BBC Blog Network

User Profile

Bradshad

Listed below are comments made by Bradshad between Monday, 29th September 2008 and Monday, 29th June 2009.

«Newer
Older»

'Rebuilding Labour's Future' 10:53pm on 29 Jun 2009 But its not jobs is it, its jobs or training, and as training is cheaper, it will be training of some very low quality with bugger all relevance to what is actually needed in the workplace.

but a box ticked for El'Gormless and his Gran Vizier Mandy.

Bah - an election now please
Iraq war inquiry - lessons to be learnt 10:50pm on 15 Jun 2009 sagamix - dont be off topic, it wont work, its an issue that should be discussed on the right forums dont you think. And if we know all this about cameron - why arent Labour going for him with both guns? Its almost an opengoal unless tehre's something we're not being told about it.

Also, shall we discuss why ALL of Tony Blairs Receipts were ordered to be shreaded? Why? What was there to hide?
Iraq war inquiry - lessons to be learnt 10:09pm on 15 Jun 2009 shame, shame, shame

Shame on this Government

Shame on Eaton and Saga for trying to defend this act of contempt and deceit

Shame on us for allowing this deceit by sitting on our behinds like the good keyboard warriors we are.

Unitedearth - you're being very foolish, learn the facts, learn what happened and then when you think you understand what went on, try again.
Taking the political mood 08:22am on 30 Apr 2009 anyone else seen this?

http://www.labourhome.org/story/2009/4/28/82152/3125

I dont know how representative of Labour this blog is, but even so.....
'A crucible of terrorism' 5:56pm on 27 Apr 2009 31. At 1:57pm on 27 Apr 2009, greatHayemaker wrote:
21

I remember one particular conversation I had with a rather arrogant partner in my former firm. Over dinner and many, many glasses of wine, I mentioned a contention of mine that the two atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki amounted to the two single greatest terror acts in history. After all, the intention was by threat and use of force to compel an enemy to submit. Textbook terrorism, no? The partner looked down his nose at me haughtily, and declared that I needed to reexamine my interpretation of the word terrorism. These, he declared, were clearly acts of war.

Not wishing to rain on your parade Mr Haymaker, but you're wrong about the bombs, they in fact probably killed a lot less than an invasion would have done.

Check the number of direct and indirect dead and wounded from the two bombs, I believe at max its 200,000.

Compared to the death toll that Okinawa and Saipan had already caused, plus the massive casualties that an American invasion would have caused to both allied and japanese forces and civilian populous, the two bombs were the best that could have been hoped, considering how the Japenese army had decided to fight to the death, and if your ead your history, a coup attempt by the army hardliners (who had virtually started the war) almost captured the Emperor after he'd decided to surrender. If that had happened then there would have been a horrendous fight which would have still led to a US victory, but with most of Japan knocked back to the Stone Age.

Plus the dropping of the bombs were a message to Stalin, you know the mass murdering pshycopath in charge of the worlds biggest army, to behave himself in Europe and to stay within the agreed boundaries.

Want to know something to beat the Yanks with? Try LeMay's fire bombing of the japenese cities, the death tolls were much higher.

Still if you want to believe the nukes were a bad thing, then so be it, you're wrong, but any amount of arguments wont change your mind.

Getting back to Broon

Is this jaunt another excuse to avoid PMQ's and the absolute kicking he'll recieve?
Confusion on the wildcat strikes (2) 7:49pm on 02 Feb 2009 Nick, thanks for your reply.

Total are in the right, the unions cant have it both ways, however much they would like to, and the Labour Government say they can.

This is a European Law I fully support and think is right.

If they were turfing out british workers to replace them with swarthy foriegn looking types, then well they might have a case. But as it is, nah tough chicken. But well done on making a numebr of companies want to hire EU workers instead of you bolshie lot. Idiots.

Anyway back to Mandleson and his little boat ride over the summer with the tarrifs.

Toodles
Back to the future again 10:04pm on 05 Oct 2008 "456. At 8:30pm on 04 Oct 2008, MaxSceptic wrote:
Saying someone attracts trouble like manure attracts flies is not comparing them to manure.

It is a simile. (Do look it up in the dictionary if you are uncertain.)

But in this instance, if the cap fits..."

Or my favourite:

If it looks like crap, smells like crap, it probably is crap.

is this the most posted NR blog ever?
Back to the future again 4:33pm on 04 Oct 2008 "354. At 00:06am on 04 Oct 2008, derekbarker wrote:
Was there a tory conference?
Is anybody talking about it?

Seems, not....all...eyes....on.....labour....."

They are and everyone's crying quite hard. Not what Labour want is it? To be a total laughing stock. If it wasnt so tragic when we need a competant well lead government in charge, we get this shower of Kinear, it would be utterly hillarious.

Oh and Derek, your period key's still stuck as is the record.
Taking the credit 9:00pm on 30 Sep 2008 So is it cock up or conspiracy?

With this government I think I can bet my Bradford and Bingly shares on the former.
Quizzing Cameron 10:21pm on 29 Sep 2008 DB - is your period (...) key stuck, are you writing from a mobile or are you just trying a new version of political poetry?

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

Bradshad