BBC Blog Network

User Profile

moriaeencomium

Listed below are comments made by moriaeencomium between Friday, 27th November 2009 and Friday, 4th December 2009.

«Newer
Older»

A balanced approach to climate change 9:48pm on 04 Dec 2009 Oh do elaborate this greater phenomenon Maria, tell us more about it, will you? It is your strongest belief that there will be this and that? Five year from now? Yes? Pray tell, what is the basis of this belief? Will it look much as if in the latest Armageddon pictured by the master of disaster Emmerich?

Wonder if we should have accepted the beliefs of Mr. Holdren on overpopulation and act upon those? He said it will happen some 20 years ago, with the very same determination you spell doom upon us.

I see you like to call upon facts, so do allow a reminder, recently disclosed fraud shows that science is not settled, the fact is, there is no consensus, we'll have to build another one, and this time, we should do our best to base it on factual accuracy and well being of us all.

Here's an opinion, this world would be better if people would stop acting as if they belong to this and that camp. That way, they would be able to stand independent and party lines wouldn't interfere with their (moral) judgements. Eh?
A balanced approach to climate change 5:36pm on 03 Dec 2009 Here, meet one firm neo-Malthusian.

http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
A balanced approach to climate change 11:11pm on 02 Dec 2009 Corporate (elite) efforts to seize national sovereignties (and civil liberties) are not new, why in the world we fought the 'Battle in Seattle'? This particular agenda was wrapped up in so many different ways that it became as annoying to watch as all wicked manifestations of Strategy of Tension. Multilateral Agreement on Investment failed because of public concern, we've agreed that public should be more engaged into 'democratic processes' and we decided to make sure public is not harmed by the 'one world government'. And what do we have now? Not only that we're experiencing deja vu, but we have most treacherous effort aimed to impose the very same thing which was rejected in past.

http://www.oocities.com/w_trouble_o/lumier.htm

You know, we already have a global civil society, it would be lovely if (as admirable reflection on Climategate by Mike Hulme and Jerome Ravetz in BBC suggested) the administrate would accept that fact.
A balanced approach to climate change 8:13pm on 02 Dec 2009 Dearest Maria, 'whatever takes place in Copenhagen' cannot be rolled back, whether you pretend not to notice or simply deny the fact that hacked e-mails and related source code show the fabrication of data is your own choice. Since you seem genuinely concerned about issues at stake, and I'm sad to say that you come about as a doom sayer of a sort, do you think that the issue should be addressed as if we are playing the game of poker? Honestly? What do we have on the table Maria? Is it a blizzard or a firestorm? If we have cooling, should we fight it with strategies that will add to the trend? I don't think that your concern is genuine, because if it would be genuine you'd do what we expect from our leaders to do. That is, you'd express outrage for malicious lies, the construct of 'phantom menace'.

As we've seen, we lack the facts, but we can see what's coming, we already know that the 'new-old' administrate will not let us choose... instead of giving, they'll restrict the choice, on pretence. Why would we go for it? Blindly?

The pattern behind the latest fraud leaves no doubt, this is not about public interest unless the interest is fearful public. We have well known mass murderers at large, we have one gigantic fraud unfolding after another and such logical failures as fraudsters receiving awards for destruction of common lives. If we ever pull out of this and allow history to unfold those who come after us to define these sorrowful times will designate 'em as 'age of global decadence'.
A balanced approach to climate change 9:05pm on 01 Dec 2009 Dear maria-ashot, the data is not confirmed it is fabricated, the change is not proposed but imposed upon us.

Of course that we need to move on from these 'murder based economies', but we will not move on if we have the same ol' monkey on our back and that's exactly what's slipping through.

I understand your motus, but we are about to start building a new reality on false data, it is a false reality by definition.

We should tread lightly.
A balanced approach to climate change 9:58pm on 29 Nov 2009 In aftermath of 2001 we've entered 'dual reality', we have people who live in ivory towers and we have people who are walking in monstrous actuality.

One of these realities is redundant, it is false and it has to go.
A balanced approach to climate change 10:03pm on 28 Nov 2009 Climategate: The BBC is still pretending not to notice

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100018211/climategate-the-bbc-is-still-pretending-not-to-notice/
A balanced approach to climate change 01:22am on 28 Nov 2009 Speaking of 'atavistic programming' have you folks seen the source code behind the data?

http://fascistsoup.com/2009/11/25/more-on-the-climategate-source-code/

I'll stay polite.
A balanced approach to climate change 00:25am on 28 Nov 2009 Tell you what, this 'Climategate' monkey business is most unfortunate, it is such from many perspectives and the more i read about it... Perhaps it even beats the grand global collapse fallacy perpetrated by NIST, perhaps It may stand as the greatest antithesis of science to date.

Now, we've been sharing all sorts of thoughts on these blogs, so let me ask, if the 'administrate' wants to 'make things better' why it has to do it with lies, fear and murder? Is there really no other frame but 'framework of fear', we've been on the brink in one lengthy constant, it's duck and cover, shock and awe, inoculate... end is neigh, on pretence.

And where does BBC stand on the issue? You folks are breaking those guidelines again, on massive scale, you're aiding to fearmongering wrapped in the 'help for the poor' package, we've been sold another lie by the administrate incapable to function outside their atavistic programming and this public service is there to support and perpetuate the lie? Why? Because lies and deceit are needed to take us into better place?

Why in the world you have those guidelines? I've said it before and I'll say it again, those rules are fraudulent and misleading and you're trying hard to prove that fact again and again.

Duck, cover, shock, awe, terror, virus, warming... it's the darn constant, it should be enough of the warning even for those who earned mastery in naivete.

Good night and good luck!
A balanced approach to climate change 8:50pm on 27 Nov 2009 "I've just completed Mike's trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 to hide the decline."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6672875/Whos-to-blame-for-Climategate.html

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

moriaeencomium