BBC Blog Network

User Profile

Named-Erion

Listed below are comments made by Named-Erion between Tuesday, 9th June 2009 and Saturday, 13th June 2009.

«Newer
Older»

March of the right 12:19pm on 13 Jun 2009 Lets see how this murder rates compare between the countries,while Russia is 5-th in the world.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur_percap-crime-murders-per-capita

Lets see this rape rates and where russia stands .

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_rap-crime-rapes

Now the most corupt in 2008.Russia is 147-th country in the list of less corupt countries acording to transparency int.

[Unsuitable/Broken URL removed by Moderator]

http://english.pravda.ru/hotspots/crimes/28-05-2007/92265-russian_skinhead-0

Thats your russia,one of the most corupt,highest levels of crime,highest levels of racism in the world,one of the most unsafe countries to live in.

I could go on if you want,there is no end to the lists that put russia in the worst categories just about everything.

I really dont wish to continue with you,since I dont have so much time to spend in this blog,so lets leave it at that.
March of the right 11:35am on 13 Jun 2009 isenhorn.

You should know that lies wont bring you glory.
Most of European countries suport the indipendence of Kosovo,and the most powerfull of them do so aswell.President Obama has expressed his suport for the indipendence,and has not moved an inch from Bush's policy with regards to that.

Lets say that Albania is small insignificant,which to an extent is true to many,including you,and that is full of crime.
Two things though stand,that with regard to Russia is much much better,and that it does not have problems with nationalists and racists,because it does not even have a nationalist party,or a racist party,like the ones you find all over europe.

And whoever spoke about the greattness of the Ottoman empire which cared for its citizins?
Ottoman empire is my favorite topic?? Man,whats wrong with you?Have you had a bottle of vodka just to start your day with?
Where did you pick that up?
March of the right 9:06pm on 12 Jun 2009 democracythreat.
Yes I have already done.I have participated in the topic that has been put foward,is not me who went out of topic,and is not me who invited you or your other compatriots who sudenly apeared as soon as mother russia was mentioned into the debate.

alex

Albania has problems with organised crime,and I am not gona suport the people involved in it,I hope they are all cought and imprisoned,whoever is involved in crime.
But this crime is mostly concentrated out of Albania not in Albania.I said that Albania is a democracy and it has very low criminality,if it was not true I would not say it,because I really dont give a damn.
It has problems with prostitution and traficking from the poor areas but it has very low number of roberies and theft,and quite a low murder rate.

That does not change anything about what we said about russia.
You have not given answer to what I questioned you about life in russia.
And I dont want your answer now since I can see we never gona have a constructive debate together anyway.
Better stick to the topic,I am not gona agree with you and you not gona agree with me.
March of the right 6:24pm on 12 Jun 2009 Isenhorn
May i remind you that there is a sizeble christian albanian community in Kosovo and nothing has ever happened to them,unless they where near Serbs.
Also most Albs dont have religious identity but national and ethnic one,be they muslims or christians.Albanians see this only as ethnic conflict and dont give a damn how serbia sees it,or russia.

Alex
AN bbc aticle from 2001 is hardly credible for the current situation ,dont you think?

More credible are statistics,find them and bring them.
March of the right 5:03pm on 12 Jun 2009 isenhorn.

May I remind you that in the 60-s Albania had no NATO or USA to protect it
(as a matter of fact was in a state of war with both),yet managed to pull out of the Warsaw pact as it wished and pleased and kick the mighty USSR out of their mediteranian bases,in the process taking some of their sub-marines for themselves just so that they could scare the ... out of Serbia,Italy and others alike.
Yes isenhorn,is like that,and dont be so sure that NATO intervened to help the Albanians,more then to help themselves,for they could not aford an armed conflict right in the heart of Europe.

As for many Russians who went to fight Nato in Kosovo,I can sent you some links wich explain very well the fate that awaited them at the hands of the KLA.An fate wich they subsequently met.
So as far as Russia-Albania thing is concerned,so far it has been a win win for the Albanians.

And yes,now we are pro-American country (always been,it was the comunists that changed that for a period of time) and we are proud of that.Also we proudly proclaim to be one of the most pro-American countries in the world.Thats also to upset Europeans who dont like that fact,the ones that tried so hard in their media to discredit Bush's vissit in the country,where he came to a hero's welcome in Albania,while he was welcomed with protests all over Europe.

And yes Albania is now a NATO member.So if russia or serbia think they can stirr up conflict in the balkans again,so that russia can mantain influence where it does not belong, they better think twice.

And yes,Albania is probably the only country in Europe who does not depend even 1% on russian gas or petrol.Is has had problems with the energy sector but it has met all needs already and is planing hundreds of hydrocentrals,and some nuclear power plants to turn the country into a regional power on energy.

And is also a democracy,and a country with some of the lowest statistics on criminality in Europe.

Ciao
March of the right 7:05pm on 11 Jun 2009 alex.

How can you posibly say that Russia is a safe country?
Do you deny that coruption is everywhere,in every aspect of life,from the most basic daily things up to trafic of dangerous armaments.
Do you deny that is a country that has historicaly not given a damn about human rights,and that its own people have meant nothing to the ruling elites? And still dont?And is evident when in a small town full of poor people who live in extreeme poverty you find millioneres and multimillioneres who rather spend their "hard earned money" with luxury in Europe and America,and not give a damn about creating jobs about this people.

You live in Moscow,but Moscow is not Russia.No artist,no art,no natural beauty can be used as a curtain to hide the sufferings of the main part of the population.
I have realised that when people talk about Russians they tend to talk about only white ethnic Russians,ignoring the fact that Russia is a multi-racial state,that even the people living in southern Russia are russians,citezins of the republic,wether be they muslims,white,brown,black whatever.

Imagine talking about American standarts and having in mind only white americans,ignoring blacks,hispanics,muslims,jews etc?

Russia is like i said an ultra-nationalist-orthodox society full of extremism.

All countries have extremists,but nothing hapens in Europe or America like happens in Russia where only in a matter of years hundreds or even more people are killed for not being white enough (i say that because they are not black,but dark skined,and some of them even white).
What about the two guys who killed tens of people for not being white enough? Bizarely some of them where actually white ethnic Russians (who just happen not to look white enough for this sick-heads).

Thats why i called Russia a non-european country.I am sorry but i just cant see that country as european in my mind.In my own definition of European.

Russia is Russia,I dont deny its achivements and its great influence on art and all aspects of civilisation,but also I have to point out its negatives,which in my opinion outwheight the positives.
March of the right 8:50pm on 10 Jun 2009 If you dissagree with my comment then you are welcome to bring foward an argument to counter it.
Second is I did not make comments about my adopted society,and I ceirtanly never have been part of the other.
But I tell you that in terms of values I respect what the USA stands for,and I never ever see myself respecting the values of an society that shines with extremety whichever way you look at it.

My comment is an answer to that particular argument that democracythreat put foward,which was full of inacuracies,racism,and typical ultra-nationalist-orthodox russian mentality which ceirtanly I found ofensive.

And that russia is a country where human life is cheeper then a bottle of vodka is aparent to me,and is an correct argument.If you dont like it,then that is a different matter.
March of the right 7:12pm on 10 Jun 2009 democracythreat:
How could a killing in Russia be the bigest news in Europe now,when Russia is not even part of Europe,never has been,and pray god,never will be.
But lets for a moment consider it.
There is no point reporting from a country run by oligarchs,organised crime,and megallomaniacs,where the life of a human is worth less then that of a botle of vodka.

On the other hand the USA showed the world what the respect for human life really is,and what individual freedom means,wether uou are white,black,muslim or christian,when you are in the USA you are given the same oportunities to prosper and your individual choices in life are guarantied by law and respected by the institutions no matter who you are.
In fact is the only country in the world who gets attacked,is forced into a war and takes responsibility for the civilians of the enemy,even if they are used as civilian shields by their own government.
March of the right 9:06pm on 09 Jun 2009 Webaliceinwonderland

The fact that you find your lack of knowledge explainable,should give me the right to dispute your ill founded argument.
Yes Albania said goodbye to Russia the moment it tried to improve relations with Yougoslavia at Albania's expense,and with that Albanian goodbye ,Russia said goodbye to its Adriatic bases and its exit in mediterranian at the time.Ah ,and also to some of its submarines,wich the Albanians thought it was best for you to live behind :-)

Do those writers who dont define Albanians as Illyrians explain how come that the Albanian population has its own unique language and culture differenet from slavs and greeks but are not Illiryans? So what are they then?
Yes the main Illyrian homeland was northwest of the Balkans but all the way to the southwest and southern Italy,with the Epirotan and Messapian tribes.
Yes the artefact of the Illyrian civilisation are spread now between all countries that inhabit that area,but then of course it would,the point is that Serb are slavic late comers in the Balkans,so are the Slovenes,and so are the others,and the Austrians are Germans,therefore none of them is Illyrian,while Albanians who have their language simmilar to Illyrians and unique traditions and culture,as well as highland inhabitance,and national counsiousness are.
The Illyrians were defeted by the Romans and Romanised to an extent,but the language did not die,it developed into the modern day Albanian language.Otherwise those Russian-Serbian historians who say otherwise better find where the Albanian language and traditions come from.
Albania did not declare itself a country in 1190.Where did you pick that up?Albania was declared a country for the first time in 1912.
Your historical sources are as valid as USSR.

On the battle of Kosovo it was not Serbs who fought the invading Turks but the whole of the Balkan people,including Serbs,but you are right that it was Serbs who hijacked this historical event and made it part of their folklore only.Because others,like the Albanians did not see what the point of celebrating an defeat was.

On the Greek-Turk issue i can confidently tell you ,that you know close to nothing.Those Turks who came over from Turkmenistan or asia were only a few thousends warriors who took control of what is today modern Turkey,but there was people living there before ,was not there????Was that not part of the ancient greece with population and cities?Acording to you Turks apeared sudenly in that land and others who were there before disapeared???

And no.Byzantium was an empire ruling on many different peoples,not greeks as you say.And it was not a greek colony.As i told you ancient greece as a concept is not a population of a country,or a nationhood,but of a scholar and military elite.

As for the Greek-Turk question,again i'd like to point out to you that when the two modern countries were founded,Greece and Turkey separated populations only based on religious affiliation ,not ethnic one,millions of christians were transfered from turkey to greece to become people of the new greek orthodox christian country,and milions of muslims were transfered to turkey (not considering ethnic element,only religious one) to become people of the new modern Turkey.

The fact that you always thought of them as Greeks is well known to me,but is well known to all historians a different,more complicated truth.
March of the right 5:47pm on 09 Jun 2009 MarcusAurelius is right.

While racism exists in both America and Europe,perhaps americans are even more racists then europeans,but there is a fondamental difference between the two,which is that in Europe racism is institutionalised,in America is not.This is a simple fact.Even in this blog I have argued with English people who refused to call a person who is black English,but only british.
Just look at the way an BBC corenspondent reports about the parties in Romania and Hungary when he calls them anti-immigration parties,while we all know that there is no immigration issues in this countries,and that this parties are in fact anti-Roma and not anti-immigration.And the Roma are not immigrants but people that have been living in Europe for as long as they can remember.They are no less european then the white europeans and their culture no less european then the white christian european culture.Europe is diverse and we should accept that.

Being roma in eastern europe means being iliterate and discriminated against in all institutions.Being black in France means not able to have a proper life unless you know how to play football.And to start counting this facts I wont be finished untill tomorow.

Tell me one reason,only one reason,ecxept that of racism,for wich the right and far right get the vote in western Europe.
And you might start talking to MarcusAurelius and objecting to this,but I live in Europe and I have lived in many European countries,and I know how it is.

The political spectrum and status quo is allowing far right to come back only for one reason,and only one reason.
Thats a reason that reporters like Mark etc know very well,but dont bother reporting,which is that far right parties make people go out and vote,and without peoples vote there is no status quo.The more people vote ,the biger the excuse of the polititians to act in their name.There is apathy in europe and one very good way to increase the % of voters is to make the far right a credible political force,this would increase political debate and take people out of their homes to vote.

In my opinion this is a dangerous way of aproching the issue of apathy.When the standarts are lowered so much then people tend to suport thugs of the BNP type.

A party such as the BNP who stands for an exlusively white christian country would not even be legal in America and rightly so.

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

Named-Erion