Advertisement
BBC BLOGS - Open Secrets
« Previous | Main | Next »

Council tax bands redacted

Post categories:

Martin Rosenbaum | 09:42 UK time, Monday, 22 June 2009

Over the weekend, the Telegraph produced some new revelations about numerous MPs who, according to the newspaper, had over-claimed for their council tax.

This story makes more interesting another aspect of how the Commons blacked out expenses information which would seem to have no obvious implications for the security of MPs.

From the examples I've looked at, the Commons authorities have redacted the council tax valuation bands for MPs' second homes. Yet this data was disclosed in the material already officially released last year for the 14 MPs subject to a specific FOI request.

Thus, here is a council tax bill for John Prescott as disclosed last week:

June 2009 version

And here is the version released in May 2008:

May 2008 version

Similarly, it was disclosed last year that William Hague's flat in Westminster was in band H, while Sir Menzies Campbell's Westminster flat was band C and Mark Oaten's Lambeth flat was band B - but this information was redacted in the material published last week.

(Just to be clear, none of these four MPs was named by the Telegraph as among the dozens who it said had over-claimed for council tax).

Comments

or register to comment.

  • 1. At 7:17pm on 22 Jun 2009, Rustigjongens wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 2. At 7:53pm on 22 Jun 2009, Rustigjongens wrote:

    Ironic is it not that my previous post has been referred to the moderators, Martins post talks about MPs redacting their expense claims, and I find my post redacted, this on a blog which is called 'Open Secrets'.

    Nothing in my original post broke BBC blog rules, what a shame that the person who referred my post was not big enough to debate on this blog what they found so upsetting about my comment.

    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 1:43pm on 23 Jun 2009, KeJaMo wrote:

    The redaction of the band letter is nonsensical as it can be discovered from other data given. all the information regarding the dates the bill refers to, council and actual amount of the bill are provided, anyone living in that council that kept the papers that came with their old bills can soon see which band the property falls in. If you dont have your own old bill the data might be found on the internet, else an FOI to the council would reveal it.

    I suspect the reason for redacting is so that no one compiles a nice little list of which MP lives in what banding and goes on to suggest that no one be able to claim any higher than an A or B.

    Complain about this comment

View these comments in RSS

Explore the BBC

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.