The May day bank holiday weekend has produced some very poor weather over the years; it has arguably the worst track record for weather of any bank holiday.

 

The very first May day bank Holiday was in 1978.

 

It turned out to be cold and windy, and in southern Britain, wet, all courtesy of an easterly block.

 

Here in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire it was cold and grey with extensive low cloud.

 

Remarkably the country had to wait until 1989 for a fine and warm Bank holiday Monday

 

There have been a few fine and warm weekends since then, but these, unfortunately, have been the exception to the rule.

 

This year, however, things look more positive, with a good deal of fine weather expected across Yorkshire and Lincolnshire.

 

The details are proving a little elusive at this stage, courtesy of weak weather fronts which may being more cloud at times and the risk of just a little patchy rain.

 

But amounts of rain will be small, and in-between these weather fronts long dry and bright spells of weather are expected with some pleasant spring sunshine.

 

With a west or south-westerly wind, temperatures won’t be far from normal, with the best conditions always likely towards the coast.

 

Early May is in fact looking promising, with high pressure set to dominate through much of next week, and possibly beyond.

 

 April, incidentally, turned out to be very dry across England and Wales, with around half the normal rainfall. Sunshine amounts were close to normal, with temperatures colder than average.

Follow me on twitter @Hudsonweather

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments.

  • Comment number 18. Posted by greensand

    on 7 May 2013 16:16

    17. QuaesoVeritas

    "I don't know enough about Corbyn's theories.."

    Same here QV, I have always viewed Corbyn as a "showman". For Paul Hudson to give credence to Corbyn's work was a surprise to me. As Paul Hudson has demonstrated over the years that he has an open mind to all "climate theories" I might have to pay a little more attention.

    I think Paul said something along the lines that Corbyn had demonstrated to him that "the position of the jet stream is affected by solar magnetic particles/forces". I have not gone into any details such as the effect the moon has etc, but PH's comments, IMVHO give Corbyn more credibility than I previously thought existed. Maybe our host will post on it?

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 18: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 18: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 17. Posted by QuaesoVeritas

    on 7 May 2013 12:37

    #16.greensand
    "The following maybe of interest - Our Host on the "maverick" Piers Corbyn and Weather Action, some might be surprised by his comments :-"

    I am a bit surprised by the comment that Corbyn says that "the magnetic particles are modulated by the Moon - by the magnetic field of the Moon, then goes on to discuss the effect of the Moon's GRAVITY on the tides. I was under the assumption that the Moon didn't have much of a magnetic field. Is there confusion here between the magnetic field and it's gravitational field?
    I don't know enough about Corbyn's theories to know if he is referring to the Moon's magnetic field or it's gravitational field.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 17: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 17: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 16. Posted by greensand

    on 7 May 2013 11:57

    The following maybe of interest - Our Host on the "maverick" Piers Corbyn and Weather Action, some might be surprised by his comments :-

    Paul Hudson's Weather Show - 4/5/2013 - approx 22:30 in

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p017wh2w

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 16: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 16: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 15. Posted by QuaesoVeritas

    on 7 May 2013 11:14

    I wonder why the BBC was making such a fuss about yesterday possibly being the warmest day of the year so far?
    There was even mention of it being a "record", (for the year so far?).
    According to CET, the highest max. temp. so far this year was 17.5c on April 23rd, but since temperatures normally rise at this time of year, in theory, new "high" temperatures could be recorded every day.
    Were the BBC implying that it was going to be unusually warm?
    The provisional daily maximum CET for May 6th is 20.1c but this is by no means unusual for May 6th., with a figure of 21.3c being recorded in 1886, 21.7c in 1889 and 21.0c in 1895.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 15: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 15: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 14. Posted by john_cogger

    on 5 May 2013 12:16

    @11 newdwr54

    One month in a 'downwards' direction seems to be enough! A month or 2 of high temps at the start of the year was enough for a few to question UAH and even Dr Roy himself.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 14: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 14: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 13. Posted by newdwr54

    on 5 May 2013 11:18

    12: QV

    Unless HadCRUT4 March is radically different from NOAA (and it's not usually) then Jan-Mar will be +0.47C as far as the Met's figures go. Looks like April may lower that though.

    I was surprised to see that April 2013 for the UK tied April 2012. It was even fractionally warmer here in N Ireland than last April. If anything it felt colder; possibly wind chill?

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 13: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 13: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 12. Posted by QuaesoVeritas

    on 5 May 2013 10:20

    #11.newdwr54
    "April 2013 was joint 11th warmest in UAH record and Jan-April 2013 is the fifth warmest 'year-to-date' in UAH. "

    But remember that the MO forecasted an anomaly of 0.57c v 1961-90 this year, which would make it the warmest on record according to the WMO average.
    That's equivalent to a UAH mean of about 0.28c, compared with the actual 0.24c so far.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 12: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 12: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 11. Posted by newdwr54

    on 5 May 2013 09:58

    9 & 10,

    April 2013 was joint 11th warmest in UAH record and Jan-April 2013 is the fifth warmest 'year-to-date' in UAH.

    Hardly cause for jubilation among the Wattsonians?.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 11: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 11: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 10. Posted by QuaesoVeritas

    on 5 May 2013 09:40

    #9.john_cogger

    "I see UAH is back in favour again with the good commentators at WUWT. Wonder why? :-)"

    I get the impression that some commentors don't appreciate that the anomalies are v 1981-2010.
    Still no HC4 for March.
    I think that the MO staff must have started their BH weekend early!

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 10: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 10: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 9. Posted by john_cogger

    on 5 May 2013 09:11

    @6 QuaesoVeritas

    I see UAH is back in favour again with the good commentators at WUWT. Wonder why? :-)

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 9: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 9: 0
    Loading…
More comments

More Posts

Previous