Open For Business?
When the former Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament George Reid drew up a report on the future of the Assembly in October last year he argued that "citizen engagement is a vital component in ensuring that the Assembly's business is conducted in line with the expectations of the democratic society which elected its members". In response the Assembly Commission developed as one of its strategic priorities "the development of a dynamic and responsive strategy for outreach and public engagement".
A new director of engagement is due to be appointed soon, but whenever the successful candidate takes up their job they will find that the Assembly is actually less open than when George Reid penned his report.
Outside the building we have seen the erection of a fence across the bottom of the Stormont steps and the filtering of all visitors through a security booth to the east of the building. As Sinn Fein's Mitchel McLaughlin has pointed out the first image a visitor has when they arrive at Stormont is "a padlocked gate at the bottom of the steps and a sign saying 'No Entry'." He believes the Assembly is "moving in the wrong direction".
Responding to the criticism, the Assembly authorities say they have " sought to balance ease of access with the need to create a safe space for everyone working in and visiting Parliament Buildings". Shortly after Mitchel McLaughlin put out his statement officials started making preparations to change the sign from "No Entry" to "Visitors This Way".
Of course there is general acceptance that security had to be revisited after Michael Stone's unscheduled appearance in November 2006, however it's ironic that Parliament Buildings did not require a fence across the bottom of the steps throughout the troubles.
Inside the building we still have the restrictions on filming introduced after Sinn Fein's Mairead Farrell commemoration. It's hard to imagine many parliaments where the notion of interviewing a Committee chair or a minister in the privacy of their own room would be controversial, but that's the situation we are in. The original draconian restrictions, which threatened to take "Stormont Live" off air were relaxed, but many of the rules remain in place.
Some senior politicians believe that - set beside their avowed aim of increasing engagement - these rules bring the Assembly into disrepute. But not all seem to agree - the DUP's Alastair Ross just yesterday raised a point of order about whether filming for the BBC "Politics Show" within the Standards Committee and an interview with the Committee Chair Carmel Hanna had received proper clearance.
The "Politics Show" team say they went through all the necessary hoops. But let's say, for the sake of argument that they didn't. What a disgrace it would be that local TV viewers had actually been allowed a peek of a Stormont Committee going about its work and the Committee's chair explaining what it is considering!
Journalists like me complain that - in contrast to our counterparts in Edinburgh and Cardiff - we remain largely confined to the Stormont basement. That can make getting to and from Committee meetings awkward and cuts down on the level of "engagement" we can have with our politicians.
It's even worse for the representatives of local charities, business and professional groups, some of whom I chatted to at a conference last week. They talked about having to wait in the Great Hall in between engagements with MLAs or Committees unable to get so much as a cup of coffee.
Mitchel McLaughlin says "one of the first things we need to look at is the provision of a dedicated visitor's facility". The Assembly authorities agree saying that "in the longer term the Commission is also developing plans for dedicated visitor facilities at Parliament Buildings, including the possibility of a new building designed for that purpose".
Certainly a more easily accessible visitor's restaurant and an expanded version of the current Assembly shop would be an improvement. A new building might enable the construction of committee rooms fitted out with cameras which should, by definition, make Stormont proceedings more open.
However waiting for a new building could take a long time. If the Assembly wants to prove it really is committed to engaging with the public it needs to address the current overly restrictive environment in the short term.
I'm 
© MMIX~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~43~RS~)
Comments
Sign in or register to comment.
You would never know the BBC are faced with such difficulties at Stormont.
Congrats on a good job despite the petty rules that obstruct.
Complain about this comment
Dear Mark,
I would like to use this opportunity to put my opinion on the new security arrangements across.
I am a members (MLA’s) researcher and I also deal with any visiting groups that come to meet them. My opinions on the new arrangements are that they went way over the top, a hindrance to everyday staff and have simply taken a lot of character away from Stormont.
For example, one morning last week we were hosting an elderly group, for many it was there first, and probably going to be their only visit to Parliament Buildings. I met them outside as arranged, and they were genuinely excited. However when they were told they could not walk up the famous white steps they were a little perplexed to say the least. We preceded to go all the way round, through the new security hut and around 15 minutes later they were at the rotating doors, whereas before they would have been there in less than a minute. Many had wanted to take pictures of each other walking up the steps but when we eventually went all the way round the new fence, people thought it would look foolish and therefore they didn’t bother. There was quite obviously a change in their mood already. Although the their tour went well I couldn’t help but notice they were noticeably quieter now than when they were just getting off the bus. And then again on their way out they had to go through the long diversion. There weren’t many photos taken that day.
It’s a shame that the new security features have taken a lot of charm out of a visit to Stormont.
Complain about this comment
I am another member of staff here at the assembly and i agree with squintedeyes.
The over the top security regulations now have taken away some of the pleasure of visiting Stormont. Visitors are asked to make their way down to the "hut" to then come back up the hill to main door. This is just idiotic !
As a member of staff - we just have to pass through the hut. Our badges are not checked - this again is not done when we pass through the security at the side door. I have witnessed several pass members being waved through after the metal detector bleeps.
So how effective is this new system >?
No -one can now pass up and down the stairs. Photos on the main steps are now restricted.
What kind of experience are we offering to our visitors ? What about those vistiors who arent here for a tour but would just like to have their photos taken on the steps ?
Complain about this comment
I would like to go and watch the Assembly in motion and see different discussions and question time but the regulations say now that they basically don't want visitors. Why shouldn't the voters see for themselves the people they elected them representing them. It is like everything else. A Joke!!
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS