BBC Blog Network

User Profile

handclapping

Listed below are comments made by handclapping between Tuesday, 24th November 2009 and Wednesday, 25th November 2009 (20 Hours Ago) .

«Newer
Older»

Getting on with it 3:44pm on 25 Nov 2009 #28
It shows up the result in Glasgow North East if Labour had £252,000 to spend and the SNP only £17,000. But what about the Tory and LibDem results there when they both had at least 3 times more than the SNP. Politics is about power and if the SNP don't have money, they'll just have to do it with boots on the streets the same way Labour did before they lost their soul to the money men.
Getting on with it 3:30pm on 25 Nov 2009 Brian
Isn't it amazing how the SNP manages to keep on getting on with it. Donations Q3
Con £5,000,000 8.4%= £420,000
Lab £3,000,000 8.4%= £252,000
Lib £ 800,000 8.4%= £ 67,200
SNP £ 17,000 100% = £ 17,000
No wonder the media are against them, there's no advertising spend to come from the SNP.
Coming home 00:17am on 25 Nov 2009 #79 Sheneval
See #77 on the previous thread.
Under pressure 00:07am on 25 Nov 2009 #76 Sheneval
So the English break their promises to people, well I never! *shock* If you promise to keep something secret for 100 years and don't, who is going to tell the truth in the 2011 census? If I live till then, I only speak Gaelic, was born in Outer Mongolia 101 years ago and live here with 11 grandchildren, a toilet and a cold water tap.
Governments should keep their promises.
Coming home 11:50pm on 24 Nov 2009 #72 oldnat
But, even with the beard, they found him and hauled him 'h'off to Holland.
Coming home 9:25pm on 24 Nov 2009 #56 oldnat
It is worrying that, whereas political anoraks like us may know the powers reserved from the Scottish Parliament, Prof King and the respondants to this poll don't, so 60+% think the Scottish Parliament should be concentrating on solving Westminster's problem with our, in the UK sense, unemployment and it's consequential effect on Scotland.
I am increasingly worried about the YouGov polling. Identified LibDems 71, weighted up to 114; LibDem Westminster voters 100, weighted up to 111. And this is a continuing pattern in their output for months. If they can't get any more LibDems because they don't exist then at worst you are looking at a LibDem share of 6.2% (71/1141) and that is really game changing.
Coming home 8:27pm on 24 Nov 2009 #43 oldnat
I looked for those figures earlier on YouGov as the questions were set by Prof King.
Torys up to near 1 in 5 and the same level as the SNP in 2005, not worth mentioning.
The LibDem support halves and no-one notices, says it all really.
Coming home 6:30pm on 24 Nov 2009 #41 RE
Yes. An explanation also would have to be nice.
Coming home 5:39pm on 24 Nov 2009 #35 RE
I find it difficult to get my head round your ability to believe everything emanating from Westminster and nothing coming from Edinburgh when it's the same Civil Service that is producing these reports whichever location they come from. Do you think Civil Servants in the Treasury would allow Darling to say that the UK hadn't borrowed the billions it did in October? So why do the same Civil Servants allow Swinney to get away with telling lies?
Do please explain.
Coming home 2:47pm on 24 Nov 2009 #21 kaybraes
Anent the ex PM, the SNP have chosen a candidate, a young lad who's given up his job to fight the election. They must have some good polling to let him do that. But we've still only had the one leaflet, and that from the LibDems, since 2007.

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

handclapping