Advertisement
« Previous | Main | Next »

Council Jargon: Play with the words

Host_Ryan - One Show team | 13:29 UK time, Monday, 23 March 2009


Are you into your blue sky thinking? What does cross-fertilisation mean?

 

After all the coverage in the media about local councils cracking down on jargon, The One Show sent Melanie Sykes to discover what all the fuss was about.

 

Melanie spoke to Richard Stocke who devised the list of over 200 prohibited words. It's all part of helping staff to communicate effectively, according to The Local Government Association.

 

But how au fait are you with work jargon?

 

Play a quiz to test your knowledge here and let us know how you get on.

 

Plus: Melanie has come up with a game to monitor the jargon in your workplace; jargon bingo!

 

Download Melanie's jargon bingo game here.

 

Print off a copy of this table for each player. Check off each square when you hear those words during a meeting. The winner is first player to get a line of four horizontally, vertically or diagonally.

Comments

  • 1. At 7:08pm on 23 Mar 2009, dixmith wrote:

    I absolutely HATE the expression "Square the Circle".

    Complain about this comment

  • 2. At 7:10pm on 23 Mar 2009, artisticRobLines wrote:

    Very disappointing item - a symposium is not "just a meeting" - it has three distinct meanings, and the one Melanie referred to is actually a meeting with an audience.

    The whole subject seems a bit rich coming from TV when TV people are the very worst for jargon.

    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 7:11pm on 23 Mar 2009, Jozhik wrote:

    My favourite is - boundarylessness as in - "we require greater boundarylessness in our thinking"

    Complain about this comment

  • 4. At 7:11pm on 23 Mar 2009, adswindell wrote:

    Calling gas installation fitters engineers, very bad jargon, the BBC should know this......

    Complain about this comment

  • 5. At 7:12pm on 23 Mar 2009, artisticRobLines wrote:

    Rob Buckley, Worcester.
    Basically, this is people just complaining about new language (or new uses for old words) that they don't like. The whole system is self-regulating - if you use jargon that people don;t understand, people won't know what you're talkig about.

    What's the problem? Chilax!

    Complain about this comment

  • 6. At 7:13pm on 23 Mar 2009, DanFromSussex wrote:

    My pet hates:



    Design a strawman
    Elephant in the room
    Quick-Win
    Low Hanging Fruit


    Say everything in 6 words (or less). Gets rid of jargon easily!

    Complain about this comment

  • 7. At 7:14pm on 23 Mar 2009, shenpet wrote:

    The trouble with people who use jargon is they are intoxicated with the exuberance of their own verbosity. So there!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 8. At 7:14pm on 23 Mar 2009, gilberthill wrote:

    I hate the phrase "The first ... since....". As in "The first Irish Grand Slam since 1948" The win in 1948 means this cannot be the 'first'. Our Queen is the first Elizabeth since the previous one. Clearly a daft phrase but regrettably gaining popularity.

    Complain about this comment

  • 9. At 7:14pm on 23 Mar 2009, mixedupdolly wrote:

    My husband Alex works for Somerset County Council and comes home frequently with hideous jargonistic rubbish! Here are a few of his work expressions:

    joined up thinking
    golden thread
    complimentarity
    cross pollonation of ideas
    sign-posting
    clear blue water

    Dreadful!!

    Yours cringeingly,
    Rachel Sherman.

    Complain about this comment

  • 10. At 7:14pm on 23 Mar 2009, LouiseDee1218 wrote:

    As an English Literature student, I am fed up with "deconstructing" poetry and "unpacking" essay titles. I am absolutely dreading entering the workplace where it looks like I'll have a whole new list of jargon to learn.

    Complain about this comment

  • 11. At 7:17pm on 23 Mar 2009, simonjgriffithshr wrote:

    There are some ghastly expressions in use by various people (mainly, it seems sportsmen/sportswomen).

    However, the sentence which was (not quite accurately) translated to "we'll do more for less" was completely understandable anyway... Just because someone has gone to the length to explain something fully, rather than using a few words is not a bad thing. As I say, the 'translation' used doesn't actually mean the same thing.

    Defence Writing has a mantra that everything should be said in the most succinct manner possible - however, it must keep its full meaning and must retain accuracy.

    The comment about a new language was also laughable! Last time I checked, 'fulcrum' and 'interface' were in the English dictionary.

    By all means ensure that literature informing people of what they are entitled to should be written in as clear language as possible. That should not, under any circumstances, prevent policy literature from being written using the correct, technical language.

    It all seems to be another step towards the dumbing down the English language.

    Complain about this comment

  • 12. At 7:17pm on 23 Mar 2009, jerry56 wrote:

    How about eminent domain used in real estate in the USA wait for it it means Compulsory Purchase

    What's the link????

    Complain about this comment

  • 13. At 7:17pm on 23 Mar 2009, lordtup wrote:

    The one (amongst thousands) that really winds me up is when trying to get a point across I am met with "I see where you are coming from"
    On one memorable occasion having received this condescending retort for the third time from a jumped up little boy wonder I told him in no uncertain words where to go,to which he went looking thoroughly dejected.
    Victory for the clear speaking brigade.
    William of Newbury

    Complain about this comment

  • 14. At 7:17pm on 23 Mar 2009, emmab3101 wrote:

    If you take one word from each of the following list in order you can make any one of hundreds of meaningless sentences!!

    aggregate
    architect
    benchmark
    brand
    cultivate
    deliver
    deploy
    disintermediate
    drive
    e-enable
    embrace
    empower
    enable
    engage
    engineer
    enhance
    envisioneer
    evolve
    expedite
    exploit
    extend
    facilitate
    generate
    grow
    harness
    implement
    incentivize
    incubate
    innovate
    integrate
    iterate
    leverage
    matrix
    maximize
    mesh
    monetize
    morph
    optimize
    orchestrate
    productize
    recontextualize
    redefine
    reintermediate
    reinvent
    repurpose
    revolutionize
    scale
    seize
    strategize
    streamline
    syndicate
    synergize
    synthesize
    target
    transform
    transition
    unleash
    utilize
    visualize
    whiteboard


    24/365
    24/7
    B2B
    B2C
    back-end
    best-of-breed
    bleeding-edge
    bricks-and-clicks
    clicks-and-mortar
    collaborative
    compelling
    cross-platform
    cross-media
    customized
    cutting-edge
    distributed
    dot-com
    dynamic
    e-business
    efficient
    end-to-end
    enterprise
    extensible
    frictionless
    front-end
    global
    granular
    holistic
    impactful
    innovative
    integrated
    interactive
    intuitive
    killer
    leading-edge
    magnetic
    mission-critical
    next-generation
    one-to-one
    open-source
    out-of-the-box
    plug-and-play
    proactive
    real-time
    revolutionary
    rich
    robust
    scalable
    seamless
    sexy
    sticky
    strategic
    synergistic
    transparent
    turn-key
    ubiquitous
    user-centric
    value-added
    vertical
    viral
    virtual
    visionary
    web-enabled
    wireless
    world-class


    action-items
    applications
    architectures
    bandwidth
    channels
    communities
    content
    convergence
    deliverables
    e-business
    e-commerce
    e-markets
    e-services
    e-tailers
    experiences
    eyeballs
    functionalities
    infomediaries
    infrastructures
    initiatives
    interfaces
    markets
    methodologies
    metrics
    mindshare
    models
    networks
    niches
    paradigms
    partnerships
    platforms
    portals
    relationships
    ROI
    synergies
    web-readiness
    schemas
    solutions
    supply-chains
    systems
    technologies
    users
    vortals
    web services

    Complain about this comment

  • 15. At 7:17pm on 23 Mar 2009, pcl1977 wrote:

    I recently encountered the term "upskilling". Is there anything wrong with just saying training?

    Complain about this comment

  • 16. At 7:17pm on 23 Mar 2009, U7431AQ wrote:

    Wrt your jargon piece. I thought it unnecessary and we need a symposium to have meaningful consultation to facilitate a menu of options reflecting our core values. Using the evidence base, you can fast track funding streams to service users.

    This will require an multidisciplinary approach using seedbed and cross-fertilization methodologies to see our value-added base-lined value proposition actioned going forward .

    Complain about this comment

  • 17. At 7:18pm on 23 Mar 2009, artisticGareth wrote:

    It seems that that with this jargon nonesense that we all have to dumb down to accomodate the masses that did not pay attention to the education so freely given.

    if councils and other establishments choose to use
    ,what to most educated people is plain and correct english then good for them.

    This is Britain after all and English is our own language...dont dumb down...educate up...

    Complain about this comment

  • 18. At 7:18pm on 23 Mar 2009, icemmigit wrote:

    we make up our own words including diarise.

    My pet hate is acronyms, where I work we have so many you can write sentences using them. We even have our own dictionary running into tens of pages - of course that's civil service for you!

    Mark, Notts

    Complain about this comment

  • 19. At 7:18pm on 23 Mar 2009, mightymikeg wrote:

    One of my personal favourite jargon sayings is "elephant in the room" meaning the big problem neading to be resolved. Makes me laugh all the time

    Mike Garaven
    from Runcorn Cheshire

    Complain about this comment

  • 20. At 7:21pm on 23 Mar 2009, alfiethelab wrote:

    I have a word template that has 3 columns. Column 1 is a Verb, column 2 is an adjective and Column 3 is a noun. You basically take any word from column 1, then one from column 2, followed by one from column 3. It doesn't matter which line you pick, it comes up with something.

    Steve Johnson, Aberdeen

    verbs

    aggregate
    architect
    benchmark
    brand
    cultivate
    deliver
    deploy
    disintermediate
    drive
    e-enable
    embrace
    empower
    enable
    engage
    engineer
    enhance
    envisioneer
    evolve
    expedite
    exploit
    extend
    facilitate
    generate
    grow
    harness
    implement
    incentivize
    incubate
    innovate
    integrate
    iterate
    leverage
    matrix
    maximize
    mesh
    monetize
    morph
    optimize
    orchestrate
    productize
    recontextualize
    reintermediate
    reinvent
    repurpose
    revolutionize
    scale
    seize
    strategize
    streamline
    syndicate
    synergize
    synthesize
    target
    transform
    transition
    unleash
    utilize
    visualize
    whiteboard

    adjectives

    24/365
    24/7
    B2B
    B2C
    back-end
    best-of-breed
    bleeding-edge
    bricks-and-clicks
    clicks-and-mortar
    collaborative
    compelling
    cross-platform
    cross-media
    customized
    cutting-edge
    distributed
    dot-com
    dynamic
    e-business
    efficient
    end-to-end
    enterprise
    extensible
    frictionless
    front-end
    global
    granular
    holistic
    impactful
    innovative
    integrated
    interactive
    intuitive
    killer
    leading-edge
    magnetic
    mission-critical
    next-generation
    one-to-one
    open-source
    out-of-the-box
    plug-and-play
    proactive
    real-time
    revolutionary
    robust
    scalable
    seamless
    sexy
    sticky
    strategic
    synergistic
    transparent
    turn-key
    ubiquitous
    user-centric
    value-added
    vertical
    viral
    virtual
    visionary
    web-enabled
    wireless
    world-class

    nouns

    action-items
    applications
    architectures
    bandwidth
    channels
    communities
    content
    convergence
    deliverables
    e-business
    e-commerce
    e-markets
    e-services
    e-tailers
    experiences
    eyeballs
    functionalities
    infomediaries
    infrastructures
    initiatives
    interfaces
    markets
    methodologies
    metrics
    mindshare
    models
    networks
    niches
    paradigms
    partnerships
    platforms
    portals
    relationships
    ROI
    synergies
    web-readiness
    schemas
    solutions
    supply-chains
    systems
    technologies
    users
    vortals
    web services

    Complain about this comment

  • 21. At 7:21pm on 23 Mar 2009, coolmatt1616 wrote:

    Jargon

    Past jobs that you had and what you should write on your CV or say in an interview:

    Worked the deep fryer - Acted as a sous-chef in popular lunch venue

    Supermarket cashier - Coordinated order fulfillment

    Answered phones - Interfaced with clients

    Mowed lawns - Landscaped for private clients

    Made beds - Arranged accommodations for a hotel

    Dug ditches - Industrial waste facilitator

    Waited at tables - Managed client relations

    Babysat - Child development consultation

    Folded clothes in a department store - Sales associate in the garment industry

    Petrol station cashier - Auto mechanic's assistant

    Lifeguard - Health and safety supervisor

    Washed dishes - Restaurant critic

    Lifted boxes in a warehouse - Inventory manager

    Centrefold - Centrefold

    Complain about this comment

  • 22. At 7:21pm on 23 Mar 2009, 29Leigh wrote:

    My daughter has just informed me that she is no longer supposed to use the term "brainstorm" at work and that this should now be called a "thoughtshower"!!
    Apparently, "brainstorm" may offend people who suffer with epilepsy.

    Gwen, Blackpool

    Complain about this comment

  • 23. At 7:22pm on 23 Mar 2009, Bigclootie wrote:

    Following meaningful consultation, it has been decided to give further consideration to the menu of options so far agreed, and - going forward - facilitate a fast track approach which should provide a value added solution to the problem of combining various funding streams in such a way that a fast track evidence based solution for all service users will be achieved. This multidisciplinary approach will negate the
    future requirements to convene a further symposium on this topic, and the benefits gained from the cross fertilisation achieved should - when actioned - reinforce the core values we all hold. This meeting has proven to be a most effective seed bed, and we trust, the first of many to be held.

    Complain about this comment

  • 24. At 7:22pm on 23 Mar 2009, freebuoy wrote:

    There's an old army saying, " Bull***t baffles brains " . Rather relevant meethinks !!

    Complain about this comment

  • 25. At 7:24pm on 23 Mar 2009, Bigclootie wrote:

    Re message 23 - I forgot to mention that I wrote that in response to 'Melanie's challenge' on tonight's show. I hope it makes sense! : ))

    Complain about this comment

  • 26. At 7:24pm on 23 Mar 2009, dyofix wrote:

    As a new age fanatical viewer of the exhibition of the single digit, I have to state my hate expression of "Foot Fall"

    I think it has something to do with the number of passing people (shops?)

    Complain about this comment

  • 27. At 7:26pm on 23 Mar 2009, Isc006 wrote:

    Just a quick one, unfinished so far...

    This morning during a symposium I was lucky enough to have a Meaningful Consultation with several of my colleagues.

    At 1300 we broke for lunch which I took in the cafe sitting on a Benchmarking the finishing line where the great multidisciplinary Sir Roger Bannister completed his sub 4 min mile.

    Whilst looking through the menu of options I noticed the fillet of beef on a Seedbed with 50% extra free, "core value" I thought to myself that's some Value Added there. So having decided what to have I actioned this by going forward to the fast track aisle for priority service users which allows the cashier to facilitate a variety of funding streams. The whole encounter only took me five minutes so I had 55 minutes left to enjoy my lunch, EBCF I thought to myself or to those not in the know Evidence base cross fertilisation!

    Complain about this comment

  • 28. At 7:30pm on 23 Mar 2009, las_laszlo wrote:

    Jargon should be banned....its bad English. See letter below from Daily Telegraph :-

    Banning Jargon


    The following letter appeared in The Daily Telegraph, a few years ago, (from Stan Springate of London N20)


    Dear Sir,

    I am prepared to become a politician in order to get jargon banned by law.

    After all, at this moment in time, the way forward is a window of opportunity to bite the bullet, speak plainly and be minded to tell it like it is. Those who can't stand the heat of the kitchen should stay out of it. This is the way to take up the challenge and strike a chord with the man in the street in the bread and butter debate. The icing on the cake is to
    reach the hearts and minds out there.

    The up-coming scenario is an unknown quantity threatening meltdown of our society's goals, so we must be in the business of being positive and ensure a level playing field. Even then when we talk the talk it must be clear there is no gain without pain if we are to walk the walk.

    Only then can we go head-to-head to properly address all the issues of the big picture. Even as we speak, we must be prepared to put our hands up and be counted. For what you see is what you get.

    Make no mistake, at the end of the day we are between a rock and a hard place. The devil is in the detail, and the bottom line is we are facing a no-win situation. Reading between the lines the die is cast and, taken in the round, if we all sing from the same hymn sheet we can take on board the fact the goalposts can't be moved.

    On the ground we are a broad church but we must keep our eye on the ball so we can put a toe in the water while the jury is still out and then, by sampling the mood music under the radar, plan for the worst and hope for the best.

    Moving on, I am bound to say, hand on heart, we are deeply committed to winning the end game and we should rule nothing in and nothing out, even though in the final analysis we may well be damned if we do and damned if we don't.


    Yours faithfully,

    Complain about this comment

  • 29. At 7:38pm on 23 Mar 2009, Hoowie wrote:

    A politician, bureaucrat or manager who talks in jargon is asserting their power over you by making you look stupid.

    A politician, bureaucrat or manager who says there should be a 'plain English' policy is asserting their power over you by taking to you as though you are stupid.

    On the other hand if I need brain surgery, I wouldn't want the surgeon saying "Right, we'll chop the top of your head off and poke about in the grey gooey stuff inside. It's a bit like dipping soldiers in a soft-boiled egg."

    In short, it isn't language that's the problem if the language reflects a body of knowledge that is informed and useful, like a surgeon or a scientist would use. It becomes a problem if it's used to deliberately confuse or belittle someone by using complicated or simplistic language in order to head off a conversation.

    It's a no-brainer!!!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 30. At 7:39pm on 23 Mar 2009, sedge_42 wrote:

    I dislike "Deferred Sucsess". This means failing a test

    Complain about this comment

  • 31. At 7:40pm on 23 Mar 2009, freebuoy wrote:

    the fact that" all posts are reactively moderated" rather pushes home the point..... of course BBC you mean scrutinized !! (silly me !!)

    Complain about this comment

  • 32. At 7:43pm on 23 Mar 2009, newAl12345 wrote:

    'World class' (says who??!!)

    'Best practice'

    'Cradle to grave approach'

    'Core values'

    'park that idea in the corporate layby, but leave the engine running'

    'Enpower'

    'Impacted'

    'Our flight plan'

    "I was so close to the elephant all I could see was grey..."

    Anything that ends in 'solutions'

    Jargon like this is generally american, usually from yuppie bosses back from their hols there!

    Complain about this comment

  • 33. At 7:47pm on 23 Mar 2009, sedge_42 wrote:

    wht abt phn txt splng in eng lit
    :-(

    Complain about this comment

  • 34. At 7:57pm on 23 Mar 2009, doublegook wrote:

    'Doublegook' makes me cringe such as 'THESE ONES'

    The only time you need to refer to 'these ones' is if you are in a hardware store choosing a 'one' to screw on your door.

    Physicists look away - they may be able to dream up a logical use of 'ONE MOMENT IN TIME' but otherwise (aghhhhhhh!!!) if a moment isn't in time what/where is it?

    Complain about this comment

  • 35. At 8:08pm on 23 Mar 2009, me_n_her wrote:

    my pet hate is the word avail!! I live in Ireland & they use it for everything.....eg:: to avail of our sale, or to avail of this service..... arghhhh now there's a word

    Complain about this comment

  • 36. At 8:28pm on 23 Mar 2009, neil_pm wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 37. At 8:32pm on 23 Mar 2009, Mightymarra wrote:

    My favourite is TESTITULATEING.
    which relates to the rest,(talking a load of balls)

    Complain about this comment

  • 38. At 8:40pm on 23 Mar 2009, floridas wrote:

    My pet hates:
    downsizing
    growing the business

    Complain about this comment

  • 39. At 9:09pm on 23 Mar 2009, kiltedbrummie wrote:

    Am I the only person to have noticed that "ICON" and "ICONIC" are now in daily use by all the media when referring to: people,places,buildings,events,scenery etc.etc. It has become so irritating that I am now actually counting every time these words are used ,mostly inaccurately or inappropriately

    Complain about this comment

  • 40. At 9:52pm on 23 Mar 2009, Boxmaker wrote:


    OFFICIAL JARGON - NOTHING NEW.

    When I joined the Civil Service MANY years ago I was handed a copy of "Plain Words" by Sir Ernest Gowers, told to read it and take note of it's advice and guidance.
    It explained how to avoid the dangers of obscure phrasing and "officialese" - I don't think "jargon" was much in use in those days. It's contents were clear and to the point and supported by many pertinent examples.
    I strongly recommend that "modern" administrators search out a copy and circulate it widely,

    Boxmaker, Berkshire

    Complain about this comment

  • 41. At 10:36pm on 23 Mar 2009, floridas wrote:

    Why are so many statements or responses to questions prefaced with the words "in terms of" instead of just stating what they intend to say. Those in the media, politics and business are all guilty. It seems to be a relatively recent practice. Perhaps. like other "cool" imports from America such as
    "high guys" to mixed group, and "I know where you are coming from".
    Oh for the preservation of our beautiful language.

    Complain about this comment

  • 42. At 10:52pm on 23 Mar 2009, PetraKens wrote:

    You wanted all these words in a paragraph:

    It became clear at our recent Symposium that our Service Users felt we were not Going Forward in a way that provided for their needs, as a result of which we commissioned a survey so that we might Fast Track a Seedbed of Evidence Based ideas for Value Added services without losing our Core Values. We engaged in Meaningful Consultation with a Multidisciplinary team in order that we may obtain Cross Fertilisation of ideas and a Menu of Options was developed. We progressed to Benchmarking the best five options and further discussion is now taking place on how we may Facilitate Funding Streams to be made available so that these 5 ideas can be Actioned.

    Complain about this comment

  • 43. At 11:41pm on 23 Mar 2009, newimprovedcrookey wrote:

    It’s not too late to facilitate
    Value added, fast track, funding streams
    The cross fertilisation of meaningful consultation
    Is the core value of service users’ dreams.

    Jargon bashers keep harking about actioned benchmarking
    And an evidence based, multidisciplinary, seedbed
    Though such unthinking adoptions of this menu of options
    Is going forward to a symposium we’d dread.

    Complain about this comment

  • 44. At 01:03am on 24 Mar 2009, shaleshifter wrote:

    re jargon on the one show. what does pushing the envelope suppose to mean? also i hate incentivise the staff or workers.

    Complain about this comment

  • 45. At 09:08am on 24 Mar 2009, johnhuson wrote:

    We need to have a meaningful consultation in order to facilitate the core value of the project. The funding streams of the service users include value added benefits and the menu of options available should lead to cross fertilisation of ideas. Going forward in this way will lead to multidisciplinary measures and the benchmarking of the funds will be actioned in the next symposium. Our evidence base will rely solely on the seedbed of the project and the necessity to fast track it.

    Complain about this comment

  • 46. At 09:38am on 24 Mar 2009, Sal616 wrote:

    In reply to post 18, icemmigit - I agree, I hate accronyms, we've just added 'alphabet soup' to our profile document so it can be understood by anyone (we don't choose the acronyms they just happen).

    My favourite is making up new definitions of the accronyms - DCSF (Department for Children, Schools and Families) also known as Department of Cushions and Soft Furnishings or Department of Comedy and Science Fiction.

    With regards to Melanie's game - they forget to add the best bit! When you complete the card instead of shouting house you stand up and shout "B***s**t" - afterall it's B***s**t Bingo!

    I also hate it when people say "if you see what I mean" at the end of every sentence -of course we see what you mean! Grrr. We keep a tally on a certain person in meetings to see how many times they say it...

    Complain about this comment

  • 47. At 09:41am on 24 Mar 2009, Sal616 wrote:

    The above comment was from Sal in Leeds.

    Complain about this comment

  • 48. At 10:10am on 24 Mar 2009, Ronaldesque wrote:

    I remember when people used to have problems. Now they are "Issues"
    Do the people who use this new weasel word have any idea of its dictionary meanings?

    Ron
    Ruislip

    Complain about this comment

  • 49. At 10:17am on 24 Mar 2009, Esophagus wrote:

    I think the One Show has fast tracked the issue of jargon without meaningful consultation with service users and actioned this item in a purely evidence based manner in order to gain added value and boost their funding streams without regard to the core values we would expect from a professional multidisciplinary production team. An ideal way of going forward from this initial seedbed of ideas would be to host a symposium with an agenda focused around a whole menu of options aimed at getting back to core values and benchmarking standards showcasing the proper use of language. John from Ormskirk.

    Complain about this comment

  • 50. At 10:22am on 24 Mar 2009, Johnfrum wrote:

    I hate "people are like that"
    Also "I try not to dwell on things"
    additionally, "I put things behind me"
    and "life is to short"

    This is all irrelevant, because if an issue needs sorting it needs sorting; if it needs to be aired it needs to be aired. Basically these hypocritical ploys are merely to sabotage other people's conversation.

    A cliche comes from popular culture of some time or another, it is not absolutely true. We have become a nation of gibberers wh o have the nerve to tell the vulnerable to take more medication because the way they are talking.

    So, the walking upside down on the ceiling is the prweferred way for deckchairs top sausage the astral lightbulb on the wings of Icarus. Gibber, gibber, I'm a banana.

    John, Harrow

    Complain about this comment

  • 51. At 10:24am on 24 Mar 2009, Johnfrum wrote:

    I hate "people are like that"
    Also "I try not to dwell on things"
    additionally, "I put things behind me"
    and "life is too short"

    This is all irrelevant, because if an issue needs sorting it needs sorting; if it needs to be aired it needs to be aired. Basically these hypocritical ploys are merely to sabotage other people's conversation.

    A cliche comes from popular culture of some time or another, it is not absolutely true. We have become a nation of gibberers who have the nerve to tell the vulnerable to take more medication because the way they are talking.

    So, the walking upside down on the ceiling is the preferred way for deckchairs to sausage the astral lightbulb on the wings of Icarus. Gibber, gibber, I'm a banana.

    John, Harrow

    Complain about this comment

  • 52. At 10:28am on 24 Mar 2009, Sal616 wrote:

    I want to use Melanie's statement, that she made at the start of the piece, in a meeting and see what happens (I imagine not much because we are soo used to 'speak' in the council it washes over us). How many times have you asked what a word meant? Not many I bet, but do you do like I do and race back to the office to look it up to see if it made sense? I work with an organisation where the CEO talks of 'releasing the magic' (8 times in one speech).

    Complain about this comment

  • 53. At 11:14am on 24 Mar 2009, BerkshireBard wrote:

    Council jargon… easy!
    Try some of the IT world’s every day speak

    There’s a game I’d like you all to play
    Involving business lingo
    A variation on a theme
    I call it board room bingo

    With hearts and minds and souls you see
    We’ll join up all the dots
    And capture sayings as they come
    I’m sure you’ll find there’s lots

    Like focus on the rich and poor
    Forget the middle man
    Is that a statement I can hear
    Absolutely, Understand

    The gravitas it oozes class
    Designed quite chemically
    In broader context you may say
    It’s needs systemically

    With heavy lifting comes much stress
    Required to watch our backs
    Not be manoeuvred in long grass
    To paper over cracks

    The choppers in the car park sit
    They’re fuelled and set to fly
    But in the bigger picture
    They are really minutiae

    Compelling though events may be
    They change like cheese and chalk
    So as the leads at BBC
    We’ve got to walk the talk

    We have to sheep dip everyone
    In some systemic way
    To spread the message far and wide
    In granularity

    To motivate the troops we say
    Is aspirational
    The focus that our message gives
    Is perspirational

    Is it hard to flesh out new ideas
    With think tank and blue sky
    You’d think we’re shooting for the moon
    Or boiling oceans dry

    The rocket science may be old hat
    As times they have moved on
    Solutions are much simpler now
    Just like ol’ Janet and John

    But to your point I must address
    And highlight more besides
    The power point won’t answer back
    When I next talk to the slides

    Those conversations deviate
    We wander from the list
    It’s common place to lose the thread
    Go totally off piste

    But once you open up the silk
    Kimono’s from Japan
    You never know what lies ahead
    All sorts of things may happen

    When things are getting out of hand
    You think you’ve lost your stride
    Don’t worry, it’s for other folks
    In the next house to decide

    That leaves me with a couple more
    The sayings far and wide
    To prove that we all act as one
    And show we’re all onside

    I’d like to seek approval of
    A straw man poll to some
    The way we talk and say our piece
    As if we act as one

    Through visible, transparency
    Our message should be clear
    To set our goals with gusto
    And change up one more gear

    But one-cies, two-cies don’t mean much
    To the layman on the street
    Who finds it hard to sing along
    To the BBC board room beat

    The wolves at bay we need to keep
    And foe that breathe like dragons
    To save intrusion of our base
    We need to circle wagons

    This interlocking of our group
    Will make the others rant
    It’s hard to digest in one go
    A single elephant

    Though acting as a single voice
    Each unit casts its vote
    And all should sail their journeys course
    By steering their own boat

    And talking on a waters theme
    I’d like to make a wish
    That people who don’t grasp it yet
    We teach them how to fish

    There’s much out there we need to fix
    Indeed we must be seen
    To paint ourselves a deeper shade
    Of environmental green

    Not green as in the game of golf
    Though to that I’ll raise my cup
    For sometimes new initiatives
    We’ll need to tee them up

    But enough of this frivolity
    It’s time to turn the page
    The curtain closes on this scene
    And it’s time to leave the stage

    On a point of order I declare
    I’m not a cheat or louse
    But I know I have the winning card
    So I’ll end by claiming House

    Complain about this comment

  • 54. At 11:55am on 24 Mar 2009, galacticAliBee wrote:

    "Can you talk to that piece?" No ! But if you would like me to explain an agenda item then I would be happy to do so ;-)

    Complain about this comment

  • 55. At 12:06pm on 24 Mar 2009, Beadopinionist wrote:

    Why make up a load of gobbledegook when we have more words any our language than any other European language? Why hijack a perfectly good word and give it another meaning, thus diluting the original meaning? My pet hate is using the word 'slash' to describe the tiniy line used in computer addresses. 'Slash' is such a violent word, but it has been reduced by this description. This little line used to be called a stroke....much more fitting.

    Maria, Newcastle upon Tyne

    Complain about this comment

  • 56. At 12:34pm on 24 Mar 2009, rowsoft wrote:

    While discussing jargon, Adrian used the words "bêtes noires" to enquire the worst example of jargon. No need to ask really, "bêtes noires" is a definite candidate. Adrian is obviously trying to prove his intellectual superiority over anyone who has no knowledge of French. What a plonker!

    Complain about this comment

  • 57. At 1:44pm on 24 Mar 2009, NIblogger wrote:

    the growing use of the phrase "in terms of" is getting out of control!!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 58. At 2:19pm on 24 Mar 2009, norfolkwitch wrote:

    Basically, I really, really, absolutely hate all this blue sky thinking. I like to be on a level playing field without moving the goalposts. I hear what you're saying and I know that you see where I'm coming from but when we think outside the envelope we should all get into the clear blue water!

    Personally I wish the BBC would stop people saying 'haitch' instead of 'aitch' for the letter H and the pronunciation of communal (emphasis on the first syllable please),or even worse saying communial, really drives me mad.

    Spelling of license instead of licence, accomodation instead of accommodation - the list is endless - perhaps the BBC could put its own house in order.

    Complain about this comment

  • 59. At 4:45pm on 24 Mar 2009, terragardengirl wrote:

    I work for the NHS and as part of our CPD (Continuing Professional Development)
    I have to use something called the E-KSF (Electronic Knowledge and Skills Framework)tool to record and reflect on any training I have done. It is riddled with jargon and not very easy to use. I could probably have treated loads more patients in the time taken to try to understand it.
    There seems to be a notion that if it is easy to understand,it must be worthless. This is my theory why gobbledegook is so popular at the moment.

    Complain about this comment

  • 60. At 5:18pm on 24 Mar 2009, Dudeken wrote:

    A friend once said to me if you get into an argument and you seem to be losing, try the followng statment, "Ethicly speaking you are correct but ecnomicly you are totaly indefenceable" total rubbish but will not be questioned by the person in the argument in case they think that they do not what you are talking about, which you dont.

    Complain about this comment

  • 61. At 5:35pm on 24 Mar 2009, greylighthearted wrote:

    The one-show is allowed to go forward, by:

    a fast tracked, facilitated, multidisciplinary Symposium acting as a seedbed. After cross fertilisation and meaningful consultation, a menu of options is produced. Using evidence based benchmarking and considering core values and potential value add for targeted service users , funding streams are actioned.


    Simon
    Hertfordshire

    Complain about this comment

  • 62. At 5:50pm on 24 Mar 2009, geids1950 wrote:

    In response to your enquiry, please read the following which should clarify matters.

    We need to Facilitate a Multidisciplinary Symposium to allow for Meaningful Consultation about Going Forward allowing for the Cross Fertilisation, of ideas about the Evidence Base of the Value Added Funding Streams for Service Users and this should be Actioned to allow for the Benchmarking of the Core Values gleaned from the Seedbed of Ideas discussed at the Multidisciplinary Symposium and be included into our Menu of Options, this should allow for the outcomes from this load of gobbledygook to be placed onto the Fast Track and sent to the bin as soon as possible.

    Complain about this comment

  • 63. At 6:06pm on 24 Mar 2009, Ficazdad wrote:

    Perhaps we could organise a WEBINAR on this vexed topic.

    This Frankenstein monster of a word recently surfaced at the company I have just left..........


    Mike D

    St Albans

    Complain about this comment

  • 64. At 08:34am on 25 Mar 2009, k4thyB wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 65. At 9:56pm on 30 Mar 2009, jan1c3 wrote:

    Re: 29Leigh I suffer from epilepsy and I don't know how others feel, but I personally feel offended that the entire country has to change the way they speak in case they may offend me. I don't have "brainstorms" I have seizures.

    High time we got back to calling a spade a spade rather than a non-mechanical earth displacement facilitatator!

    Complain about this comment

  • 66. At 3:56pm on 01 Apr 2009, Johnfrum wrote:

    freebuoy: Bull does baffle brain. I am supposed to be a mensa level i.q., but my head as been muddled like a schizophrenic by all the mouthy games that were uttered to tie me up in knots so people could take advantage.

    Yes, jan1c3, I think it was a "brainstorm" I had, overloaded with rubbish that I could not get off my chest, owing to all the mind games from people I trusted. I accept, though, you have seizures. Brainstorms are commonly attributed to geniuses.

    It took a lifetime to clear my head; in the end I had to send open letters to the perpetrators and the police told me to just get on with my life when my parents died.

    Yes, those who played those games told me it was a fuss about nothing, but sent CID men after me when they got a taste of my own medicine.

    I was diagnosed as a psychotic because of all this. But I could not cope with those close responding to me with dwells, daft generics and boastful lies all the time, not to mention shouting abuse to stop me having my say.

    Complain about this comment

  • 67. At 3:58pm on 01 Apr 2009, Johnfrum wrote:

    freebuoy: Bull does baffle brain. I am supposed to be a mensa level i.q., but my head as been muddled like a schizophrenic by all the mouthy games that were uttered to tie me up in knots so people could take advantage.

    Yes, jan1c3, I think it was a "brainstorm" I had, overloaded with rubbish that I could not get off my chest, owing to all the mind games from people I trusted. I accept, though, you have seizures. Brainstorms are commonly attributed to geniuses.

    It took a lifetime to clear my head; in the end I had to send open letters to the perpetrators and the police told me to just get on with my life when my parents died.

    Yes, those who played those games told me it was a fuss about nothing, but sent CID men after me when they got a taste of their own medicine.

    I was diagnosed as a psychotic because of all this. But I could not cope with those close responding to me with dwells, daft generics and boastful lies all the time, not to mention shouting abuse to stop me having my say.

    Complain about this comment

View these comments in RSS

Explore the BBC

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.