BBC Blog Network

User Profile

Hank_Reardon

Listed below are comments made by Hank_Reardon between Tuesday, 28th October 2008 and Wednesday, 25th March 2009.

«Newer
Older»

Ex-BBC journalist arrested in Iran 11:21am on 25 Mar 2009 So i am guessing the point of the piece is we are not to like Iran.

This is just pure propoganda and nothing else.

It's a disgrace, it's misleading and it only serves to demonise another people who have the crazy notion of living above oil.

Miss Siberi, once Miss Dakota, was detained because she bought alcohol and then found to have no valid visa for being in Iran.

On march 9th, two days before this blog was written, her lawyer visited her in tehran and reported that she was 'depressed but showed no signs of torture'. Both her lawyer and her father report the charges to have been clear.

Miss Siberi, seems an intelligent woman and a brave one too, she took a massive risk by placing herself illegally in a strict regime. She then pushed this by buying some wine, this is not an offence they always prosecute people for, but she now has to pay the consequence for it. Simple.

Her book on Iranian culture may be a different one now.

Although initially facing up to two years it now looks as though she will be released in the next few weeks.

The whole thing is just there to make us fear Iran. How soon before we are told they can imprison any journalist in 45 mins.

You could show concern for any number of journalists but you chose Iran a Country that although is the 6th largest jailer of journalists they dont even merit a mention on the 14 most dangerous countries for journalists.

Last check they had 5 journalists in prison, 3 more than we have in Iraq, 1 more than Isreal has and the same amount as Azerbaijan has.

I know your working hard at the BBC, but what i want to know is, who you are working for?
Caught up in a conspiracy theory 3:39pm on 31 Oct 2008 Lets stick to the footage, We could play tit for tat with who said they saw what, In the footage we have hard evidence of what was broadcast that day and what 'home' videos have been handed over to the media, uploaded to the internet and such.

all i am suggesting is that the majority, if not all of this footage is faked. Edited after the fact or during the event.

Tecnically not that a hard thing to make to fool the casual observer, but very hard to pass under analysis.

The plane crashes, like the barbara olsen phonecall, never happened.

That about as far as my theory goes.
Caught up in a conspiracy theory 3:07pm on 31 Oct 2008 Excellent pixels,

Glad to see you are taking up the mantle where john112 refuses to tread.

So i am a nutjob who gives the truth movement a bad name. I see you have reverted to mockery, Why not let me take you through the footage, in it we have hard evidence broadcast to millions. But evidence of what? Lets start with this one

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTsiLX3XbA

DO you want to tell me where the plane is?

Also i am glad to see my tin-foil-hat comment time travelling device is working.
Caught up in a conspiracy theory 7:03pm on 30 Oct 2008 and we are talking about 9/11 John, so it has got out. Just cos mike isn't convinced doesn't mean it's not happening.

You said nothing about kennedy got out, that would be nothing barring E Howard Hunts confession. So do you believe what Mr. Hunt has to say or is a confession no good unless it involves waterboarding.

The reason folks think you are shill john is because we refuse to believe you could be that stupid.
Caught up in a conspiracy theory 3:10pm on 30 Oct 2008 We are only allowed to know what we are meant to know. if some agent from an agency decides to write a book and tell all, fess up to the masses then unless he knows something really damaging then i am sure the agencies have no problem letting them do it. I would imagine if they tried anything else they would be prevented.

So John your argument is that everything else has come out. Well how do you know everyting has come out. That is a ridiculous statement. You can say lets of things have come out, You can say the Iran contra but this doesn't mean other such operations exist.

Plus all this talk of the CIA or the MI6 and so on is again you presupposing who the perpetrators of these things are. Its just lots of folks following orders. From journalists being told what not to write, filmmakers being told what to make, soldiers being told fight and even theorists being told to conspire.

Also its intersting that you can believe that he US govt can research advanced weapon systems, maybe they even came up with some kind of explosive to bring down the towers, sorry to get back to the actual argument here, It wasnt that 2 planes had hit them.

I am guessing your still avoiding the no-plane theory. And it sounds so wild i thought you would relish such an oppertunity to debunk me and prove me wrong. Weird that.
Caught up in a conspiracy theory 9:08pm on 29 Oct 2008 John you still avoiding my no-plane theory. I thought you would have been able to tell me where the plane was in the video i Linked to.
Caught up in a conspiracy theory 1:44pm on 29 Oct 2008 John i linked a video for you and asked you where is the plane.

Lets do this theory one step at a time or i fear you will start getting ahgead of yourself with demands for clarification of random specifics. As i said i only wish to debate the footage that you think is real.

So watch the link and tell me where is the plane?
Caught up in a conspiracy theory 10:19am on 29 Oct 2008 Not up for arguing with my 'no-plane' theory then John.

Didn't think so.

I am guessing it is because it's hard to argue with the raw footage available as it doesn't rely on interpritation by experts and such, you just use your eyes and either see planes or you don't.

You just stick to arguing about building 7, plenty of grey area where you could go back and forth for hours.

i will get back to other matters
Caught up in a conspiracy theory 00:20am on 29 Oct 2008 John112, I have to agree with you about remote control planes, I am quite sure there was not remote control planes used that day. Which is kind of our point here. You see, as much as me a Ynda agree that the officiial line is a fairy tale, we disagree in what we think might have happened.

I am, from the "no-planer" end of the argument as to what might have happened. Which often leaves me as vilified by the 'truth movemnt' as you. Us no-planers are a very small crowd. So i am sure if your looking for what you would consider an outrageous argument, you could have it with me.

My theory doesn't really extend beyond what little hard evidence there is, the footage.
So please don't expect me to be able to answer any of your questions beyond what we were shown that day. just the footage nothing else. Most, if not all of it, is fake. Some badly done some very well. But fake all the same.

I'll start you with this clip

Where's the plane?

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTsiLX3XbA

So its not quite Lizard men but it is a bit too dramatic for even those in 'truth movement'

Pixels well done for having the Kean commisssion report, the next step is you watch all the public testimony given to it, read up on all their sources, crosschecking the information and you will soon start seeing the glaring holes and misdirections that are in the final report.

The order still stands and such, also keep an eye out for the contradictory timings, you can do this purely with the kean report. This time read it whilst taking notes.

oh and about your no one made money from put options, well

“To the embarrassment of investigators, it has also [learned] that the firm used to buy many of the ‘put’ options… on United Airlines stock was headed until 1998 by ‘Buzzy’ Krongard, now executive director of the CIA.” Krongard was chairman of Alex Brown Inc., which was bought by Deutsche Bank. “His last post before resigning to take his senior role in the CIA was to head Bankers Trust—Alex Brown’s private client business, dealing with the accounts and investments of wealthy customers around the world.” [Independent, 10/14/2001]

Just a coincidence eh.
Caught up in a conspiracy theory 3:44pm on 28 Oct 2008 Liltbrokie,

If the BBC and their peers can't bring themsleves to tell us even the most basic things can you really imagine them even broaching the subject of Ms. Sheerin and her Codex.

Even worse could you imagie what the Johns of this blog would have to say about it.

9/11 research is easy as pie compared to taking on the Codex. But i have to say i am heartened that at least someone else knows about it.

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

Hank_Reardon