David and Ruth Archer can curse their bad luck in finding that badgers have damaged their slurry pit (or 'lagoon'). But they are by no means the only farmers having to fork out substantial sums in order to comply with the Government's latest Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZ) regulations.

A year ago the National Farmers' Union (NFU) estimated nearly half of dairy farmers in England would not have enough slurry storage when the rules changed on 1 January this year. Just to stay in business they would have to invest in new storage tanks or different ways of processing slurry. As David said, it is investment just to stand still, with no prospect of a return.

Of course, the rules haven't been changed just to annoy farmers. They are there to protect the rivers, streams and underground aquifers from being polluted by fertilisers or farm waste running off the land.

The UK government has adopted the European nitrates directive and the NVZ strategy stems from this. 62 per cent of England is now covered by NVZs. There is even talk of making the whole country into a zone, so that the same rules apply to everyone. This is because some farmers have complained they are put at a disadvantage compared to neighbours who are not in an NVZ.

Farmers inside a zone - there are maps on the Defra website - have to keep detailed records of where, when and how much fertiliser they spread. There are also closed seasons for spreading slurry, manure and manufactured fertilisers. Different rules apply according to soil type and whether the land in used for grazing or cultivation.


The risks

The Environment Agency may ask to see these records and can prosecute people who don't keep them accurately. It is also a 'cross-compliance' issue, so farmers risk losing part of their single-farm payment if they don't comply.

The big change that came in on January 1 is about the capacity for storing slurry on livestock farms and, again, one rule doesn't fit all farms. Cattle farmers have to be able to store five months' worth of slurry safely. On pig and poultry farms they need six months' storage for slurry and/or manure. It can be a complicated equation.

Many dairy farmers have been advised to separate the solids from their slurry and store that as manure so they would need a smaller tank or lagoon for liquids. This has the additional benefit that the liquid is a very good grassland fertiliser, with less taint than conventional slurry. Cattle can graze the treated land within a few weeks of application.

But this wasn't an option for Brookfield because some years ago David and Ruth got rid of their cubicles and switched to a loose-housed system with the cattle on straw in the winter months. This meant they had less slurry to deal with. Their pit would have been big enough to comply with the new regulations.

If only it hadn't sprung a leak...

Steve Peacock is The Archers agricultural advisor.

Tagged with:

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments.

  • Comment number 6. Posted by Simon

    on 10 Feb 2012 17:19

    The Brookfield story is about to run foul of the CAP reform proposals. David will be prevented from ploughing up his grassland leaving very few options and potentially leaving him as the environmental pariah if he destroys any grassland now. This is a real issue for many dairy farmers and with another buyer looking as though dairy farmers may suffer bad debt a real concern as farmers desperately try to release capital to retain their farms and livlihood.

    Incidentally Steve Peacocks contact system on his website doesn't work.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 6: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 6: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 5. Posted by Keri Davies

    on 23 Jan 2012 12:59

    An interesting point littlerobbergirl. Of course an anaerobic digester is an integral part of Borchester Land's proposed mega-dairy.

  • Comment number 4. Posted by littlerobbergirl

    on 22 Jan 2012 11:50

    Why no mention of bio digesters? Surely the answer to problem or do farmers still need six month storage despite only needing a month or so holding space?

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 4: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 4: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 3. Posted by Splath

    on 15 Jan 2012 21:56

    Good grief, David looks as if he fell in the slurry pit. Don't know owt about the EU, the NFU or the FU, but do know that i hate the stink that slurry on the fields creates. Wish they'd find another way to dispose of it. At certain times of the year the town where I live stinks of dung. People may say its got to be accepted, but I don't. I've never noticed a similar stink when travelling in Europe.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 3: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 3: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 2. Posted by BVFL33

    on 12 Jan 2012 16:02

    duncanpt is spot on ..... I live in Germany and have to trave to France on a regular basis . It's amazing really how few things are 100% adhered to , merely signed ....

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 2: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 2: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 1. Posted by duncanpt

    on 12 Jan 2012 10:47

    So since this comes from an EU directive, how thoroughly are other EU countries complying with it? Netherlands for example where there are a lot of diary farms.

    Or will this be yet another case of the UK sticking to the rules while others avoid the costs?

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 1: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 1: 0
    Loading…

More Posts

Previous

Next