Advertisement
BBC BLOGS - BBC Sport: Paul Fletcher
« Previous | Main | Next »

Hiddink holds his nerve

Paul Fletcher | 01:17 UK time, Wednesday, 15 April 2009

Chelsea boss Guus Hiddink planned to go home after his team's 4-4 draw with Liverpool and drink a glass of wine.

After what the Dutchman witnessed on Tuesday evening he would have been well within his rights to make it a very large scotch.

What unfolded at Stamford Bridge was a stone-cold classic, the sort of encounter that bolsters the belief held by many that English football is the most exciting in the world.

It was also the sort of match to send a manager over the edge.

You could see the frustration in the respective dugouts. Hiddink had started the match wearing a large coat but that didn't last long, such was the frequency with which he made the short journey to berate the fourth official.

Liverpool boss Rafa Benitez refused to be outdone and by the end of the evening the official on the sidelines, Alfonso Perez Burrull, might just have developed a high-pitched ringing sound in his ears. Benitez was quick to tell the assembled media afterwards that his team had been penalised for 29 fouls. He left them to draw their own conclusions.

Benitez constantly issues instructions to his players, almost coaches them through the game. He is rarely still and must cover the same distance as a midfielder. He should have his own ProZone statistics.

Hiddink does not communicate with his players nearly as often during a game but the fact that he made a tactical substitution after 36 minutes, replacing Salomon Kalou with Nicolas Anelka, told you all you needed to know about his take on the opening to the contest.

Frank Lampard scored twice as Chelsea won 7-5 on aggregate

By that stage his team trailed 2-0 on the night and were one more from falling behind in the tie. Hiddink berated his players at the break, told them that they had not started as planned and had given Liverpool far too much space. He also felt that too many of his players had lost their individual duels, but there is no denying that what made Tuesday's match so enthralling was in part straightforward human error.

Chelsea's encounters with Liverpool - and there have now been 24 since Benitez arrived at Anfield in 2004 - have occasionally been tense, tactical affairs in which the two sides have cancelled themselves out. This was not the case on Tuesday. Petr Cech's horrendous neglect of his near post, for example, allowed Fabio Aurelio to strike the most unlikely opening goal and gave Liverpool the self-belief to really take the match to their opponents.

Cech, uncertain against Bolton on Saturday, had another poor game and looks a pale shadow of his former self. Hiddink refused to be drawn on whether he would consider dropping the Czech keeper for his team's FA Cup semi-final with Arsenal on Saturday, choosing instead to acknowledge it had not been a great few days for Cech, who he described as "very intelligent and very self-critical".

Chelsea squandered possession far too easily in the first half, inviting their opponents to attack. For a team with such an enviable home record they looked extremely uncertain. I asked Ricardo Carvalho afterwards what it had been like in the dressing room at half-time. "Difficult," he said.

If it was difficult for him, the opening half must have been hell for suspended skipper John Terry, who was sitting a few rows in front of me. Looking towards the goal to his right as Liverpool clawed their way back into the tie, he must have noticed the huge banner that hung from the tier above. It said "JT - captain, leader, legend", but from his seat he was powerless to influence what was happening in front of him.

Hiddink deserves high praise for taking such decisive action in replacing Kalou with Anelka. He explained that when making such an early substitution he prefers it to involve attacking players and felt Anelka would offer more of a one-on-one threat and greater penetration.

Chelsea also responded to what Hiddink had told them at the break. It is one of the things that the coach has noticed in his short time at Stamford Bridge - the ability of his players to react to his instructions.

When Frank Lampard, inspirational at times and perhaps unlucky not to be on the shortlist for the PFA player of the year award, scored to complete a sensational turnaround and put Chelsea 3-2 ahead, the tie looked to be definitively over.

Sometimes, however, football does throw up the most unpredictable and breathtaking sequences of play. It defies logic and expectation. It is what makes it such a remarkable game and why we turn up week after week; a fear of missing something that we might live to regret.

Liverpool's quick-fire late brace remarkably took them to within one goal of qualification for a second time in the match before Lampard struck again to finally seal the tie in Chelsea's favour.

By this stage the atmosphere inside Stamford Bridge was sensational. The decibel level had oscillated throughout between the two sets of fans before finally settling in the home team's favour but all had seen something to savour.

As the players made their way out of the stadium afterwards it was clear that both teams felt they could take something positive away with them.

Benitez paid handsome tribute to his side, praising their character and quality as well as singling out the much-maligned Lucas Leiva for his performance in deputising for the injured Steven Gerrard. Xabi Alonso said that there were many positives for the Reds to take into their quest for a first Premier League title.

And there is no doubt that Liverpool did prove a point. Chelsea shut down Gerrard and Fernando Torres in the first leg and left 3-1 winners. People hinted at a team over-reliant on these two players yet, even though Gerrard was missing at Stamford Bridge and Torres relatively ineffective, Liverpool still had enough about them to score four goals.

Chelsea march on and now face Barcelona in the last four - although with Wayne Bridge now at Manchester City and Paulo Ferreira injured they will have to contest the first leg without a recognised left-back after Ashley Cole was booked on Tuesday.

Before then they face Arsenal in the FA Cup and resume their Premier League duties. Perhaps with so many fixtures looming they won't have time for a full video debrief of Tuesday's match.

I don't think Carvalho would be too bothered. When I asked him if he would like to see the match again he said: "No, no, no. We can watch it to learn from our mistakes but it would not be good."

Millions of football fans might choose to disagree.

Comments

or register to comment.

  • 1. At 07:50am on 15 Apr 2009, azeb-manutd wrote:

    a fantastic match. good luck to chelsea against barcelona - your going to need it.

    unlucky liverpool, another tropyless season is upon you.

    Complain about this comment

  • 2. At 07:55am on 15 Apr 2009, ChelseaSaffer wrote:

    What a game! Honestly, i'd much rather have Barca in the semi's than Utd or Arsenal. English teams are the toughest to play against in Europe. One step closer to the final guys! COME ON U BLUES!!!!!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 07:56am on 15 Apr 2009, realthing wrote:

    Whilst it was entertaining I thought it was a really poor game in terms of quality. At least 3 of the goals were caused by error rather than skill. Liverpool should never have been allowed back into this game after being 1-3 down from the first leg. The first goal was a shocker almost a School boy error from Czch. Then once Liverpool were back in the game Reina commits an almost equal error to undo all the good work. Chelsea are going to have to improve defensely or will get punished against Barcelona. The one good think is that Terry will return to the fold.

    Complain about this comment

  • 4. At 08:00am on 15 Apr 2009, chimney_leaf wrote:

    At 2-0 down, Chelsea were a goal away from going out 4-3, nothing to do with away goals. 3-1 + 0-3 = 3-4 Simple enough really.

    The BBC don't seem to be able to understand away goals, just a few days ago there was an article saying Manchester United beat Juventus on away goals in 1999, but the aggregate score was 4-3 to United that time too. United were going through on away goals on that occasion until they went 3-2 up.

    Complain about this comment

  • 5. At 08:12am on 15 Apr 2009, snowJacuzzi007 wrote:

    What an incredible game. I'm so gutted that we've gone out, but i believe we can hold our heads high. We gave it a damn good go. I was up and down like a yo yo all game! And so was my blood pressure!

    It was all won and lost in the 1st leg. If only we hadn't capitulated like that then we'd be sitting in the semi finals right now. Oh well, there's always next year. You can't win it every year i suppose!

    But it was definitely one of the best games i have ever seen. Maybe not in terms of actually skill, but the heart, determination, drama and atmosphere was outstanding. Stamford Bridge isn't know for it's atmosphere like Anfield is, but the place was certainly rocking last night. Credit to both sets of fans.

    Well done Chelsea on reaching the semi finals. You guys played well over the two legs. And if you can keep Messi quiet in the 1st leg of the semi, you've got a chance of making the final.

    Shame we couldn't win for the 96, but we did that on saturday. YNWA.

    Complain about this comment

  • 6. At 08:25am on 15 Apr 2009, Mat_Bakus wrote:

    People should not be so quick to judge Reina on the first goal. The egregious Drogba (seriously, rolling back on to the pitch to stop play for an "injury", it beggars belief) got a slight touch on it, giving Reina about 0.1 of a second to re-adjust. It was not his fault, although I can understand why people would think otherwise.

    A fantastic game. Why get bogged down looking for errors when you have seen a game like that?

    It hurts me to say it, but Chelsea deserved it.

    And now, of course, in typically optimistic footy fan fashion, we can concentrate on the league...

    Complain about this comment

  • 7. At 08:33am on 15 Apr 2009, daquanqm wrote:

    Rather unexpected from a Champions League game. This is the sort of encounter we get many of in the Dutch Premier League - matches that are riddled with mistakes.

    I didn't see that coming from two teams that boast nothing but world star players.

    Great entertainment though. Keep it up!

    Complain about this comment

  • 8. At 08:41am on 15 Apr 2009, LFC_Its_Only_A_Game wrote:

    replying to azeb_manc: another trophyless season it maybe mate but you have to admit that your prayers came thru when the mancs didnt draw another english team in the CL, therefore meaning with there below par performances of late, do you think the mancs would have produced a remarkable performance against chelsea at stamford bridge??? be an honest manc fan with your reply ok. and hey just to remind you all you mancs have at this current time is the mickey mouse cup that all manc fans have been calling it anytime liverpool won it...so mate live the real world & quit acting like a typical manc fan.

    Complain about this comment

  • 9. At 08:43am on 15 Apr 2009, LFC_Its_Only_A_Game wrote:

    a truly great game by both sets of players and one for all fans to remember... best of luck to Chelsea now, hope they meet the mancs in the final and get some sweet revenge.

    Complain about this comment

  • 10. At 08:46am on 15 Apr 2009, Schopenhauer wrote:

    I think I must have been watching a different match. The game I saw was poor, full of unforced errors. There was drama, fouls aplenty, but nothing approaching good football.

    Complain about this comment

  • 11. At 08:50am on 15 Apr 2009, ArsenalArseneArshavin wrote:

    Many goals don't mean it was a quality game. It was schoolboy errors. It was entertaining but not because of the quality..

    You say benitez moves around like a midfielder, why is he so fat then?

    Chelsea don't impress me at all, and Barca are going to demolish them. I already know their game plan. Long balls to Drogba so he can cause panic against Puyol and co.

    What we all want is pure football. Barcelona vs Arsenal is that the world is deserving

    Complain about this comment

  • 12. At 08:50am on 15 Apr 2009, LFC_Its_Only_A_Game wrote:

    everybody we got a joker in at 8.46am... :-)must be another manc fan already warming his chair for the nervy game coming up tonight... joker

    Complain about this comment

  • 13. At 09:02am on 15 Apr 2009, LFC_Its_Only_A_Game wrote:

    One last thing to everyone on here today, can we all please remember this date 20 years ago and also the people who lost there lives so tragically.

    Complain about this comment

  • 14. At 09:05am on 15 Apr 2009, QPR, A Real Fan wrote:

    Schopenhauer, you must have been watching a different match then, for example, Dirk Kuyt's goal was set up by a superb cross, good football? And if by good football you mean technically brilliant, no one wants to watch a team pulling of amazing passes in defense, as that would be boring. Football is a game, and on TV it is there to entertain which is what the Liverpool Chelsea match did brilliantly, and it was a good night in, instead of waching a drab 1-1 draw which is what I expect today with Man U playing.

    Complain about this comment

  • 15. At 09:12am on 15 Apr 2009, hermannredux wrote:

    Yes there were errors and yes it was a good match - the two aren't incompatible. There were times when it was reminiscent of a 1970s Boxing Day game - a comedy of errors perhaps, but great to watch.

    To whoever thinks Barca will demolish Chelsea - think again. Barcelona are capable of demolishing teams that attempt to beat them at their own game, which
    1. is impossible, and
    2. Chelsea won't do.

    It'll be tight but my money is on Chelsea to sneak it, aggregate score of 3-2.

    Complain about this comment

  • 16. At 09:14am on 15 Apr 2009, snowJacuzzi007 wrote:

    Seriously, some people need to gain some perspective!!!!

    We KNOW it wasn't a quality game in terms of skill last night. No-one is saying it was! But it WAS quality in terms of drama, excitement, end-to-end stuff and the fact that, despite the first leg result, you didn't really know who was going to win this until the last couple of minutes. There are many definitions of quality, and THAT is one of them.

    Why knock the game? Yeah i'm gutted we've gone out, but it was an amazing game and one to be remembered for a long time to come. Good luck to all English teams left in.

    Last nights game was a great entertaining tribute to the lost 96. YNWA.

    Complain about this comment

  • 17. At 09:23am on 15 Apr 2009, philtoon82 wrote:

    Thoroughly enjoyable game last night, end to end stuff and drama until the final minute.

    Hats off to both, Liverpool gave it their best shot but the 2 goal advantage from the first leg always looked at bit too much.

    Just want to point something out, Liverpool fans backed their team to the very end in both games singing to the end of the 3-1 defeat in the home leg and for the 90mins of last nights match too!!

    The Chelsea team were booed off last night at half time!! This being the same team that still have a chance of winning the premier league, FA Cup and at this point, were still going through to the Semi Final of the Champions League on away goals!!! Tells you all you need to know about the supporters of these two clubs.

    Whitley for the Vase!

    Complain about this comment

  • 18. At 09:24am on 15 Apr 2009, surferShaz wrote:

    I agree. This game was purely for specatator and media enjoyment. I loved it. It will talked about for years

    But removing the emotion, it was actually a pathetic game. There was errors upon errors upon errors. Percentage passes completed was bad and loosing the ball unnecessary was abundent.

    Any true football person would be worried. For example. Ask a great coach like Mourinho if he would take a 4-3 win or a 1-0 win. He will tell you he'll take a 1-0 win any day over a 4-3 win. Because he does not care if his strikers could score 4 goals but he would have sleepless nights because his side leaked 3 goals. And that will be a worry more for any great football coach who knows the game. At the end of the day although Liverpool came and gave it a shot to score the required goals they also let in the same amount and vice versa. Where is the trade off? Yes all good and well to remove your holding midfielder, yes remove your right back, but at what cost. Naturally you'll score but at the same time you'll let goals in. In the end Liverpool did not find the balance. The more they scored the more the target of goals needed crept up and that was not wise until the whistle blew.

    Football is not about only about the forwards, it about the backs as well. And between the two ties liverpool leaked 7 goals and chelsea 5. So if I was a coach I'd be seriously worried about that.

    Complain about this comment

  • 19. At 09:29am on 15 Apr 2009, kevthered83 wrote:

    Id actually bet on chelsea to do Barca. Im a utd fan but agree with one of the Chelsea fans above that you would rather face Barca than another English team.

    With a little luck we can do Porto tonight, then do Chelsea in the final again perhaps???

    Complain about this comment

  • 20. At 09:30am on 15 Apr 2009, Bearsridingbikes wrote:

    Some of the comments on here are a joke! Seriously, if you came away from watching that game and can only manage to whinge about how many errors there were then you are in urgent need of a hobby!

    Complain about this comment

  • 21. At 09:31am on 15 Apr 2009, kevthered83 wrote:

    By the way, how come its Paul Fletcher on the blog today and not Mcnulty....I didnt notice until my comment got posted without a 5 hour time delay.

    Complain about this comment

  • 22. At 09:33am on 15 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    Great game of football. Drama, mistakes, passion and skill aplenty.

    It's easy to blame Cech/Reina for the two opening opposition goals conceded but the execution by Aurelio to smack a 35 yard free-kick at pace to just and run across his defender and athleticism from Drogba to direct the ball past Reina were actually superb bits of attacking play and worthy of higher praise than they are getting. If only Drogba tried to play like that for 90 minutes instead of diving round the pitch trying to con the referee.....

    Those slamming Rafa's tactical nous, or claiming Liverpool lost the first leg because they were focusing on the League and couldn't cope with the idea of playing 2 different competitions were shown up for the nonsense they were talking within half an hour of a brilliant opening from the redmen.

    Last week's new 'best midfielder in the world', Essien looked lost without Gerrard to chase around the pitch for 45 mins and the loss of respective captains seemed to affect Chelsea far more than Liverpool.

    That Hiddink was forced to respond with a tactical switch so early is to Benitez' credit as well as to the dutchman for having the balls to make the call so early but Chelsea remained fortunate not to concede a 3rd before the break.

    The 2nd half was a different story and their opening goal clearly gave Chelsea the confidence to press on and score more goals against an increasingly open Liverpool side.

    To seemingly be out of the tie again at 3-2 down on the night and yet respond again, now without Torres on the pitch either, showed the depth of resolve this 'one-man'/'two-man' team have and had the game finished 4-3 to Liverpool i'm not sure many (bitter mancs aside) would say they didn't deserve their victory on the night.

    Overall though the better team over the two legs went through, just. The tie was won at Anfield but there is no doubt pride was restored last night at Stamford Bridge.

    Good luck to Chelsea v Barca.

    Complain about this comment

  • 23. At 09:33am on 15 Apr 2009, snowJacuzzi007 wrote:

    philtoon82 - top comment mate. :-)

    Complain about this comment

  • 24. At 09:33am on 15 Apr 2009, Arsenalpassion wrote:

    As a neutral, the game was enthralling. The high octane drama and unpredictability demonstrate why footfall brings so much joy and peace to the world. I have a wife who cannot stand football, but after seeing bits of the game, she has softened up. For me , football was the winner.

    Complain about this comment

  • 25. At 09:40am on 15 Apr 2009, GerrardTheKing wrote:

    Congratulations to Chelsea. I thought you were resilient in face of immense pressure and deserve great credit for closing the tie out, as well as for playing exciting football over the two ties, something you haven't been accused of too much in recent seasons.

    We could have done with another goal before half-time to really set your knees shaking, or else with Reina saving Drogba's effort early in the second half.

    Brilliant entertainment, and I wish you luck in the semi against Barca. I also don't think you have any reason to fear your next opponents, they've looked great, but not come up against any English sides as yet in the competition. Chelsea to go through.

    Complain about this comment

  • 26. At 09:42am on 15 Apr 2009, Wegotmorecorners wrote:

    I hate these 8-goal games. I much prefer the ones without errors, crisp football, 100 percent accurate passing stats etc....well...I think I do...I don't think I've ever seen one except on my playstation. BUT IF I HAD....well I'd definitely prefer it. Brilliant, brilliant tactics by Hiddink to man-mark Gerrard in the stands last night with Terry. He really is a genius.

    Apparently Barca were boring and predictable last night. Not so much "videogame" as "betamaxgame".

    I agree with messi4arsenal. Good luck to Chelsea in the semi but if an English team can't make the final then Arsenal v Barca would be great. (or that the world deserving as he put it).

    I've already got a ticket for both legs of the Arsenal v Man U semi-final. I've got a new book to read about Afghanistan and apparently Old Trafford and the Emirates will be the quietest places to be for us bookworms to read in peace.

    Speaking or worms...this is called idiot fishing.








    Complain about this comment

  • 27. At 09:51am on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    The game was great, even as a Liverpool fan i'm not too disheartened - I had my sulk last week when I figured it was already over, but the lads showed once again that nothing is impossible - It was entirely feasible that we could have got the win by a 2 goal margin needed.

    I think if Drogba hadn't got his big toe to the first goal we'd have gone through, but he did so it's irrelevant.

    Both free kicks were completely different but equally brilliant, even if I do feel both free kicks shouldn't have happened in the first place, and Lamps deserved both goals, even though did almost fluff the first! The second was a great goal though.

    Complain about this comment

  • 28. At 09:56am on 15 Apr 2009, OldRedBren wrote:

    The performance of Bolton at the weekend played a big part in this game, Chelsea were unrecognisable from their Anfield display.

    I think tactics for Benitez is like playing the lottery, he's no idea why Liverpool are scoring so many goals, he takes off Torres and they proceed to score their only two goals from open play! Mascherano made a difference in midfield but as the most persistent fouler...he should never complete a game.

    The bottom line is Barcelona will be in the final.

    Complain about this comment

  • 29. At 09:57am on 15 Apr 2009, MUNKEYCFC1980 wrote:

    What a game! Diehard Chelsea fan sat in the East stand last night metres away from LFC fans - have to say your not my most favourite club in the world but you supporters can be proud of your team and all credit to you for singing your hearts out throughout the match..something we severely lack - great game, rollercoaster of emotions,best game seen live by far for entertainment which is all we want surely !? Bring on Barca now - have sneaky suspicion will lose in Spain but turn it around at home with Drogba menacing the Barca backline at the bridge and onto Rome!- Also could yet be Arsenal in CL final and top 3 all have to play them in league yet..beware the gooners... Cmon the Chels!

    Complain about this comment

  • 30. At 10:08am on 15 Apr 2009, ThomThomTiger wrote:

    philtoon82 - You can't judge fans on just one game son. Yes, the Chelsea fans booed at half time, but that was down to the sheer rubbishness of our first-half performance. 2-0 down at home with our first leg lead? I think that deserved some fan feedback. We got right behind them from the second half whistle and didn't stop.
    It is not a regular occurence -every single armchair chelsea fan spent that first half cursing the players. Guus himself laid into the team at half time. It doesn't mean you don't support the team, but a little bit of fan disappointment is sometimes a good thing. Unless, of course, you support Man U. I mean, those guys ARE fickle.

    Complain about this comment

  • 31. At 10:12am on 15 Apr 2009, mcboni wrote:

    i wouldnt say the better side won,cos the luckiest side won.it was an encounter that fild with tension right after the first goal.

    Complain about this comment

  • 32. At 10:13am on 15 Apr 2009, nmenelaou_lfc wrote:

    I usually read the blogs with quite a bit of interest. First of all good luck to Chelsea on the next CL round but most importantly kudos to liverpool that never gave up fighting. As a person in my pub said chelsea players needed their shorts changed a couple of times in the game.

    There was an issue I wanted to flag in the game. Drogba display was horrible. Early in the game he was rolling in pain on the sidelines and then rolls back in the pitch....what for. Then he kept playing a player in pain, crying and then he was OK and running like nothing happened to him. He should have been booked in my belief for delaying the game far too often. I think the referee feel for his display and kept on awarding him with fouls no matter what. 3 Fouls on around the same area in less than 2 minutes. Thats what brought the second goal just to remind all.

    Other than that......great display from Lampard.But all the Liverpool players deserve to hold their heads high as this was a fine display in a nerve breaking game.

    Oh and btw to the ones that say this was a horrible game with many mistakes. Well first 45 minutes I dont remember many mistakes from liverpool....I barely remember Reina having to do any saves. After the game opened up, well yes many mistakes were bound to happen.

    Complain about this comment

  • 33. At 10:16am on 15 Apr 2009, gakCFC wrote:

    ...one small step for Chelsea last night ...one giant step towards the Roman glory on wednesday 27th of May
    You could see last night how much it hurt chelsea last may in moscow,and they are determined this year to make ammends...

    Complain about this comment

  • 34. At 10:16am on 15 Apr 2009, boomshakalak wrote:

    what a great game - Liverpool gave it a proper go and after looking like they had no other game plan than to stand on the pitch and wait for 90mins to be up, Chelsea then turned on a bit of style as well.

    Of course there were mistakes, if there were no mistakes then there would never be any goals, and of course some of the defending and goalkeeping (Cech more so than Reina) was questionable... but what excitement... with a couple of minutes remaining liverpool only needed to score 1 more to go through... and then Fat Frank does what he does best and bags another for Chelsea... super game!... loved it!

    Complain about this comment

  • 35. At 10:25am on 15 Apr 2009, richolanrewaju wrote:

    what a match?i think hiddick should be Dr mourinho successor at chelsea.for a super sub he made,by bringing in anelka.he should try and find a replacement 4 cole because of messi.he's very dangerous.best of luck.true blues 4 life.o fokasibe

    Complain about this comment

  • 36. At 10:35am on 15 Apr 2009, ruggerholic wrote:

    surferShaz:

    'Ask a great coach like Mourinho if he would take a 4-3 win or a 1-0 win. He will tell you he'll take a 1-0 win any day over a 4-3 win'

    Actually, if you think about it a 4-3 win will be more beneficial than a 1-0 win. Although the goal difference will be the same, if goal difference is equal then it would go to goals scored. Thus a 4-3 would be better than a 1-0.

    Complain about this comment

  • 37. At 10:37am on 15 Apr 2009, ruggerholic wrote:

    Oh and Drogba...what a fantastic player.

    What a terrible play-acter.

    We really saw the best and worst of Drogba last night.

    And a final word, Clive Tyldsely it is Drogba not DrogbaR. Drives me mental!

    Complain about this comment

  • 38. At 10:41am on 15 Apr 2009, zianfranco_gola wrote:

    If Chelsea aren't to win this years premiership then i hope liverpool can catch man u and take it. I don't like either of them really but i've always just opted for man u over liverpool, however after last nights amazing spectacle (and certainly the buzz of winning is a part of it) i feel slightly warmer to liverpool, got to hand it to you guys you really pushed it to the edge.

    having said that i still believe Chelsea can catch you both! Come On Chelsea

    Complain about this comment

  • 39. At 10:42am on 15 Apr 2009, DubRtd wrote:

    Without mistakes you will not see many goals in football. it is all part of the game.
    21 men gave us a great game to watch. Too bad there was 1 miserable excuse for a football player that left me with a bad taste in my mouth. It is only because of Drogba that i hope Chelsea will never win a trophy again.

    Complain about this comment

  • 40. At 10:48am on 15 Apr 2009, Dannyxtra wrote:

    As a United fan all i can say is that neither team deserved to lose that game, an absolute cracker where both teams played there part from the first minute to the very last.

    Complain about this comment

  • 41. At 10:51am on 15 Apr 2009, Shaboogie wrote:

    I was never more proud after loosing a tie.BUt I hold my head high.Altho Chelsea didnt play as a team comparing to us,but credit to them!I dont blame Reina for first goal.take closer look its Skertls foult,he shuld just stick his leg out and it would be different story.Reina was wright to be yard of goal line as he was covering approaching player just behind him.And this goal out of nothing suddenly give Chelsea believe.Shame that Nando missed two great chances but great heart and team spirit for all the players.Man of the match?...10 of them in the team,all of them except Skertl.
    Lucas was great by the way,give him some credit!

    Go on U BARCA!

    Complain about this comment

  • 42. At 10:52am on 15 Apr 2009, zianfranco_gola wrote:

    To DubRtd,

    It has to be said that Drogba has changed a lot since he cam under massive critisism for his 'rolling aound on the ground' technique, and its not so common to see him doing it these days. However we saw him go back to it in last years final with man u and again yesterday. It seems that sometimes the big matches bring it out in him. As a chelsea fan and a massive supporter of didier drogba, i have to admit that i really don't like it, but i have to wonder, does it work?

    Complain about this comment

  • 43. At 10:57am on 15 Apr 2009, RedBlueArmy92 wrote:

    Messi4Arsenal... "What we all want is pure football. Barcelona vs Arsenal is that the world is deserving"
    When you played pure football, a few seasons ago (when you were good and thier was a top 4 not a top 3) you had that final and lost... remember?

    Liverpool and Chelsea proving Premiership football is the greatest in the world... Another all english final anyone?

    Complain about this comment

  • 44. At 10:58am on 15 Apr 2009, mcskiver wrote:

    Great match, and Chelsea did well in the end. Apart from Drogba, who utterly disgraced himself throughout with his diving and complaining.

    Neither goalkeeper will be especially pleased with their respective performances...

    Complain about this comment

  • 45. At 11:00am on 15 Apr 2009, collie21 wrote:

    Great fun, great to see 8 goals in a game, but shocking displays from guys who get millions for playing football. Barca must be rubbing their hands at the thought of a bye into the final.
    So Liverpool conceeded 7 in the tie, and I am told Benny tez is a master tactician?
    I think Acrington Stanlely would have scored a few against Chelsea or Liverpool last night.
    The league might be the richest, but on this display it's poor quality. I don't think Man United will show much better quality either, but a match of the same score tonight would seem them qualify....
    The ref last night was shocking !

    Complain about this comment

  • 46. At 11:01am on 15 Apr 2009, DennistounDon wrote:

    outstanding Game CL game of the season thus far and unlikley to be better. As for mistakes that people keep mentioning, Rafa taking off Torres anyone? For me he threw in the towel FAR to early and should have kept him then we may have been looking at a very different story. As is however Liverpool are out of the CL and IMO will fail in the EPL, shame consider how much they have improved this seaon that they won't lift a trophy.

    Complain about this comment

  • 47. At 11:09am on 15 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    when it's 0-0 or 1-0 we're told Liverpool v Chelsea is boring

    when it's 4-4 it's shocking, poor quality defending, error strewn....

    seems some people just love to moan regardless of what's dished up in front of them

    and if 'Benny tez' (sigh) is mocked for his lack of tactical nous for Liverpool shipping 7 in the tie by Chelsea fans, what on earth do they make of Hiddink for letting his Chelsea team concede 7 inside 4 days to an obviously tactically inept Liverpool and the hoof-it merchants of Bolton?

    Complain about this comment

  • 48. At 11:09am on 15 Apr 2009, wengitari wrote:

    Really unfortunate for Liverpool not to come home with the result they were looking for after that performance. Magnificent. Liverpool ran Chelsea off the ball and dominated the first half of the game. At 2-0 up, I really did believe it would all work out. There's a lot of talk about Hiddink's role in the comeback, but really, as the second half began, although Chelsea has positioned themselves further up the pitch, they were the same as before. Nervous, and poor. That was, until the lucky goal. I say lucky, because Reina 99% of the time would have picked that one up. Somehow - and not his fault, it slipped away and he knocked it into his own net. The most unfortunate of own goals.

    That changed everything. Suddenly, Chelsea picked up the pace, and their plastic fans began cheering - yes, i think they were actually supporting their team!

    Had Reina saved that minor touch by Drogba, it would have continued the same way - Liverpool dominating. However, from that point on it was a different match.

    Credit to chelsea for coming back and finishing it off with a draw. But Liverpool can take real pride from an outstanding performance. Without Gerrard the arguably best midfielder in football (and the Captain) AND Torres.. who went MIA!!!! The team really gave everything, and were most unfortunate. I think again, Liverpool have shown why and how they are a class above all other teams. Had Gerrard not been injured, I think Liverpool would have gone through. Imagine Chelsea without one of their best players last night! - maybe Drogba, or Lampard... ?

    4 goals at stamford bridge........ !!!!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 49. At 11:12am on 15 Apr 2009, philtoon82 wrote:

    ThomThomTiger

    No dad i wasnt basing this post on just 1 game. Every now and again there is always some incident that makes me dislike Chelsea fans more and more. Most of which has came about since Abramovich strolled into town.

    i remember the final game of the 2004/2005 season when Chelsea's final game of the season was away to Newcastle, a game that ended 1-1 but Chelsea had already won the league a few games earlier away to Bolton and Chelsea didnt even sell out their allocation of tickets at St James. Bearing in mind that this was the first league title that Chelsea had won in FIFTY YEARS surely any fans that are worth their salt would have sold out their allocation of tickets and turned up to create a carnival atmosphere to celebrate only their 2nd league title in the clubs history? dont you agree?

    Complain about this comment

  • 50. At 11:14am on 15 Apr 2009, royalCescisthebest wrote:

    Either deliberatey or out of ignorance, most of u chelsea fans dont want to state the fact that Guus Hiddink in recent past has not coached a side beyond the semifinals of a major championship. Once again you have reached the end of the road.
    its not just messi you have to worry about, Henry, Eto, Xavi, Iniesta, and even Alves would cause you problems. Go barca! Go barca!

    Complain about this comment

  • 51. At 11:25am on 15 Apr 2009, danyengland10 wrote:

    it was a great game...8 goals scored and that was more than enough! the game was full of excitement, drama and passion! I can't believe that some people complained about the number of goals scored...it a game finished with a 1-1 result people say not enough goals scored...if it finishes with a 4-4 result people still complain too .That beats me...
    as for the goal errors, well it happens in every field whether it is sporting or medical..we are humans after all...finally , regarding liverpool not lifting any trophies this year,,,as a liverpool fan i am disappointed to say the least but after all we have to be realistic and not to expect to lift every single trophy every single year..we are still holding the record number of 18 leagues so far( barring united winning it this season) and 5 CL ( or its equivalent), a record for english clubs and the third in europe after the galacticos and AC MILAN..so it is not bad after all...i do hope next year things will turn to the best,,,the signs are on the wall and God willing will get there ...thanks once again chelsea and liverpool for a pulsating game!

    Complain about this comment

  • 52. At 11:26am on 15 Apr 2009, MrBlueBurns wrote:

    #50 royalCescisthebest

    Has Guardiola coached a side beyond the semi-finals of a major championship yet?

    Complain about this comment

  • 53. At 11:29am on 15 Apr 2009, RedBlueArmy92 wrote:

    It is strange, both Chelsea and Liverpool fans seem to have earned a mutual respect for each other after last nights match, and all the criticism on this blog is coming from Arsenal and Utd fans...? A little worried about tonite maybe, ManU scared of an approaching liverpool in the league, Arsenal frustrated at being left behind by the bigger clubs and facing the prospect of anohter trophyless season???

    Complain about this comment

  • 54. At 11:56am on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    52. At 11:26am on 15 Apr 2009, MrBlueBurns wrote:

    #50 royalCescisthebest

    Has Guardiola coached a side beyond the semi-finals of a major championship yet?

    ---

    A good point, but how many chances has he had?

    Either way, the guys point is completely wrong as he won the bloody thing with PSV.

    Complain about this comment

  • 55. At 11:57am on 15 Apr 2009, shanuaz wrote:

    I think a lot of credit for last night's pulsating match(and last week's)has to go to Hiddink. The previous mind-boggling bore draws were played mainlu under Mourinho. Benitez and Mourinho had more of a personal duel goin on, thus the ties were more tactical and nervy. The approach taken by the managers was to see who can crack first, whereas Hiddink seeks to land the first blow, and thus l'pool responded. I'm sure had Jose stil been ere, we wud not have witnessed this great spectacle last nite. Well done both to both teams, but I was ecstatic to see the scouse get eliminated, now my team United gotta make sure they do not get a sniff of nicking our title!!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 56. At 12:01pm on 15 Apr 2009, sevenseaman wrote:

    Very refreshing reportage for a change.

    It was pleasing to see that Chelsea took the game to the opponents rather than sit back. No defence is unbreachable. Today both teams proved the weight of that centuries old maxim. You just have to go out and take initiative. This is a new Chelsea side under the Dutchman. Now they have the answers to going a goal or two down. The situation galvanizes Chelsea whereas earlier it used to paralyse them into helpless zombies. Now they do not even care to shut up shop,like in Mourinho days.

    Some snap observations on the play:-

    Torres was a bit listless today. Aurelio's extra ordinary free-kick goal! What a goose it made Cech look! That penalty Alonso wangled from the young and inexperienced Serb was as crafty a piece of con as they come. Not every referee would have cared to award it. Lucas had a big slice of luck in scoring his goal, inadvertently deflected off Essien's arm. Chelsea could count their blessings as, but for the end-result Essien might have received a booking. Drogba's goal could just as well be classified as an own goal. But I am yet to imagine a goalkeeper not reflexively extending his hand to a ball passing barely 3 feet away from the goalmouth. Drogba's deft touch and then seeing the ball in the netting was a tribute to the highest qualities owned by this superlative bully of a striker. He also provided two excellent lay-ups for Ballack and Lampard. Ballack is very wasteful. For a player of his international stature, Ballack botching up a dolly from Drogba was dismally depressing. And he does that regularly. What a sublime goal from a thunderous free kick from Alex. If there's one thing I'll always remember it is this goal. It was one of those that are made by 'fates'.

    Whole world sings paeons in praise of Gerrard. Spare a thought for Lamps. What he has been doing for Chelsea on a regular basis, without an injury or a suspension lay off! Just who matches that?

    Best piece of football of the evening came from, who else but the incomparable Essien, when he headed off that certain Liverpool goal at the last line of defence. The feat didn't seem to leave any pumped up ego either.

    From an aesthetic point of view first leg, from drama and suspense angle second leg.

    Against Barca Chelsea will have some problems. Let them have no illusions that they can easily cover up for their very under-rated LB in Cole. Its a very specialist position and Ashley sure brings a consummate degree of skill to his role here. Now that he is suspended, they are really going to miss him just as much as they missed Terry last night. But for his suspension he would have been matching his wits against the irrepressible Messi, never easy to contain. Whoever deputises , will need to have some very big 'pocket' as the popular phrase goes.

    Complain about this comment

  • 57. At 12:02pm on 15 Apr 2009, kneerash wrote:

    for all those complaining about the game, it was a quarter final of the CL, the tie was on a knife egde and with so much at stake there was bound to be some mistakes. What about the great goals scored? Alex free kick? Kuyt's header? also Fabio's free kick (bring back memories of Garry Mac against the toffes?) all quality. Fair enough some errors but it was a pulsating game full of drama.

    Complain about this comment

  • 58. At 12:12pm on 15 Apr 2009, equality_street wrote:

    @8:50 Messi4arsenal

    What we all want is pure football. Barcelona vs Arsenal is that the world is deserving.
    ---
    No, that is what Arsenal fans want.
    Every other fan wants to win at all costs. If that means putting 4 past Liverpool, then I'm not complaining.
    Good luck on another trophy less season :)

    Complain about this comment

  • 59. At 12:36pm on 15 Apr 2009, ExiledDevonRed wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 60. At 12:37pm on 15 Apr 2009, Zapulek wrote:

    The game is the talk of today - and I am not living in the UK. It reminded a bit of the film "300", Rafa Benitez and his team as King Leonidas and his Spartans who tried the impossible and won a lot of admirers. Liverpool always seem to be involved in that kind of crazy games, incredible their passion and belief!

    To both sides: thanks for a fantastic football night.

    I think Chelsea deserved to go through after their excellent performance at Anfield. With Hiddink I would even see them as favourites to go through against Barcelona. Good luck to Chelsea, it could come to another Chelsea v Manchester Utd final now!

    As for the poor people who complain about the quality of the game yesterday: is just envy or do you really have such a miserable life?

    Complain about this comment

  • 61. At 12:54pm on 15 Apr 2009, wengitari wrote:

    As for Drogba.... well well well.

    In my opinion, he should have received a yellow card for his blatant 'fake' injury that left him lying on the floor OFF the pitch... and then when realising no-one cared for him, rolling himself back ON to the pitch to hold up play.

    He was clearly timewasting.. knowing that Liverpool needed to score 3 goals, and this he did at the beginning of the game. Why else fake an injury and stop play, only to be running around freely again seconds later.

    Drogba is a disgrace of a player. I hope nobody credits him with a goal last night when Reina blatantly knocked the ball into his own net.

    Complain about this comment

  • 62. At 1:02pm on 15 Apr 2009, Paulaustin85 wrote:

    At the end of the day Chelsea were the better side at Anfield & in the end that was the deciding factor. I felt we showed great spirit last night & really made Chelsea work for their Semi Final place without Steven Gerrard considering we are only a one man team. One bad point from the evening has to be Drogba's behaviour though, the man is a world class talent who has everything yet people will always think of him as a cheat and last night proved it. He is 6 foot 2 14 stone of muscle yet goes down at the slightest touch the man has no honour.

    Complain about this comment

  • 63. At 1:03pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    To be honest, Drogba's awful, awful antics were the only sour note on the night.

    Complain about this comment

  • 64. At 1:06pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    7. At 12:02pm on 15 Apr 2009, kneerash wrote:

    for all those complaining about the game, it was a quarter final of the CL, the tie was on a knife egde and with so much at stake there was bound to be some mistakes. What about the great goals scored? Alex free kick? Kuyt's header? also Fabio's free kick (bring back memories of Garry Mac against the toffes?) all quality. Fair enough some errors but it was a pulsating game full of drama.

    ---

    Lampards decider was also a great goal.

    Complain about this comment

  • 65. At 1:19pm on 15 Apr 2009, panucci wrote:

    So begins the Drogba-bashing!
    Face it: Chelsea and Liverpool drew 4-4. No dirty tricks. And there were no Chelsea complaints against that 'penalty'.

    Complain about this comment

  • 66. At 1:19pm on 15 Apr 2009, mindalter wrote:

    Great game of football. Hats off to both sets of players for a top match. Oh, except for Drogba, the bloke is a complete embarrassment.

    Complain about this comment

  • 67. At 1:20pm on 15 Apr 2009, The Unused Substitute wrote:

    Last night only strengthened my belief that it was a disgrace for Frank Lampard to miss out on the PFA Player of the Year shortlist. If Chelsea end up winning a major trophy this year and Lampard maintains the level he's been performing at for the entire season, he has a very good shot of winning Football Writers' Player of the Year.

    Anyway, fair play to Liverpool for last night - I naively ruled them out before the game - but the best team deservedly went through in the end.

    Complain about this comment

  • 68. At 1:28pm on 15 Apr 2009, Emmnues wrote:

    Last night's game was exciting but be not fooled it was low on quality. Yes the first goal was class and Alex freekick will also be remembered for a long time but the midfield battle was rubbish...

    Who made it rubbish - Mascherano! While some complain about Drogba, they fail to see that it is the same thinking that inspires Mascherano to consistently foul others when he can't get the ball.

    Its called win at all cost - even Gerrard shows the same mindest when he does his own diving act to earn penalties for Liverpool. So stop being hypocritical and lay off Drogba, he is a GREAT footballer!

    Goodluck to Chelsea against Barca, you will need it against the one true genius of a player in this era - Lionel Messi. Don't forget though that despite his skills, Messi is also a diver in the penalty area.

    Complain about this comment

  • 69. At 1:29pm on 15 Apr 2009, ExiledDevonRed wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 70. At 1:31pm on 15 Apr 2009, ExiledDevonRed wrote:

    Ooops, post 69 was supposed to read "I'm no Liverpool fan, just as I'm NO Chelsea fan"

    Complain about this comment

  • 71. At 1:39pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    Drogba has come in for some stick and rightly so, but Liverpool have their own "fake it villains" in Alonso and Gerrard, week in and week out, so please watch the glass windows as you keep throwing those stones.

    Complain about this comment

  • 72. At 1:43pm on 15 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    If anyone has ever seen Alonso or Gerrard faking injury, then realising they are off the pitch so roll back onto it to get play stopped, then bizarrely roll down their sock to show, surprise, surprise, absolutely no mark on their shin whatsoever - then i'd love to see it...........

    Complain about this comment

  • 73. At 1:45pm on 15 Apr 2009, LTBFAUH wrote:

    i cant believe ppl are bashing drogba,when he scored 1,set 1 up and played a part in lampards second goal!without him chelsea would not have got the result they needed.

    Complain about this comment

  • 74. At 1:48pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    Not much comment either about the Liverpool player (can't remember which one)who tried his very best, and suceeded in getting Cole a yellow card. Its horrible to watch referees getting conned all the time, but it seems players in all teams do it, not just Drogba.

    Complain about this comment

  • 75. At 1:49pm on 15 Apr 2009, RelaxedSteak wrote:

    I was going to post this last night but 606 closed on me, but if Cech plays as horrendously as he did yesterday then forget 4, Barcelona are going to score double figures.

    Complain about this comment

  • 76. At 1:50pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    Tommy Onion.......I have seen Gerrard earn a penalty agst A.Madrid and Alonso get Lampard sent off, and everyone knows exactly how and why they did it.

    Complain about this comment

  • 77. At 1:51pm on 15 Apr 2009, teamhero wrote:

    Chelsea fans seem to be complaining a fair bit here about the repeated complaints (by Liverpool fans mostly) about the emmaculate diving ability of Drogba. Yes, you're right in that Gerrard dives... Ronaldo dives, Van Persie, El Hadj Diouff... even Pires in his time... and of course the daddy of them all in Klinsman!

    What Drogba does is not simply dive, but dive, roll around in 'pain' off the pitch, then on the pitch because no one saw him... late in the match, rolling around in pain because he tore his sock... was surprised he doesn't go down when someone calls 'man on!'

    Give us a break!

    Complain about this comment

  • 78. At 1:55pm on 15 Apr 2009, bluegal1970 wrote:

    I'm Chelsea through and through and obviously delighted with last nights result, it was heart attack football. Well done to Liverpool though for scoring 4 goals and almost getting there (twice!!). I wouldn't have complained. I'd settle for the same again against Barcelona but 1-0 will do too!!! :)

    Complain about this comment

  • 79. At 1:57pm on 15 Apr 2009, The Unused Substitute wrote:

    I think we can all agree that we saw the best and worst of Didier Drogba last night; his 'play acting' frustrates all fans (including Chelsea), but his sheer strength and power caused Liverpool's defence all sorts of problems.

    If we can keep him fit and in the mood, we stand every chance of beating Barcelona.

    Complain about this comment

  • 80. At 1:58pm on 15 Apr 2009, jimmyupnorth wrote:

    damn you scolari for letting bridgey go to man city. we knew it would bite us in the backside. should have let cashley go. totally over-rated and we've won bugger all since he turned up. thought the game was immense last night and liverpool can feel pretty unlucky they bossed virtually the whole game. and to the chelsea fan who said it never would have been 4-4 if mourinho had been in charge. if he had been we probably wouldnt have been 3-1 up from the 1st leg

    Complain about this comment

  • 81. At 1:58pm on 15 Apr 2009, Gianfranco_Cando wrote:

    #30 - i agree, it is unfair to judge fans on just one game - but that's at least two games now that Chelsea have had to put flags on EVERY seat to create some atmosphere! And even then, you couldn't be bothered to wave them until the result was no longer in doubt at 4-4! Liverpool showed you what proper fans do over both legs, you support your team, whatever the outcome...

    YNWA

    Complain about this comment

  • 82. At 2:02pm on 15 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    76. norapeti


    Gerrard went down easily against Atletico, i'll give you - he didn't fake injury though and blaming Alonso for Lampard's sending off is pathetic


    and neither incident was a patch on Drogba's embarrassing antics last night

    Complain about this comment

  • 83. At 2:02pm on 15 Apr 2009, ThomThomTiger wrote:

    philtoon82

    There was a carnival atmosphere - it's just it was at the Bridge for the final home game against Charlton (where we celebrated with the trophy) and the penultimate away game, when we bopped Untied 3-1. When you've had Gary Neville clapping your team onto the pitch (he hated it), getting a full away allocation in for an essentially empty game all the way up to St James' comes a poor second. No, it's not ideal but I think it's perfectly understandable and no reason to hold it against the fans. I'm telling you, you're imagining it.

    Complain about this comment

  • 84. At 2:03pm on 15 Apr 2009, RomanIbramovic wrote:

    Both teams displayed a beautiful game, despite some errors. for me M Ballack was the man he did a good job going from end to end. chelsea produced 11 goals in 3 matches but also conceding 8. the question is, are there any goals left for Barca game?

    Complain about this comment

  • 85. At 2:04pm on 15 Apr 2009, ExiledDevonRed wrote:

    The fact that Drogba did play so well last night, well in the 2nd half at least, merely makes his bevaviour even worse.
    Yes Gerrad dives, but he wasn't playing last night, and my comments (as a non-Liverpool supporter) and others' comments are based on last night's game.
    Now, I've had 2 posts "referred to the moderator", so does anyone want to do the same with this one?

    Complain about this comment

  • 86. At 2:05pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    74. At 1:48pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    Not much comment either about the Liverpool player (can't remember which one)who tried his very best, and suceeded in getting Cole a yellow card. Its horrible to watch referees getting conned all the time, but it seems players in all teams do it, not just Drogba.

    ---

    You mean the blatant obstruction? Get a grip.

    Not ONE person is denying Drogba is a fantastic player, but you see the way he BULLIES people off the ball (fairly) with his brute strength and balance and then goes down without any contact arching his back at every tackle when he can't get past someone - it's pathetic and embarrassing at times.

    Watch Chelsea's 4th goal again, he's about to go down on the right wing but realises the ball is going to a Chelsea player, he runs over the defenders foot, arches his back as if he's about to go, but the ball reaches his teammate so he stays on his feet. Teammate passes to Lampard, great finish, tie over.

    His playacting really does overshadow his great skill, technical ability and strength.

    Tell me the last time Gerrard or Alonso got injured off the pitch, then, when realising he's off the pitch therefore the game won't stop, ROLLS BACK ON to get the game stopped (thus stopping a Liverpool attack in Chelsea's half), gets back up once the game has restarted and runs around normally. It really is awful, awful sportsmanship.

    Don't get me wrong, it's not the reason we didn't go through, and even if he hadn't playacted for the free kick which Alex absolutely thumped in, we'd have still gone out on goal difference. Just a real shame.

    Complain about this comment

  • 87. At 2:07pm on 15 Apr 2009, AfricanFootballRules wrote:

    That was a fantastic game. Did anyone see Essien clear the ball with his head? Spectacular! Essien is world best.

    Complain about this comment

  • 88. At 2:09pm on 15 Apr 2009, Paul Fletcher - BBC Sport wrote:

    I agree with the people who say that the match was at times poor in terms of quality - that there were too many mistakes and sloppy passages of play. Personally, I think that made it a much more exciting encounter than if Chelsea had kept it tight for an hour and slowly closed out the tie.

    The first two goals gave the atmosphere inside the stadium a real edge, while the goal rush after the break ensured it was a night to remember.

    Not a match for those who admire technique and tactics above all other things but if football loses its ability to be unpredicatable then why bother?

    Complain about this comment

  • 89. At 2:09pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    87. At 2:07pm on 15 Apr 2009, AfricanFootballRules wrote:

    That was a fantastic game. Did anyone see Essien clear the ball with his head? Spectacular! Essien is world best.

    ---

    If i'm being honest I think Essien looked a bit lost last night without anyone to follow around all game. They should put him at Left Back for the Barca game and have him keep hold of Messi if he can.

    Complain about this comment

  • 90. At 2:13pm on 15 Apr 2009, GunnerDeburca wrote:

    Although im an arsenal fan, i have to give credit where credit is due. Chelsea did a professional job on liverpool who infact have been very lucky in games this season. I thought their luck was going to bring an average side to the semis again! Thankfully not, chelsea were showed character and strength something arsenal lack, but are gaining. Chelsea are miles ahead of liverpool, only for the changing of managers they would be top of the league leaving utd and liverpool competing for second. Arsenal have a good chance with all there players back and only for injuries, i would say we would be closer in the league, but thats football. Next year liverpool will struggle once utd and chelsea get there act together. At the start of the season they had high hopes, yet now they have nothing, apart from that league they havent won in god knows how long. You never know they may fluke that title anyway. But so far it looks like they have had the least successful season of the "Big 4", not even an FA cup semi final to look forward to. Hope utd win the league as its the best thing for football, as liverpool play boring football, a neutral can not watch that pityful passages of play, apart from torres scores the odd good goal.

    Complain about this comment

  • 91. At 2:13pm on 15 Apr 2009, RomanIbramovic wrote:

    i totally agree i think Essien would be on the left with Barca. . i can not think of anyone else could do the job. but Guss is the man, he will think of something.

    Complain about this comment

  • 92. At 2:14pm on 15 Apr 2009, rubertos_08 wrote:

    #11 messi4arsenal: I already know their game plan. Long balls to Drogba so he can cause panic against Puyol and co.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Simple as your an idiot. Out of the 7 goals scored by chelsea over the 2 legs how many were scored by punting long balls up to drogba. Try watching a game so that you can make an informed opinion rather than regurgitating stereotypical views of a chelsea side from the mourinho era.

    Complain about this comment

  • 93. At 2:18pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    Simple as your an idiot. Out of the 7 goals scored by chelsea over the 2 legs how many were scored by punting long balls up to drogba. Try watching a game so that you can make an informed opinion rather than regurgitating stereotypical views of a chelsea side from the mourinho era.

    ---

    I think 2 of the goals you scored last night were due to long balls. The free kick was a long ball to Drogba, and I think your 4th was a long ball but I may be wrong.

    Complain about this comment

  • 94. At 2:20pm on 15 Apr 2009, optimistic_cynic wrote:

    A lot of Drogba criticism and though I haven't been his biggest fan you have to ask why the hypocrisy? A few Rafa facts to put things in perspective.

    First leg, Drogba has the opportunity to go down in the penalty area under Skrtel's knee high challenge, he stays on his feet to take the shot that is cleared on the line by Carra. Same match, dying minutes Dirk Kuyt swan dives for no reason in the Chelsea penalty area with barely anyone around him. No card, no penalty, just cheating.
    For Ivanovic's first goal, Xabi Alonso tries to bear hug him, but is shrugged off, the same move that gets Liverpool a penalty in the second leg. A few minutes later, Ivanovic is pushed in the face by Lucas at another corner. No huge cries for penalties, he just gets on with it.
    Same match a crowd of Liverpool players surround the referee to ensure John Terry is booked for a 50:50 challenge with Pepe Reina, waving imaginary yellow cards in the air. He's duly booked and misses the second leg. Throughout, Aurelio and Arbeloa kick lumps out of Malouda and Kalou. Chelsea get on with it.

    Second leg: Following Alonso's penalty, Ivanovic is shoved off the ball in the Liverpool penalty area. He jumps back to his feet and gets on with it. Arbeloa goes down clutching his face after being pushed in the chest by Ashley Cole, getting him booked and making sure that he misses the 1st leg with Barca. There is even some talk by commentators of an imaginary elbow, he makes out he is that injured.
    Arbeloa then studs Michael Essien at knee level to make sure he doesn't break away but gets away with a yellow card as again no fuss is made. For the 2nd Lampard goal, Drogba is again fouled in the penalty area, but doesn't go down, allowing Anelka to pick up the ball and cross for arguably the best goal of the tie. In fact, I can't think of any occasions where he has gone down in the penalty area over both legs. He seems to ride the challenges in those situations and believe he can score.

    Long post but my main gripe is that everyone is glossing over deliberate foul play by Liverpool over two legs and focussing on Drogba, who while annoying wasn't even close to being the biggest cheat on the pitch.

    Thoughts please ...

    Complain about this comment

  • 95. At 2:20pm on 15 Apr 2009, RomanIbramovic wrote:

    goal is a goal, long ball short ball, free kick,.... doesn't matter, u don't get more credit for scoring a better goal, so get over it guys.

    Complain about this comment

  • 96. At 2:22pm on 15 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    90. At 2:13pm on 15 Apr 2009, GunnerDeburca wrote:

    classic WUM


    lucky, boring Liverpool top scorers in the Premier League


    here's hoping we can indeed 'fluke' the League title this year !

    Complain about this comment

  • 97. At 2:23pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    94. At 2:20pm on 15 Apr 2009, optimistic_cynic wrote:

    Thoughts please ...

    ---

    Most of what you said is absolute rubbish and clearly about as one-sided as you can get.

    Complain about this comment

  • 98. At 2:24pm on 15 Apr 2009, cpeskett wrote:

    The whole game last night revolved on mindset. Chelsea came in nervous, rather than confident and assured, possibly because of the mental letup on Saturday. Liverpool came in with nothing to lose, on the back of a good weekend performance. The first goal rattled Chelsea, and some serious self-doubt set in. Instead of seeing it as a simple mistake, they saw it as a fulfillment of their doubts. The penalty further hammered this doubt home. They could not wrap their minds around the fact that, despite playing better, Liverpool had not opened Chelsea up in open play yet.

    In the second half, it took Reina's mishandle for Chelsea to get back some measure of belief that they could get things back on course, and you could see, particularly after the Alex free kick that confidence was coming back, and had Ballack scored instead of passing back to Reina, I don't think that the game would have ever been so close. As it was, a pure chance goal, deflected off of Essien (what fool said that he should have been booked - it hit his arm which he was trying to keep back), served to bring back the initial doubt, and to spark Liverpool. Kuyt's goal was excellent, and really had me worried. Lampard's equalizer seemed to come despite Chelsea's faltering.

    To me, the most pressing issue is the fact that Chelsea seem to have a very fragile psychie when put under pressure, especially when falling behind. Sometimes they respond well, as at Anfield, and sometimes they respond poorly. Luckily, they seem to respond reasonably well to a verbal kick to the posterior from Guus.

    Complain about this comment

  • 99. At 2:24pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    Some very stupid comments about long ball goals from Liverpool fans. Liverpool beat man U 4-1 with 3 ong ball goals. I for one thought Liverpool were awesome in that match and destroyed Man U. Are you now saying you were rubbish when you beat Man Um or is this just yet another example of double standards.

    Complain about this comment

  • 100. At 2:26pm on 15 Apr 2009, thebunshop wrote:

    The Unused Substitute - spot on. Both sides of Drogba on display there last night. Incredible strength made our defence look weak, Carragher and Skrtel barely won a ball off him all game, he's almost unplayable when he stays on his feet and uses his upper body like that. However his play-acting is made all the more obvious by his obvious physical attributes. He could do a lot worse than watch Rooney play, another player with considerable strength who rarely goes down easily or feigns injury. Having said that he probably doesn't want to pick up Rooney's temper. I'm not claiming that Drogba is the only player who play-acts but he does it in such an obvious way that he really is inviting all the criticism he gets. If he could remove that from his game he would get nothing but praise.

    It's something that no-one likes to see in football, except when the player in question is your team's striker and it's a crunch match in the league/cup and time is running out. Then it doesn't seem quite so bad does it? "Yes, he dived but the defender left his leg in so it was probably a foul anyway," you kid yourself. I'm not proud when LFC players dive or play-act. I think Arbeloa was most obviously guilty of it last night: Cole did not deserve a yellow for that challenge.

    On a separate but similar note it's interesting that all the Chelsea fans who laud Drogba's ability to 'legitimately bully' players off the ball (as I think someone put it) and yet when Mascherano does this it is called 'fouling'. Mascherano is tenacious in the extreme, a bit hot-headed sometimes but he is still young. A few more years and he won't be mis-timing so many of those tackles ;-)

    Complain about this comment

  • 101. At 2:26pm on 15 Apr 2009, teamhero wrote:

    eugh... some just aren't getting this. Now we're getting counter arguments about how Drogba doesn't go down sometimes. Yeah... so what? So he doesn't go down sometimes... I think you'll find that's the case with hundreds of players across all leagues. The point is, when he does go down, he goes down like a pre-teen 5-a-side player!

    Complain about this comment

  • 102. At 2:27pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    Optimistic cynic....

    You are totally correct in everything you wrote.

    Complain about this comment

  • 103. At 2:28pm on 15 Apr 2009, bluegal1970 wrote:

    Why is everybody picking holes in everything and everybody? Don't you go to matches to get entertained? If that wasn't entertainment I don't know what is. Yes there were errors but these are part of everyday life. Can't we just say great game?

    Complain about this comment

  • 104. At 2:29pm on 15 Apr 2009, MrBlueBurns wrote:

    #90 GunnerDeburca

    How have Liverpool been lucky this season? Does that explain them being 9 points ahead of you? (Before you mention injuries, Liverpool have been missing Gerrard and Torres this season as well, supposedly their only two decent players, if people like you are to be believed.)

    Also, would Chelsea be top if they hadn't changed manager? Surely, the change in fortunes since Scolari left and Hiddink arrived would suggest that Chelsea may well be nowhere near where they are now if it weren't for the difficulty decision that was made.

    It strikes me that you have come to a conclusion as to which teams you like and have then tried to bend facts to support that decision.

    Complain about this comment

  • 105. At 2:31pm on 15 Apr 2009, teamhero wrote:

    ...the game itself was fantastic! Almost loved every minute of it. Liverpool fan.

    Complain about this comment

  • 106. At 2:31pm on 15 Apr 2009, ArsenalArseneArshavin wrote:

    what did chelsea win last year and the same goes to liverpool? The same applies to this season. You have won nothing yet just like Arsenal.. I really love it when they still underestimate us. It makes victory even sweeter.

    The only side I fear right now is Barcelona and Messi in particular. Chelsea? We owned them at the Bridge, Liverpool were too scared to attack us when we played 60 minutes with 10 men. We beat united as well without Adebayor and van persie.

    Complain about this comment

  • 107. At 2:32pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    teamhero.......you are the one not getting it, there is no better way to con a ref, it is equally bad whichever tactic you use, so please don't try and discriminate between players like Alonso, Gerrard and Drogba cause there is no difference between them in this regards whatsoever.

    Complain about this comment

  • 108. At 2:36pm on 15 Apr 2009, ArsenalArseneArshavin wrote:

    Diving is one thing but Drogba fakes injury all the time and get up and running seconds later. He does it all the time. Every time he did yesterday I knew nothing was wrong with him. Honestly he is just pathetic. At least Ronaldo dont pretend to be injured all the time...

    Complain about this comment

  • 109. At 2:37pm on 15 Apr 2009, teamhero wrote:

    At 2:32pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    teamhero.......you are the one not getting it, there is no better way to con a ref, it is equally bad whichever tactic you use, so please don't try and discriminate between players like Alonso, Gerrard and Drogba cause there is no difference between them in this regards whatsoever.


    I get it. I just have an opinion. Diving is part of the game. Always has been, always will be. I have a problem with time-wasting due to the absolute faking of injury. So don't make me laugh.

    Complain about this comment

  • 110. At 2:46pm on 15 Apr 2009, optimistic_cynic wrote:

    97. At 2:23pm on 15 Apr 2009, Chelsea 4 - 4 Liverpool - Classic wrote:


    Most of what you said is absolute rubbish and clearly about as one-sided as you can get.

    Is that it or can you actually refute any of the facts I mentioned.
    29 fouls to 14 in the second leg.
    The only really dangerous tackle was the Arbeloa one on Essien and yet we had 3 bookings to your 2.
    Mainly because the Chelasea players didn't try to get other pros booked/sent off

    Complain about this comment

  • 111. At 2:47pm on 15 Apr 2009, DrCajetanCoelho wrote:

    Two great football teams and two brilliant football managers. Congrats to the strikers, goalgetters, midfielders and defenders of both sides. Lampard, Drogba and Anelka were outstanding for the winners. And what a bullet like hit by defender Alex ! Dirk Kuyt was always looking dangerous for the Reds.




    Dr. Cajetan Coelho

    Complain about this comment

  • 112. At 2:48pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    Teamhero.....Well you shd perhaps re-appraise that opinion because earning a penatly by faking contact, or getting players sent off has far more impact in distorting a fair result of a game than time wasting, which normally gets added on at the end anyway.

    Complain about this comment

  • 113. At 2:54pm on 15 Apr 2009, teamhero wrote:

    norapeti, are you saying Chelsea don't fake contact? Really?

    Complain about this comment

  • 114. At 2:54pm on 15 Apr 2009, GunnerDeburca wrote:

    MrBLUEBURNS, your right i hate liverpool! utd's recent slump is down to injuries, arsenal have had that all year! 2 players out 4 3 weeks is not what i would call an injury crisis. As long as you qualify for champions league it doesnt matter if you come 2nd 3rd or 4th, unless your 1st. so this 9 points thing is just a jab at a very young arsenal squad and im happy with this season so far! So they scored 4 goals, they must be great well, they conceded 4 so really a 0-0 draw would have been much better for liverpool fans, instead of giving them false hope. Saying that i think Arsene Wenger has gave the arsenal fans false hope over the past few seasons, but ive come to understand him now and believe what he is doing is right. Nah im on about Grant not scolari, so i think thats a fair enough opinion. To be honest im worried for arsenal tonight as i find fans thinking we are through, but i have faith. Hopefully we will have an exciting last week in may lifting the double! Tommys your a bit odd

    Complain about this comment

  • 115. At 2:57pm on 15 Apr 2009, RedBlueArmy92 wrote:

    Teanhero/Norapeti... Liverpool Cheat, Chelsea cheat... Even honorable Aldershot have been known to break the rules on the odd occasion! Pointing out every foul either team have done would take far too long... Agree to disagree and move on...

    Complain about this comment

  • 116. At 2:58pm on 15 Apr 2009, debatanu1984 wrote:

    i'm proud of my team. we have lost the match with our heads held high. chelsea were favourite to go through even before the game. the result proved why every team was trying to avoid liverpool when champions league draw for quarter final was made. But one thing is that i still couldn't believe how Reina conceded 4 goals. But anyway i'm proud of all the 14 reds who played like gladiators yesterday.

    Complain about this comment

  • 117. At 3:00pm on 15 Apr 2009, MrBlueBurns wrote:

    #114 GunnerDeburca

    Firstly, I would guess that Liverpool would prefer what happened last night than a 0-0. At least they gave it their all in a topsyturvy game.

    All injuries take their toll surely. Essien out between August and March for example?

    As for this evening, Arsenal are in a better position than Man U. I think Arsenal should try something similar to Liverpool as opposed to what Chelsea did. Go out there and try and win the game from the off. Don't let it take a goal from Villareal before you start giving it a go.

    Complain about this comment

  • 118. At 3:00pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    110. At 2:46pm on 15 Apr 2009, optimistic_cynic wrote:

    97. At 2:23pm on 15 Apr 2009, Chelsea 4 - 4 Liverpool - Classic wrote:


    Most of what you said is absolute rubbish and clearly about as one-sided as you can get.

    Is that it or can you actually refute any of the facts I mentioned.
    29 fouls to 14 in the second leg.
    The only really dangerous tackle was the Arbeloa one on Essien and yet we had 3 bookings to your 2.
    Mainly because the Chelasea players didn't try to get other pros booked/sent off

    ---

    Considering one of your bookings was for protesting the penalty decision i'd say you don't know what you're talking about. I don't need to refute your points but the stuff about Ivanovic and Drogba in the penalty area was rubbish as no contact was made. I understand you wanting to praise Drogba for NOT diving but it shouldn't really be neccessary, now should it?

    Complain about this comment

  • 119. At 3:01pm on 15 Apr 2009, SummersIron wrote:

    I don't support any of the big four (though Arsenal are my favourite of them), but I still found last night's game hugely entertaining. It's true that the football played would have at times disgraced a couple of league two sides, but there was a great deal of quality there as well. Apart from Drogba's (which still had it's good points), all the Chelsea goals were actually rather excellent - an amazing free-kick and two good team moves. Liverpool's goals were not as 'pretty' but their general play going forward was very promising and Lucas was consistently impressive. It would have been unfair if his deflected strike had led to the reds winning, however. People who say the game was error-strewn - well, Cech was poor, yes, but who else was making errors (except the ref)?

    Complain about this comment

  • 120. At 3:02pm on 15 Apr 2009, teamhero wrote:

    At 2:57pm on 15 Apr 2009, RedBlueArmy92 wrote:

    Teanhero/Norapeti... Liverpool Cheat, Chelsea cheat... Even honorable Aldershot have been known to break the rules on the odd occasion! Pointing out every foul either team have done would take far too long... Agree to disagree and move on...


    Agreed RedBlueArmy92... moving on.

    Complain about this comment

  • 121. At 3:02pm on 15 Apr 2009, SummersIron wrote:

    And how do I turn over-write off?

    Complain about this comment

  • 122. At 3:03pm on 15 Apr 2009, debatanu1984 wrote:

    #108: messi4arsenal:

    "Diving is one thing but Drogba fakes injury all the time and get up and running seconds later. He does it all the time. Every time he did yesterday I knew nothing was wrong with him."

    totally agree with you. the funny thing is that he always remains unnoticed by the referres.

    Complain about this comment

  • 123. At 3:07pm on 15 Apr 2009, MrBlueBurns wrote:

    #121 SummersIron

    Press the 'Insert' button between the alpha bit of the keyboard and the numeric pad.

    Complain about this comment

  • 124. At 3:09pm on 15 Apr 2009, optimistic_cynic wrote:

    Re: 118. At 3:00pm on 15 Apr 2009, Chelsea 4 - 4 Liverpool - Classic

    I'll keep it simple then shall I. Did Liverpool players actively press for JT to be booked in the first leg so he missed the 2nd leg? Did Arbeloa deliberately attempt to get Ashley Cole booked by feigning a facial injury in the 2nd leg?
    Did you on any occasion in the tie see Chelsea players campaigning to get Liverpool players similarly booked?
    The Drogba and Ivanovic 'no contact' comments just show you were watching a different match to the rest of the nation. Are you Phil Thompson perchance?

    Complain about this comment

  • 125. At 3:15pm on 15 Apr 2009, GunnerDeburca wrote:

    True mrbluesburns, maybe arsenal's below par title bids in the recent past is giving arsenal fans making up excuses, but next seasons hopefully we will be up there. I agree essien has been the biggest miss out for any of the top 4 teams, going by recent performances and if if holds well with messi, i think that would put him as the best player in the world. I always wished arsenal kept diarra, as he has that essien type of style.

    Yeh all my work mates are liverpool fans, and they all say 4-4 was better than a 0-0 or 1-1 but last night in the pub every liverpool fan was singing "We are on the way to Rome" when they went 2-0 up. At the end of night i was the only one singing, as i do dislike them.

    My predictions- Chelsea v utd/arsenal euro final
    Arsenal v everton FAcup
    league will go down to last day with chelsea and utd only with a chance

    Complain about this comment

  • 126. At 3:26pm on 15 Apr 2009, Whiteheskey wrote:

    Optimistic cynic....
    you are 100% right, and i tihnk any liverpool fan would want drogba in his team if they could
    in the end neither of the teams supposed cheating made any real difference to the game

    Complain about this comment

  • 127. At 3:32pm on 15 Apr 2009, Johnnygray26 wrote:

    I don't think it's wrong to be uncomfortable with the fact that, although Hillsborough has been commemorated left, right and centre this week, the 20th anniversary of Heysel passed with barely a mention in Britain.

    Complain about this comment

  • 128. At 3:33pm on 15 Apr 2009, SummersIron wrote:

    Thank you MrBlueBurns. I can now edit my comments without having to rewrite the entire thing. I also agree with your earlier comment.

    Complain about this comment

  • 129. At 3:41pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    124. At 3:09pm on 15 Apr 2009, optimistic_cynic wrote:

    Re: 118. At 3:00pm on 15 Apr 2009, Chelsea 4 - 4 Liverpool - Classic

    I'll keep it simple then shall I. Did Liverpool players actively press for JT to be booked in the first leg so he missed the 2nd leg? Did Arbeloa deliberately attempt to get Ashley Cole booked by feigning a facial injury in the 2nd leg?
    Did you on any occasion in the tie see Chelsea players campaigning to get Liverpool players similarly booked?
    The Drogba and Ivanovic 'no contact' comments just show you were watching a different match to the rest of the nation. Are you Phil Thompson perchance?

    ---

    I saw John Terry do something he would have had a right go at someone should they have done it to his beloved Petr Cech. If anyone flicks Cech's ear the entire 10 players surround the referee. Are you telling me if Carragher had rugby tackled Cech whilst he was in the air not one of the Chelsea players would be demanding a booking? Of course they would, it was bloody deserved.

    Why would Arbeloa care about getting Cole booked? The tie was seemingly over, so your point is null, and it was a booking whether or not he feigned a facial injury for blatant obstruction.

    There was NO contact against Drogba in the penalty area, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA, NIENTE, how many times can you say none anyway? You get my point, noone touched him so he should have stayed on his feet. I'm not going to applaud him for doing so although sometimes we should because he's pathetic at times.

    The Ivanovic "incident" - was it even an incident? It was nothing. You want to know why noone protested? BECAUSE IT WAS NOTHING.

    Sometimes the obvious answer is the answer, and when football players do not protest it is because they know there is nothing wrong with what proceeded. Much like cricket in a way.

    Complain about this comment

  • 130. At 4:01pm on 15 Apr 2009, GunnerDeburca wrote:

    The fact of the matter is. Liverpool are OUT, who cares if it was a good game. They are out, if draw 6-6 tonight i'll say it was a shit nite

    Complain about this comment

  • 131. At 4:04pm on 15 Apr 2009, ExiledDevonRed wrote:

    Why were posts 59 & 69 removed?
    Is it because I criticised the ref because he kept awarding fouls at the merest hint of contact? Football is a contact sport isn't it?
    Or that I used the word "embarrassment" in relation to Drogba? Many other posts have said exactly the same thing. You'd probably remove half of the posts for this article if that was the reason.
    Tell me so I don't have the same problem again!!!!!
    Are people so sensitive that they can't accept valid criticism?

    Complain about this comment

  • 132. At 4:13pm on 15 Apr 2009, kevthered83 wrote:

    I read your second post exileddevonred, was nowt even remotely wrong with it...must have been the word "embarrassment"....HarsH!

    Complain about this comment

  • 133. At 4:16pm on 15 Apr 2009, optimistic_cynic wrote:

    So you're agreeing the Pool players demanded that JT get booked and Arbeloa did feign a facial injury? No mention anywhere of where Chelsea players in this tie attempted to get Pool players booked accept some vague speculation about what Terry might have done in a similar situation so I take it you're tacitly agreeing with that point too.
    Actually I give up, keep believing Drogba is some pantomime villain if you like

    Complain about this comment

  • 134. At 4:16pm on 15 Apr 2009, Squiddy2003 wrote:

    Chelsea supporter at the game yesterday, yes it was poor quality. When Chelsea got their first I thought it was getting worse. Only Kuyt's goal was a quality one from Liverpool, while both Lampard's goals were extremely well-worked. I liked them.

    Chelsea were terrified to concede at the start and didn't get going until the second half. As soon as they did, they put 4 past Liverpool which goes to show how good we are and how poor they are.

    When Chelsea got their 3rd, Benitez gave up on the game by taking Torres off early. Just to show his incomplete inability to read any game, two quick goals against us when we relaxed again forced him to put Babel on.

    The game was dramatic, certainly, for the kind of 14-y-o girls that pontificate based on what they watch on TV, but in the stadium it was a bit of a farce. Truth is, it showed how poor Liverpool were, how past it Carragher is, how Benitez barely knows what football is about, how Chelsea players think that turning up is enough to win when they have too much quality in them anyway ans should just go out to win.

    On the semi-final, as good as Barcelona undoubtedly are, I don't think they've come up against a team as good as Chelsea. There'll be no taking it easy because everyone knows what they're capable of when it all runs their way. But they won't get it all their way, which is why Chelsea will go through in a bruising, suffocating two games.

    The winner will win the Champions League this season. Man Utd, with all their phony PFA candidates, have already blown themselves out this season. Trophies are awarded at the end of the season, not in the middle of it. PFA awards should be scrapped.

    Complain about this comment

  • 135. At 4:19pm on 15 Apr 2009, GunnerDeburca wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 136. At 4:23pm on 15 Apr 2009, il_dolce_far_niente wrote:

    Just a small correction re. the statement opining this as "the sort of encounter that bolsters the belief held by many that English football is the most exciting in the world"
    "English football" is an oxymoron. It would be more correct to state "football in England" bearing in mind that, of the 27 players on view in yesterday's mayhem, the number of English players was a truly pathetic, 3.
    I'm surprised Liverpool supporters don't sing and display banners proclaiming "Nunca caminaran solo"....

    Complain about this comment

  • 137. At 4:32pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    133. At 4:16pm on 15 Apr 2009, optimistic_cynic wrote:

    So you're agreeing the Pool players demanded that JT get booked and Arbeloa did feign a facial injury? No mention anywhere of where Chelsea players in this tie attempted to get Pool players booked accept some vague speculation about what Terry might have done in a similar situation so I take it you're tacitly agreeing with that point too.
    Actually I give up, keep believing Drogba is some pantomime villain if you like

    ----

    No, i'm not agreeing that we demanded JT get booked. I actually don't remember whether they were or not, I remember the contact and both Reina and Terry lying on the floor. I think the Liverpool players were complaining about the tackle, which they're more than welcome to do.

    I didn't mention the Chelsea players trying to get Liverpool players booked part because I don't remember whether anyone did or not. I don't even remember which Liverpool players were booked in the first leg nevermind any complaints from Chelsea players. However I will put my neck on the line and guarantee at least one Chelsea player said a player should be booked to a referee for a challenge between the two games.

    The Arbeloa instance - I don't know whether he did because I saw the initial obstruction and knew it was going to be a booking, but they only showed the replay once and I wasn't looking because I was reading the 606 forum at the same time. I do remember Tyldsley saying it was harsh but i'll take it with a pinch of salt.

    I noticed you managed to ignore all of the other points in which I proved you completely wrong with, which in turn i'll take as acceptance that I am correct, much like you did. I have now answered the points that you claim I ignored.

    Complain about this comment

  • 138. At 4:34pm on 15 Apr 2009, snowJacuzzi007 wrote:

    GunnerDeburca - it's ok, we hate you too. Not your club, just you.

    Complain about this comment

  • 139. At 4:38pm on 15 Apr 2009, dutchmountains wrote:

    As the famous dutch philosopher Johan Cruijff once said;
    'Football is a game of errors'

    His advice for Chelsea when facing his beloved Barca;
    'If you keep the ball, the other team can't score'

    Good luck.

    Complain about this comment

  • 140. At 4:39pm on 15 Apr 2009, Johnnygray26 wrote:

    re 136

    You're quite right, but the media love to picture Liverpool as a bunch of working-class scallies from Toxteth. The Spanish media call Liverpool "Iberpool", which is closer to the mark. The majority of the players speak Spanish as a first language.

    When they have all their players fit, Chelsea are an English club - Terry and Cole would have started last night. United are too. But Arsenal and Liverpool are foreign clubs based in England.

    Complain about this comment

  • 141. At 4:44pm on 15 Apr 2009, gokes_in_zar wrote:

    Great from an entertainment point of view but not good tactically. To have both in a game is rare to say the least. I think they came a time in the match when both sets of players said to hell with tactics etc lets just bang in as many as we can and hope for the best. A high scoring match with thrills & spills is bound to have errors. It was an amazingly open game by two teams who we know can keep it really tight. I thoroughly enjoyed it and compliment both teams for really going for it. Certainly makes watching footy exciting, neutral or not.

    Complain about this comment

  • 142. At 4:47pm on 15 Apr 2009, Parish1987 wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 143. At 4:52pm on 15 Apr 2009, dutchmountains wrote:

    Re 142.

    So that makes 6. Impressive!

    Who cares about nationality anyway. We want good football...

    Complain about this comment

  • 144. At 4:55pm on 15 Apr 2009, Johnnygray26 wrote:

    Last years Champions League final included 10 players starting, all of whom would be in the England starting XI (Wes Brown the only iffy one).

    ------------

    Huh??? Scholes would be in the England starting XI and not Gerrard? And Carrick has been dropped by Capello. And since when has Carrick - Scholes - Lampard - Cole been considered England's starting midfield? And who in their right mind would play Rooney up front for England on his own these days?

    136 was right because he was talking about last night. And his comment on Liverpool fans singing Nunca caminaran solo (Spanish for you'll never walk alone) is fantastic.

    Complain about this comment

  • 145. At 5:05pm on 15 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    love it


    Liverpool are a foreign club because they have 2 English players

    Chelsea are an English club because they have 4 English players



    so there we go, for those who weren't sure of the rules 3 is the clearly cut-off


    thanks to Johnnygray26 for clearing that up !

    Complain about this comment

  • 146. At 5:15pm on 15 Apr 2009, Johnnygray26 wrote:

    TommyOnion -

    (1) Chelsea have 200% more English players than Liverpool. I dunno, but 200% is usually thought to be a quite high figure. Twice the number.

    (2) Chelsea are a multinational side. Their players come from all over the world. Many companies in England have workers from all over the world - the NHS too, which is English. So Chelsea are a typical English organization. Liverpool, on the other hand, is made up mostly of Spanish speakers. It's basically a Hispanic organization which happens to be based in England.

    Clear now?

    Complain about this comment

  • 147. At 5:18pm on 15 Apr 2009, Chezdon wrote:

    At 4:16pm on 15 Apr 2009, Squiddy2003 wrote:
    Chelsea supporter at the game yesterday, yes it was poor quality. When Chelsea got their first I thought it was getting worse. Only Kuyt's goal was a quality one from Liverpool, while both Lampard's goals were extremely well-worked. I liked them.

    Chelsea were terrified to concede at the start and didn't get going until the second half. As soon as they did, they put 4 past Liverpool which goes to show how good we are and how poor they are.

    When Chelsea got their 3rd, Benitez gave up on the game by taking Torres off early. Just to show his incomplete inability to read any game, two quick goals against us when we relaxed again forced him to put Babel on.

    -----------

    Rofl. Inability to read a game? Football fans make me laugh sometimes. Do you really think anyone in the whole of the world predicted a 4-4 scoreline? Idiot.

    Aurelio's free kick? Most players couldn't even hit the target from there.

    Complain about this comment

  • 148. At 5:21pm on 15 Apr 2009, sevenseaman wrote:

    The tie was full of drama and suspense and bids to be best match of CL for some very simple reasons.

    Liverpool had to go for 3 or 4 goals as they simply had no alternative. But the reason for a good measure lies with Chelsea's choice of tactics in the response.

    If they were diffident in the first half, the severe tongue-lashing they must have received at the interval motivated and galvanised them into action. And what a response! It created a beauty of a contest for all to cherish.

    Mistakes are a part and parcel of the game. So is some degree of play acting. We should be happy it was a fair and well supervised game in which both teams distinguished themselves and can be deservedly proud of their performance. It was a tie but the game of football was a winner.

    Complain about this comment

  • 149. At 5:21pm on 15 Apr 2009, sethistle wrote:

    If there is one thing that categorises discussion on football in England it is that it always descends to an infantile level. "Your players dive more than ours do! nah nah nah" Get a grip! Simple fact is that ALL clubs have players that dive and in many teams it is a tactic coached on the training field. That may be sad but is the truth, unpalatable as that may be. It is not a coincidence that teams with great free kick experts get a lot of "soft" fouls on the edge of the penalty area. It has always been part of the game - long before the introduction of "johnny foreigner" as well before somebody brings that one up. Is why rugby players have always described footballers as cry babies - footballers dive and play act - live with it! The important thing about last night was not all that nonsense though it was that we witnessed an amazing spectacle and were fabulously well entertained by two teams intent on winning one of world football's major competitions. Everybody moaned when Chelsea and Lievrpool were drawn together again as we all expected yet another drab and boring chess match. What we got was a 12 goal thriller across two fantastic matches. Yes there were mistakes made by both sides but that was down to the pressure and emotion not to lack of skill or endeavour. Aurelio's goal, whilst a howler of a mistake by Cech, was a fantastic piece of skill. He curled it inside the post from a long way out - full credit to him! Kuyt's goal was down to awful marking and defending by the defence but he took it brilliantly. Drogba's goal was a superb piece of centre forward play and personally I would not criticise Reina for that. Alex's goal was breath taking and the reverse pass from Ballack to Malouda that set up Lampard's goal was sheer brilliance. No quality in the game? I saw another childish comment earlier about "Fat Frank" Lampard. It is totally pathetic to use such terms about a footballer who quite simply is a genius in the game. This is a player who would walk into ANY football team in the world. How many goals is it this season for "Fat Frank"? I think 19 in all competitions now after the two he scored last night. How many last year? And the year before? One last thought about "Fat Frank" - what other ENGLISH player scored in either of the two matches? "Fat"? - ridiculous and childish comment. Well done to Liverpool and Chelsea for giving us the game of the year entertainment wise!

    Complain about this comment

  • 150. At 5:30pm on 15 Apr 2009, Chezdon wrote:

    Mistakes are a part and parcel of the game. So is some degree of play acting.

    ---------

    And you accept that? Surely play acting should be abolished?

    Complain about this comment

  • 151. At 5:42pm on 15 Apr 2009, soccerlifer wrote:

    Really can't believe some of the comments here. Last night's game was surely one of the most exciting you'll ever see in the Champions League, regardless of errors. Most goals in football are down to error but I don't agree that there were that many yesterday. Cech will take some flak for Aurelio's free kick, but anyone who thinks it's easy to pick that exact corner of the goal from all of 35 yards should go try it. Blaming Cech just takes some of the gloss off Aurelio's acumen. As for the first Chelsea goal, Reina was obviously deceived by Drogba's slight touch and just didn't have enough time to readjust.
    Some think the number of goals conceded is a poor reflection on both coaches (although, of course, it's Benitez that gets the most of that). I think that's just disrespectful of both managers. Remember, one of Liverpool's goals was heavily deflected and another was a penalty. But Kuyt's header was pure class and at the other end, both Lampard goals came after very good passing moves involving Drogba, and Alex's free kick was simply unstoppable.
    With both teams needing goals and committing to attack errors were inevitable, especially given the quality of the opposition. The decisive errors in this tie came in the first leg, when Liverpool failed to stop Ivanovic at two corner kicks.
    A couple of words about Drogba: He played with hunger and desire yesterday and played a key role in three goals. Kudos to him.
    Yet, when he rolled back on to the field after getting injured off the field, that was pretty low and I think the ref should have booked him for delaying the game. Yes, I know it was to his team's advantage, but there's sportsmanship..and then there's gamesmanship.

    Complain about this comment

  • 152. At 5:45pm on 15 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    Johnnygray26

    a few points


    200% more than 2 is 6, not 4

    have to hand it to you though "200% is usually thought to be quite a high figure" has to be the line of the day - cracked me up !

    If anyone can think of a bigger number than 200% i'd be fascinated to read it !

    and as for

    "Liverpool, on the other hand, is made up mostly of Spanish speakers. It's basically a Hispanic organization which happens to be based in England"

    Wrong and ignorant in 2 sentences. Well done.

    Complain about this comment

  • 153. At 5:55pm on 15 Apr 2009, soccerlifer wrote:

    @johnnygray96 or whatever your name is.
    So what if Liverpool has loads of Spanish players? Have you seen Real Madrid of late? Guess they are a foreign team based in Spain too. Everyone's chockful of foreign players these days so if you think having more English players is something to brag about good luck to you.
    Regardless of who lines up for them, it's still Liverpool FC of England.

    Complain about this comment

  • 154. At 6:02pm on 15 Apr 2009, Xavierneville wrote:

    I've just skimmed through the postings, but I'm glad most people can see that the game was in actual fact quite poor. Never in the world was it a 'Stone cold classic', Fletch get yourself a new cliche book.....

    The paucity of both defending and Goalkeeping was incredulous at some points. For no reason two reliable custodians behaving like Jelly on a plate. With the excpetion of the Free kick, the game never got above adequate for ability. Chelsea's players needed big signs to show were their team mates where

    The game had little structure and Chelsea seemed to believe that Liverpool were destined to come back from two goals down.

    then Liverpool with the game at their mercy began to fire passes to anywhere but a red shirt.

    I think we are unlikely to see the same Chelsea again, against Barcelona for all the attacking prowess are pretty ropey at the back. Chelsea will shut the shop up and watch Barcelna run out of ideas.....

    Complain about this comment

  • 155. At 6:07pm on 15 Apr 2009, soccerlifer wrote:

    @Gunnerdeburca

    Clearly, lots of people care about the game, even if Liverpool are out. That's why there are so many comments here. Even those who claim to hate Liverpool - and are not Chelsea fans - are here commenting.
    Which begs the question? Why are you here? If it's to gloat, I'd be careful if I were you cos it could be your turn tonight...and Saturday night too..

    Complain about this comment

  • 156. At 6:13pm on 15 Apr 2009, Xavierneville wrote:

    Lets clear the Cole thing up, he was booked for breaking the play up not for some pansy attempt at caressing arbeloas face. He tracked 20 yards and cut acorss him, knowing full well ther'd be contact we the player had clear grass in front of him.

    Too easy to target Cole because he aint the most popular player in the world, look at the context not just the contact......

    Complain about this comment

  • 157. At 6:15pm on 15 Apr 2009, sherbiz wrote:

    I agree with #6. I thought Reina did well to get anything on it at all and if the ball had been going in originally he would have deflected it away instead of in and everybody would have said it was a brilliant save. Speaking of brilliant saves, did anybody else see Jeremie Janot's save for St Etienne against Rennes from Saturday?

    Complain about this comment

  • 158. At 6:22pm on 15 Apr 2009, norapeti wrote:

    201%.......is that a bit higher?

    Complain about this comment

  • 159. At 6:28pm on 15 Apr 2009, Squiddy2003 wrote:

    On the difference between an exciting game and a good game, the two legs of this tie are a good example. The 2nd leg was terrible by most measures. The first leg was excellent by most measures.

    In the first leg, Chelsea conceded first by failing to cover properly on the left, but Liverpool forced the goal by good play. Ivanovic's 1st goal was masterful movement to break down the zonal marking system that's given Liverpol one of the best defensive records in the world over the last couple of years. His 2nd was a failure to track him properly, but well executed. The third by Drogba was an excellent worked move by Lampard and Malouda.

    This was quality football in the first leg. The sort of football that should be rightly lauded.

    In the 2nd leg, the first three goals were just dreadful. Credit to Aurelio for getting a dead ball on target from 30 yards, but everyone stood out of his way, so it was hardly a result of good football. The 2nd was a wrestling match. The 3rd was a cock-up. The 4th was an excellent strike, but against a keeper who was way out of position and let the ball through his hands, the 5th was brilliantly worked but Reina again let the ball through his hands. The 6th a deflection of a ball probably missing the target. The 7th a great pass, cross and strike, the last good too.

    The 2nd leg was like watching a kids game, chasing the ball like a swarm of bees, running from end to end with more hope than expectation. It was rubbish.

    Anyone - and I mean ANYONE - who claims anything for football in England on the basis of this game is a perfect example of someone who perpetuates the acceptance of drama over quality, which is why the English International game has failed over and over again. Don't praise dross. Call it for what it is and carry on letting the 14-y-o girls wet themselves over it. Adults, on the other hand, can treat it for the aberration it was and be quietly embarrassed about it.

    More embarrassing still is that professional writers on football (not football writers) actually try to boost the claim that the game was good. To me, that's why football ends up on the gossip pages more than the sport pages. No-one much is interested in football quality. It's the drama that counts for them.

    Not for me. I like quality football, not the dross served up yesterday.

    PS: I was at both games, having now completed 42 years of support and 39 years of attending games as a plastic fan.

    Complain about this comment

  • 160. At 6:57pm on 15 Apr 2009, Mike Martin wrote:

    It was a great game for the neutral but, in terms of pure quality, Chelsea 4 Barcelona 2 in 2005 was leagues better.

    Complain about this comment

  • 161. At 7:01pm on 15 Apr 2009, GunnerDeburca wrote:

    @soccerlifer, i did not say people dont care about the game, I obvousily care as im commenting on this, i said i don't care it was a good game or not, thats just certain peoples view on it

    How can i gloat? What have arsenal won in the recent past? Nothing, if you read my earlier comment you will know im worried about the game tonight as i think that many arsenal fans think it's in the bag.

    As for the many comments, they comment as the want to express their opinions on a very high profile game. For me it just wasn't a classic game, but thats me. If liverpool won the game and went through, then yes i would be here saying fair play to liverpool, congrats etc.

    Complain about this comment

  • 162. At 7:06pm on 15 Apr 2009, swappatil wrote:

    chelsea deserved it!!!
    now barca watch out 4 us..
    since 1st leg is away 4 chelsea , it puts dem in d driver seat..
    so my prediction is chelsea vs arsenal final..all english...
    i know its still pretty early..bt as a chelsea fan i feel it :

    Complain about this comment

  • 163. At 7:10pm on 15 Apr 2009, GunnerDeburca wrote:

    TOMMY ONION knows his math, but does he know his footy! Well no not really lol Liverpool have no place in the semis as chelsea were a FAR FAR FAR better side over the 2 legs(but thats just my own view) We'll see 2nite if arsenal and utd have a place in the semis

    Complain about this comment

  • 164. At 7:13pm on 15 Apr 2009, GunnerDeburca wrote:

    @SWAPPATAIL

    UR spot on chelsea are far superior to liverpool in every way! I'll at the moment they have more prospects than Arsenal!

    As you can see from my earlier comments i have predicted they will get to the final, if essien stays clear of injuries!

    Great for the capital if it is Chelsea v ARSENAL

    Complain about this comment

  • 165. At 7:27pm on 15 Apr 2009, soccerlifer wrote:

    @gunnerdeburca

    well, although we are definitely not on the same side of the fence - since you hate Liverpool - I have to give you credit for a sensible and well balanced response to my probe. You are right: it was no classic, but for fans of both teams, it sure was an exciting, dramatic, rollercoaster night on which anything could have happened.
    IN the final analysis, it doesn't matter if it was a good game or not, only that Chelsea went thru and Liverpool, despite making a game of it, fell short. As a Liverpool fan, I sure appreciate the team's efforts under very trying circumstances and although I think Chelsea were worthy winners over 2 legs, I have to disagree that they were "FAR,FAR, FAR" better. But that's just me. On to Arsenal-Villareal!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 166. At 7:50pm on 15 Apr 2009, iancheese wrote:

    Cech has had his time & should go.

    Complain about this comment

  • 167. At 8:14pm on 15 Apr 2009, kneerash wrote:

    64. At 1:06pm on 15 Apr 2009, Chelsea 4 - 4 Liverpool - Classic wrote:

    7. At 12:02pm on 15 Apr 2009, kneerash wrote:

    for all those complaining about the game, it was a quarter final of the CL, the tie was on a knife egde and with so much at stake there was bound to be some mistakes. What about the great goals scored? Alex free kick? Kuyt's header? also Fabio's free kick (bring back memories of Garry Mac against the toffes?) all quality. Fair enough some errors but it was a pulsating game full of drama.

    ---

    Lampards decider was also a great goal.

    ------

    Yeah sorry great goal.

    Complain about this comment

  • 168. At 8:38pm on 15 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    GunnerDe

    if you care to check post #22 i stated that the better side prevailed over the two legs.

    keep taking the tablets

    Complain about this comment

  • 169. At 9:50pm on 15 Apr 2009, dudesteven_g wrote:

    It's a pity the media have to crow about the game being a classic, all that's good about English football etc, as it just smacks of the need to proclaim the Premiership as the 'best league in the world', and that just detracts from the fact it was a hugely entertaining game. Yes there were mistakes, but there was also plenty of good football too, and more importantly, plenty of goals. Great stuff for the neutrals, not so great for the respective managers!

    Complain about this comment

  • 170. At 10:25pm on 15 Apr 2009, fcalanian wrote:

    to messi4arsenal,

    I would invite you to sum up all the goals Arsenal scored since last January and count how many of them were scored from direct Arshavin's contribution. He is the only reason why Arsenal is on a good run recently.
    Chelsea deserves to win the Champions League, they won against Liverpool and Barselona is no more dangerous after all. The important thing is that Chelsea are sharp in attack again and can beat anybody if they keep their form. Since the new manager, the team plays different footbal.

    Complain about this comment

  • 171. At 11:20pm on 15 Apr 2009, chelseamurf wrote:

    chimney_ leaf. You could say at 1_0 down Chelsea were 2 goals from going out 4-3 or when Liverpool were 3-2 down on the night they were 3 goals from going out. Tell me is your comment really relevant? I think not, you could go on forever. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. If i'd put a pound on that score i'd have got 100/1, but damn i didn't

    Complain about this comment

  • 172. At 00:56am on 16 Apr 2009, CarefreeCoors wrote:

    Re : #166 (iancheese)

    What a ridiculous thing to say. Cech is, what 26? Yes, clearly he's had his time and should move on. You plank.

    The guy was immense for two seasons, the best 'keeper in the world. He'll come back to form again. To move him on would be insanity. Who could replace him?

    Anyways, responding to idiots aside, anyone else think Benitez threw in the towel early by withdrawing Torres with about 20 minutes to go? Think he would have done the same thing if you told him Liverpool would score two more and come within a goal of winning it? No way. I know Torres was fairly anonymous throughout the game but he has a knack of going quiet for ages and then knocking in goals from nowhere, doesn't he? We all know N'Gog isn't up to much.

    Poor management from Rafa in my eyes. Assuming he was saving Torres for the League run-in, realistically it's going to take quite a collapse from United and a big surge from Liverpool for them to have a chance of overtaking them. Does anyone see this happening?

    Yeah, me neither. Although I would like it to, to save myself from the wrath of Liverpool supporters. Fergie’s face would be priceless; Rooney will surely punch somebody (anybody) and Ronaldo will finally burst into tears like he looks like he’s going to every time one of his swan-dives doesn’t manage to con to referee.

    Who cares about the quality of the football? Did you enjoy watching the game? I know I sure did, fingernail-biting and pillow-grappling aside. As some posters have suggested earlier, some people are never happy. A 0-0 or a 1-0 is boring; a 4-4 is poor quality.

    Also, I think the mock-card waving antics are absolutely disgusting and should be a card-worthy offence in itself. I know Liverpool aren't the only team to do this but the John Terry incident in the first leg springs to mind. For the record, that was a 50-50 challenge (from a biased Chelsea fan's point of view); a foul but never a card.

    What were the odds on that score? I was going to put down a sneaky bet on a high-scoring draw, probably not 4 a piece though! Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

    I'll go for a United - Chelsea repeat for the final.

    On a side note, Fletch you're quite camera friendly, aren't you? Pretty sure I caught sight of you on one of the many times the camera panned to the frustrated man-marvel that is John Terry. Very easy on the eye.

    Complain about this comment

  • 173. At 09:51am on 16 Apr 2009, panucci wrote:

    Barcelona have been dumped out 3 times by English teams in recent years: Chelsea in 2005, Liverpool in 2007 and Man Utd in 2008. I reckon Chelsea can scrape a draw at the Nou Camp and then see them off in style at the Bridge. History is in their favour.

    Complain about this comment

  • 174. At 10:46am on 16 Apr 2009, wengitari wrote:

    Let's just quickly clear up this Terry yellow card issue. It was NOT a 50-50. It was 80-20! Maybe even less. Terry jumped in late, with very little chance of getting the ball. So little chance, he appeared to be more interested in taking out the keeper (which he did!) than connecting with the ball... hence why the ref yellow carded him.

    If Skrtel jumped in that late on Cech.... hmm.... i bet Chelsea wouldn't have been too happy.

    Complain about this comment

  • 175. At 10:47am on 16 Apr 2009, Zapulek wrote:

    Sweet Jesus, when I read some of the comments here then I understand why England fail to produce any decent football managers...

    Complain about this comment

  • 176. At 11:01am on 16 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    taking the thoughts of fans post-match on a football blog and think it's giving you insight into the poverty or otherwise of English Football managers?

    I think you want to have a word with yourself.

    Complain about this comment

  • 177. At 11:27am on 16 Apr 2009, chips_in_the_queue wrote:

    Re 26. Wegotmorecorners

    I love it how every comment you write ends up being about United. You've got your managers obsession! This blog was about Chelsea v Liverpool but you just couldn't help yourself - again.

    ps - love the 'idiot fishing' touch. it's like a disclaimer trying to get one up on anyone who dares disagree with your childish ramblings.

    Complain about this comment

  • 178. At 12:54pm on 16 Apr 2009, olumidefisayo wrote:

    It is the match of the decade. 12 goals in both tie. what a match. Chelsea was lucky and Reina wasn't as good as he was that night. I feel for Liverpool but they lost to a better side.

    Complain about this comment

  • 179. At 3:33pm on 16 Apr 2009, Hastings_battle wrote:

    "the belief held by many that English football is the most exciting in the world."

    yes, but how much english is left in english football ?

    Benitez and Hiddink are not English

    Drogba, Anelka and many others are French

    Ronaldo is not English

    Complain about this comment

  • 180. At 4:48pm on 16 Apr 2009, TommyOnion wrote:

    English football is about attacking play, action, 100% physical commitment, aggression, goals and a little bit of tactics thrown in. It's not about 11 Englishmen born and bred versus another 11 Englishmen. I'm not sure it ever was.

    Complain about this comment

  • 181. At 5:26pm on 16 Apr 2009, Best_manutd_analyser wrote:

    Hi friends!!A super match isn't it? Malouda is in confidence, Lampard happy with his role and fit as well, Drogba goal instinct is back, but chelsea backline is not so fine!!Taking 4 goals against liverpool and 3 against bolton in 8 minutes!!That Guus Hiddink must see,before playing barcelona who this season have scored more than 100 goals, with his trio-messi,eto'o and henry in full form!! But chelsea have the ability to overcome this obstacle. with the return of Essien in the squad, and a tactic of diamond, that is 4-1-2-1-2,chelsea should be unbeatable!!

    Hope for a great match, between these two giant!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 182. At 9:41pm on 16 Apr 2009, ian09rush wrote:

    Hiddink holds his nerve? Nah.
    Guess which Portugese Special One called Jose is laughing his head off at home...

    Complain about this comment

  • 183. At 02:32am on 17 Apr 2009, sevenseaman wrote:

    Coming in so late may be my way of having the last word. Whats the compulsion? Ever since the game I have been in stitches over the hilarity component of Liverpool's first goal. Yes, when it first happened there was only anger; at the time, a reasonable reaction perhaps. But later I found I just couldn't stop laughing.
    While one has to admire Aurelio for seeing it, Petr Cech, through this one rare piece of football, may just have immortalised his name for posterity.

    The way he placed his two walls, the main and the 'one man', and the way he positioned himself in the wrong corner, Cech was like a traffic point man clearing the lanes for passage of royalty. And when the ball went by, the way he took his bow to it, it was like a policeman acknowledging his deference to the passing VIP.

    Complain about this comment

  • 184. At 2:00pm on 26 Apr 2009, robinmirror wrote:

    i'm proud of my team. we have lost the match with our heads held high. chelsea were favourite to go through even before the game. the result proved why every team was trying to avoid liverpool when champions league draw for quarter final was made. But one thing is that i still couldn't believe how Reina conceded 4 goals.

    Complain about this comment

View these comments in RSS

Explore the BBC

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.