BBC Blog Network

User Profile

neil_a2

Listed below are comments made by neil_a2 between Thursday, 24th September 2009 and Tuesday, 20th October 2009.

«Newer
Older»

A president for clangorous times? 04:21am on 20 Oct 2009 Biden carried the day? Were the teleprompters out of service?

Is Biden protecting Obama's flanks by rallying the generals to thwart a rogue news channel?

The inaction strategy is working ... looks like Afghanistan is winding down. Obama will get our troops out by February ... in boxes.
From Wall Street to Main Street to Skid Row 01:48am on 19 Oct 2009 Ugh #92 Except for the part, "I support Obama", I am pretty much in agreement with your post.

With regards to 0bama:

I detest the administration that encourages legislators to vote without reading legislation. (Now they vote on unwritten legislation because the public might read it, too.)

I detest the administration that lies before Congress regarding legislation that at least one vocal congressman actually read. (Yes, Joe Wilson was correct.)

I detest the administration that adopted the czar system because none of his cronies could pass scrutiny for the very most basic of ethics.

I detest the administration that took Air Force One, his motorcade, 44 marines, and two helicopters so he could go on a date with his wife.

I detest the administration whose stated objective is to tax employers solely to fund those it did not employ, and then provide exclusions for his union supporters.

Is it really difficult to understand why no one wants more employees? When the big "O" gets more of his entitlements pushed through, who would want to hire an American and carry the burden?

0bama never ran a business. He never made payroll. He never actually employed anyone. He never had to produce a profit. He is absolutely clueless on what it takes to encourage (not create) employment and make the business work once you have employees.

I do not live my life hating one party or the other. The last election was a lose-lose election. I feel we lost to a popular, empty shirt.

Obama's premise, "If they hire, we will tax." Business response, "Why hire, they will tax!"

Our cost of our labor is already uncompetitive in the global market. Obama's ambition to burden employment further will only aggravate the shedding of American jobs.
Obama's Afghan troop conundrum 00:11am on 18 Oct 2009 Additional troops will not help if the commander and chief is incompetent.

Our casualties are one half again higher than Bush's highest rate. The reason is because "the politicians" will not allow an air strike to come to the aid of ambushed troops. (and yes, the unsupported troops get slaughtered) The troops can not shoot until they are under fire; the insurgents learned to aim before starting the volley.

Why do the generals not support our troops or allow them to fight? Because they are following orders from higher up. They only answer to one person.

Obviously, the community organizer is incompetent in this theater, too.
From Wall Street to Main Street to Skid Row 11:58pm on 17 Oct 2009 The 10,000 should be no surprise.

Since January 20, 2009, the messiah's spending spree and money creation spree knocked 12% off the value of the dollar. We are still close to 8,800 in December, 2008 dollars.

Look for more rapid shedding of American jobs as the midnight administration is pushing through health care, voting on legislation that is not even in writing.

The gains are just taxable numbers and do not reflect an increase in value.
Putting Afghanistan in the driving seat 02:40am on 01 Oct 2009 Re 158 David - That was delightful. I concur.

Philly-Mom, may I quote you on the "chains and hot pants"?

This blog takes interesting twists. Some are mindless ventures. Yet, some others are very clever.
Putting Afghanistan in the driving seat 02:26am on 01 Oct 2009 Re: 105. saint

Did you read either healthcare proposal? I think NOT.

Fox news gave observations and page numbers.

Pelosi, Reid, and Obama said, "It is not in there.".

Following the Fox references, it is very obvious Pelosi, Reid, and B.O. were lying.

At least Fox was honest enough to cite references to the documents in question.

I commend the tea party for not following the flock.

Don't feel bad, saint, my senators did not read it either.

(Hey Mark, you are doing good.)
Tough enough? 05:22am on 28 Sep 2009 Iran could drop the price of their oil and watch the resolve of any sanctions disappear.

Was it not earlier this week that B.O. told the U.N. he wanted a nuke-free world? Did I miss the retraction?
Inside the 'Bubble' 05:08am on 28 Sep 2009 Mark, when you travel with the POTUS, can you see outside the bubble?

During the Montana town hall meeting, the bubble was flown in and never left the airport where the town hall meeting was staged. If you got to the gate of the airport, you would have seen the locals protesting. You would have seen the SEIU disrupting the assembly.

The bubble never saw that 900 of the 1500 town hall tickets were destroyed, and the 900 "supporters" were flown in to fill the hall. The real locals were outside the gate. The bubble never saw them. They were not allowed to take cameras out.
Not so special? 1:30pm on 24 Sep 2009 Dear sincere, American housewife,

What is your number?

Oh, it's 114. My bad.
Not so special? 1:19pm on 24 Sep 2009 The last time the British actually fought America, the British won.

Should Obama visit the UK again, he should be treated to Little Chef. It is more befitting the respect warranted. Bending over backwards for him would only add a new position to the other 101.

We are not losing the alliance and good will of the American people.

Obama does not appear to respect Europe, Christianity, Caucasians, or public directed self-governance.

Losing an alliance with their new government is a welcome loss indeed.

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

neil_a2