BBC Blog Network

User Profile

Spanner7337

Listed below are comments made by Spanner7337 between Friday, 24th April 2009 and Monday, 27th July 2009.

«Newer
Older»

Monday 27 July 2009 10:53pm on 27 Jul 2009 The NHS is a bankrupt socialist idea 50 years past its sell-by-date and we have a corrupt 3 party system, as with the EU, that keeps this policy afloat and squandering taxpayer money.

The last thing that should happen is leaving it to inept politiians, the worst managers on the planet, to make the decisions or cronies like Lord Desazi who achieved nothing in his 2 year in charge.

The 5% reduction in productivity is a scandal. The waste of 10% budget increases 40% squandered on higher wages is appalling. And the NHS is more dangerous to your health on a weeks visit (1 in 300 risk) than a lifetime of smoking (12 in 100,000 risk).

Wind up the NHS and lets have private competition delivering high quality, efficient, effective health services. Politicians cannot manage anything withour corruption and an inept shambles. NHS RIP.
Make a comment on youth unemployment 11:00pm on 15 Jul 2009 Labour Employment Minister found wanting yet again. This Labour Govt, as a guest said, "love making announcements" but the gritty truth is, Labour deliver zero.

And the Labour Minister was accused once again of pouring money into training quangos and training companies that deliver nothing. The guest wisely suggested either funding small businesses with the money directly or expert guest suggested cutting taxes on business.

Once again the guests accused Labour of having no coherent plan, just loads of waffle, red tape and beauracy.

This Labour Govt is siphoning £billions of taxpayers money into vacuous corrupt quangos. They are a socialist-spiv disgrace and should not only be booted out of Govt, but kicked straight into jails. The public sector is a corrupt shambles. The private sector has had enough of the inept obese public sector pointing the finger at them to do better or pay more tax. We need a new Govt and a new system of Govt. Westminster has fialed this country miserably and this socialist cabal of zaNu Labour even more so. They're crimimals
Thursday 21 May 2009 11:01pm on 21 May 2009 David Blanchflower - how many cronies can the BBC muster. This ex Bank of England thinks the last budget (suicide note) makes sense!!!!

Spending like a banshee by borrowing huge mountains of debt Blanchflower thiks is clever and an "investment in the future"! Can this cronic croney not work out its DEBT IN THE FUTURE.

Why when all businesses and all consumers are reining in spending and paying off debt does this croney think bigger spending, no spending cuts and bigger debt is intellident. Even a 12 year old knows he can't keep spending pocket money he hasn't got and cannot pay off.

And the BBC is bent puffing up this croney as "right" regards cutting interest rates and Mevyn King "wrong". There's NO WAY to measure that. The BBC is a pure spin machine, you idiots think we were bron yesterday, pathetic!
Monday, 27 April, 2009 11:09pm on 01 May 2009 #40 cynicalHighlander

Google 'The Petition Project' and there's 34,000 scientists against the scam that is global warming. That should be enough "peer review" for you?

The Petition Project includes the science on CO2 and it enhancing plant growth. Indeed market gardeners have been using the addition of CO2 in their small plastic greenhouses to enhance plant growth for decades.

Your reference to "peer review" is because of the corruption of this method by AGW protagonists. Some of the comments I've seen from peer reviewers amount to anti-science and show more concern for "how this will appear" and look. Peer review is zero guarantee of good science (see M.Manns Hockey Stick).

The UN IPCC's own Reports do not have peer reviewed science. And in particular their computer projections have not been validated and indeed omit key known science of climate (eg. cloud albedo has a large cooling effect on climate) which invalidates their (faliscously warming) projections.

In fact the entire case for man made climate change rests on a fabrication used by the IPCC, that mans 2% contribution to annual CO2 emissions is 'multiplied' many times over by water vapour. There is no known science of this effect. This is a theory with a mega hole in its entire basis and that fails even basic scientific principles to the point of total ineptitude (and that's a nice way of looking at it!).
Tuesday, 28 April, 2009 01:41am on 29 Apr 2009 #24 Steve-London

If you're referring to sun cycles (Malkovich cycles) these undoubtedly dominates Earths temperature and indeed climate. The sun can turn Earths atmosphere from +42 Degrees to -4 Degrees in a single day (Iraq desert) and while greenhouse gases has some effect the only gas worth counting is water vapour (1-5% of Earths atmosphere). CO2 is a waste of time as a warming agent, like an ant walking across the back of an elephantine weather system (CO2 is 0.038% of our atmosphere).

We have the ice-core measures from polar regions like Vostok which shows the Malkovich cycles and also CO2 peak lags temeprature peak by 800 years. Namely temperature change (cause) leads to high CO2 levels (effect) with a lag of 800 years. Basic science but still the AGW alarmists still try to reverse cause and effect which is so dumb you have to question their entire mentality (certainly isn't scientific or credable!).
Tuesday, 28 April, 2009 01:26am on 29 Apr 2009 TheGangofOne

Looks like my post is being moderated so I'll keep in plane.

1). Do you know the radiative forcing of CO2?
2). Do you know it runs out of puff at 20-40ppm?
3). Have you seen the 460,000 year ice-core data chart (the 50ft one Al Gore showed in his 39 global climate errors film of fiction)?
4). Do you understand cause and effect?
5). Do you understand the UN's IPCC has literally fabricated a theory where mans 2% of CO2 emissions (nature makes 98% of annual CO2 emissions) is 'multiplied' many times over by water vapour, a theory that doesn't exist in known science and the IPCC has yet to account for?
6). Did you know IPCC factor in this unknown water vapour theory but factor out water vapours cloud albedo effect in their global climate models, making these computer projections unreliable heat seeking missiles?
7). Did you know of all the known greenhouse gases, water vapour is the only GG worth counting?
8). Did you know how many of your 99% of scientits amount to?
9). Did you know there are 34,000 scientists on The Petiton Project that disagree with AGW hysterics?
10). Did you know 34,000 scientists make a "consensus" a lie and "the debate is over" another lie?
Tuesday, 28 April, 2009 11:46pm on 28 Apr 2009 Justin Rowlett reached new farce tonight just to add to consistency to his total beginner label on climate science. Perfect qualifications for a BBC climate 'expert' who couldn't tell you CO2's radiative forcing or how the IPCC fabricate mans CO2 output by multiples by using water vapour that has no known scientific basis (ie. is 100% junk science).

And his maths and economics isn't much better than Mr Rowletts junk science. How does Obama plan to make green energy "profitable" and Mr Rowlett propose green technology be made popular? By nobbling oil with high taxation. That old socialist trick of taxing it until its bankrupt to force feed bankrupt socialist ideas down consumers throats (very democratic!) and leave us with an expensive energy impoverishing its citizens. Clever these socialists.

Mr Rowlett joined an enviro group flying in (carbon content?) who then drove (carbon content?) but couldn't find their way from the airport to a campaign rally (they can't find their way to the science either!). This BBC broadcast then reached new levels of dribbling propaganda and bias promoting "indoctrination" and "civil disobedience" and "how to resist arrest" classes. "I can't imagine the British Government doing this" muses Mr Rowlett. No, they just thieve green taxes and double coal and oil exploraion licenses (consistency if ever there was!).

But love the promotion of indoctrination of teenagers Mr Rowlett. Very 'scientific' programming. Kids'R'Us rallies promoted directly by Obamas team of junk science Big Brother 'experts'.

Meanwhile he interviews the scientific lightweight Ed Miliband, British Climate Minister, who claims countries see "clear evidence of climate change... more drought, more heavy rainfall". Can he make his mind up?

Here in Britain it snowed on Parliament when they emitted all the hot air to pass the Climate Bill. But reality and enviro windbags never see eye to eye!

Mr Rowlett your report tonight was as lame as your grasp of climate science and wouldn't pass 'The Idiots Guide to Science'. Your reporting is the worst drivel I've ever seen (from the BBC that's saying something!) and an ongoing embarrasment to broadcast standards.

I presume we can expect the same dreary standards in your next report of zero science with extra lashings of propaganda to pad out the lack of anything remotely intelligent in your reports. Just don't let the facts get in the way of your fictional account of climate science, it just doesn't suit your 'style' of reporting or the BBC's desent into the tragedy its become.
Monday, 27 April, 2009 11:18pm on 27 Apr 2009 BBC journalist Justin Rowlatt once again demonstrates brillaintly BBC's appalling bias. He stated the Cap & Trade would "satisfy most climate sciences". The overwhelming number of scientists in the world (see The Petiton project) disagree with the AGW hoax/financial fraud.

Mr Rowlatt went to lost of biased experts to interview, no dissenters whatsoever!!

Mr Rowlatt showed the Senate hearings featuring the global clown Al Gore. His only dissenters were countering on an economic basis.

Mr Rowlatt and the BBC continues to ignore the science and demnonstrates their palpable bias for junk science. This isn't a "public service" broadcaster this is a corrupt old socialist antique peddling propaganda. Bin the BBC and its monopololistic license fee
Newsnight & Newsnight Review: Friday, 24 April, 2009 00:01am on 25 Apr 2009 Tomm174

Wow you know alot about economics don't you? So while consumers cut spending, and business cuts spending, the Govt (according to you) should INCREASE spending!

When you have a recession do you patio your drive and splash out on a new flatscreen TV... using your credit card?

When you've "added 1 million new jobs in our strong economy" as Brown claims, and 965,000 are public sector pen pushers, do you cut the fat, or support people doing nothing jobs?

Browns public sector is so obese (over 50% of GDP) he cannot balance the books and needs to loan £140bn this year and £170bn next year to support his gluttony. Do you support the private sector being screwed for decades (2032 to balance the budget!!!) or do you think its about time Browns fat lady started to sing?

Next you propose "supporting demand". That's called fanning the flames of a consumer bubble. Brown spent a decade fanning the flames of consumer bubbles (mortgages, credit, loans) and sat on his lapdog FSA regulator to not say a word. Then the bubbles all went 'pop'. Guess where the £200bn in bank bailouts went? Let me help, bailing out those inflated assets, thats why while pushing for "transparency" he hid his dirty dealings at Northern Rock etc in 'National secrecy' Laws.

Fanning the flames of consumer demand is stupid economics. "Stimulis" doesn't work, it fuels false bubbles and the money is sourced from debt, digging bigger black holes to dig yourself out of. Namely 'stimulis' is no such thing. It just makes you MORE bankrupt for LONGER with MORE DEBT.

Geddit?
Newsnight & Newsnight Review: Friday, 24 April, 2009 11:33pm on 24 Apr 2009 Cut the £6 Billion to the EU/EC. Easy!

Britain never voted for this cabal of penpushers. The people never gave their democratic consent to be ruled by Euro-fat cats, gave them noi authority to make 85% of our laws, no mandate to tell us what to do.

Cut this £6 Billion we cannot afford to an Empire we do not endorse.

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

Spanner7337