Advertisement
« Previous | Main | Next »

What did you think of The One Show? Guest: Holly Johnson

Post categories:

The One Show Team | 13:41 UK time, Tuesday, 20 October 2009

Adrian and Christine with Holly Johnson

Adrian and Christine were joined in the studio by singer Holly Johnson.

It's been a year since the banks began to collapse on both sides of the Atlantic. Adam Shaw investigated the reports that it's boom-time for bankers once again.

At York Museum, Angellica Bell examined the skull of a woman who lived in the area, in the fourth century.

Lucy Siegle met a One Show viewer who had been burgled. However, their home contents insurer refused to payout claiming that they did not have the correct lock on their front door.

And Ellie Harrison visited a 'Priory for pets' in Dawlish, Devon.

What did you think of The One Show? Add your comment.

Comments

  • 1. At 7:17pm on 20 Oct 2009, highlandsbhoy wrote:

    So Hadrian's Wall kept out the wild tribes of the north. Funny how the BBC doesn't mind taxing their tax revenue though...

    Complain about this comment

  • 2. At 7:24pm on 20 Oct 2009, SPECTRUM13 wrote:

    Hi Adrian and Christine

    Love the show.

    Please let Holly that we think he looks really good, love the music



    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 7:24pm on 20 Oct 2009, hansa123 wrote:

    Hi ,
    Well, My Husband works for the very esteemed bank and I think its not fair on him, when He really work hard and I mean really work hard! and I can see its really stressful for Him ! he rearly sees his children everynight , they go to bed before he come in! and I think its not he or people who works to his level are not responsible for the fisco we face today its the top executives who made wrong decisions ?( who also get huge bonuses!!!) so why should he should suffer? for his hard work???

    Complain about this comment

  • 4. At 7:30pm on 20 Oct 2009, Gubbahgara wrote:

    Really enjoyed watching the show yet again. Useful advice on the locks for doors, really good to see Holly again after all these years, and what a lovely dog and yes I would pay £12,000 for my dog.
    Would it be possible to ask where Christene bought her dress as my husband thought it was lovley.
    Regards Elaine (Gubbah Gara)

    Complain about this comment

  • 5. At 7:33pm on 20 Oct 2009, hurrahforBenbenben wrote:

    Angelica was surprised, not only did a person of mixed race live and die in fourth century Roman York, but that person was not a slave! All this proves is her ignorance of British history. Of course people travelled around from one part of the Roman Empire to others. Could the One Show please raise its expectations of viewers' levels of intelligence to something above pre school levels?

    Complain about this comment

  • 6. At 7:34pm on 20 Oct 2009, lab-rat wrote:

    Must avoid the politics of envy after a video report full of the politics of envy. Frankie points to nurses pay but the average nurses pay as of Sep 08 was £31,600, well above national average. Nurse consultants start on a basic salary of £50k. Last year was the first year ever when several nurses earned over £100k.

    It is true that many junior nurses and doctors start on low pay but the same applies to many junior staff working in the City. If people don't want to be judged by the highest earners in their profession then they have to be careful not to demonise many low paid City workers because of the earnings of an elite minority.

    As for stress, we were all being told that should the banks collapse it would be the end of civilisation as we know it. How's that for stress! Even under normal conditions I'd be stressed trading in huge amounts of other people's money. The real issue is not how much is earned in bonuses but what the benchmarks are for earning bonuses, long term goals preferred over short term goals.

    Jan Moir clearly got her facts wrong even before you consider her a homophobe or not. It happens but the BBC aren't saints. When will the BBC discuss their demonisation of Israel and Jews as people who indiscriminately bomb women and children when even the UN has had retract its wild claims. What about the double standard on treatment between Carol Thatcher and Anton Du Beke.

    Complain about this comment

  • 7. At 7:34pm on 20 Oct 2009, Merovinci wrote:

    what was the video called where Holly Johnson was singing in ... it sounded good .... thanks people

    Complain about this comment

  • 8. At 7:34pm on 20 Oct 2009, djwhatsoccurin wrote:

    Very much a sense of deja vue tonight-I visited my bank today and have been a customer for many years-the staff still seem as smug and complacement as ever as though last year never happened-good work to be in though-do well and the bonus is yours-do badly and the taxpayer picks up the bill and pays you a bonus!
    Another insurance company playing the "heads we win tails you lose" game-the couple had not locked their inside door properly-you can guarantee that they could have locked the inside door and had a security man outside and they would have been told ,no payment because the outside door was not locked-also whats this special condition if the house had been burgled before-how do you know?
    On the bright side Chris looked lovely-has she been auditioning for "Chicago"

    Complain about this comment

  • 9. At 7:37pm on 20 Oct 2009, Minnie33 wrote:

    Why was Ellie wearing a very large CND (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) logo on her t-shirt on her report this evening? Maybe she just thought it was a pretty pattern? or is too young to know what it means? - or maybe the BBC is surreptitiously putting forward a political opinion? Does the BBC support CND?

    Complain about this comment

  • 10. At 7:40pm on 20 Oct 2009, darrylginns wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 11. At 7:50pm on 20 Oct 2009, thebaileyz07 wrote:

    I did not think it was appropriate for Adrian to make reference to homophobia being any more prevailant that racism. Watching Panorama yesterday is just an example of what is very much live in todays society.

    Complain about this comment

  • 12. At 7:51pm on 20 Oct 2009, kevin473 wrote:

    I fully agree with Minnie33 above. Why was Ellie wearing a CND logo T shirt. Adrian normally makes comments like there are other order shops when Holly mentioned Argos. In fact the presenters are so patronisingly PC in everything they say and do. A question, if people disliking gays are called homophobes then are gays disliking straights called heterophobes.

    Complain about this comment

  • 13. At 7:53pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    good evening...
    enjoyed the show tonight..
    labrat,,,do not think that holly johnson mentioned nurses at all,he compared with ambulance drivers and pointed out that they do not get vast amounts of money and asked if there was anything that causes more stress(than being an ambulance driver).
    the thought of the fat cat hooray henry LONDON BASED merchant bankers earning vast bonuses makes me feel sick,,it is not envy it is disgust.
    labrat if you think that most of the country is behind you on this one i think you are sadly wrong,but hey its about opinions.
    about jan moir...i buy the daily mail everyday,i also buy other papers as i try to keep up with events.
    i missed the article on the day but only found out about it from other papers and the internet.
    the writer and the mail should be ashamed,it was a shabby article and was only safe(in some ways) because as he is dead mr gately can take no action.
    to read the daily mail you wouldnt know anything was happening in the country about it.
    labrat-you never miss an opportunity to turn it about face and use it as a way to clobber the bbc,surprised you didnt find a way to link it to looney lefties and gordon brown.
    it was a disgusting article and she(moir) should be sacked.
    as for where did the dress come from(Gubbahgara,blog 4) it was supplied by JOHN HOLYER AND COMPANY a firm of designers that use the latin influence.........

    Complain about this comment

  • 14. At 7:55pm on 20 Oct 2009, Sumaghen wrote:

    I was concerned at Adrian's comments during his conversation with Holly Johnson about Stephen Gately and homophobia. He commented that racism was not a problem. To say is comment was ill thought through is an understatement. Did he not see the BBC's Panarama programme last evening. I think an apology to all of those who experience racism on a daily basis is in order.

    Complain about this comment

  • 15. At 7:57pm on 20 Oct 2009, astroplums wrote:

    #3 Hansa

    So your husband works hard. So do many of us, but we don't get bailed out by the taxpayer when we get it all wrong, we lose our jobs and the company goes to the wall.

    Most of the high earners in the banking system are just gambling other peoples money, something that any fool can do...over-rated and overpaid non-entities.

    Given what has happened in the banking system in the past couple of years, I think that Nick Leeson should be given a Queens pardon.

    Complain about this comment

  • 16. At 7:57pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    blog 14...watched the show but did not pick up on adrian stating racism "was not a problem".did he really state it in such simple and plain terms ?

    Complain about this comment

  • 17. At 7:58pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    astroplums .love your blog,,,agree 100%

    Complain about this comment

  • 18. At 8:02pm on 20 Oct 2009, secretrdw555 wrote:

    CND T shirts....see also Minnie33 7.37pm....I've complained officially to the BBC for this blaitant flout of political unbias.......or the intelligence of the reporter and feature producers! Take you pick of either.....

    Can't wait for Giles to wear a BNP T shirt ......as if !!!!

    come on BBC get your act together.......You are meant to be the Worlds Best!

    By the way the answer to the question is "Producers" remember J Ross! A Du Beke!

    Complain about this comment

  • 19. At 8:05pm on 20 Oct 2009, djwhatsoccurin wrote:

    14 and 16-just a bit of good news-BBC West reported tonight that the young boy, pretending to have a gun and the thug who hit the moslem reporter in the documentary last night have both been arrested-my view throughout that programme was that they were serious criminal offences and should be addressed-Southmead is a huge Bristol housing estate and has the tolerant, the intolerant and groups of teenagers who think they own the place, the same as anywhere else.

    Complain about this comment

  • 20. At 8:15pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    secretrdw555........CND,,something from our past really.
    the name says it all,they campaign to rid the planet of something that could destroy the entire planet in seconds.
    if that is the wrong view to have lets not be upset if iran continues to develop weapons of mass destruction.
    myself i say lets get shut of the lot of them.

    Complain about this comment

  • 21. At 8:15pm on 20 Oct 2009, regdodniffoC wrote:

    Although we normally really enjoy The One Show, tonight we were sickenened by Adrian and Christine fawning over Holly Johnson as
    though he were royalty or something special! He is no more special than any of us, be we hetrosexual, white/black, male/female, Christian/Muslim, or in any other of the pigeon holes society likes to put us in! We thought it helped create a very bad example of this societys inequality, where hetrosexuals and the value of marriage between hetrosexuals have been trodden into the mud and others elevated to a higher status! We don't agree with the hysteria over Jan Moir, for somebody to die as Stephen did, is not natural, whatever his sexuality, which has nothing to do with it! Jo & Phil

    Complain about this comment

  • 22. At 8:19pm on 20 Oct 2009, charlieneve wrote:

    The female reporter wearing a CND log T shirt is out of order in the BBC rules of unbiased reporting. To blatently wear a logo emblazended T shirt of a political movement, anti governmental and unpopular in the main, is not in the spirit of the BBC which is fudned by the tax paying public. This article was not political, had no reason to show this logo and was insnesitive to the military, political and public sector workers. THe BBC editor of this article should have realised the insensitivity the wearing of such a shirt would have on memebers of the general public. The niaivity of the reporter is no excuse for the incompetence of the editorial staff of the OB article.

    Complain about this comment

  • 23. At 8:21pm on 20 Oct 2009, albertleefizz wrote:

    Aaaarrrg! Relax? No way. Liked the new version of the song Relax but can't find it on any legal download site. Plenty of illegal ways to get the tunes, but I want to buy it legally! Anyone there to help me out?

    Complain about this comment

  • 24. At 8:25pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    regdodniffoC...blog 21...i did not think adrian and christine were any more fawning than usual.
    it is amazing that we even have to read someone thinking it is due to his sexuality.
    do you really think the presenters being friendly allows you to read so much into it and to make such sweeping statements?
    according to what we know IT WAS A NATURAL DEATH,,,that does not mean that there was nothing wrong with him it means he had an underlying heart condition that caused his death,a natural thing in his body.
    if you know something i do not...ie that something he was doing contributed to it then state clearly what that was.
    if not shut up. moir made it seem like it had something to do with his lifestyle.
    you do not understand what a natural death conclusion is or you are just ignoring it to make a jaundiced case.

    Complain about this comment

  • 25. At 8:27pm on 20 Oct 2009, GAZ911 wrote:

    I'm sure some people just watch the one show so they can find something to get offended by.

    Complain about this comment

  • 26. At 8:29pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    Gaz911 .. i am offended by your blog...only kidding

    Complain about this comment

  • 27. At 8:29pm on 20 Oct 2009, astroplums wrote:

    Adrian said that he felt racism wasn't such a problem in Schools now, but that homosexuality may still be.

    I don't think he suggested that racism wasn't a problem per se.

    Complain about this comment

  • 28. At 8:30pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    astroplums.thats how i remember it but some people hear what they want to hear...

    Complain about this comment

  • 29. At 8:30pm on 20 Oct 2009, wigglediggle wrote:

    Well tonight a mix bag cnd tshirts racism silly adrian sort it out. Didnt he hear of the burkes comments etc also is christine hoping for another spot on sickly come dancing. And can adrian and chritine get a room any closer and she will be on his lap.

    Complain about this comment

  • 30. At 8:34pm on 20 Oct 2009, wigglediggle wrote:

    Also a dig at the bankers again pointless most of us already now that the bonus culture wouldnt go which ever govermnets in the bankers and people in power always win. Just pointless gestures was that put in for the producers to feel close to the people who pay the licence fee for there amazing wages. But I dont see that as a coming one show artical tommorow what we pay christine and adrian lol dont think so some how.

    Complain about this comment

  • 31. At 8:35pm on 20 Oct 2009, GAZ911 wrote:

    Re 27 I think he ment homophobia in schools not homosexuality.

    Complain about this comment

  • 32. At 8:36pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    wigglediggle ..good comment,when MP EXPENSES was in the news the one show talked about it,,BANKERS BONUSES..the same the one show talked about it ,but when BBC PRESENTERS PAY was in the news NO MENTION ON THE SHOW..

    Complain about this comment

  • 33. At 8:43pm on 20 Oct 2009, astroplums wrote:

    #28 HokeyK

    Thanks.

    Problem with comments on the show seem to be split with some, rightly, commenting on the subject of the pieces, whilst other folk seem to be unable to stop criticising the presenters or contributing presenters in quite a vitriolic way.

    Yes, I have occasionally been critical of Christine's garb, but hopefully not in a vicious way, but some seem unable to stop themselves from having a pop at A&C just for the sake of it.

    Anyway, I have a cold just now, so no reason for Christine not to have one.

    Complain about this comment

  • 34. At 8:45pm on 20 Oct 2009, astroplums wrote:

    #31 Gaz911

    You're right. I stand corrected

    Complain about this comment

  • 35. At 8:45pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    regdodniffoC BLOG 21...on 16/01/09 you said on this blog...."I think the one show gets better and better, has a very interesting range of subjects and is very informative. Please don't change anything. It's one of my favourite shows and
    leaves a real blank when it's not on! ATB
    Phil [ almost famous ] Granger"
    not so impressed now eh !!
    still waiting for your medical facts.or like moir do you also work in the rumour industry?

    Complain about this comment

  • 36. At 8:47pm on 20 Oct 2009, watchingone wrote:

    25 - agreed. 27 & 28 - agreed again - he said kids in school dont seem to call each other names based on race (although granted Im sure there are places where this happens) but they may still use derogatory terms based on homophobia. I agree as my nephew's friends at school were definitely using the term gay as a derogatory term, probably before they even had a clue what it meant. The offence over the article on Gateley was the nasty assumption that his death was related to his lifestyle, before the results of the medical examination had been made public.

    Complain about this comment

  • 37. At 8:48pm on 20 Oct 2009, djwhatsoccurin wrote:

    32-very true but can you imagine this conversation
    Adrian-did you see Jenson Button in that merc today-I can easily afford that with the wonga I earn.
    Chris-I thought your ex-wife had cleaned you out-anyway I have to pay out for my dresses-I dont get them from Matalan you know.
    A-fair enough-meal after the show-see you at the Ritz
    Loadsamoney!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 38. At 8:49pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    watchingone.read blog 21 and you would believe it was based on medical fact !!!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 39. At 8:50pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    37,,,,like it...

    Complain about this comment

  • 40. At 9:59pm on 20 Oct 2009, regdodniffoC wrote:

    hokeykokeyalex, You made exactly my point! There was only any fuss over Jan Moir's article because Stephen was a homosexual! If he had been an English, white, Christian, heterosexual, no comment would have been made about Jan Moir! These divisions in our society have been made so as to close down any comment or discussion. As for my previous great admiration of the One Show, it still stands, but it would be childish to suppose I can agree with everything and write them a blank cheque! By the way, grow up!

    Complain about this comment

  • 41. At 10:01pm on 20 Oct 2009, letsallbesensible wrote:

    I had to change channels - again. What answer did Mr Childs expect from Holly Johnson ? - he obviously wasn't going to defend or support Jan Moir. He got the one sided 'balanced' answer he and I expected. Then we had the biased, one sided City report on bonuses. How about a feature comparing Mr Child's and Ms Blakely's pay packets to ordinary television licence payers' - I bet everyone thinks they're reeeal value for money !!

    Complain about this comment

  • 42. At 10:15pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    regdodniffoC.fact...moir only wrote the article BECAUSE he was a gay man.
    if he was a "straight" man she wouldnt have wrote the article,,,did you read it?
    did you understand it?
    as with most people that cannot see the difference between fact and fiction they then resort to insult,,"grow up"...is it because i asked you to justify the facts and that you cannot.
    put up or shut up.
    do you know something that the medical investigation team does not?
    please do educate us.
    i go back to your comments on "the fuss"
    can you tell me your opinion"truthfully" on people who have differing sexual preference,ie same sex relationships?
    do you have a problem with them?
    you commented "There was only any fuss over Jan Moir's article because Stephen was a homosexual! If he had been an English, white, Christian, heterosexual, no comment would have been made about Jan Moir! " .
    i say again if he was white,straight and not living a good life as a popstar moir wouldnt have written the article..why mention his sexuality????..she is the newspaper version of a shock jock....still lets not cause any fuss eh?
    i ask you again was the death a natural death?
    or do you not understand the question?

    Complain about this comment

  • 43. At 10:20pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    regdodniffoC.re "close down any comment or discussion".....in what way am i closing it down.
    i have a view,you have yours ,i ask for facts not rumour and you respond telling me to grow up.
    are you saying his sexuality and lifestyle was the major factor in the way he died and that it was a death that was not natural....answer please ??????

    Complain about this comment

  • 44. At 10:27pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    reading blog 21 more in depth i can see where you are coming from...
    you are the typical daily mail reader i am sure,if you are not i am sorry.
    i believe your point is that gay people have a status because of the media that has elevated them above "straight" people who have a husband or wife,have a house and mortgage and 2,4 children.
    i also believe that you believe that black people and non christians also have an elevated status above us good white straight christians.
    how do i arrive at this,,,well you may well be ms.moir with all the hidden meanings and thrown in descriptions of whites and blacks etc.
    opinions like that disgust me.
    will we get the answer to the questions i ask of you...or more throw away rumour????

    Complain about this comment

  • 45. At 10:30pm on 20 Oct 2009, regdodniffoC wrote:

    hokeykokeyalex, My,my you do get yourself into quite a lather! Like so many others, what you read into Jan Moir's article seems to be affected by your obvious point of view and not by rational thought! You have been arguing against yourself and a lot of the information you ask for is not relevant to the argument. You are not my judge, to decide what my opinion should be, so as I said GROW UP!

    Complain about this comment

  • 46. At 10:34pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    regdodniffoC.are you an MP?
    EXACTLY WHERE DO YOU STAND?EVERYWHERE!!!
    SORYY FOR SHOUTING.
    it is very easy to use put down comments like"you get yourself in a lather" but not so easy to put facts.
    you atated his death is not natural....why,,,lifestyle,sexuality?
    or are you so much a coward you will not say what you really think?
    i am not your judge,you are entitled to your opinion but if you comment and put comments that can be questioned (ie little things like facts) then expect to be asked for answers.
    non yet forthcoming.
    are you related to ms moir?

    Complain about this comment

  • 47. At 10:43pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    "what you read into Jan Moir's article seems to be affected by your obvious point of view" writes regdodniffoC in blog 45 ,,,my goodness that just about covers all of the population possibly just not you though.
    you appear to be blessed with the moral high ground that allows you to see the real article for what it is and allows you to see it rational way.unlike as you say "like so many others".
    you say i am arguing against myself...but again do not back anything up.
    i do not know the ins and outs of this terrible loss.
    but i do not know more than the medical team...
    please tell me in what way his sexuality and lifestyle contributed to his death?
    please tell me that if it is all "fuss" why did ms. moir highlight the sexual preference and lifestyle and state that there was nothing natural about the death.
    i have no problem with gay,straight,white,black,christian in fact most law abiding people.
    where do you stand?
    or will you just not answer again and tell me to grow up????

    Complain about this comment

  • 48. At 10:47pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    well sorry to say my mum says i have to go to bed now....8 hours beauty sleep to help my growth.
    look forward to some telling answers when i next log on.
    bloggers please do read the comments from regdodniffoC and consider whether he(like me) has a biased opinion,,,,,,,,,i admit i am biased against bigots.
    not that in the style of ms.moir would i suggest anybody is one.

    Complain about this comment

  • 49. At 10:47pm on 20 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    goodnight all bloggers....

    Complain about this comment

  • 50. At 10:49pm on 20 Oct 2009, regdodniffoC wrote:

    hokeykokeyalex, You really are losing it aren't you! I've seen your comments about everything and everybody else on this page and you seem to imagine you are some sort of supreme being whose opinion is superior to everybody elses and you're also extremely rude! You're not Tony Blair, are you? I'm suprised the BBC allows such rudeness and by the way does you're mummy know you are still up and using the computer at 10:50?

    Complain about this comment

  • 51. At 10:35am on 21 Oct 2009, Nucleon wrote:

    Adrian and Christine's fawning over that dreadful fellow Johnson was downright embarrassing. Jan Moir's excellent article was giving her point of view, something that is not encouraged by the oh so PC BBC unless it corresponds to their PC ideology.
    As for the "Relax" T-shirts worn by the crowd in the background, what if one of the crew had refused to wear one. Would that person have been fired by BBC's PC Police?
    "Relax" one of the greatest pop songs of all time????? More like one of the worst pieces of putrid garbage of all time!!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 52. At 10:51am on 21 Oct 2009, highland fling wrote:

    Post 50 !!Cant stop laughing brilliant!oops I always get told off for exclamation marks ,and of course if I like the show, or the presenters ?there are so many people who just have to pick everything to bits on here . God I would hate to be in the public eye, you just cant win!Christine was seen with another guy folks and it was not Adrian !funny how Mail always pictures them together, but never when they are seen with othere people?

    Complain about this comment

  • 53. At 10:53am on 21 Oct 2009, highland fling wrote:

    Jan Moir was not the only journalist who made the same comments , so strange she was picked on ?

    Complain about this comment

  • 54. At 12:01pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    regdodniffoC ..........anyone reading the blog please note that the coward that is regdodniffoC did not back up comments with any facts.
    regdodniffoC .....a patronising blogger.
    regdodniffoC ..... a blogger that can only further rumour and does not have the guts to be clear about what they mean.
    highland fling,,i note your comment in blog 53 and believe it as you are an honest person.
    if i have been RUDE then i say sorry.
    perhaps now you will come forward with those facts ?????
    regdodniffoC .the man who described himself as "almost famous"...

    Complain about this comment

  • 55. At 12:10pm on 21 Oct 2009, jwelshman wrote:

    I am now 73 years old and at the age of 16 I was taught, at my local grammar school, to read all newspapers and then reach my own conclusions. These newspapers, available in the school library, went from the "Daily Worker" to The Times (then a serious newspaper and not the present rag following blindly the instructions of its owner).However to reach one's own conclusion that meant having a modicum of intelligence. Something that seems to be lacking throughout the BBC hence their too often one sidedness. Discussion and divergence seems to be forbidden.

    Complain about this comment

  • 56. At 12:17pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    Nucleon.......jan moir asked people who were critical of the article if they had read it. can i ask you the same?
    i ask because i missed it and read it later when i heard of the "fuss".
    if giving a point of view goes over a boundary and is downright wrong then the view or opinions of that person have to be looked at .
    i will not go into the rubbish that was in it but i ask do you think it was right to bring up lifestyle and sexuality(as if there was something wrong with it) and to state it was not a natural death was justified.
    would you be happy reading opinions that people who "rightly killed jews" was justified ?or do you agree boundaries have to exist?
    the comment i put about jews is not my opinion and would rightly be seen as disgusting and wrong.
    my opinion is jan moirs comments are the same.
    opinion can go too far...
    about RELAX...MORE THAN JUST A SONG,YOU HAD TO BE PART OF IT,THE TIME AND THE LIFE.
    from a happily married(27 years) man who is white,straight,doesnt drink or smoke,has one kid,2 grand children and is tolerant of people that are not the same as me...........
    and i read the daily mail...

    Complain about this comment

  • 57. At 12:22pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    jwelshman ... but surely they raised the issue and did not put words in holly johnsons mouth ?
    i do not think the one show is the forum for the topic but "hey "thats what they do.
    the daily mail has buried the story......and if anything happens to jan moir and she has to retract it will be hidden somewhere under an advert for a stairlift or cruise and not prominant as it should be.
    as for the papers after 73 years you must realise they all write what the owners want to hear !!!!!
    do you really think that has changed?

    Complain about this comment

  • 58. At 12:32pm on 21 Oct 2009, regdodniffoC wrote:

    hokeykokeyalex, Oh dear, he's got his head out his backside and is off again! He seems to think he either owns this site, or is in control of it! He's calling me every name under the sun [that's why I called him childish!] and he doesn't even know me, know what I think, how I live, what I believe and then expects to take the moral high ground as far as rational thought is concerned! I don't think so! Go back to school and learn some manners, proper debating skills and how not to make an ass of yourself, sonny!

    Complain about this comment

  • 59. At 12:47pm on 21 Oct 2009, astroplums wrote:

    Come on guys, calm down.

    HokeyK, the more you demand an answer the less likely it is to happen.

    No matter how much we disagree with someone else's point of view, in the end we just have to accept our differing opinions.

    Today is another day, lets see what the show brings up tonight and lets hope poor Christine has been applying the Vick liberally.

    Complain about this comment

  • 60. At 12:51pm on 21 Oct 2009, Nucleon wrote:

    Nr 56
    I did indeed read the article.

    "if giving a point of view goes over a boundary and is downright wrong"

    Who lays down the demarcation lines?

    "then the view or opinions of that person have to be looked at".

    How very reminiscent of Germany circa 1930s/40s

    "right to bring up lifestyle and sexuality"

    There are aspects of certain lifestyle and sexuality that a vast number of people find abhorrent but many of these people are being forced into accepting it by a Government that does not only seem to be promoting it but almost making it "compulsory" with the BBC being used as it's all too willing forelock tugging PC tool.

    RELAX...MORE THAN JUST A SONG,YOU HAD TO BE PART OF IT,THE TIME AND THE LIFE.

    Unfortunately I was and thought the song was a load of drivel even back then.

    Complain about this comment

  • 61. At 2:02pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    astroplums...you are right,,,how very adult to say things like "head out of backside" and "ass of yourself sonny".
    you are right the more i ask for an answers the less likely we are to get them,,,mostly because the truth would state exactly where regdodniffoC stands. time to move on...
    nucleon...you ask "Who lays down the demarcation lines?"
    answer,in my opinion the society of good taste.
    if opinions of people do not get "looked at" then we end up with people like nick griffin free to become members of the european parliament.
    How very reminiscent of Germany circa 1930s/40s.
    which part of life/sexuality have you been forced by the government into accepting,something made compulsory by the government ?
    very intersted

    Complain about this comment

  • 62. At 3:05pm on 21 Oct 2009, jadedoldie wrote:

    post58, are you new to the blog, I ask this as you don't seem to realise that while bloggers here often differ we manage to do so without resorting to unpleasantness. I have no wish to offend you, but perhaps a gentler approach to discussion would help?

    Complain about this comment

  • 63. At 4:14pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    jadedoldie .........words of wisdom.but we expect no less from you

    Complain about this comment

  • 64. At 4:23pm on 21 Oct 2009, TerryS wrote:


    The arrogance, greed and selfishness of the bankers interviewed on last night's 'One Show' was staggering - have these grossly overpaid people no shame? Do they not realise that because of their actions large numbers of their fellow citizens have lost their jobs, had their savings decimated and now face severe cuts in government and council services? The rest of the population will be paying for the bankers' folly for a generation, yet the bankers have the audacity to whinge and whine that they "deserve their bonuses". Like hell they do! Sandi Toksvig, the chairman of BBC Radio 4's 'The News Quiz', was correct when she said, "Bankers should regard it as a bonus that they have not been lynched." Very true.

    The Government should force bankers down to Earth with a very big bump. It should impose a substantial windfall tax on both the banks and bonus payments to staff. In future, the average of bonuses in the banking sector should not be allowed to exceed the average of bonuses paid across all other sectors of the British economy - after all the former produce no wealth themselves, their wealth is entirely dependent upon the wealth generated by those industries and businesses that genuinely produce an end product. Banking is not an end in itself, it is just a means to an end. It should be the servant of the rest of the economy (as it once was), not vice versa. The banking sector has a grossly over-inflated opinion of its own importance and worth, and the levels of salaries and bonuses paid are totally unjustified.

    The chairman of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), Lord Turner, was entirely correct when he described much of what modern banks do as "socially useless" - far too many bankers are essentially economic parasites who have contrived a system that allows them to skim off money from the profits of genuinely useful industries (for example, through ludicrous schemes such as 'micro-trading' etc). The banks should be split up to separate their core business (borrowing and lending) from riskier practices ('casino banking'), as stated by the Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King. The entire City of London is too big and powerful and needs to be reined in so that it acts in the interests of the country as a whole and not just in the interests of its members.

    Complain about this comment

  • 65. At 5:00pm on 21 Oct 2009, highland fling wrote:

    Does anyone else find the blogs some nights are more interesting than the show?

    Complain about this comment

  • 66. At 5:07pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    TerryS....blog 64.
    what an excellent blog.
    i listen to a radio station on a morning called talksport.
    on the alan brazil show they have a financial "expert" called henk potts.he is what i describe as the hooray henry champagne swilling london placed bankers .
    he works for barclays wealth.
    if you listen to him he regularly plays up the high life,see's nothing wrong with big bonuses as he says that the banks are generating the wealth of our nation.
    he enjoys travelling the world and entertaining people with the money of barclays because he knows they make vast profits.
    as long as share holders make a good return he is happy to get huge bonuses.
    he is so out of touch........
    we need a fairer banking system for all,i have no problem with more state control in what is such an important sector.
    bonuses above a certain amount should be taxed at 75% and should the bank or financial institution within 3 years return a loss then the money should be returnable or "clawed back"......short term profit can earn huge bonuses yet losses do not see negative salary clawbacks,,,why ????
    the system allows reckless banking - we need to see wealth distrubuted throughout the country,,,not just canary wharf

    Complain about this comment

  • 67. At 5:08pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    highland fling.i do highland fling,,i do

    Complain about this comment

  • 68. At 5:14pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    highland fling.i have strong opinions,like everyone i have no devine right to be right.
    we have not always seen eye to eye...but i have found you honest and have never had to press you for answers you will not give and i do not call people cowards without much thought.
    it is just SOME PEOPLE say things then just resort to blanking tactics and insults.
    i believe we have people writing on this blog with extreme right wing views that hate gay people and think they can get away with using the "lifestyle" comment as a cover all term.
    i am not gay,,,i do not have a vast amount of gay friends and do not have a particular agenda.
    i just hate bigots..............

    Complain about this comment

  • 69. At 5:25pm on 21 Oct 2009, jadedoldie wrote:

    Post 65,highlandfling, only on the odd occasion [5 nights a week], the only reason for watching the show[apart from aged old relative who has a hissy fit if we don't]is to participate in the blogging later! Sorry nicked one of your exclamation marks, lol, but I really needed it then.

    Complain about this comment

  • 70. At 5:47pm on 21 Oct 2009, highland fling wrote:

    Do you think One Show will discuss BNP appearing on Question Time ?should be an interesting subject to discuss on blogs ?will get my hard hat ready in case !could not resist a little !lol

    Complain about this comment

  • 71. At 5:54pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    highland fling ......it will probably be raised after the show has aired.
    it will be the usual way.....a quick summary adrian style and ask the guest who only wants to flog a book to comment..
    they will mumble a 12 word reply then adrian will tell us we are off to dorset to hear about lesser spotted frogs learning to walk again after road accidents.......then we see the same lisping suspects tell us that spiders are interesting

    Complain about this comment

  • 72. At 5:55pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    didnt mention london ONCE !!!!!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 73. At 6:02pm on 21 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    cannot blog tonight,out working.then tomorrow off to dog training classes so happy blogging,,,will read your comments

    Complain about this comment

  • 74. At 6:57pm on 21 Oct 2009, regdodniffoC wrote:

    jadedoldie, You must be a friend of alex, the evidence of the correspondence shows he became insulting, was ranting, was making false assumptions about me and lost it! That's why I supplied no more information so it could be distorted to suit his point of view!
    You're very perceptive! The tongue in cheek [almost famous] refers to the fact I'm a very well known letter writer and I'm afraid a lot of the ranting from alex wouldn't even make the paper. This is my first try at blogs and if this the standard of discussion to be expected, then
    it is my last!

    Complain about this comment

  • 75. At 7:01pm on 21 Oct 2009, highland fling wrote:

    Cant believe they are talking about BNP??amazing!tonight

    Complain about this comment

  • 76. At 7:03pm on 21 Oct 2009, highland fling wrote:

    Post 74 dont go we need people like you!

    Complain about this comment

  • 77. At 7:36pm on 21 Oct 2009, regdodniffoC wrote:

    Highland fling,
    Thank you for being the sole person to support me against the rude, abusive and uncalled for hectoring by alex. Do you have a problem with him assuming only his view is of any value and that he runs the page? Maybe he should be renamed jiminy Cricket as he wants to be everybodies conscience! Is this the normal way of blogs, or is it possible to have a sensible discussion without people going off on one?
    Thanks again for a welcome in what appears to go between being either a hostile club, or the usual apathy we expect from the British.

    Complain about this comment

  • 78. At 9:05pm on 21 Oct 2009, jadedoldie wrote:

    post 74, I am never influenced by friedship in any comment I may make.
    I regret having addressed you in a polite and respectful manner, I will not make the mistake of taking you for a gentleman again!
    By the way, I have never met Alex, in fact we have locked horns on many an occasion,but he does not descend to pitiful name calling! How sad you will not be joining us again.

    Complain about this comment

  • 79. At 9:06pm on 21 Oct 2009, jadedoldie wrote:

    * friendship*

    Complain about this comment

  • 80. At 10:27pm on 21 Oct 2009, jonty1602 wrote:

    Although I do enjoy the show, I wonder if Adrian Chiles would agree that it's a bit rich him talking about "the politics of envy" (regarding bankers bonuses) when he (and the others) are worth a small fortune...

    Complain about this comment

  • 81. At 11:01pm on 21 Oct 2009, serjanus wrote:

    Nick Griffin for PM!

    Complain about this comment

  • 82. At 10:22am on 22 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    regdodniffoC .i suppose what you like about letter writing is that it is not interactive,you can suggest an untruth and it isnt really questioned.
    the blog is supposed to be friendly but from time to time it gets a little heated.
    if you cannot cope with that go back to the safe option of writing to the daily mail..they love white straight males who live in the south east and would bring back hanging for people who do not conform to the "norm".
    regarding jadedoldie,,,as she says i have had many a verbal scrap.
    i do not want to get into the name calling,your names have been silly ones where as i have tried to confine to specific terms that describe,,if i have been wrong then sorry.
    but that is debate,,,when you do not like what is put you hide behind a load of made up reasons.
    i will not ask you to answer the specific points as it is obvious you will not answer.
    i hope you stay with the blog,,,i think in a rather different way - the british are great but you insult them ALL.
    I WOULD RATHER THINK YOU PREFER THE "USUAL BRITISH APATHY" you claim. then you can write your famous letters and nobody will question them.
    myself i would rather be honest and put my points to the test of public scrutiny whether i agree or disagree with the great british public.
    highland fling and i also do not agree all the time .
    you mention that i am not very good at debate but say you are a famous letter writer,my opinion is that a letter writer does not enter into a debate,they write and do not have to respond and justify what they have said...ummhhh thinking about that point i am sure you are a very good letter writer.
    i await your next round of insults...
    but please do stay with us...i have enjoyed it.

    Complain about this comment

  • 83. At 10:22am on 22 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    jadedoldie..i consider you my blog friend and i am proud of that....

    Complain about this comment

  • 84. At 12:16pm on 22 Oct 2009, jadedoldie wrote:

    hokeycokeyalex, I would consider you to be an ether friend also, and really appreciate your pleasantness.

    Complain about this comment

  • 85. At 1:44pm on 22 Oct 2009, regdodniffoC wrote:

    hokeykokeyalex and friend jadedoldie, Letter writing is better, because you're not allowed to run off at the mouth, make false assumptions, false and unsubstantiated accusations, call people 'cowards' and 'gutless', then suddenly exhibit delicate feelings when the recipient turns on you! Your flights of fancy as to where I write to, what I write about and the reception I may get, shows an aptitude for fairy stories. Maybe with that aptitude, plus being able to turn
    anything on its head, you would make an excellent career in politics.
    As for me I'll return to the more sane, logical and rewarding letter writing, you'll be glad to hear! Obviously blogs are not for logical, sensible and reasoned debate. Dealing with you, it's all fly off the handle, muddy the waters, fire off in all directions and all cliques stick together against the foreigner in our midst! How dare he disturb our comfort zone!

    Complain about this comment

  • 86. At 2:52pm on 22 Oct 2009, jadedoldie wrote:

    post 85, wow I am impressed, off you go, back to the fairyland of ex-military men, local councillors, and failed would be column writers ie, the average letters page.

    Complain about this comment

  • 87. At 5:07pm on 22 Oct 2009, hokeykokeyalex wrote:

    jadedoldie ....what can i say about regdodniffoC,,,he obviously see's himself as something rather above us normal bloggers(and indeed above the rest of the british public),just read his contributions.remember british public according to regdodniffoC you all suffer apathy !!
    he also describes him self as a famous letter writer-i am almost chuckling to myself as i write this.
    well off you go regdodniffoC to the land you inhabit,that rather grand land where you can lie and never bother with the truth or be questioned as to whether what you say holds water.
    we are accused of being a clique because we have respect for each other.
    as i said before i welcome you to the blog,it is you that is taking your rather grand bat and ball home.
    i am sure being famous has made you a little fragile,still we have been in the company of a star.
    goodbye almost famous well known letter writer- you could decribe yourself now as the blogger that couldnt hack it.
    my goodness the amount of stick i have had for my strong views from johnholyer,robertbridget,serjanus,highland flind,geordieangel etc .
    we do not always agree and can give it out,but we can also take it without crying into our letter page....
    goodbye regdodniffoC...frightened off by the nasty hokeykokeyalex

    Complain about this comment

  • 88. At 9:35pm on 22 Oct 2009, jadedoldie wrote:

    hokey, you are awful, but I like you!

    Complain about this comment

View these comments in RSS

Explore the BBC

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.