Journalism's job is to kick the powerful in the backside when they get
things wrong - and they do, all too often - and see what happens next. If you
doubt whether that precise definition is in the BBC Producer Guidelines, then
you might have a point. (It is, in fact, written in a secret code on page 94 but
if I told you how to crack it, I'd have to kill you).
This blog is dedicated to the victims of power gone
mad, bad or just plain wrong. This summer for Panorama I met people in all
three categories while spending five weeks travelling
in China just before the Olympics. I duly noted the country's amazing
economic growth, but came face-to-face with the authoritarianism of the powers-that-be
in the Chinese Communist Party. I will never forget the day we went to see a
school knocked flat by the earthquake in Sichuan
while all the other big buildings around had stood intact. Our official minder told
grieving parents, effectively, to shut their mouths lest they say anything
critical about China.
There's a clip on You Tube,
so you can judge for yourselves.
Later on in 2008 working on a Panorama about tax
havens, to be screened sometime in the New Year when the editor can be tempted to
give it a slot, I met Jack Blum, a rare bird who happens to be a lawyer based
in Washington DC and believes in ethical behaviour. Jack
and I chewed the fat about how the super-rich like to park their money out of
the taxman's reach but we also reflected on how some of the world's powerful states
will cope with the 'crunchion'. (Don't bother look it up. I've just made it up
because I couldn't be bothered typing out 'credit crunch generated recession').
Jack believes that the United
States and Britain will take a big hit, but
that both countries have democratic institutions strong enough to cope with the
crunchion. Can the not-so-very democratic regimes in China
and Russia
- however alluring the
topless shots of strong man Vladimir Putin fishing and shooting may be - withstand
the storms to come? Wise man Jack shook his head, and fears trouble for those
who march in step in Beijing and Moscow. We shall see.
Closer to home, injustice still creates great pain
for pernicious and unnecessary reasons. Last spring I did a Panorama which
questioned the safety of the conviction against Keran
Henderson now in jail for manslaughter for killing little Maeve Sheppard, a
child she was baby-minding. Keran, hitherto a pillar of the community in
Buckinghamshire, denies she harmed the child. The only evidence against Keran
was 'shaken baby syndrome' - a massively controversial scientific doctrine
which some sceptical doctors and most bio-mechanics say doesn't make sense. Britain's
child protection establishment, however, believes that Shaken Baby
Syndrome is valid.
Keran is still in prison, but her appeal will be
heard sometime in the New Year.
Meanwhile, don't tell the Panorama editor but I did
a bit of moonlighting the other day for Newsnight,
reporting on the long agony of Suzanne
Holdsworth. She spent three years inside for murder for a crime that didn't
happen. There are grave questions about the thoroughness and fairness of the
investigation by Cleveland Police, but they've announced that they won't be
apologising to Suzanne. Her partner, Lee Spencer, is not
impressed by a police investigation that failed to take statements from two
surgeons who were going to operate on the brain of the boy she was wrongly
accused of murdering.
Suzanne Holdsworth is the eighth person wrongly
convicted of murder or manslaughter I have helped clear the name of or free since
joining the BBC in 2001, starting with Sally
Clark, Angela
Cannings, Donna Anthony,
Lorraine
Harris, Ray Rock, Angela
and Ian Gay.
But I'm afraid there are plenty more people inside
who shouldn't be.
Meanwhile, fans of Scientology's number one
parishioner, Tom Cruise, will be interested to see how he plays anti-Hitler
hero Claus Von
Stauffenberg in the upcoming film Valkyrie. If you can't work out
what I think about that, you shouldn't be reading this blog.
Comments
Sign in or register to comment.
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.
It is so good that we still have journalists who are willing to consider that "Journalism's job is to kick the powerful in the backside when they get things wrong". It is so good that John Sweeney and the BBC are willing to stand up for what is right.
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS