bbc.co.uk Navigation


Beijing

I don't think it's too much of an exaggeration to say I grew up with Alf Stewart.

Not literally, of course, but it would be fair to say the man who owned nearly half of Summer Bay's going concerns was a tremendous influence on me.

His cut-to-the-chase straight-talking, his old codger shell hiding a sweetly sentimental centre, his raging against an incomprehensible world, his very essence...he spoke to me as a youngster.

I heard that voice again on Tuesday and it was coming from the mouth of Australian swimming coach Alan Thompson.

alf_alan438.jpg


There were moments during Tuesday's Aussie swimming press conference when I could have sworn "Thommo" was aching to call somebody a "flamin' galah" or cry "strike my living harry" at the sheer wrongness of it all.

The IOC nearly got it for selling out to US TV over swim finals in the mornings, the media almost wore it for hyping the Speedo LZR suit, the Chinese could have copped it for letting some of Beijing's totally fine really air into the Water Cube during Monday's "blue sky day" white-out.

It was a virtuoso performance from my new favourite head coach and, if you allow me to walk the tightrope of national stereotypes for a while, served as perfect reference point for three very different press conferences.

The first up was Team GB's thoroughly OK effort at the Johnson & Johnson Pavilion.

The US Acuvue-to-Zyrtec giant is one of Beijing 2008's sponsors or partners or suppliers (I forget which), which means we all got free shampoo in our rooms and it gets to set up a fancy showroom on the Olympic Green.


J&J's is actually quite good. It reminded me of a classy Ibizan nightclub but with British Olympic Association chairman Lord Colin Moynihan, Team GB chef de mission (it doesn't mean team cook) Simon Clegg and British Cycling mastermind Dave Brailsford standing in for all the beautiful Mediterranean people.

Anyway, the three of them burbled on politely for a bit before the fairly sparse British press pack asked them a few gentle questions about parochial British concerns.

We then packed up for soft drinks, cakes and "one-on-ones" (something our press seem to treasure far more than any other country's).

Brailsford was the pick of the bunch but he was holding all the best cards. He runs one of the most exciting teams here and has plenty to say (Pollution? It's the same for everybody.

The venues? First rate, let's start racing. Pressure? We're just racing the clock. And so on and so on).

So where was everybody? Had the BOA told the rest of the world's media that here was a chance to quiz the man whose team won half the gold medals available at the world championships in March?

Perhaps they knew the British hacks would bang on about which acronym actually runs Olympic sport in the UK and why the rest of the world wasn't as saintly about doping as us.

So they went to the Aussie Q&A instead and, having just sneaked into the back of the press centre's biggest auditorium, I don't blame them.

aussie_swimconference438.jpg

Thompson sat in the middle, flanked by six world record-holders: Stephanie Rice, Eamon Sullivan and Libby Trickett on one side, Grant Hackett, Leisel Jones and Jessica Schipper on t'other.

And what a picture they were with their canary yellow, sorry, Australian gold tops and big, healthy grins.

Not that I had a particularly good view, stuck as I was behind the 24 TV cameras across the middle of the room.

Why were they all there?

It's simple really, the Aussie swim team are box office. They're like the US track team, Federer and Nadal, the Brazilian football side or whoever the cutest beach volleyball pairing currently is. They're rock stars, they're money, they're gold.

They also give very good quotes.

Leisel Jones told us "anybody with a lane in semi has a medal chance", Grant Hackett said he'd be "going to the well again and digging as deep as possible", Eamon Sullivan explained "everybody is looking for a better hold on the water", before Thompson concluded "we're in for a pretty big meet".


Of course, that wasn't the only thing Thommo said.

He slammed Jacques Rogge and co for "lacking loyalty" to sport's traditions and letting NBC's $1bn "talk too loudly" when it came to moving the finals to the mornings (so America could watch them live).

He sounded off about the "haze" in the Water Cube ("I asked a few questions about it, but didn't get an answer") and congratulated Speedo's marketing department for making us think it is the suit breaking all those records, not the world's best swimmers.

But it wasn't all Aussie aphorisms and Alf Stewart cussedness, there was light relief and romance too.

Jones told a story about watching a Discovery Channel doc on the making of the Cube, Trickett confirmed she was studying journalism and had been taking pics of us and Sullivan looked like the cat that got the cream when he said he and former girlfriend Rice were "just good friends". Friends with privileges, I'd say.

But most of all there was just a general vibe of confidence and determination. They also weren't afraid to speak a few home truths about sport coming second to money or pollution.

It was a rollicking good show and I was really missing the Aussie swimmers an hour later when the US women's volleyball team press conference started in the same room.

I expected it to be a tad boring, far too serious and way too long, and I wasn't pleasantly surprised.

It was even more cagily diplomatic than the British conference, and some of the (very dull) questions from the floor lasted longer than the answers.

The big scoop, and the only thing anybody cared about at all, was the fact the US coach, Lang "Jennie" Ping, is a Chinese volleyball legend.

Known as the "Iron Hammer" during her playing career, Lang played on China's gold medal team in 1984 and then coached them to silver in 1996. She is, according to US volleyball "libero" Nicole Davis, as big in China as Michael Jordan is in the US.

Poor old Davis, in fact, was only called upon to confirm just how great Lang is and her team-mate Danielle Scott was almost completely ignored as she didn't seem to be quite so forthcoming with Lang anecdotes.

The one mildly interesting thing to come out of the whole event was Lang admitting she needs "GPS" when she comes back to Beijing. The city's cab drivers should take note; they have no idea where they're going either.

The Americans (who have a decent team, apparently, not that anybody asked) were completely upstaged by their Chinese coach. A sign of things to come?

So the Yanks were po-faced and looking dangerously like becoming second-class citizens here, the British were polite but ignored, and the Australians were just themselves.

Strike me pink, Alf would be proud of them.

Matt Slater is a BBC Sport journalist focusing on sports news. Our FAQs should answer any questions you have.


Comments

or register to comment.

  • 1. At 12:12pm on 06 Aug 2008, Moutarde wrote:

    So, the big news is “Australian sports stars sound confident”? What next, a report on the amazing news that night followed day?

    At the end of the day, yes, the Aussies have a good chance to win some rosettes or whatever it is you get for winning in the “sport” of swimming (we all know it’s just a recreational hobby, not a sport), but I am surprised you allowed yourself to get sucked in by their bravado.

    For a country which apparently spends more on swimming pools than defence, I think you could even have asked if they feel have under-performed - although that might have been slightly antagonistic, you would have got a good quote.

    Complain about this comment

  • 2. At 12:33pm on 06 Aug 2008, AussieInDubs wrote:

    You want some cheese with that whine, Moutarde??

    Looking forward to getting in to the events this weekend - I'd love it, really love it, to have another crack at those Americans but Phelps will just be too strong. He's an amazing athlete. Try telling him that swimming isn't a "real" sport.

    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 1:23pm on 06 Aug 2008, blujus wrote:

    It does seem a bit ridiculous how many medals there are for swimming - I mean, fair enough, there should be different distances, as in athletics, but different strokes? Since freestyle/front crawl is by far and away the quickest stroke, that means that the majority of medals are for "not swimming as quickly as possible".

    Why not have medals for 100 metres running backwards and for 100 metres hopping on one leg? Just as silly when you think about it.

    Complain about this comment

  • 4. At 1:27pm on 06 Aug 2008, The Marvellous Mechanical Mouth Organ wrote:

    If you are an Aussie- thank God for the swimming!

    AussieInDubs- be that Australian whine? I hear they make some of the best!

    ;)

    Complain about this comment

  • 5. At 1:28pm on 06 Aug 2008, andysw12 wrote:

    Jeez Moutarde, fair chip on the shoulder.

    I'd say a pastime where a person propels themselves through the water has more of a right to call itself a sport than, say, riding an extremely expensive bike... or motor car... but that doesn't seem to stop the Brits banging on about them all the time.

    I wish you would write us all out a list of what sports are "real sports" and which aren't. It gets very confusing.

    Thanks in advance.

    Complain about this comment

  • 6. At 1:28pm on 06 Aug 2008, Moutarde wrote:

    Good point, Blujus.

    How about a new Olympic swimming discipline: chuck a bucket of marbles in the deep end and see who can collect the most in 60 seconds. Under strobe-lighting. Any other suggestions for livening up the "sport" of swimming?

    Complain about this comment

  • 7. At 1:34pm on 06 Aug 2008, andysw12 wrote:

    Don't worry guys, GB is projected to overtake Australia at this Olympics (on the back of one "sport").

    Hopefully then you won't have to spend time moaning about which sports are "real" and which aren't.

    All the best for the next few weeks. You may even win a few swimming medals (but I know that won't impress you).

    Complain about this comment

  • 8. At 1:41pm on 06 Aug 2008, Not logged in wrote:

    They'll be a lot of pressure on the Aussie swimmers. Australia's high placings in the medals table at recent Olympics have strongly relied on the pool and the velodrome. They've got a better chance of matching 2004's haul on water than on their bikes, but it'll still be hard to avoid a drop.

    The US olympic boss suggested GB would finish in 4th - i.e. above the Aussies. That implies that he's confident that the US swimmers will take a lot of golds ahead of the Australians (and probably that he thinks we'll take golds in events the US aren't that bothered about, like track cycling and sailing).

    Complain about this comment

  • 9. At 1:52pm on 06 Aug 2008, Not logged in wrote:

    andysw12 - if you're an Aussie, it would be hypocritical to mock a country for targeting medal rich events, particularly since one of them is the other one you used to be the best at - Australia got seven golds in the pool, six on bikes in 2004.

    Complain about this comment

  • 10. At 2:44pm on 06 Aug 2008, andysw12 wrote:

    Notlogged

    I am an Aussie but I would hope that it was obvious that I was pointing out that GB fans will be quite happy to jump up and down if GB tops Aus in the medal table on the back of cycling... but apparently Aussie success in swimming is devalued (see above).

    Not sure how pointing out hypocrisy makes me a hypocrite.

    We Aussies know we are good at swimming and we know that's where most of our medals usually come from. We don't see why we must apologise for that.

    But then, we also don't resort to comments like "its not a real sport" just because we aren't good at something.

    Complain about this comment

  • 11. At 3:48pm on 06 Aug 2008, Moutarde wrote:

    Okay, sorry Aussies, I will concede that the 50m freestyle is a a proper race, but the rest are just a waste of time which could be spent watching Twenty20 cricket or darts at the Olympics.

    Complain about this comment

  • 12. At 08:02am on 12 Aug 2008, AussieInDubs wrote:

    Moutarde, now that the UKL have won their first gold in the pool in 48 years, does swimming still not count as a "real" sport?? I expect that no media in the country covered the win and the medal won't be counted in your tally.

    Bring on the darts and 20/Twenty!!

    Complain about this comment

View these comments in RSS

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites