A slightly random selection of notes and links following our 60th anniversary...

Mary Cutler
Following the huge audience reaction to the anniversary episode, this week's scriptwriter Mary Cutler will write on this blog soon, explaining the thinking that went into the storyline, and the implications for the future.


Omnibus
The anniversary episode was double length, at 30 minutes long. But the broadcast version of this Sunday's omnibus edition is the standard length: 75 minutes. Because of this, Mary wrote some scenes (for the episodes later in the week) with the intention that they be cut in the omnibus. These so-called "omnicut" scenes used to be a regular feature in the days before the 75-minute omnibus was introduced, along with six slightly shorter episodes every week.

However, if you want to hear all the events in Ambridge this week, the complete 90 minute omnibus will be available to listen here on The Archers website.


YouTube
Archers editor Vanessa Whitburn and the actor Graham Seed were interviewed on BBC Radio 4's Today programme in connection with The Archers 60th anniversary. Both interviews are available on YouTube


YouTube also has a range of clips featuring famous Archers listeners talking about the place of the programme in their lives.


Blogs
The BBC's head of audio and music, Tim Davie, writes about the anniversary.

'...The reaction has spanned many emotions: listeners are angry, supportive, underwhelmed, overwhelmed, shocked, sad and enthralled. Above all, what is clear is that they care, deeply, about what happens in Ambridge...'


There's an interesting analysis of the online activity surrounding the episode from blogger John Fox.

'...It was, indeed, absolutely riveting. Whether that's from the perspective of the unfolding plot or simply the level of interest in the programme and its general storyline, or the sheer fascination of the speculation as to what would happen...'


BBC History
Find out more about the history of The Archers with The BBC Story.


Keri Davies is an Archers scriptwriter and web producer.

  • The picture shows the YouTube index page for the clips
  • Follow @BBCTheArchers on Twitter
  • Or for fuller-length discussion of the programme try The Archers message board

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments.

  • Comment number 23. Posted by tgcampkirk

    on 13 Jan 2011 16:46

    The story line on The Archers has been entirely predictable and weak. To make matters worse the quality of the acting has also been poor.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 23: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 23: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 22. Posted by holcombej

    on 7 Jan 2011 23:07

    Hi
    I don't know if this has been said / expressed elsewhere - why when characters such as Sid / Nigel / Betty leave the programme don't the BBC or the team put together a tribute / memorial feature on them?

    I know this has happened before (thinking of course of the death of Norman Painting last year) but I for one would really be interested to hear how these characters have changed and evolved over the years, some of the storylines they have been involved with etc etc.

    I think this is particularly important when you have characters and actors who have been in the show for such a long time - contrast this with the way that passing of long term actors / characters in programmes such as coronation street / eastenders are marked with clip shows, interviews etc. In a way i also think that when an actor has given so much over such a long time it's the least they deserve?

    Just a thought..

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 22: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 22: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 21. Posted by zooms

    on 7 Jan 2011 16:48

    Please tell me Nigel's death is just someone's bad dream and he will be resurrected next week when they wake up...

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 21: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 21: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 20. Posted by Philip Haddon

    on 7 Jan 2011 15:27

    I am returning to this because it`s obvious from Mary Cutler that you just don`t get it, and you are not listening. It seems to me that people listen to the Archers differently to how they relate to soaps on TV. There is a consistency and relationships are formed. On the other hand it is not for extremes, but for "the everyday story!" The whole basis is
    shattered if you make it too exceptional, so that the deaths of two long standing characters is enough, the grief is still very much in the programme, you do not need a third! Then there is the Archer Family how many accidental deaths have to occur? This is simply not giving due attention to the kong term narative of the family itself. The death of Nigel is simply foolish, I am not a particular fan,(too much of a lefty!) but he was the only character who was consistently optimistic and successful, just count the sighs or spaces where sighs are heard, life is not easy in Ambridge Nigel`s voice was necessary.
    All in all I feel that the whole believability, consistency, and balance of the programme is damaged. The trust between the listeners and the creators damaged, for many killed, so that there were two deaths in this episode.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 20: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 20: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 19. Posted by joanbone

    on 7 Jan 2011 15:01

    What on earth has come over the BBC? I have supported the Ambridge community and the Archer famuly in particular, for as long as I can remember (I an 72 years old and have a good memory). I know you have to be topical in your storylines but to kill off Nigel in such a tragic way and at Christmas was totally barbaric. Why not lay poor Jack Wooley to rest? I cannott say too strongly that you were wrong!!!
    I will no be listening to the Archers again but I must say I miss my 15 minutes of pleasure. Thanks to your writer my pleasure has ceased.
    Sometimes realism disguised as entertainment can be just too painful.


    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 19: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 19: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 18. Posted by Leaping Badger

    on 7 Jan 2011 14:17

    Hmm: two positive articles so far: one written by a BBC boss and the other concerning the Twitter hype rather than the drama itself.
    'Ö'

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 18: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 18: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 17. Posted by Tony Morris

    on 7 Jan 2011 14:10

    The Archers seems to be in terminal decline. It appears that the writers are using soaps like Neighbours or East-enders as their template. I'm afraid that they have totally misjudged both the intellect of their listeners and their reasons for listening. A shame, but after more that 50 years, but I for one probably won't bother to switch one any more.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 17: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 17: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 16. Posted by eggnut

    on 7 Jan 2011 14:08

    Does Vanessa Whitburn actually understand anything about TA and the majority of its listeners?

    Can you all please stop congratulating yourselves for the "publicity" and acknowledge that many people are outraged by the lazy writing and cheap sensationalism?

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 16: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 16: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 15. Posted by mikejt

    on 7 Jan 2011 13:57

    I work a lot in China and have to say that the review of the papers in this column about the media commentary on the ruination of the Archers is quite amazing for its twisted reporting and goes beyond Chinese censorship. There was an overwhelming majority of people expressing disbelief at the sheer awfulness of the way the editor chose to celebrate this Anniversary. My wife and i have now stopped listening. Please ensure a more honest reporting on what people really think of the appalling sacking and killing off of a normal guy. Sid Perks is gone and now Nigel - who's next to get media attention and apall listeners further?

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 15: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 15: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 14. Posted by woolpittwo

    on 7 Jan 2011 13:21

    We can't believe that Nigel has been killed off because he was popular - this is outrageous and we will be starting or joining any campaign going to get this overturned & Vanessa Whitburn sacked. I have been so angry ever since I heard Vanessa Whitburn say on the Today Programme "a birth and a death, how iconic". There was nothing iconic about the 60th anniversary episode, my husband and I knew from the build up that either Lizzie or Nigel was going to die and it would also include Helen, Tony and the baby. I would say that we were underwhelmed except all pleasure from listening has now been taken away. Bring back Nigel, its all just been a bad dream from which we can move on!

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 14: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 14: 0
    Loading…
More comments

More Posts

Previous

Next