BBC Blog Network

User Profile

grumpy-jon

Listed below are comments made by grumpy-jon between Friday, 29th August 2008 and Saturday, 30th August 2008.

«Newer
Older»

Wednesday, 27 August, 2008 3:20pm on 30 Aug 2008 Re #18. Thanx as ever for your refs JJ. How the hell you keep abreast of so much material, I have no idea.
Friday, 29 August, 2008 2:43pm on 30 Aug 2008 Re 17 etc. lancashirejim/Steve-London.
Sorry if you boys had no-one to talk to last night. There was this bar to be propped up and Scottish Wine to be swallied.
At any rate, I'd have been agreeing with every word you said, except where you said Jim that our leaders were 'lilly-livered'. I'd prefer the term 'corrupt'. Only corruption and pressure from sectional interests, in my view, holds the big party leaders back from gathering the political pay-off that would accrue, to whoever permits a full debate on immigration. Rather, they're all intent on preventing debate and real electoral choices, although they're finally being forced to talk about it by the growing very voter-radicalism that you display in your posts.
They haven't promoted these decades of mass-immigration, and of oppressing and criminalising the British people, only to allow this to be stopped and reversed, IMO.
Prospects for Friday, 29 August, 2008 09:17am on 30 Aug 2008 Re #11.
Hard to believe, isn't it, that this simple solution hasn't been introduced in this "alleged democracy?"
The establishment daren't allow the debate.But it is being forced on them. And they are losing it.
Friday, 29 August, 2008 09:06am on 30 Aug 2008 Re #20/21.
Reword it Ed to give us the general idea.
Friday, 29 August, 2008 09:04am on 30 Aug 2008 Re #7/8/11. That's right. Do all you know. No answer to points made earlier. Just more of your usual 60 year old propaganda, prejudice, and hatred for your own countrymen and women. I won't even bother to point out your utter ignorance about the killing of Keith Brown, since you're incapable of sustaining an arguement.
Suffice to say that with the thousands abandoning the old parties, it comes as a huge relief to know that you "totally reject" the BNP. Please try to maintain this position over the next 20 years, won't you dear boy.
Thursday, 28 August, 2008 6:29pm on 29 Aug 2008 Re #18.
"Why do many people on this site resort to....?" Because it makes us feel better Bill.
Friday, 29 August, 2008 6:02pm on 29 Aug 2008 Could we look at the limitless barminess Americans reveal, when naming their children, as highlighted by Sarah Palin's, who named hers:- Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper and Trigg. Is this a secret Republican code? We should be told!
Wednesday, 27 August, 2008 5:40pm on 29 Aug 2008 Re #16. JJ and thecookieducker. Priceless. But also uncannily near the truth. First part of the course-Watch Newsnight avoiding and surpressing issues, until torpor sets in.
Prospects for Friday, 29 August, 2008 5:19pm on 29 Aug 2008 Re #7. Reverting to lifting the proaganda your so cherish, directly from your favoured organ, I see. And this as substitute for making and replying to points made.
'Dense' you say? As in accepting a view of a political party wholesale, from its direct opponents? Very shrewd.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, 2 local by-elections took place yesterday, with the BNP polling an average of 14%-real people-real votes-real concerns, not shared by all by any means, but by many. Your response has already been established- these people like sex with sheep.
Don't imagine that you are opposed to, or worried by, the growth of the BNP, a perfectly responsible position for many; no you are a would-be censor, a ban-promoter, and a hater of your own countrymen and women, without the intellect or integrity or knowledge to reflect on their fears and concerns.
Is it possible to stop illegal immigration? 4:55pm on 29 Aug 2008 "Is it possible....? Of course, given the political will, and to see that develop, the establishment has to promote democratic debate, and stop pushing it's standard output of pro-immigration propaganda, such as Newsnight's current series of 'reports' by an illegal, while completely excluding the host-population's concerns, followed up by stupid questions like this, aimed at prejudicing discussion.

«Newer
Older»

^ Back to top

BBC MMVI

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk

BBC Blog Network

Find and talk to the BBC's bloggers.

User Profile

grumpy-jon