BBC Blog Network

User Profile

wonderfulchinese

Listed below are comments made by wonderfulchinese between Thursday, 25th September 2008 and Monday, 29th September 2008.

«Newer
Older»

Nobel prize for dissident? 2:20pm on 29 Sep 2008 To midnightjunkie.

By the way, my government(Australian government) told me that Hujia is a peace maker. I have not heard of the name "HuJia" from Chinese government. I found things about the person on the internet. You are pretty good at misunderstanding my post. When did I say that he deserve to be jailed? Can you find out for me?
Nobel prize for dissident? 2:12pm on 29 Sep 2008 To onjournalism.

I accept your critism to change my blog name. I picked up this blog name from BBC's suggested blognames when my original "chinese" username was rejected by BBC. It looks like this blog name bother some people here. It is only a blogname right? Why would people take it so seriously?

I did not choose this blog to do my self critism. It attracted my attention during the torch relay because of its unfairness. I stick to it to talk back.

You could be a perfect Chinese from whom other Chinese should learn from. However I am in no mood to learn that at the moment. Please do not try to regulate others. (Only CCP tries to do that, right?)We are who we are.

RE HuJia. Did you see his letter to German Chancellor Merkel? In which he seems represented "hundreds of millions Chinese Buddhists wish Dalai Lama back to China".
Sorry I do not agree with him and I do not think he can represent "hundreds of millions of Chinese Buddhists". I do not think he has achieved anything related to peace.
Nobel prize for dissident? 1:44pm on 29 Sep 2008 To midnightjunkie.

How did I insult Nobel peace price? Which part of my post is not true? Which word is not true? Simple facts. NPP insulted its self by allowing political figures who have nothing to do with peace become nominees. If you think NPP is a holy thing that can not be criticised it is your view, not mine.
One giant leap 11:06am on 28 Sep 2008 Congratulations. 3 farmers' sons out in the space. There should be a female astranaut for next mission. Good job. Great achievement in science and technology, China.
Nobel prize for dissident? 06:23am on 26 Sep 2008 Zhang Dan Hong, a Chinese woman who work as an editor for DW-Radio is now sacked. She made comments such as "the communist party of hina has more than any political force in the world inplemented Article 3 of the Declarartion of Human Rights." She was suspended and now finally sacked. Hu Jia will get Nobel peace prize? Of course. Any one who speak ill of Chinese government /ccp will be given a bonus and anyone who dare to praise the Chinese government or the party will be punished. Freedom of speech is dead. We are the lucky few who can deliever our censored speech at BBC. We are anonymous, right?

The Chinese government is not managing the internet well. They should learn from BBC. They should sensor unwanted speech and delete it like BBC does. Then there would not be a Hu Jia at all and they can boast freedom of speech. Given the fact that China has 0.2 billion netzens, there would be thousands and thousands moderator jobs created. The Chinese government should collect a special tax to fund the jobs. The Chinese must be happy to pay the tax to get the freedom of speech.

Thank you BBC.
China's taikonauts in germ-free press conference 03:40am on 26 Sep 2008 Heyone.

Fear is a good thing for a government donot you think? The opposite is not fear of any thing. That is pretty much the description of the US government. It has fearlessly overthrew many governments, droped bombs in a dozen of countries, killed millions in their wars, flared up racial or ethnic and religious conflicts on different continents. No worries of loosing face, no fear. No need of perfection. It is normal for the US government to do all of that. What a fearless government the world has to put up with.
Nobel prize for dissident? 03:27am on 26 Sep 2008 Nobel prize? What kind of prize is that? George Bush came close to it after his wars resulted in a million people dead, millions became refugees and millions disabled by their injuries. The prize has been used as a political carrot often given to the oppositions of targeted countries.
High-profile departure 03:14am on 26 Sep 2008 To newborn Khampa.

The interaction between Han, Mongolian, Manchuran and Tibetan is a long story. China is not a single ethnic state. In recent history Mongolian, Han and Manchurian took their turn to run the country. Mongolians invaded Europe during their rule and Manchurian took Korea during their rule. But one things has been consistant through out centuaries is Tibet has been on China's map started from Yuan Dynasty, during Ming Dynasty, Ching Dynasty, Republic of China, and today's people's republic of China. Same to XinJiang province and inner mongolia. There are separatists in almost every single country in this world. My advice to them is to avoid a violent approach. Respecting nations' sovereignty is the fundation of world peace and the opposite only leads to wars.
High-profile departure 02:50am on 26 Sep 2008 Newborn Khampa.

Not 1.2 million genocide anymore but 214 protestors killed? Evidence to back the claim?

Chinese have no problem with peaceful protest. Anyone not happy can protest. Protests of different scales happened in many places in China in recent years. Out of 1.3 billion people if 1/1000 are not happy then there would be 1,300,000 people not happy. If only 1 out of 1000 decide to protest then there would 1,300 protesting. So any protest of 1000 people is quite normal for a country has a popullation of 1.3 billion. No government in this world can make every single citizen happy.

The so called peaceful protest by Tibetan monks and Tibetans in exile are not peaceful. Yes, there are many protests by monks watched by thousands of onlookers that did not lead to violence. But the monk leaded protest in Lasah resulted in programmed attacked on Han and Muslim in Tibet. It is clearly a racial attack on non-believers. Whenever and whereever there is violence directly links to a religion it has to be closely scrutinized. Resorted to violence only make people doubt the quality of the so called peaceful and democratic religion. The torch relay protests were another ugly show. Using fire extinguisher on torch bearer, snaching torch by force and harrassing wheel chair bound athlete only show the world what kind of people they are. They are not peaceful.

It is a fact that there were suppression and violence on religions during the culture revolution. The Chinese government does not deny it and Chinese people can tell lot of stories about it. The Chinese government does not have a drape of democracy/freedom. It is subjected to the critism from all over the world. In contrats Tibetans in exiles have presented the government in exile as a democracy to western world. Most westerners buy unconditionally simply because they do not know much about it. There is a basic principle in democracy: the church must be separated from the state. Definitely not so in this government in exile. It is run by monks who work as polititians. Monks have 2 votes while ordinary Tibetan in exile only have one vote. What kind of democracy is that? It is a religion rule full stop. The darkest thing on the planet.
China's taikonauts in germ-free press conference 06:22am on 25 Sep 2008 I think Chinese people have a superb ability to sniff out propogandas. Do not you think so, James?

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

wonderfulchinese