Michael Fenton Stevens on Paul – lover or controller?

Web Producer, The Archers

Tagged with:

Michael Fenton Stevens (Paul Morgan)

Seeing his ex-wife remarrying has increased Paul’s desperation to be with Lilian to alarming levels. The actor Michael Fenton Stevens examines the motivations that drive his character.

Paul feels that the important thing is that when he loves someone he should devote everything to them and those things need to be reciprocal. We’ve gone through periods with the character where he’s said ‘I love you so much, I will put up with anything to stay with you’. They were very interesting and quite difficult scenes to play, because clearly Lilian had decided at one point that she couldn’t go on and risk it anymore. He gave her a way out and said he’d he at her beck and call.

But was he deceiving himself when he was saying that?

I think he was absolutely. Now he’s getting to the point where he can’t bear sharing her.

I think that’s also what is happening with his ex-wife. Not that he loves her any more as he does Lilian, but he still feels responsible for her. He thinks that Celia is leading herself and his children to a position where everything will go wrong. Whether that’s really true, in his mind it is. So you have to play those things as if they are true for him.

It’s the same when it comes to deceiving Lilian. This has been the first time he’s done that in the whole of the time he’s been with her. I think because he is deceiving himself he can’t actually be completely honest about it, because I don’t think he understands the reasons behind things. It’s not that he’s thought it through and worked it all out. It’s an emotional reaction and so it doesn’t make sense.

As far as he’s concerned, he’s not done anything wrong. All he ever did was protect Celia and the children and make sure that they were doing the right thing. But of course to them that came across as domineering and as somebody who was telling them what to do.

It sounds like the part has progressed from being a relatively simple proposition to being a very complex one.

Yes and that’s the skill of the writers, I think, because they’ve taken that from tiny little things that you’ve done in performance. There was a line quite a while ago in a scene where he was telling Lilian they’d do this now and do that and she was saying ‘don’t keep telling me what to do’. I said I’m sorry, I’m sorry, that’s what my ex-wife used to say, that I was too controlling.

There was an element of over-earnestness about the character. The absolute earnestness of the man leads you down that road. I’m sure the audience has been split, as have we performers, as to how he would eventually turn out. Either a person who was genuinely completely in love and be delightful, soft and gentle – as he was for many months – or controlling and wanting to be in charge.

He wants Lilian to be with him all the time. He can’t bear the idea of her being with Matt, because as far as he’s concerned Matt is completely the wrong man for her. Paul thinks he’s the right man. He will show her love and devotion – and they have great sex!

It obviously angers him that Lilian might occasionally sleep with Matt. As far as he’s concerned, it’s almost prostitution. He thinks she’s with him because she needs to be for her business, whereas they love each other. He genuinely means that, I think.

Michael Fenton Stevens (Paul) on Anita Dobson, instant rows, trust and green room chat

Keri Davies is an Archers scriptwriter and web producer

Read more about Paul, Celia, Lilian and Matt in our Who’s Who

Tagged with:

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments.

  • Comment number 8. Posted by the old hand

    on 26 May 2013 13:40

    Matt is my favourite character! He is one of the few people in the Archers who is acquainted with reality. Please don't send him down for abetting GBH on Paul.

    At times, like when Elizabeth is rabbiting on about what windows she wants in her castle, I long for a scene with Matt - especially when he gets to have a go at Pat, or Linda. OK, so he does a bit of harassment of his tenants sometimes - not a crime is it? Well all right, I suppose technically it's a crime....................

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 8: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 8: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 7. Posted by marianetc

    on 23 May 2013 17:56

    Quite right Arkwright, without wishing to be ageist Lillian has a drink problem, is a smoker and nearly 66 according to my Archers teatowel. Paul is still working so about her age at most, there are plenty of younger, more attractive females on dating sites and this storyline is very hard to believe.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 7: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 7: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 6. Posted by Arkwright Hall

    on 21 May 2013 16:52

    More a comment on the Vote rather than this thread, but please don't call Lillian and Paul's relationship as an "affair". That would require one or both of them to be married. Unless Ralph Bellamy is still alive, or Celia committed bigamy this weekend, then they are simply two single people having a "close relationship". And of course, Lillian has the morals of an alley cat, but was only having an affair with Matt before he got divorced.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 6: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 6: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 5. Posted by Sir Kevin

    on 21 May 2013 07:36

    I for one, don't like Paul and I don't much like Lillian ("the tart with a heart") in her scenes with him. Celia is OK, would like to see more of her.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 5: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 5: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 4. Posted by tremewan

    on 20 May 2013 17:48

    Sharon, there's nothing wrong with "he's not done.." - it's the same as "he has not done" (that's what the apostrophe is for). Have you never been to the north, where tis form of usage is quite normal?

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 4: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 4: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 3. Posted by davina

    on 19 May 2013 23:43

    Micheal, your name ring's a bell, I am a big R4 play fan and formerly 'Weekending'. Have you done some production too?
    I thought many new arrivals into long running series either start off nice and turn nasty or the other way round. It's a development tool isn't it? I'm sure your not really thta bad are you Paul? Are you.... :) enjoying the storyline very much, just show's! watch who you befriend!!! In pip's case Quigley, she has gone from one selfish phase to another, me me me. Kid's heh!

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 3: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 3: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 2. Posted by Sharon

    on 19 May 2013 21:02

    "He's not done..."
    Please , he has not done, or he hasn't done...

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 2: 1
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 2: 1
    Loading…
  • Comment number 1. Posted by Quigley

    on 19 May 2013 18:36

    Paul's change of character seems to be a pattern that the Archers' writers are following. They portray a character with a set of behaviors and then, seemingly to suit the plot, change the character's behaviors drastically. Pip is a fine example of that character transference, but now it's Paul.
    I don't believe Paul was expected to be a likable character, but now he is absolutely unbearable - but - he sure is adding suspense - and we all like that - I think.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 1: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 1: 0
    Loading…

More Posts

Next