BBC Blog Network

User Profile

RoastDuck

Listed below are comments made by RoastDuck between Friday, 22nd May 2009 and Tuesday, 7th July 2009.

«Newer
Older»

Three years in China 8:38pm on 07 Jul 2009 Good luck!
Conflict of party and private lifestyles 10:28pm on 11 Jun 2009 To #43
There really have no evidence that chairman's son could touch politic and to become another chairman. Or you could give me one example in either China or USSA. Communism is not Feudal system, NK is not a real communism country although the name of the party is called NK communism party. And they even don't talk Marx much, just talking about the theory from Kim I. Cuba is a communism country, although their didn't have leadership change before. But its politic system is real communism, and they follow the road and method from Marx. China today is very special, I don't know it is a communism body wear capitalism cloth or a capitalism body wear communism cloth. Free market is a typical aspect of capitalism, however, improve production efficency is also one of the main aim of communism from Marx. When this two thing didn't conflict, it applied in China so quickly, and have great effect. The people who perfer the capitalism think it is the capitalism make China rich and strong so China should make more politic change as what they did in economy, so China will become more rich and strong. And the people who perfer the communism think use free market to improve the production efficency is the right way to achieve communism, and it is follow the Marx method which make China improvement,thus we need constant follow the method of Marx. No one know which is the right reason, so no one know which road will have a bright future, but luckly the real situation is China become rich and strong.
If I could have a better life, who cares much which way it achieves. When the India show better perfermence, China should study from them and also move our politic system similar with them. If anyone wish to change China, please don't only use verb attack China, but take effort to help India to show a better example. When that time arrive, no one could deny the universal suffrage could make a huge and poor country prosperity. And no one will refuse the capitalism system any more.
No comparison group no presuasive conclusion. Comparison group should formed between two similar samples.
Conflict of party and private lifestyles 6:43pm on 10 Jun 2009 I heard something from a friend, but even him couldn't assure if this information is real.
Mr. HU, the chairman of China, told his son before he(son) could enjoy life in bussiness, but he should never touch politic a little during his entire life. Even without any help from his father, the son of chairman will respected by other bussiness partners, and they wish to do bussiness with him. However, if his son touch the politic, all the other party members will angry and fear he would gain big advantages not from his capability but from his blood relation. This will ruin both his and his father's life.
You could always see some high candidates or leaders of China has a high position father,(the other party member trust him as his father). But you could never see any child of chairman (not include vice chairman) touch politic.
So Bo Guagua could enjoy his life in every place except politic, unless his father failed to be a chairman then he could have hope to participate in politic.
It's not good, but china didn't need a Kim II or Bush II. There are so many talent people, without one nothing will happen.
How much they need pay for the fee of university? My family saved equaly 300,000 dollar to prepare any accident. My parents are all teachers in university. Every month they together earn about 2000 dollars and our entire family spend about 200-250 dollars per month. We really don't buy anything that is unnecessary, and the food price in china is much lower than here (usually one yuan which equal to 0.16 dollar could purchase same amount one dollar's food in US). And the officer also don't need buy too many things, their house don't need pay unless you wish to live in a bigger house than the gov provide, their car and driver is payed by gov, their working cloth is payed by gov, their computer is provide by gov, they only need to buy food.
An interview with President Obama 9:12pm on 03 Jun 2009 #84,
#78,
The Iranians (and the Muslim world in general) will only see Obamas soft, reconciliatory tone as a sign of Western weakness.

I'm not interest in those middle-east thing. But I think this idea is very interesting.

In an Asia people's view: Bush, get a big treasure from Clinton.
Very very rich! Economy increasing and positive budget.
Very very strong! Powerful army and widely ally.
Very very respect! At last in my country, actually we very respect US government in that time.

What Obama get?
Not very rich-(if didn't say it poor.) Economy crisis and huge negative budget. GM is down.
Not very strong-(if didn't say it is at weak time.) Two wars is still continues waste the energy of US army. World widely anti force. Not so strong ally.
Not very respect-(if didn't say dislike.) In my hometown, people laugh at US from heart.

So, how could Obama show tough to other players? Haven't you see NK become tough in the end of Bush Administration because NK know Bush didn't have the enough power to invade him any more? And Iran become tough in the nearly same time. So was the other similar things in South American.

We laugh NK, because he always threaten a war but actually don't have any chance to win the war. NK knows that himself, and don't do anything except show tough, bark , and fight war in verb.

So do you wish Obama show tough just as NK?
Obama's US isn't as strong as Bush's US is because the real power. Not the tone of the president.
As if 1989 never happened 7:51pm on 02 Jun 2009 To #11,
I live in china 26 years. I haven't meet any time that my TV black out not because the fuse is overloading.
Maybe that is because we didn't show foreign TV program at all. And I'm so happy that so many foreigners like to look Chinese TV program although they didn't understand Chinese language. Do you always look other languages TV programs?
And web is famous in China only those 8 years. We usually don't have PC, or usually don't have enough money to buy a PC before 2001 year. Before that time we are work so hard to feed our stomach. But now, there are more than 0.3 billion chinese on the web. At least there are 0.3 billion people could buy PC, and have free time to consume. You may curious why, I should thank Bush, he is a friend of China, he helps us more than harm us.
BBC site always been blacked out in China. But it is not so weired in a country who is in the disadvantage position in propaganda compare with the rich developed country. Information freedom only fair when the two opposite voices have the same power. Or who is eloquent who is truth.
Before I came to US, my father told me that I may meet some shock because I meet quite different truth in the aboard, which is very normal to happen in a chinese student who come aboard around 1991(my father study in East-German between 1991-1992). However, I really didn't meet any shock as my father said. All the thing is really normal as I live in china before except US people is really honest. That's the only thing impressed me. I really wish chinese one day could as honest as US people. (I have been cheated uncounted times in my hometown, and I have only been cheated one time in here for nearly one years time). I dislike to be cheated. That make me shame.
As if 1989 never happened 6:32pm on 02 Jun 2009 I don't think my comment could publish... Because I have different view point of the BBC.
I'm 27 years old now, and I live in Beijing. I have go to the Tiananmen just several day before the disaster with my father. But we went back home after no more than 2 hours.
The protest acturally last a very long time. From a small group of student to huge amount of people including lots of people just came for fun. I'm really serious! At last some of them are just come for fun(such as me, that time I was only 7 years old). You need to know. There are culture revolution before, in culture revolution, people could run to every place of china, and in that time, except some event, you couldn't leave your city or villiage, you need to work. And all the people have his work assembled by gov, even the children need to go to school. But those day, all the school in Beijing stopped classes. So I can visit Tianmen for fun. And my father is a phd student that time. He really with to advice some thought to the gov. However, when we go to there, we found thing isn't right. Most of the people's motion in there are crazy. The people who is calm as my father dislike that situation, so we leave. And lots of people leave also. Only the most crazy people are stay there more than one day. More things are, First I should say, I don't discriminate the people who isn't live in Beijing, because both my parents are born in Shandon province. But a small amount people who came from other province stay in Tiananmen isn't peace. They burn and break the things to consume their angry... Actually I didn't think all of them are really extrimely angry, some is only for exiting, that the first time they come to the capital of china, the center of capital, and its also the first time to destroy something which if they do in their own hometown would be punished very strict.

One thing is ture, which may disappoint most of the anti-china medium. The students who come to Tiananmen first isn't anti-communism at all. Actually, most of them are communisms as my father. They think the direction of the country isn't right, and for a communist, he has the duty to correct the direction of the country. (It sounds a little ridiculous today,isn't it?) My there are old word in china, that every people need to help the country to pass the bad times. And those communists are the one who bravely come out to advice the party the right way. So, no student is come to show their angry to the goverment at the begining time, they are going to give the goverment advice. However, after the priminister Li Peng refuse to accept the letter of the advice from the students several times. The students angry that they havn't be respect. And some of them swear, if the Li Peng didn't come out to receive the letter , then they won't go back home. After some days protest. Li Peng was afraid, and call the army to protect the order. But at first, its only come to protect the order. The army went through my house, and the soldiers rest at the door of my house, they are laughly talking with each other, and it is definitely their first time come to Beijing, they are friendly to the citizens around them, and they really don't know what will happened just several days after.

However, disaster happened when a bunch of "Football hooligans" meet a coward priadminister Li Peng.

And really, before the disaster happen, some soliders who watching the protest has been killed by some bad people, but no solider is killed by students. However, who can identificate who is angry student and who is mob? Mob usually run away first when they say the gov is really angry, but the students who didn't know there are soliders have been killed, they don't think the govment seriousely wish to repressive, they didn't leave and been killed without know why.

Li Peng is a fool. Most of communists have the same thought as I.
Pragmatic on Guantanamo - and healthcare 9:34pm on 25 May 2009 This blog moderated so quickly!^_^
When I submit a comment in the BBC's blog about China, usually it takes 2-3 days to moderate my comment... And in that blog, I never see any topic have so many comments like here. You don't exciting, when your comment could only publish several days later, and sometimes it will be rejected by houserule after several days' waiting.
Pragmatic on Guantanamo - and healthcare 8:47pm on 25 May 2009 To #449 TrueToo

Why I lie to you about this
You could ask a German people or find evidence from the German newspaper http://www.bild.de/.
US wish German allow nine of those freedom solders ,who captured in Afganistan terroiest camp and jailed in G bay several month, to live in German. Because those people say they didn't hate US, they are training for attacking China. And CIA think those people isn't a threat of US.
This isn't the first time US pursue other country to allow anti-China freedom solders who captured in Afganitan to live in their country. And this isn't the first time China protest the US and destination country, and threat if German protect those people the relationship between china and German will break.
You could ask a German people, he must know that.

And about the copper mine, I read it from a Chinese newspaper, I know you didn't believe any Chinese goverment's newspaper. But although we have bias, we don't fabricate a doesn't exist thing as what you say Sadam have WMD, Sadam have connected with Al-Quida, Sadam may connected with 911. Acturally I'm not the only one really doubt if Ben Laden connected with 911. From that Chinese goverment newspaper, a chinese industry first get the copper mine contract deal with Afganistan, and then the deal has been cancelled by Afganistan because they say the US didn't agree! Why who have the Afganistan copper mine need US agree? Just because you pay so much money to change the Afganistan goverment, so any benefit in Afganistan should be a Compensation to your? Is Afganistan another colony?
But I know, today, you only wish to get ride of the Afgan as soon as possible, because you didn't receive expected benefit, but pay much more than expected. This bussiness mistake make the biggest economy meet crisis. And we also suffering in this crisis although it wasn't we decide to invest in this bussiness which Russian failed before.
Pragmatic on Guantanamo - and healthcare 7:54pm on 25 May 2009 #449 TrueToo
while China continues to supply the Sudanese government with weapons for their ongoing slaughter of civilians in Darfur. China has been enabling the genocide for years in exchange for oil contracts.

What do you feel that US supply Iraq Sadam toxic gas weapon,when Iraq invasion Iran for a religion war? Is it not for oil contract?

At last in our chinese's view, the goverment of Sudanese is the public government of Sudan, and the anti-government military most from Somali who is weaponed by West kills more innocent people. Doesn't your government told your those anti-government force also slaughter the other side innocent muslin people?
They too are fight for water and earth, it is a difficult problem, and don't you know China goverment send the messagers to Sudan told them don't kill innocent and Sudan goverment told us they will as careful as possible, but in the war there alway is innocent who suffering more. If Sudan goverment don't have weapon to defence itself, you think anti-government will kill less innocent than what goverment do? You think Taliban will kill less than Pakistan goverment do?
You didn't get the oil contract so you say bad word to it as much as possible. Just as to Iraq and Iran today. Before Iraq invasion of Kuwait, Sadam is the second good friend of US in middle east aisan except Arab, who is the biggest oil contracter of US. And you need also know Kuwait is a oil contracter of US, and Iran is a big oil contracter who refuse to sell oil to US. So in that time Arab,Iraq,Kuwait is good, Iran is evil. But when Iraq attacked the Kuwait, which make Arab afraid, you become to say Arab, Kuwait is good, but Iraq and Iran is evil.

To supply a goverment is alway the right game rule in the history, unless you supply a goverment who is going to attack another goverment. Before Nazi attack other countries, does US boycotte it? That is the game rule. Before Sudan attack other goverment, China won't boycotte it just because someone think he is evil. When he attack other goverment we will boycotte him just as US did in WW2.

As a conclusion, I didn't say any goverment is better than others or innocent. All the goverments are pursuing its own interest, when moral meet the interest, moral will gone. But the game rule, at last the true game rule in the history, is that, if you wish to monopolize the world, you will be against by the world. If you don't share any benefit with others, others will not help you. When you feel you don't stronger enough, you pursuing ally, however you need to share the benefit first before you ask help. Why EU didn't wish pay more on Afganistan, is because they couldn't get enough to compensate what they lose in there. You couldn't get any help from China because you harm his interest NOW. Actually, I think Chinese goverment is too polite, when Russian attack Afganistan, US directly supply the muslins money and weapon to setback. But today when US attack Afganistan, Chinese goverment just keep neutral because muslin extrimelist harm us too. But who will be a real competitor in the big game? At last Afganistan will never be a real one.
Pragmatic on Guantanamo - and healthcare 7:17pm on 22 May 2009 Bush is really pragmatic. Haven't you forget in the Afganistan war, when a terriosts camp has been captured, about 200 anti-US muslim terrorists with 15 anti-China muslim terrorists have been caught together. Then those 15 anti-China muslim have been called freedom soldiers and send to EU with freedom and finance support and in the same time be protected not be harmed by Chinese Gov. But the other anti-US muslims are in Cuba Gantaname bay. That's the reason, US should never never hope China will give a little help in Afganistan war. Although we-chinese dislike those terrorists very much, but we dislike Bush more.
Another thing Bush is very pragmatic. When a chinese company get a copper mine from Afganistan Gov by highest bid. US is angry and threat to reduce the military support to Afganistan Gov until they cancelled their deal with chinese company. So the chinese company has been kicked out. And US should never never hope China will give a little help in Afganistan rebuild process.
You think that's all your bussiness, you didn't share any profit even that action didn't harm you a little. Then that's all your bussiness, if something goes wrong you need bear it only by yourself.

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

RoastDuck