Grail of globalization, over the past decade, supported by the rapid advance of websites and the internet, out sourcing to India etc, perhaps it might be time to think green, think sustainability and think long term and National whilst not turning our back on global exports.
We are in danger of not only a crisis of confidence but a full blown financial, economic and social "Crash" which could devastate large swathes of the UK for the long term.
My Grand Father was a welsh miner and once injured, at age 42 years, he never worked again. Human Capital and education which is both useful and marketable is our only salvation, where we reject these City Elite values of £15 Million mansions and value what is best in our companies, both small and large- people.
Will we have to suffer yet another week of GB and AD setting more fires of dispair and panic whilst we burn?
Westminster must start to really press for an Election now, as the public have lost all confidence in our fundamental Institutions, Parliament, BOE, FSA and the BANKS.
Globalization of markets and trade may be a good thing, but National Identity, National interests, National Pride will always come first, ask the Chinese. "Broken Britain" needs a new Chieftan and soon, we can only have our own "Obama" if we have an Election. Brown is making this Nation increasingly angry. He has no mandate and he does not carry a majority of the Country at large, he knows that too.
The UK is moving into a dangerous phase.. it is ungoverned, riding at night on high seas, with the name "Titanic" at the bow.
As President Obama said "God Bless America" on his acceptance of the US Presidency, I say "God help us, here in Britain." We are now riding on prayers.
Complain about this comment
It is part of running a business to keep employees skills up to date. As a self employed professional, I have to do this at my own expense. Really, Corus is wanting a subsidy for jobs and this sounds like a kite flying exercise.
Corus' UK plants must have become very much more competitive recently thanks to the decline in sterling, certainly compared with the Netherlands and also compared with the large Asian producers. Perhaps the company should be giving the UK a subsidy for this advantage.
Jaguar and now Corus; Tata certainly know how to beg.
Complain about this comment
So have I got this right?Taxpayer tops up the wages to provide re-training.Isn't training what companies are supposed to do all the time to keep up with a changing market?Sorry I don't see my way to this unless I can audit the training and the outcomes, personally.It used to be my area of experience so gissa job.
Wasn't steel once one of the nationalised industries which had to be broken and sold to the lowest bidder in the 80's?I've already paid for this and lost my investment as a taxpayer,now I may have to do it again.Thought private industry was supposed to be the big brave boy and public ownership was featherbedded.Plus ca change mateys.
Complain about this comment
Be under no illusion that Steel was a vibrant going concern that was being kept as a strategic UK industry.
Corus and its predecessors has been cut back for years and years. No longer was there any meaningful engineering or development work going on.
When new plant was needed it was bought in. Designed in Germany for the most part.
Gone are the days of inhouse engineering let alone research and development.
If we ever get out of the current mess and need new plant then it will most likely be designed in India. Not just detail design which is happening now anyway but ground up, concept design.
The question that has to be asked of course is "Why have a domestic steel industry".
We import all the raw materials. By sea. We have no high grade ore. High grade coal is expensive to dig. We already import sinter.
Why not just import semi finished steel?
Our carbon footprint would be artificially reduced.
Another British industry consigned to the scrapheap of history.
Complain about this comment
I was once puzzled but now I have serious debts. Do foreign owned businesses genuinely benefit the country, especially privately owned? Is it all careful and skillful spins and lies? This crisis teaches much we must remember and should extrapolate.
No handouts refused, more demanded and hinted through leverage on politicians and jobs. Countries are played off against one another for long term benefits of no country. Government hand outs increases profits which goes into foreign private pockets.
If the same businesses are owned locally or listed companies, there may be more tax receipts and profits more widely distributed and retained in the country. Benefits of foreign ownership are real and worthwhile only if there is yearly and long term net gain of taxations, GDP, more export earnings over import costs, additional jobs created after taken into account jobs and skills off-shored. A British passport or birth does not mean the holder cares about this country.
Corus job losses are regrettable but where are profits and "incentives" received over the years?
We need to own more businesses and industries, nurture more expertise, organically grow more jobs.
Self reliance, self respect and self determination are ways we msut do to free ourselves of debts and free from those happy to enslave us with debts for their self-interests.
Complain about this comment
Like #8, glanafon and #10, GrouchoMarxist1 I think this "re-training" at taxpayer's expense idea seems a bit questionable.
If the workforce is so lacking in skills then why bother to preserve it?
If the training is vital to ensure future productivity then why won't Corus itself make this "investment" in it's people?
Complain about this comment
If you want the answer you have to take the prevailing situation to its logical conclusion. That does not mean you will like the out come but once you have worked it out you can start to direct things effectively.
The West created a boom of money in a false property market which allowed the East tiger economies to develop cheap products to be consumed by people with false value assets
That is we spiralled up wealth [a debt balance- shown as an asset] based on a false economy fuelled by greedy bankers and others
This inflated the price of everything not only homes.
Then some one noticed the problem and hay presto.
Now we know the debt is not worth anything we panic and create another problem causing everything to go racing downwards and it will drop below where a true price should be because we have created massive unemployment and real hard ship in the sectors that just did their job of providing the materials of real need manufacturing building food clothing and supply.
That is most of the problem is being heaped into the real economy of production and value enhancement and housing and so the remedy for cutting back to a true value economy is not being redressed where the problem was really created in financial sector manipulation for greed and government overspending for votes nor in all faith could it be because once the problem was upon us we need the government spending to protect the people who are forced out as victims from the real economy
We can do little now but to let this recession run its course because unless we can create a proper economic model fit for global consumption and based on real physical need in a supply and demand market there is no chance.
We have to have a new order to meet the world as it is today and we need to create opportunities for the 80 percent of the world who live below the poverty line to work and create and enhance and aspire to do things to live just a little better
Now just think of the demand that would create f or products and homes and other things like medicine and entertainment that make every one better off including the service providers
One phenomenal problem there has to be a way of swapping the take culture to the philanthropic culture, the sharing culture of cooperation and I don’t mean a co-operative [there is a big difference] stop admiring the brutish bullies and admire the unassuming talented
Build a society fit for us all to live in
Problem is the false economy has some way to fall and until it does the real economy is going to be battered and more people hurt and become dependant on the state making it longer.
So sit down now governments and work it out do what we elected you for.
Complain about this comment
If we really are supplying advance briefing questions for a press conference tomorrow, here's some they might consider:
Exactly what are the training objectives/expected learning outcomes that the UK is being asked to pay for?
What exactly will these people be able to do in 6 months time that they cannot do now?
Is that really worth the cost?
If so, why won't Corus pay for it?
Complain about this comment
Steel is a cyclical business. The cycle used to be about 5-7 years. It used to be reflected in British Steel's (precusor to Corus) profits and turnover.
I wonder where we are in the cycle?
Complain about this comment
The Guardian reported from Brussels on Christmas Eve that the EU had rushed through permission for HM Gov. to put in place £500bn 'insurance' for banks' credit default swaps... at a premium of: 50 basis points plus 100% of the median 5 year swap rate from August '07 to August '08.
Will Hutton (and others) quoted RBS's and Barclays' exposure to CDSs as £1.7tn (now £1.9tn due to the fall in the pound, presumably). The median rate was harder to track down. I believe it to be around 0.3%.
0.3% plus 0.5% = 0.8% of £1.9tn is £15.2bn to be paid annually for 3 years (with possible extension to 2014. No wonder RBS are pleased to be relieved of the 12% preference shares.
However, can the banks that enter the scheme afford £45.6bn over 3 years AND continue to build up their equity AND lend?
Mycoblastus, 25 Jan '09
Complain about this comment
errrr.... seems like no one told the unions there is gonna be job cuts.... someone spreading porkies? lol
Complain about this comment
Tata - Jaguar Land Rover - acquired 2008
Tata - Corus - acquired January 2007
Where did the money come from? What did it cost?
Will support for Tetley Tea be next?
Complain about this comment
I agree Jericoa - tax the bankers who put us here.
Having said that the steel makers are at fault due to their greed as well - the cost of sheet product went up 70% between Jan 08 and July 08 for some of us - surprise surprise, they have now ended up putting us all out of business and their order books are going down.
I wish I was a big company who could get my hands on government (our) money like the banks, Corus (perhaps) and every other big business that cries "help"
God help us all.
Complain about this comment
We need more British owned business. Would it not be more prudent for the government to invest in a brand new British Steel Industry and employ those workers losing jobs. This could be a starting point for British owned investments and a precedent for the creation of more industries that we so desperately need.
It is fundamentally wrong to throw money at foreign companies in the UK when we need to create our own for the sake of our future economy.
Complain about this comment
Retrained,
That sounds very promising for the longer term.
Any indication what is proposed?
However, I recall a poster commenting on trainloads of steel coming in from abroad recently.
Do not forget, lots of our manufacturing GDP is generated by companies owned by overseas conglomerates.
Complain about this comment
30 puzzling
''I was once puzzled but now I have serious debts.''
Well your not alone there. Except some of them were never even puzzled.
Complain about this comment
#32, hack-round:
Nice rant :0) - and a pretty good summary!
One thing worth adding, I think, is that in the process the West is ending up with most of the stuff (goods/materials etc) and the East with most of the money. If it carries on at this rate it could at least see an end to East-West military conflicts. Why invade the UK when you can just buy it? And at a knock-down price!
Complain about this comment
34. mrsbloggs13c2
'Steel is a cyclical business....
...I wonder where we are in the cycle?'
We are in the spin cycle. TATA are just flying kite after kite. PS Port Talbot is the most air polluted site in Europe as I understand it. They recently had a huge fine for H and S and worker deaths.
Complain about this comment
#24 - bearing the brunt in the UK are we? 2000 UK losses of 24000 UK jobs is 0.083%. 3500 of 42000 is 0.083% seems suprisingly fair to me! I agree normally our jobs are open season due to no protection, but not this time it seems...I bet no job losses at all at the French plants though!!!
Complain about this comment
So, Tata of India is poised to announce job cuts at Corus, but feels it is fair to ask taxpayers to give them a helping hand.
Didn't I just read that the owners of Jaguar and Land Rover were also looking for a helping hand, who were they again - ah, Tata of India.
Less well known, Legal & General outsourced 300 IT jobs to Tata Consultancy Services (part of Tata) last year, and this month they announced 130 of them are to go. Most of the roles will remain, but will be carried out by cheap offshore staff. Will they be asking taxpayers to help keep these jobs in the UK?
The silence is deafening.
Complain about this comment
I'm pretty familiar with this company and I can tell you that since the merger with Hoogovens Corus has been battling with a huge managerial and ' cultural identity' crisis. The two companies never really managed to fully merge and the end result was a company that couldn't see past the endless testing of new management 'initiatives' and consultancy programmes. If it wasn't for the easy money of recent years there'd have been job cuts before this imminent announcement. What is sad is that this is plainly a 'leak' from senior Corus management who were, as I understand it, to announce 'something' later in the coming week. What is sad, is the fact that under New Labour the UK manufacturing base has been undermined. There's little respect in New Labour circles for manufacturing. Now many good people will lose their jobs.
Complain about this comment
37 missus bloggs
...Will it be Tetley Tea next...
Could be, they have lost the flat cap and come over all Earl Grey lately dont you know, never a good sign.
Complain about this comment
When will CERTAIN PEOPLE learn a
BUSINESS IS FOR LIFE NOT JUST CHRISTMAS.
Complain about this comment
I think we went through all his about a month ago, when it transpired that the alleged similar Netherlands scheme simply doesn't exist?
Complain about this comment
"Corus cuts are as much about the firm as the economy."
This is the problem with much of the USA and UK bail-outs is it not? What is not being said much is the way many companies and especially the banks knowingly charged right into these problems...what were they all thinking? What many citizens can't understand is what these groups thought was the "end game" plan. They seemed to just go for broke and didn't seem to care who lost and paid for this mess. Are these people so RICH they just didn't care, did they put so much protection funds away for themselves they knew they would be safe, no matter what, if these companies fell and our nations went broke? Now our governments want the people, they used and hurt, to pay MORE for these companies and their crimes. There sure is something rotten behind this entire economic breakdown, it goes way beyond bad, greedy business. There were/are all kinds of rules and safegaurds, is this treason then? Citizens appear to be left totally defenseless. I was taught the elected officials in the USA and UK were to work only for the good of people who elected them, where are they?
Complain about this comment
Back in September last year steel prices were at an all time high (double the levels of mid 2007). I regularly purchase steel containers and at the moment prices are still too high. That's what you get from a market with virtually no competition!
It’s all too easy for companies to make job loss announcements and blame the downturn in the economy, but I believe this is simply a case of Corus protecting its high margin profits.
Complain about this comment
#37:
The money most likely came from banks and wealthy investors. These tiger economies have achieved such rapid growth by running massive leverage.
#7 and #15 have it, sadly. Britain needs a domestic steel industry, the knowledge and infrastructure at least, but I am not sure how much production is feasible in the foreseeable future. Where would we stockpile unused steel, now that the construction bust is going global? Production cuts are inevitable in the face of weak demand. I think the focus has to be on far-sighted preservation of a core of infrastructure and expertise so that we may take advantage of the recovery many years from now, rather than a short term propping up exercise at present capacity.
Complain about this comment
I agree, a windfall tax on city bonuses over the last 10 years is required to support those hard working individuals who actually have jobs with tangible benefits. These industries will be required to support us when the recession ends.
It is interesting to see support for a windfall tax gaining ground on Robert's blog. This should serve as a warning to those considering such reckless lending in the future, that high risk financial pursuits resulting in short term gain but long term national bankruptcy must not be funded through tax revenues.
Complain about this comment
So the government will soon own not only all the banks, but our manufacturing companies as well (surely the govt will want a stake in Corus for subsidising its work force and training budget?).
Looks like 'New Labour' will soon have achieved its ultimate objective - total control of everything in the UK.
Don't tell me you didn't see this coming!!
Complain about this comment
Maybe a few could be re-trained to be BBC blog moderators? There would seem to be a shortage :o)
Complain about this comment
Robert, Me thinks the steelmakers doth protest too much. As a UK manufacturer, we have had to live with massive increases in the price of steel since 2004. It just about finished our company but we are hanging on - god knows how. Then between September 2007 and September 2008 our buying prices for steel products doubled yet again. Since then prices have indeed fallen but they are still above the September 2007 levels.
As with oil, I believe the steelmakers are intentionally cutting back on output to keep their very good margins in place until the Chinese economy comes back on line.
As with oil however, there greed is in danger of killing off their customer base for a long time to come. I wonder how much of this is down to wanting to get in the queue behind banks, carmakers for a free state handout. Beats working for a living!!
Complain about this comment
Robert,
There was an over-capacity issue in this industry before the global downturn took its grip, as you said. It faces not only structural adjustment to reduced demand for its products but also carbon credit liabilities if it cannot invest large costs in carbon reduction technologies.
Unions have been reluctant to look at pay-cuts, have they? Peter Mandelson does not want to 'chose winners and save losers'.
How does the wages top-up work? I have seen reference to a suggestion that HM Govt picks up 70% of the wages bill, the company the remaining 30% - argument being HMG would pay the unemployment benefit if it didnt act. But every business could say this knowing that it could be a good way to avoid redundancy costs and have HMG subsidise it wages costs.
Peter Mandelson sees us developing into a value-added, knowledge-led economy - how does Corus qualify and to what end are the workers being re-qualified.
6 months until steel demand recovers seems a remarkably optimistic timeframe, which could extend the taxpayer commitment.
What's the policy here so that all businesses and workforces know where they stand?
Complain about this comment
Does Corus donate to the party? If it's in trouble , let it go . Better to wait till the recession's over and Gordon Brown is long gone before spending any more money on a dying industry. Then perhaps the new government can finance a new efficient steel industry owned by and profitting Britain. In the same vein , the time has come for British companies outsourcing work to Asia to be taxed heavily for the privilege. Why should the British taxpayer subsidise jobs abroad ?
Complain about this comment
We operate a free market, and allow foreign owners to buy up british companies.
It seems to me that a lot of other countries have control over who can own their large companies.
So then we are at the mercy of foreign businessmen looking after the employment interests in their home country first and then making any redundancies and closures here.
Complain about this comment
I truly hope that GB et al don't simply stump up the cash to top up wages, but rather use the money to retrain those workers in some alternative trade. At least that way taxpayers money is being invested in the future of this country and is not simply propping up some foreign-owned company which doesn't feel obliged to shoulder the burden of either paying full wages or redundancy. The inclination of large companies to threaten job losses to get their way when profits fall is highly divisive and we need to send a strong message that UK interests come before those of other nations.
Complain about this comment
Tata can re-train it's own staff if the business is viable, this is just them trying it on! Well who can blame them they are businessmen and spotting an opportunity with the shower that make decisions on our behalf.
Complain about this comment
#44 - show your working!
2,000 jobs out of 24,000 is 8.3%, not 0.083% as your calculator told you it was (you divided 2000 by 24000 but then forgot to multiply that answer by 100 to obtain the percentage!).
I'd say 8% is actually quite a high proportion of the workforce...
Complain about this comment
Woops! Type correction in #30.
'I was once puzzled but now I have serious doubts."
Complain about this comment
44. At 5:43pm on 25 Jan 2009, borophil wrote:
"#24 - bearing the brunt in the UK are we? 2000 UK losses of 24000 UK jobs is 0.083%. 3500 of 42000 is 0.083% seems suprisingly fair to me! I agree normally our jobs are open season due to no protection, but not this time it seems...I bet no job losses at all at the French plants though!!! "
No wonder we are in trouble if our sums are so far out.
Bring on the engineers.
#
Who's who: China’s politburo
* Hu Jintao, 62, president of the People’s Republic of China, graduate of Tsinghua University, Beijing, department of water conservancy engineering.
* Huang Ju, 66, graduate of Tsinghua University, department of electrical engineering.
* Jia Qinglin, 65, graduate of Hebei Engineering College, department of electric power.
* Li Changchun, 61, graduate of Harbin Institute of Technology, department of electric machinery.
* Luo Gan, 69, graduate of Freiberg University of Mining and Technology, Germany.
* Wen Jiabao, 62, premier of State Council, graduate of Beijing Institute of Geology, department of geology and minerals.
* Wu Bangguo, 63, graduate of Tsinghua University, department of radio engineering.
* Wu Guanzheng, 66, graduate of Tsinghua University, power department.
* Zeng Qinghong, 65, graduate of Beijing Institute of Technology, automatic control department.
Complain about this comment
45. ronapple
Re Tata bidding for UK IT work, getting it and then offshoring and dumping UK staff.
I do not think this is the first time this has been raised as an issue and whilst I cannot be sure I thought another UK company had subcontracted to Tata, or moved an entire IT support division to Tata with similar outcomes. Perhaps Tata would like to post comment here to clarify.
Complain about this comment
Ken Clarke on. the Andrew Marr show this morning
This was a truly enlightening interview on how he sees the state of the economy.
There are and still will be a broad sector of good businesses still here at the end of the depression.
New businesses will be created and Britain will again get back on its feet.
Well worth a watch if you are feeling totally depressed about the present situation.
There will be one heck of a mess to sort out and it would be better if the Tories could get on with it now rather than waiting for this government to make it a lot worse.
I couldn't agree more.
Complain about this comment
#40. sosraboc
"However, I recall a poster commenting on trainloads of steel coming in from abroad recently."
With some hundreds or thousands of different steel specifications in use there is bound to be import and export. It would not be economic to make all specifications here.
Maybe all steel is equal in the eyes of accountants and economists. I can assure you that this is not the case for engineers who specify the stuff.
Complain about this comment
Post 42
Well said vegetable_grower - that is already happening who owns our companies supplies our gas and no need for war quite right
But the longer term point is this. back in the 1970 s one Prime Minister Callaghan persuade us to sell our slow cotton looms in Lancashire to India and Africa and Indonesia we were persuade by government grant to buy high speed German and Italian machines.
These temperamental machines were not bad with synthetic fibre but useless with natural fibres.
Now the one time best cloth makers in the world Lancashire produces next to nothing and the best cloth is to be found anywhere else in the world
The point is we don’t do basic needs any more.
So if we stimulate all those foreign economies they will supply our basic needs then as you say they will have our money but money itself is no use it’s a promise
So what will they want - all those things that make life better so the will buy all our high engineering skills and technical knowledge and learning design and sigh level skills in medicine etc
So the money will come back our way in exchange for what we do best
problem is you need to keep the basics going when you move on to the higher things people always forget that and let go the basics to work at some higher level but you cant maintain anything unless you ensure the foundations are always kept tip top sadly everyone always forgets the basics and so change consciously occurs and things go up and things go down.
We are forever tampering with the roof and forgetting to shore up the footings.
Complain about this comment
I have much sympathy for other people working in the steel industry, but we do not all work for Corus. Why should they benefit from government/BBC supported subsidies whilst the rest of us endeavour to work through this independently and unaided?I would like to know how unilateral support is an endorsement of a socially-aware government?
After all - why are they in this mess ???? As a stockholder, we have seen our profits slashed by Corus stockholder- lead initiatives as Corus manufacturing based companies hold firm.
We do not - can not - buy many products from Corus. We import materials from other countries and manufacturers as they refuse to give us a fair market price - selling predominantly to their preferred stockholders, offer unreasonable terms and are over protective of their market. Some customers using 'other' western european sources have allegedly looked to book material on Corus rollings to find them 'full' or 'unavailable'.
Maybe the 30% or so who walked out at ISTA (Intl Steel Trade Assoc) in December 2008 - disgusted at sheer audacity Corus seems to have to its own market - should give you some idea of how we despair.
Demand is down lets fight on a level playing field.
Complain about this comment
Corus' revenues are down 50% but the planned reduction in staff is only 10%. Sure that's a lot but given the circumstances Tata should be congratulated for not going further. It knows it is being scrutinised by a sceptic British public and this is an opportunity for Tata to enhance its reputation in the UK and show it is a good employer.
Complain about this comment
The wider context for this is the international trade agenda, where India is the main demandeur of bringing cheap skilled temporary migrant labour into the EU, including a demand to disregard the minimum wage, because it interferes with the 'comparative advantage' of Indian transnational corps, moving cheap labour around the world.
This is happening in the WTO context, in negotiations on the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), but also through the EU/India Free Trade Agreement.
In the text for the latter is secret until negotiations are completed! For the GATS, Mandleson has already made the offer - on our behalf - he just hasnt told us.
There has been a great deal of promotion, by the UK govt, of trade with India over the last few years. The financial services corporations of the City, the majority of which are foreign owned, want access to investment in Indian services. There are big protests in India about all of this, by ordinary people, but we dont hear about them here, and we dont hear about the agreements either.
This is big business pitted against people everywhere, to drive down wages etc, adn increase corporate power.
If the UK is going to put in money, if TATA expects to buy in and then get subisidised cheap workers ( there wont be any end to it), just nationalise the firm.
It is imperative that we reverse this corporate running of the world - definitively.
Complain about this comment
48 alexandercurzon wrote:
"When will CERTAIN PEOPLE learn a
BUSINESS IS FOR LIFE NOT JUST CHRISTMAS."
But LIFE is actually the life of the product. Every product has a life cycle. No company lasts forever.
Even Rolls Royce went bust.
Complain about this comment
A word to the wise.
As each merger and takeover occurs, the senior management and in particular the CEO get a real buzz and the endorphins flow. They become addicted to the chase and the business/workers/economic justification is irrelevant. We have seen this globally over the last ten/fifteen years.
The companies grow and grow like Topsy and size becomes the measure. The upshot is that the company becomes unwieldy and internecine warfare starts.
Profitability is low and cost cutting is enforced as soon as the going gets tough.
The very bad news is that the going is now tough and governments are putting enormous pressures on companies to keep the pain as far as possible from the home markets.
Because UK plc is really the worlds whore and no longer a powerhouse, the pain is coming home to roost.
Sorry.
Complain about this comment
projects that could help CORUS and others etc.
and here is a little equation at the route for you to think about Mr Peston.
Some say History does not repeat itself but is does in the new labour universe
TSR2+ F111 = Jaguars&harrier + JSF.
Some of you will have to search the internet for the First part. But Denise Healey Him with the eyebrows and very few brain cells.
if they had Navalised the Typhoom (EFA) upgrades the Harries and Jaguars we would have the following
1) high class Jobs all the way down
to the shop floor.
2) demand for locally made Engineering products
3) Strategic independance from USA and Euroland
4) Export orders which we could have taken from the USA and Euroland
5) An Industrial stategy to keep us selfsuffuicent etc
6) build 3 Carrieers (corus would like that) build the original 12 T45's or more rather that the 6 we are only going to get.
And that is only in one industrial sector that has been hammered by GB+co.
Then apply that to Farming and other area etc, etc
Complain about this comment
If the worst of this is felt in Teesside it will be like losing ICI again. We are getting used to be being dumped on. Souterners mock the Northerners but it has always been said that before you mock someone walk a week (should be a year) in their shoes. I really don't know how much more bad news we can take - the Government have made such fools of this country that it looks as though we are losing the off shore work which was already agreed. However I am not being a NIMBY it will be just as bad for whichever area loses this amount of work.
Complain about this comment
Someone should write a history of the steel industry in this country - it used to be a massive employer, with very poor productivity and now it emplys relatively few people but is pretty efficient. A 40% cut in demand and a 50% reduction in price makes it almost certain that there would be substantial cuts in output.
The proposal that the gov't provides funding for retraining does seem a bit of a figleaf for what is a request for (hopefully temporary) subsidy to keep people employed in the industry.
If the slow down is temporary then this is no bad thing in the short term. It is probably better to subsidise jobs temporaily than have to pay unemployment benefit and the other social costs associated with job losses. However how temporary is temporary and what will happen if the exisitng market conditions are still in place in 6 months?
Complain about this comment
May I remind you of a quote attributed to Einstein that, for me, represents your failure to truly understand the position that the world and UK economy is in.
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted".
You are a great counter - just like most economists. But the real economy consists of much more than economists count. As you might see if you looked at some UN models related to measuring life and life values.
Your view of the world is very simplistic. This would not be worrying were you to be sitting on a sofa on your own in Liverpool. Unfortunately, the BBC has chosen to give you the status of a guru on the UK economy.
I think you are extraordinarily naive as a reporter. You lack breadth and depth in your analysis. You frighten people unneccessarily.
Had you thought of finding another more appropriate outlet for your journalistic skills? Following the Royal Family perhaps? Or comedy writing?
Let me know if you would like an introduction.
Complain about this comment
I agree that foreign owned businesses are now cottoning onto governent subsidy. They know that the 'subsidy or redundancy' ultimatum makes the government sweat.
Then the government doesn't have a bottomless pit of money - notice how the government when questioned on how they will get through this recession, has moved from saying 'we will do whatever it takes...' to 'we will do everything within our power...' - a subtle shift but one which signals the limits have been reached. Also the patronising phrase 'it is the right thing to do...' has thankfully gone quiet.
In truth, no government can outspend a recession in high cost geography. Rhetoric and politics aside, the recession will happen and many jobs will be lost, causing house prices to fall faster with its related consequences.
Complain about this comment
Remember when NULAB caused a fuss when they did something about CLAUSE 4 !!!! ... and got elected !!!
Well, what did it say?
Is it now being reintroduced?
What a clever trick!!
Can anyone remember what it was about?
Complain about this comment
The biggest emerging factor I can see in people I talk to--- is the idea that these bankers have left the table with winnings each year for over a decade...so while losing their job IS "losing their job"; it hasn't quite the same meaning as it is for the hundreds of thousands of non Bank execs now losing theirs----- without the cushion of £millions salted away over the last 10 years.
Obviously the amounts that can be clawed back in 'misgovernance' cases won't 'make any material difference'---but that isn't the point.
Nor will they be 'fair'.... which isn't here nor there.
Nor need they be excessively punitive...just downsizing execs assets to two times national median would do it...no need for prison sentences.
But they will give people a clear target for the very real feelings of anger growing across the country ... and this 'target' (conveniently) will divert the attention from the politicians...... which isn't a major 'good'.
The above is a bit 'tongue in cheek'.... but only a bit---and the main reason for doing them would be that seeing some kind of attempt at redressing the balance of material reward just might also remove momentum from extremist political parties (of all persuasions) who are lining up to try and exploit the situation---- and THAT would be a major good.
Complain about this comment
All these jobs going, yet the Government seems hell bent on giving any remaining jobs to foreigners as if the average poor Brit cannot possibly live without Johnny Foreigner doing all our work for us. We've reached a new level of sickening self-loathing that really does have to stop:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/4324382/Record-number-of-work-permits-handed-to-migrants.html
I'm confused. Either there is growing unemployment for all, or there isn't. Are migrant workers the only ones not being made redundant, then? Are these migrant workers - for however long they may be here - "British"? Yea, right. I'm assuming that's what Gormless Brown meant when he said he'd give British jobs to British workers. If this wasn't bad enough, we have that French-run powerplant setting up in Britain but utterly refuses to hire local and qualified workers, in favour of bloody Poles and Portugese. Who the hell benefits from globalisation in this country? NOT US! Apparently it is neither illegal to hire foreigners in favour of locals in the UK, or sack British workers, but no-one can tell me that almost every other developed nation doesn't have better protection for its workers than we do. Britain's inability or unwillingness to protect its workers' rights is legendary.
I'd like to know what proportion of the projected 3 million employed will be foreign workers, and what proportion will be "indigenous" Brits. If they hardly register in the figures, then either they are ridiculously qualified, or they're being handed jobs in favour of indigenous Brits because of their relatively cheap labour (like usual). One would assume that in an economic crisis affecting the UK, it would affect all workers, not just some, regardless of where they come from originally. But something tells me this is not the case...
PS: Will someone please just explain to me how in the hell unemployment can be rising, while the number of migrant workers being brought in from outside the EU is now higher than the levels of 1997? It is utterly counter intuitive and non-sensisical. Unless of course, it is indigenous Brits who are being sacked and sidelined in this "economic crisis"...
Complain about this comment
Where is all the steel for building the Olympics coming from?
What happened to those two big aircraft carriers we were going to build?
What happened to the fiscal stimulus?
Are we going to end up importing steel with sterling on the ropes?
Does this government possess the capacity for joined up thinking?
I can only answer the last question and that is in the negative.
Time for change!
Complain about this comment
@50 "There sure is something rotten behind this entire economic breakdown, it goes way beyond bad, greedy business."
You do have to wonder about dark forces at work, to destroy the UK.
Let's just hope Kenneth Clarke asks Mandy the necessary hard questions about this latest outbreak of concern for our future, emanating from Tata. Their desire to retrain the workforce at taxpayer's expense has a hollow ring.
Why not just build prisons using Corus steel, for the bad times ahead?
Complain about this comment
52. WerringtonSilent
''I think the focus has to be on far-sighted preservation of a core of infrastructure and expertise so that we may take advantage of the recovery many years from now, rather than a short term propping up exercise at present capacity.''
Firstly I am not against taxpayer money going into business. I am against it going in for political reasons. I am against it going in too large. I am also against it going into multinationals who appear to play one country against another and can move money about internationally easily.
But - How do you determine a 'viable core of infrastructure'. That is the whole question. The government that has no skill in this area? The business that is in trouble? The establishment economists who have such a good track record?
Tata are not talking at present about shutting down UK operations just trimming. this leaves an activity, and plant capability.
There is virtually no evidence of strategic intervention in other areas now bemoaned as critical eg manufacturing and technology for decades. It appears to have been a wholesale prop or wholesale drop. I do not expect much different this time around.
Why is steel production so important to the UK. Why is steel more important than any number of other activities.
Why does Tata seem to think its entire workforce need retraining. It is a bizarre proposition. What other industry can you think of that says its entire workforce needs retraining for 6 months. In what way does this retraining ensure the continuation of the operation in its current short term size.
Additionally Tata seem to be getting a name for flying kites and queuing for handouts.
I've heard just too much rhubarb from multinationals and how much they can do. Look at the LG plant in S Wales, to name just one. Largest single investment in Europe. Massive taxpayer input. An entire department set up at the University of Wales training graduates to LGs spec. Gone before it opened.
Complain about this comment
Surely when everyone has had a chance to blame everyone else it all comes down to good old fashioned housekeeping!
The fundamentals of correctly priced markets with enough competition to encourage R and D along with sensible profits for companies (countries) that aren't mortgaged to the hilt are the backbone of progress.
No government on on earth can do more than fiddle round the edges and hopefully encourage economic equilibrium to return a wee bit qucker!
This trough we are in is part of the natural cycle of things and should serve as a reminder that financial basics apply to everyone. The globality of this mess will be repeated many times before we get to real stability.
Complain about this comment
Couple of things, unfortunately the very people that the labour party was set up for , it is hurting the most, the very well off , will remain well off, and the masses will suffer if it gets as bad as some think it will, either way it will be the masses and not the well off that will end up paying for this mess.
Those who have suffered in the past must be turning in their graves seeing the same things happening time and time again. Was the UK ever out of the doldrums ?
It will be the hollow words of the ruling classes that will ring in the public's ears like they did with King George , like the Jarrow men who were turned away from Parliament, who were forced to move by the soldiers many of whom would have been outraged to know that many of these men were WW1 veterans, bottom line the not well off will suffer again, and for a lot of people if they think they are not well off now, are in for a shock if they are to live like their ancestors did prior to the 1950's
Anyway here is a thought, for years UK industry was shipped offshore to other countries, because of lack of investment and poor insight, how about we import these industries now, open up LCD and PC factories using the Chinese technology, and anything else we dont know , that's how they did it right ?
Once the country is over its much needed correction and debt payment, make these things, people will have to get used to less pay, but then the cost of living should be less so it will all be relative, any company that overcharges like it does now, will suffer a rapid decline.
And we will never be able to draw a line under all of this until those who were complicit in this mess answer for their mistakes and ill gotten gains taken off them, let the super rich suffer for a change.
Complain about this comment
4. At 2:24pm on 25 Jan 2009, AqualungCumbria wrote:
A foreign company losing jobs in this country should come as no shock.No doubt they will be shutting major plants if they dont get government help.
Be an interesting fight as all the remaining plants are in Labour heartlands.
Just another once core industry that we will have to import the products for in a few years when things pick up.
Yes...
RBS (Godro Bank) is committed to meeting 'targetted' Central & Local Government initiatives...
I may have no objections to this, but I want the honest truth...
No more Mandyspin
No more Godrospin
Complain about this comment
Once again Robert, an informative, insightful blog. I would just like to say thank you for making the seemingly incomprehensible - comprihensible. That being said, I am of the view that a positive mental outlook promoted within the media, even in these bleakest of times would help the public phsyce. What is your view?
Complain about this comment
44. At 5:43pm on 25 Jan 2009, borophil wrote: #24 - bearing the brunt in the UK are we? 2000 UK losses of 24000 UK jobs is 0.083%. 3500 of 42000 is 0.083% seems suprisingly fair to me!
Borophil - go and get your calculator re-calibrated. It's 8.3% not 0.083% (which would only be 20 people)
Complain about this comment
7 good years, then 7 bad...
The moral of this very old story: save some of the profits of today to weather the storms of tomorrow.
I'm not religous but I see the common sense of the story of Joseph!
Corus, where are your reserves?
Complain about this comment
This soft touch government will pay up as they are scared.
Strange that with a weak pound massively helping exporters that it is the UK that has to bear the brunt of the foreign owned company's redundancy.
Complain about this comment
Jobs are being lost everywhere why does this Government not look at simple solutions to the crisis we are in? Bring back tax releif on mortgage interest up to £100,000 for the next 3 years and thereafter on £50,000 for the next 5 years. Just think what this might achieve - restoration of the housing market/construction industry and money straight to the pockets of people in need rather that hoping the "Banks" wil do this!
Complain about this comment
Regarding outsourcing IT to Tata Consultancy Services, Corus have also done this. It was a "big surprise" when the contract renewal for IT development was up in 2007 that Capgemini lost the contract to Tata, bearing in mind Tata had just bought Corus!
Since the downturn, Tata Consultancy are already talking of redundancies to UK staff and more work being offshored to its operations in India. The company has sold its soul to the devil for short term gain. Short term thinking means UK job losses, means fewer people buying cars, means less demand for steel. New world order? Possibly.
PS. I wish mention of this article would stop referring to "24,000 steelworkers". Many of the people who work for Corus are highly skilled professionals in finance, sales, IT (what's left of it), etc. This isn't just a case of unskilled people losing their jobs, just like banks aren't solely made up of desk clerks. There are many well paid jobs in Corus and these redunancies will hit the local economies very hard indeed.
Complain about this comment
This is all getting a bit silly. Come on, let's get real:
Banks collapse - Bail out plan
Banks collapse again - further bail out
Industries collapse - bail them out too?
This whole system has to collapse, it's not sustainable. We are trying to prop up the final years of the Industrial Age, this is not sustainable, we have reached the limits of our planet's resources.
Profit as a concept has to go, in order to do this we have to remove the need and want or it. Our golbal monetary system will not serve us going forward.
----------
In the nineteen fifties my father lived on a small-holding in the West of Ireland, they had 5 acres of poorish land. They had chickens, a few goats, one cow and a sow, and of course they grew all their own vegetables. They raise turkeys and geese for Christmas and Easter etc.
Were they any worse off? Big question indeed... My father thinks not, I love to hear him talk of those days, especially how they all worked as a community.
The whole village brought the harvest in together, entertainment was shared and all took part. My Great Aunt provided goat's milk for all her visitors, it was her way of providing to the the community.
One chap in the village (sorry Dad I can't remember his name) had the only radio in the village and would listen to the daily news. The village (about 30), would go to his house every evening and he would relay the world events.
This wasn't that long ago! My Dad taught me as a child how to rear animals, how to grow vegatables, how to fish and how to live off the common land.
I work in Industry but had the foresight to not give up what I was taught. I keep chickens and grow my own veg. If I am pushed I can sustain myself, winter may be a bit difficult but I still have my old books on bottling and pickling food.
I don't think my ancestors had it that wrong, after all they survived to get me here.
Am I alone? Do we need to fundamentally review how we live?
Or am I just pipe dreaming?
Complain about this comment
TaTa Steel (quite literally) are not even interested in supporting their own car company, Jaguar/Land Rover; and have been trialing Aluminium body panels to be provided from within the UK. With this in mind it seems the future of steel making in this country is all but dead. Bessemer must be turning in his grave.
Complain about this comment
67
Thank you
Complain about this comment
Robert
Re:
'Corus feels it will have to reduce the pay of employees for six months or so, until demand for steel recovers. The company feels it's fair to request support from taxpayers for an increment to staff pay, because the alternative of making more employees redundant would lead to a rise in social security payments.'
The old fashioned names for this
kind of behaviour are coercion and blackmail - its amazing how so many the times the UK and its government is seen as a soft target by overseas investors. Steel making operations are comparitively easy to mothball the until if an when the market returns - my guess is that if we, the taxpayer, bail out Corus in the UK - this will only be the first round of job cuts and the government should stand firm, resist calls for hand outs to foreign investors and invest the money in local green jobs e.g use the steel plants for re-cycling - snatch and raid the assets of Corus if necessary - and put in funds from the Treasury UKFI for alternative new industry. No one goes to the Chinese dictators or any other country that I know of and says 'give me a pile of dosh or else' - they only dare say it in Britain.
This would be tough on the workers losing their jobs initially but better if the right things are done.
The government should ensure that any steel plants to be closed are immediately put to alternative use e.g. re-cycling plants, grow something/make something and get a government approved and financed loan for doing so - to replace the jobs lost - better to invest in sustainable local employment - street level intervention - doing the right things - new sustainable industry.
Too much talk of retraining for what? - You have to create the industrial infrastructure first - its no good retraining people if the jobs and infrastructure are not there.
Also, I suppose that Corus may already be subsidised by British sourced bank loans? But we taxpayers seldom get the full story?
Too many 'internationalists' seeking hand outs from the UK.
I think Nick Clegg is sounding good on this - I never thought I'd ever be agreeing with him but he sounded OK on this issue (A Marr this morning). K. Clarke sounds like he will join G Brown and wait for the city of London to recover, i.e. incredibly, the city of London is still seen by some as the main UK economic driver.
Needs a fresh approach - where are UKIP Green Party and 'others' ? - Can't the BBC speak with them as well?
Both of the the main UK political parties are stuck with 1970's HM treasury macro economic models and have no idea whatsoever?
I hope this government doesn't now send aid to e.g. China or other countries! Perhaps G Brown will refinance to cover this?
Complain about this comment
a bit of a go slow amongst the moderators
I think more detail is required from your "understanding" so that we actually know what is being offered.
Sounds to me that a business has been forced to grasp a thorny issue it hasn't wanted to up until now.
Complain about this comment
Robert
Why the need to tell us that Port Talbot is in South Wales?
Is it in case readers confuse it with another Port Talbot with a large steelworks in the UK?
Or, if the detail is for readers who are geographically challenged, could you also tell them where Scunthorpe and Teeside are located?
Complain about this comment
I am just wondering. I have heard that we have stockpiles of steel waiting to be shipped to China to be recycled. Perhaps it would be better for this recycling to be carried out here instead? Helping those affected at least in the short term.
Of course there is the problem of little demand due to a lack of manufacturing. But since only a few months ago there was a shortage, when the market does pick up, there will be product waiting to be shipped.
Some similar could be done with all the other material waiting to be recycled that we are now paying to have stored.
Complain about this comment
It is now abundantly clear that we are not merely in a recession but are headed inexorably for depression and Brown must be more discerning what he does with the money he has left to play with: Shoring up banks is dubious as when the british workforce sees what is now becoming widespread, even if he fixes the LIBOR blockage, it is too late to focus upon consumer confidence: people are panicking and simply not going to borrow money when they see their jobs at threat and the very real probabilities of losing houses and effective bankruptcy.
Logically, he will be better served trying to refocus UK employment away from the financial sector -green projects, etc.
We are in serious trouble akin to the 1930's, it may even transpire to be even worse and it is no longer about confidence in the banks.
Complain about this comment
#64
2,000 of 24,000 is 1/12 or 8.3%.
Heaven preserve us if you're one of the engineers you want us to "bring on"!
Complain about this comment
AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE
BHP BILLITON BOARD – “AUSTRALIAN TRUST FOREVER LOST”
A) VERY QUESTIONABLE FRIENDS OF AUSTRALIA OR AUSTRALIANS?
B) VERY QUESTIONABLE FRIENDS OF ANYONE? (except for “A” class shareholders)
BHP BILLITON BOARD
Don ARGUS Chairman
Marius KLOPPERS
Paul ANDERSON
Alan BOECKMANN
John BUCHANAN
Carlos CORDEIRO
David CRAWFORD
Gail de PLANQUE
David JENKINS
David MORGAN
Jacques NASSER
Keith RUMBLE
John SCHUBERT
Jane McALOON
CAVEAT EMPTOR – to all elected politicians. Local Government Authorities (LGA’s) and Australian citizens, when listening to the business spin of these self-appointed “so-called pillars” of the resource sector.
Just a month ago (18th December 2008) Don ARGUS stated in a letter to its shareholders:
Extract - A strong future
As to the future, I want to be very clear that BHP Billiton, as a standalone company, is in a strong financial and operating position. We believe we are better placed than our competitors in these challenging times to respond to the fluctuating demand for our products. We have:
(1) A portfolio of long-life, low cost, expandable, tier one assets. As a result of this portfolio, and low-cost position, BHP Billiton’s margins are the highest among the industry and in these difficult times, we expect to outperform our peers.
(2) A very strong balance sheet, with a net debt level of just US$6.3 billion at 31st October 2008 against a market capitalisation of around US$115 billion as of the date of this letter, as well as robust cash flows to support investments through the commodity cycle.
SEE CHARTER - http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/aboutUs/charter.jsp
Based on the ARGUS statements to shareholders, the board of BHP Billiton has shown a complete lack of corporate responsibility, morality and ethical practice in its business operations:
(1) BHP Billiton - Has sufficient cash reserves to maintain its workforce for many years, without destroying entire communities and the individual livelihood of thousands of Australians and associated small business houses established to service such communities.
The board of BHP Billiton has put pure greed for $$$$’s before its corporate responsibilities, society and human lives and has effectively destroyed the complete economies of large regions of Australia.
(2) Instead of looking at “bottom line profits” this inept board, could have completely upgraded their operating and processing systems, thereby improving business efficiencies. Instead, it chose to “off-handedly” closedown and payout some A$300+ million in redundancy payouts to its discarded workforce, whilst, also showing little heed to the plight of hundreds of contractors and their families.
HOW MUCH LONGER ARE AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS GOING TO LET OUR POLITICAL REPRESENTATIVE/S TOLERATE SUCH BUSINESS BEHAVIOUR BY UNETHICAL MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS? TELL YOUR “POLITICIANS” WHAT YOU REALLY THINK…THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO GOVERNMENT.
[Personal details removed by Moderator]
Complain about this comment
#88: Get your hands off my psyche!
Complain about this comment
'#98 a bit of a go slow amongst the moderators'
Go easy on the moderators, they probably have to monitor loads of blogs, I bet an edition of 'Pro-Celebrity X Dressing, Get Me Out Of Here' has just finished on beeb1 and they are up to their eyeballs in postings about Sarah Beeny dressed as a navvie :)
Did Tata get any joy when they went cap in hand to the government over JLR ?
Have they tried it on with other Tata ownd subsidiaries both here and abroad ?
Why not post both here on this blog and at
http://www.democraticbritain.tp2p.com/
Real time blogging.
Complain about this comment
Six months ago Corus were working full pelt, having reopened mothballed furnaces and were raking it in on the back of high metal prices. I do not therefore support any subsidy by the British taxpayer.
Complain about this comment
#52 wellington silent.
I am not for pouring money down a black hole either, dont get me wrong. Core industry does need to be preserved however in a pragmatic well thought out way ( I liked old nick666 post about all the Chinese leadership being of engineering academic background...very sensible..we get ex lawyers to run our show)
Some assitance to Corus is entirely justified I think, but not a blank cheque book, the training would need to be relevent for potential new industries for example if it is to be in part Gov sponsored.
The lads that work on the blast furnace floor at Corus will be skilled heavy industry operatives, they could turn thier hand to making all kinds of real stuff. What i would hate to see is some sham training scheme where they are trained to be 'champions of street football' or diversity consultants we need to learn that lesson as a nation.
In fact if you asked the lads at corus they may have thier own ideas and pet projects they may want to do with some encouragement, micro hydro electric schemes for example in streams etc (Will have to cut a load of Environment agency red tape first however believe it or not .....I am not kidding). You may have noticed we have alot of water in this country consistently flowing down hill.
For a bigger solution and in the interests of both international relations and our recovery can I suggest we ask the Chinese government for thier expertise and advise on how to build a sound economy built on something more substantial than a load of spivs in suits.
I think they may really appreciate that and become our new best friends..I am not kidding by the way. They want some respect in the world and positive engagement with them on those lines would be good for everyone.
just a suggestion.
Jericoa
Complain about this comment
#77Bishopplatimer
Try paul masons blog instead (newsnight web page economics editor). From your commentary I thing your faith in humanity will be in part restored if you read his material.
Jericoa
Complain about this comment
Overtly or covertly, all of the European governments are making plans to protect their industries and workers. After all the love affair with Obama has died down the US will be doing the same. Yet, in the UK we are still singing the failed mantra of gobalisation and foreign investment.
The economists try and tell us that The Great Depression was exacerbated by protectionism. However, when any nation is faced with either military or economic annihilation then it must protect itself all fall into a state of anarchy.
I forward these ideas for consideration:
1 All profits from our Utilities to be retained in the UK and re-invested here. If this is in conflict with EU law then we pass Emergency legislation to be kept in effect until 'hostilities' are over.
2 Any foreign owned company that wishes to close should be allowed to do so. However, there should be a complete prohibition on the export of any capital equipment in the firms.
3 We develop a list of industries and individual firms that we will not allow to fail.
4 Every firm that receives government contracts or incentives must be committed to a set investment in both R&D and training.
The above are meant as a starter for a discussion on the urgent need for a strategic plan to ensure all of our futures.
Complain about this comment
Several $/£bn of bonuses were paid by bankers to themselves after receiving government handouts. We don't want to repeat that mistake by giving more handouts only to find out weeks or even years later that the executives and owner have spirited away $£bn.
Pensioners got a few pence rise a few years ago. There are also means testing galore. How about applying some of these to businesses?
Have any business offered to pay more into the Treasury when the times are good? We should take note of those businesses who have the self-respect to take the good years and the bad years in their stride; to have the wisdom to put away plenty in good times for a raining day; to have the honour not to swindle countries, governments, their shareholders, their customers and the public. They we msut partner in the future.
Don't know about Tata IT services. The most astonishing blatant case I read and heard was about DSG (dixsons etc) who span the idea of "co-sourcing" with an Indian IT company to DSG British staff. A year or little more later into the deal, the "co-sourcing" turned into out-sourcing. Most UK staff lost their jobs to India Nationals who were brought into the UK to replace British workers. All legal but likely to have left a long, bitter taste in the people affected, their families, their relatives and their friends. Don't think the government cared.
Complain about this comment
#94 wakeupbritain
I think you’ve got it right, we do need to fundamentally review how we live, but you are pipe dreaming I’m afraid, don’t expect this government, or the Tories, to do anything inspirational.
My Father came from the West Coast of Ireland too.
He was the most wonderful person, never wanted for anything, was a contented man.
What do you want to waste your money on that for, he would say.
Why do you want to holiday abroad, you won’t find anything different there.
He was right, we are all chasing after something we have lost.
I go home to the West of Ireland and find they have a great sense of community and family.
But this could be true of many communities in Britain too.
BUT
they have been badly served by their so called betters
led astray by the media and celebrity culture
kept quiet with football, cheap booze and big brother
ill prepared by an education system which fails a large proportion of young males
while the fat cats run away with the cream.
Complain about this comment
#100 plusser
For information.
Scrap steel comes in many grades. Different steelworks have different requirements. You may be looking at things rather simplistically.
Complain about this comment
#102. BrownKnows
I suggest you read the post again. I was quoting someone else's error in post #44.
Maybe the speech marks "---" are the clue.
Do I have to spell everything out?
Complain about this comment
I now have sympathy for Mr A Curzon.
ONE HAS TO SHOUT TO GET THE MESSAGE ACROSS.
WHERE DO YOU GET AN IRONY BYPASS?
Complain about this comment
Watch the film Network 1976. Google "mad as hell Peter Finch".
You all should be MAD AS HELL!
Complain about this comment
This from Network 1976, this is today:
I don't have to tell you things are bad. Everybody knows things are bad. It's a depression. Everybody's out of work or scared of losing their job. The dollar buys a nickel's worth; banks are going bust; shopkeepers keep a gun under the counter; punks are running wild in the street, and there's nobody anywhere who seems to know what to do, and there's no end to it.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat. And we sit watching our TVs while some local newscaster tells us that today we had fifteen homicides and sixty-three violent crimes, as if that's the way it's supposed to be!
We all know things are bad -- worse than bad -- they're crazy.
It's like everything everywhere is going crazy, so we don't go out any more. We sit in the house, and slowly the world we're living in is getting smaller, and all we say is, "Please, at least leave us alone in our living rooms. Let me have my toaster and my TV and my steel-belted radials, and I won't say anything. Just leave us alone."
Well, I'm not going to leave you alone.
I want you to get mad!
I don't want you to protest. I don't want you to riot. I don't want you to write to your Congressman, because I wouldn't know what to tell you to write. I don't know what to do about the depression and the inflation and the Russians and the crime in the street.
All I know is that first, you've got to get mad.
You've gotta say, "I'm a human being, goddammit! My life has value!"
So, I want you to get up now. I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window, open it, and stick your head out and yell,
"I'm as mad as hell,
and I'm not going to take this anymore!!"
Complain about this comment
As i write we already have 2 million people unemployed.
Many more on short time and millions worrying if they will have a job next week.
Add to that the highest levels of indebtedness that this country has ever seen.
Now that to me is REAL pain.
So as we engage in esoteric arguments about the banks and short selling perhaps we should include a little compassion into our discussions.
Just a thought.
Complain about this comment
#17
Rahere was in the neighbourhood at the New Year. Most of these job losses may be found through early retirement, freezing recruitment, and voluntary redundancies, and there's enough new industry moving into the area to recruit fairly easily - Amazon's huge new depot, a couple of miles away near Briton Ferry, is still recruiting, for instance, and pursuant to #74, building work on the new Joint Forces Defence Training Academy at St Athans is about to start, needing large numbers of competent steelworkers. And perhaps we could repatriate a few call-centre jobs from India while we're about it.
Complain about this comment
Ok, just so I understand this:
A very rich foreign person owns a factory or two in this country.
Money's tight in the business so owner wants staff to take a pay cut. Staff via union say no.
A little while on, money's still tight, so owner decides to cut jobs in the UK factories, cut wages of remaining staff, requests a subsidy for retraining remaining staff, suggests they'll cost more if out of work on benefits.
Same very rich foreign person who purchased car industries in this country previously requested government bailout when USA were looking at helping their giant car manufacturers.
That about right?
Hmmm...
We pay subsidies then buy products again at their massively overinflated prices? What of benefits for workers being laid off? Giving money twice then.
Has this gentleman asked for time to pay the vat, tax and NIC? If so, giving him even more money. These contributions will be less anyway cos of less workers.
Why did this owner decide to raise funds himself for his car companies? Was it because there may have been conditions attached?
This owner is costing us money as it is-abe he wants more?
If he is as rich as he says, let him pay to retrain his workers himself, and keep their wages. This latest news from the camp of the same owner as the car manufacturers suggests that he:
Has no conscience
Appears to think the UK should pay for his UK employees
Is treating his companies as lifestyle businesses
I agree with dear Alex C-a business is for life including during recessions!
I think this guy has an absolute nerve trying to hold us to ransom like this!
HOW DARE HE!
Complain about this comment
over 2 hours for Moderation!!
What a way to run a ..........
Complain about this comment
So now I understand it I can do the following:
Take all the spare cash out of my businesses
Tell everyone I have a strong order book (true actually) but lay of 10 percent (8.3 I know, but keeping the numbers easy!)
Cut down the hours of remaining workers (I don't know how much they are paid at Corus-but would a pay cut take wages close to the National Minimum Wage?)
Tell the government I want a subsidy for training (unspecified) or more will be laid off
Run my hands with glee as the government tops up my wage bill and I don't have to pay tax and NI on as much.
Sounds like a no brainer!
What do you reckon my chances are?!
If the government do this for Corus, they are making a huge mistake. Repeat HUGE! (repeated just in case anyone in the treasury are reading!)
This is tantamount to blackmail-effectively financial terrorism. Holding workers to ransom!
And, frankly, surely any job is better than no job?
I heard of a business man today who wants to pay his staff a 10k bonus each (80k) plus more for himself and his son as a thankyou for his staff working longer hours through this year without overtime! And this based on 1 definite annual contract for 100k, and overheads of 60k plus a month!
Admirable intentions, but surely cloud cuckoo land?
The road to hell is paved with good intentions so they say.
Surely anyone with a job should be pleased they have one? Even with a pay cut it's got to be better than being on the dole.
Or is it all that work ethic-something for nothing?!
Complain about this comment
#48 Alexander Curson in his comments show a clear understanding of what defines capital in a really successful Enterprise or Company- It is people, or the human, skilled, motivated men and women who choose to work for you and your Organisation.
Only humans totally committed to their companies and who enjoy their work, gain real reward and happiness from that labor.
Lose the trust and confidence of your troops or employees or co workers and you are finished.
Banks and Politicians like Brown only understand their own feeling and emotions, those of the "Proles" is of no significance as the workers have no power in this game. Pass the blame and move the money, making sure you move cash to key voting areas.
A business is for "Life" if you truly commit, You should never take a pet except for life, so why start a business, make it a success, then ignore it to wither on the vine.? Brown has no idea what he is destroying as he nor Darling have ever built anything. Builiding a good team of people in a business takes years, building a great company takes ten years or more.
New Labour is going to leave the field with a scorched Earth policy, if the Tories get in, then damn them, they think. Things will be so bad that they will fail and power comes back to those who play the game. Brown and Co plus the "bubble bankers" have contempt for traditonal British Values of fairness, of family, of integrity and hard work. They have no feeling of national pride, nor service to their country.
How do we get rid of these people and fast? The North East had the Jarrow March some sixty years ago. The Internet makes combined City Marches much easier to organise. I can see hundreds of thousands soon, marching to London to DEMAND this Goverment resigns and calls national elections.
Brown has weakened the Police and badly weakened and overstretched our Military whist paying for an extra 800,000 jobs worth civil servants in the past ten years, all he thinks will vote for him as he allows them to have index linked pensions.
Maybe it will be Welsh Steelworkers who start the march for change.? It is about time that David Cameron made real noises and demanded transparency, to all these secret Billion pound decisions to Banks,
Complain about this comment
Robert Preston:
It has sad that CORUS is cutting jobs in the United Kingdom, But...in a slowing economy this company decided to cut jobs instead of being forced to closed the entire business....
~Dennis Junior~
Complain about this comment
I suspect this could be the straw to break the camel's back.
If no government help has been forthcoming for large or small businesses, what would happen if Tata got what he's asking for?
The people of this country could well explode.
Gordy, Mandy and Ally D should be very, very careful.
Complain about this comment
Re handouts
RBS paid 16bn corporation tax, then we bailed them out 20bn.
Tax rebate plus interest then?!
All of this is so totally loopy I doubt there's a word to describe it in the dictionary
And a rumour of further bailouts, this time for certain 'must not fail' industries, including car makers?
Looks like Tata gets his wish as we say 'tata' to our tax payer money going to line someone's pockets overseas (indirectly of course)
Unbelieveable!
Complain about this comment
#121. At 01:26am on 26 Jan 2009, Tigerjayj wrote:
'Surely anyone with a job should be pleased they have one? Even with a pay cut it's got to be better than being on the dole.'
I agree with the sentiment but history has shown that whilst the owners of companies are happy to share the downturn with the employees they are unlikely to share any up turn.
If the owners complained a little less bitterly about the minimum wage during the boom periods then I would be willing to work for less than minimum during the bad trading periods. We all have a vested interest in the success of the business.
Complain about this comment
So, when do y'all get to have an election?
Complain about this comment
#127 OldSouth
For some strange reason, the English like to leave the date of the election in the hands of the Prime Minister, instead of having fixed terms.
Complain about this comment
Morning Robert,
bit of a storm in a tea cup, these losses at Corus isn't it?
Surely the point here (alluded to by one or two posters) is what industries need to survive (at ALL COSTS)?
We have had the ludicrous pronouncement from HMG that "no bank can be allowed to fail". Now what about industry?
I'm an engineer by background and it seems to me that once the Tories (under blessed Margaret) stated that Britain would be solely a service economy then we were all doomed (doomed I tell ya).
However Governments can get things wrong especially greedy ones!
We human beings in this country need certain basics to survive, food, water, energy, shelter and maybe a pride in what we do for employment.
I issue a challenge to HMG (this one and the next four). We need to take back ownership of companies involved in providing the basics to survive (and maybe provide defence). We need a long term project to educate more engineers so that we can rebuild our crumbling infrastructure.
We need a long term apprenticeship scheme to pass on valuable skills.
All of this will cost a lot of money and will take quite some time but the future of our children depends on what we do now.
It's thirty five years since Maggies failed experiment, it's destroyed lots of families and consigned many to the dole for life. It doesn't have to be like this. We will soon have an opportunity to speak for the nation (I'm still betting on Spring 2009) and I'll vote for any party that promises to rebuild the real Britain, not this consumer led shambles that has hurt our collective pride so much.
Oh and how did your interview with the select committee go?
Complain about this comment
#129,splendidhashbrowns:
Totally agree - but with proper apprenticeships rather than box-ticking NVQs,
John Bray (ex-apprentice)
Complain about this comment
time some firms realised their staff are their best asset-too many don't-hence the issues with minimum wage for some.
However, no matter how much you value your staff, you do get those who have no commitment to anyone or anything except themselves.
Hey go, another day, another dollar!
Complain about this comment
THE idea of another bailout of sorts is unreasonable.
Given the purchase of Corus by Tata,was to increase their control of worldwide steel production and maximise profits.
Now the market has turned against them ,why should the British taxpayer be pumping money into them .
Their profits abroad are hardly taxed let them use some of this for the the period under review.
Sorry suggest this is the tip of the iceberg,there will be more redundancies to come .
Will the govt ensure that money given will be payed back,or can we say it was a cheaper option than return to nationalisation.
Feel this story has only just started and the long term implications for taxpayer and Corus workforce isnt pleasant.
Complain about this comment
#130
I thought NVQ stood for Not Very Qualified.
Complain about this comment
#127
If you followed my postings, you'd find that Michael Wills, Jack Straws' #2 in the Ministry of Justice, rather let the cat out of the bag on that one last Monday. He was talking to the National Elections Conference (the convention for electoral registration officers and the like) about the Political Parties and Elections Bill 2008, which is likely to pass into law in late June, when hes said:
"Whilst the Bill is unlikely to be in place in sufficient time for the June elections (and conscious of what the Gould report said), for the purpose of the European elections this year, we have dealt with the issue for England and Scotland in other legislation. "
Now, the Gould Report was an investigation into the chaos caused in the Scottish Elections of 3.5.2007, where 140000 votes were disallowed as the result of the confusion caused in voters mind by being asked to vote in two different elections simultaneously. In it, the principle recommendation was that two elections should not be held simultaneously.
Therefore, given that the European Elections in the UK are definitively scheduled for 4.6.2009, that means the's a closed window between the start of April and then. However, Wills' comments would have been pointless had HMG any intention of going before then, and so putting these pieces together you come up with:
"Given that the results of the June elections will either be a massive defeat for HMG or a sufficiently strong indication that there's not going to be any better time to go to the country, prepare for an election in September."
Needless to say in passing, this Act, whilst appearing to strengthen the democratic system, contains further deregulatory provisions.
Complain about this comment
Before we start the blame game, we should ask ourselves why the slump in global demand?
If you look back over the last 10 years, whilst there has been massive growth in infrastructure projects in the Middle East (Dubai etc), pipelines and massive developments in the Far East (Indonesia, Malaysia) let alone the huge projects in China, there have been few Steel related projects of any worth in the Western Hemishphere. The UK Building boom was peanuts in the global sense. Once these global projects were complete, demand panned. Car manufacturing is but a fraction of steel production.
With the drive by powerful lobby groups and energy interests (remember the infamous Stern report about the cost to the global economies of environmental disaster?!) to implement environmental constraints and legislation on resources, manufacturing and consumption since 2002/3, manufacturers of all resources have seen costs escalate and demand for the end products diminish.
Taxation and future taxation on things like transport and conventional energy production haven't and won't help in the future, when they are implemented.
The combined effect of high energy costs from uncontrolled speculation and industries strangled by often needless legislative bureacracyand now a lack of global consumer confidence has led to this day for companies like Corus.
Once one goes, they all go down like dominoes.
If we think this is bad news, wait till the sectors supplied by the steel industries are impacted.
What makes you think any bank will lend or allow any business to continue in steel related trades, when the banks attitude will be if a global player like Tata/Corus thinks things are bad, how is your (little) company going to fare any better?
This is so very serious.
The only way out. China, India, USA, Europe to announce major major infrastructure projects on nationwide scales. Not a few buildings here and there.
Have they the courage to act in unison?
It depends on the political climate. Ask yourselves this, who were the major investors Lord Myners referred to, that withdrew the enormous funds from the banks that threatened the stability of the banks last October?
Politics you can be sure of causes problems, but just as its an uunneccessary evil it can and is the only way out of this situation.
UK PLC and HMG needs to get "into bed" with its opponents, as well as its friends.
Complain about this comment
?
This is on the Business web site, why duplicate news ?
Point 1 may have the answer ?
Complain about this comment
From the DT today about the "rescue package for the struggling motor industry": "It is understood that the package will include government cash to subsidise car workers' training". Well what a coincidence!
Complain about this comment
Is training to be the new financial services?
With a bit of perseverance, I may be able to achieve two of my personal goals here:
A mention in Private Eye AND first and last word on Peston's Picks!
Complain about this comment
110. Puzzling
You have alluded to what I believe to be one of the major issues.
When these companies are taken over, years of R and D, Intellectual Capital and Intellectual Property become available to the new owners. Look at the major inroads into the UK 4x4 industry since LR and then JLR were passed around like a parcel.
This knowledge is used to train, equip and motivate staff in low cost countries. This will cost us far more in the long term than closure of plant coming to the end of its life cycle.
Complain about this comment
Dear Robert
It has been reported in the Daily Express that Gordon Brown did not see the recession coming, "Why is he still Prime minister?"
It does not matter how often you report the job losses WE THE PUBLIC know that Britain has been in recssion for over Six months, and its not even begun to bite yet,
What we need is optomism, and with Labour incharge that will not happen they have AGAIN wrecked the Economy, we need a change of Leadership, as what we have now is a bunch of squabbling Spivs, in governemnt and the city who cannot get it together to support the Country
Every single senior executive should be STOPPED from gettingbmassive payouts on retirement, when ordinary people get NOTHING and it is they who did the work to keep executives in the way theve beome acustomed to.
They should only get paid on performance because it is immoral that when, mangers and the work force get nothing these people get £500,000 pay off 's (Brighton and hove council chiefs Early Retirement at at 54, )
yet another fat cat creaming the system.
It doe not matter weither it is CORUS, or the CEO OF A COUNCIL IT STILL IS NOT RIGHT.
Complain about this comment
Dear Robert
It has been reported in the Daily Express that Gordon Brown did not see the recession coming, "Why is he still Prime minister?"
It does not matter how often you report the job losses WE THE PUBLIC know that Britain has been in recssion for over Six months, and its not even begun to bite yet,
What we need is optomism, and with Labour incharge that will not happen they have AGAIN wrecked the Economy, we need a change of Leadership, as what we have now is a bunch of squabbling Spivs, in governemnt and the city who cannot get it together to support the Country
Every single senior executive should be STOPPED from getting massive payouts on retirement, when ordinary people get NOTHING and it is they who did the work to keep executives in the way theve beome acustomed to.
They should only get paid on performance because it is immoral that when, mangers and the work force get nothing these people get £500,000 pay off 's (Brighton and hove council chiefs Early Retirement at at 54, )
yet another fat cat creaming the system.
It doe not matter weither it is CORUS, or the CEO OF A COUNCIL IT STILL IS NOT RIGHT.
Complain about this comment
sanity4all was wondering if the countries of the world would have the courage to act together. He seems to believe (or hope) that global capitalism can realize some sort of common interest. I don't think thats the way Capitalism works. The Indian company Tata bought Corus to give them access to markets outside of India and to the technology/skills of the West. Now that they have this, why on earth should they waste money by keeping British workers employed?
They have a ready source of cheap labour in their own country.
A few people benefited massively in the short term from the Indian takeover and can now wash their hands of the mess. The way people blame the government astounds me though. National governments have less power now than in the 1970's when Harold Wilson spoke of how the City of London pulled the strings. Now those strings are pulled by International puppet masters who have no loyalty to anything except themselves.
Complain about this comment
#139-, sosraboc:
That's a very interesting point. Are we being asked here to pay for training of people who will then return to India?
Complain about this comment
#66 virtualsilverlady
and Who's who: NOT in China's politburo
1 billion poorly paid, poorly educated and poorly cared for people with limited civil rights, limited health care and no rights at work.......
It's partly why we ruled the world in manufacturing during the 19th centuary!!!!
Complain about this comment
At least Gordon is still helping the hard pressed Bankers (sorry families)
Complain about this comment
when in India recently I read that the UK government had heavily subsidised Tata to purchase Jaguar. Is this correct?
Complain about this comment
118 rahere
Work in the area. Yes I'm sure a blast furnace operator will make a brill call centre operator. Just has to learn not to shout to be heard above the noise by the blast furnace. Square pegs Round holes. Long term unemployment for some. Dont be so glib.
Complain about this comment
To all those above who ask for wundfall taxes on "bankers", a few questions.
1) Who are the "bankers" you are talking about? Board members, senior management, traders, stockbrokers, mortgage advisers, where do you draw the line? It's a ridiculous catch-all term.
2) Do you really think that all of the money paid to these individuals over the last 10 years has been salted away, or is it just possible that a lot of it was recycled into the economy?
3) Are you willing to pay back the money you have earned over the last ten years as a result of being the car salesman that sold the "banker" a nice Porsche, or the waiter in the top-class restaurant who only had a job because the "bankers" used to pay the extortionate prices there, or the architect who designed new offices for the "bankers", or the builder who built them, or the person who made money in buy-to lets because the "banker" was willing (legally) to lend him money, or indeed the person who made money on selling their house during the house price bubble allegedly caused by those "bankers"?
4) If not, why not? You have profited from the money the "bankers" have put back into the economy, you should also share the pain.
5) Do you think that it's just possible that you might concede that things are a little more complicated than they appear to be in your blinkered view of the world?
Complain about this comment
sosraboc
Sadly you are wandering into engineering.
The first landrover was a copy, development if you like, from the US Willys General purpose (GP hence Jeep) over here in WW2.
Toyota 4x4s supplanted Land Rover as the leading brand due to higher reliability a long time ago. In the Outback in Oz, where reliability was a matter of life or death the switch over was remarkable.
Audi as a result of military funding for a 4x4 developed the drivetrain which they put into a rally car as part of their perceived technology marketing strategy. We now call this the Quatro system. This lead to the fad for 4x4 domestic vehicles, few people need 4x4, it is a fashion statement.
Suzuki developed the small 800cc 4x4 for 3rd world markets. There is ever upward pressure on size in manufacture, basically the manufacturing cost relates to the number of component handled, so a bigger vehicle costs little more than a small vehicle yet gives a potentially higher profit margin. Suzuki followed this path and now produce larger 4x4s.
So 4x4 is a mature technolgy and desoite LR being a good product it is not actually a marketing mover or shaker and it is not clear that it has some stunning advantage technicaly. Incidentally 4x4s were and probably still are excempt of the impact crash tests as they are not classed as a leisure vehicle and do not perform well as a group in crashes, or handle well in cornering due to a high centre of gravity, but try explaining that to somebody who only sees a lot of metal.
There you are, you can be an anorak too. However you are mistaken to assume that old UK firms generally have technology worth stealing. The problem is they have been suffering underinvestment.
Complain about this comment
Derek Simpson, joint leader of Unite, said
"We understand that Corus do face difficulties, but before this recession, Corus had been making extremely healthy profits,"
"Our members have supported Corus through good times and bad and now expect Corus to support them."
Very unlikely. "extremely healthy profits" in the past have most likely been quickly salted and hidden away, put beyond the knowledge and reach of the dedicated workers and governments.
Governments around the world must never give handouts, under any disguise, to businesses where the owners and executives have not put most of their personal and family wealth (savings, homes ...) into the business and on the line.
Short term bridging loans may be made only if it can be 100% secured on tangible local assets of the owners and executives (eg. properties, precious metals). The amount of the loan should be less than 10% of the taxes paid in previous years. EG. 3 year loan is limited to 10% of the taxes paid from the previous 3 years.
Retraining is wasteful if there are no realistic prospect of a job, any job, within the next 12 month. Retraining is a swindle disguised if the retaining resources is giving to the same companies who have made workers redundant.
I have slowly and reluctantly come to the inevitable conclusion that all handouts and swindles, in its many disguises, are join schemes by outsiders and insiders.
Complain about this comment
Test
Å£
Complain about this comment
#20 an excellent link but it ducks the issue of who made the decision to let Lehman's go to the wall having supported Bear Stearns. Lowenstein's book the Crash deals with the political pressure put on the Fed and SEC leading up to the dot com bubble and its well worth a read as I believe a similar scenario occurred between 2000 and 2007.
#64 an interesting list and illustrates the problem of putting a deluded History Graduate in charge of the economy.He appears to be under the delusion that if he can say it long enough and loud enough that "it was those nasty bankers that caused the problem not him."We will not realise that the actions of the bankers and even the subprime morgages were but a symptom of a failure of both the Uk and US to regulate the derivitives markets and to effectively control the growth in money supply which gave rise to the asset price bubble.
Complain about this comment
Presumably they didn't get get the training grant then?
Complain about this comment
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.
Corus may have been aquired by Tata, but this contraction in britain is part of the continuing attack on out industries by the EU.
The Brussels idea is to make the Uk destitute so that there is no chance of us being able to leave this criminal organisation.
I have noted that the continued attack on the Pound is moving its value nearer to 1 for 1 with the Euro, another aim of the Europeans to make us, through the Brown dictators, join the Euro at which point all independence is lost and we wilol be part of the BIG BROTHER organisation for ever, or until it falls by its own weight.
The only answer to the present problem is to leave the EU and stop paying BIllions per year to that worthless organisation, we can then stop the mass immigration, which is also ripping us off in Billions sent to other EU countries, and use this money to support our own industries in this time of recession.
Complain about this comment
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.
>these are proper jobs...people making things
That people aren't buying!!!!!!!
Supply and demand. Or do we want a steel or car mountain to match the EU butter mountains of years ago?
If we've learned anything from the past mistakes in the EU it is that subsidies don't work.
Complain about this comment
The construction industry due to no private investment has stalled beyond repair.
The Civils Industry will be ok due to all of the transport and heavy civils work out there but the Construction Industry i.e. fit out, house building refurbishment, hotels have completely stopped or stopping.
Recruitment companies have 50-60 people applying for one job.
Recruitment companies have many positions advertised but they are on hold for up to three months or the jobs do not exist.
Any white collar worker working in the build side of the industry will have to face facts and re train as the industry will take 5 years to come up to the level ouput required. any people working for the private sector will find that jobs in the public sector they will not be considered for, until the labour force has been used and re used for which they will be considered, which will be march 2010.
unfortunately the olympic park project will be too little to late for many and will only touch the surface of mass redundancies in the industry and once the project has finished there is no where for these workers to go.
my advise for any professional white or blue collar people in the industry is to re train now and get out as the industry as it will not recover until 2015 if the current workforce does not grow.
if immigration of european workforces grow in the uk over the next five years it will create a cheaper workforce for big business and any young persons coming in to the industry thinking of a carreer it would be prudent to think again and retrain in to Local Authority Health mental health or Education for a sustainable career.
Complain about this comment
Vauxhall one week Corus the next.
Or vice versa.
Luton or Teesside the results will be the same.
The real economy shutting down.
Foreign owners deciding what to do.
The global casino needs resetting. UK Pounds are well over valued.
Bankers think not of course. They reckon their livelihood depends on the status quo.
In actual fact their livelihood depends on there being a continuous blip free separation between "their" economy and the real economy.
Well the continuous separation cannot continue. Just like a constantly stretched elastic band eventually snaps - so will the UK real economy. What will the bankers do then?
Complain about this comment
I don't think one should think of financial bail-outs as necessarily throwing money down the drain; done right the government could actually make money out of these investments (such as making a tidy sum from dividends on its bail-out of Lloyds bank). In fact the U.S. made about $5b from the first round of bank bail-outs, which are now in the process of being repaid. However, I'd be reluctant to throw money at companies like Tata, but that's not to say it couldn't work. Again in the U.S., the government made millions from bailing out Chrysler years ago, so it's not necessarily a bad idea always.
Henry
UK Insurance Direct
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS