- 11 Jul 08, 05:17 PM
It's good to be back in Birmingham, where we've had some great domestic championships and trials over the years.
I think we'll be in for a good weekend of athletics. In almost every event, there are little stories going on and there aren't too many events where things look to be straightforward.
Those who come in the top two in their event in Birmingham and have reached the Olympic qualifying standard (and there is still just a little time left for them to achieve that) know that they are going to Beijing.

Undoubtedly all the focus will be on Dwain Chambers, who runs in the 100m before his High Court hearing next Wednesday on his lifetime Olympic ban.
It's a shame he's going to take all the attention because the 100m would have been interesting anyway.
None of the guys will realistically think they have a chance of being medal contenders in the 100m but the 4x100m relay is another story.
Both the men's and women's team will go to Beijing with high hopes.
So the sprints in Birmingham will be crucial when it comes to deciding who gets in the team.
In the men's event, there are so many guys who already have the Olympic qualifying time of 10.21 seconds.
So it will be a big test for the likes of Craig Pickering and Simeon Williamson in the semi-finals and final on Saturday.
They need to step up and show, if nothing else, they are worthy of a place in the relay.
In the women's event, Emma Ania, Jeannette Kwakye, Emily Freeman and Anyika Onuora Abbey are all vying for places.
So that's a subtext to the sprints where there is a wealth of talent - and I'm not even going to try and predict who's going to win them.
Away from the sprints, the women's 400m looks like it could be a very interesting race.
World 400m champion Christine Ohuruogu is not doing the 400m in Birmingham but is focusing on the shorter sprints instead.
So it's really a case of who will finish second behind Nicola Sanders, the world silver medallist? Well, it would have been had she not pulled out with a slight thigh injury.
The reason this race is interesting is because the women's 4x400m squad are a big British medal chance at the Games.
Somebody has a huge opportunity to step up at the trials and potentially grab a place in the individual 400m and in the relay too.
The women's 800m has been an ongoing saga for the last two years really and you can probably expect more of the same at the weekend.
Jenny Meadows is fit and in form but she is ill and will not be taking part in the trials.
Marilyn Okoro and Jemma Simpson have run quicker than Jenny this season while Vicky Griffiths and Amanda Pritchard are also running close behind.
If three women run really well and Jenny's not there then that puts real pressure on the selectors.
In the men's 800m, one-miler Andy Baddeley is taking part after he decided not to run in the 1500m at the trials, and that could cause a bit of an issue.
He's not trying to qualify for the 800m but if he comes in the top two what will the selectors decide to do then?
Michael Rimmer is slowly getting back to form but Richard Hill or James Brewer could have a big race on the day.
Andy's decision not to run the 1500m, where he already has the Olympic standard, also opens the doors for Tom Lancashire and Michael East in that event, so they are set to be a couple of very interesting races.
You can never guarantee conditions will be helpful in the long jump and in the men's event you just wonder which of them is going to come out with a big jump first.
Greg Rutherford is struggling to get back to the sort of form he had in 2006 when he won European bronze.
Chris Tomlinson has found his run-up tricky all season long, but he is convinced he has some good jumps in him.
I expect UK Athletics to announce 75% of their team on Monday depending on what happens over the weekend.
There are a few events, like the women's 800m, where selectors will give people a chance to recover from illness or take into account other people who are not at the trials.
I'm not quite sure if Paula Radcliffe will have made up her mind by the official Olympic deadline of 20 July. I doubt she will have decided to run the marathon by then.
So she will be pencilled in and then Hayley Haining could be named as a replacement at a later date if need be.
There might be some contentious issues come Monday but whether there will be any real shocks, well, I doubt that to be honest.
I'm not quite sure that we have anyone kicking around that is capable of an upset.
At the trials four years ago I absolutely castigated the men's 1500m field for not even trying to grasp the opportunity of an Olympic place.
They jogged round and none of them had a chance to qualify - and I hope we don't see a repeat of that in any of the events at the weekend.
The one positive out of what I said in 2004 was that Andy Baddeley and his coach got stung by the criticism and they wrote to me.
Andy then changed his perception of himself and here we are four years later and he's going to the Olympics as a world-class athlete.
All the athletes in Birmingham have got to accept that their chances are running out and if they really want to go to the Olympic Games then they have to produce this weekend.
They may even have to produce something better than they have ever have done before - or they'll miss their chance.
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

CommentsSign in
You need to sign in to contribute to this page. If you're new to BBC Blogs, creating your membership is quick and easy.
Good article although i dont think you are behind baddeley's success. Looking forward to seeing Marilyn Okoro run away with the 800, and seel her olympic place, but the trials will be a little dissapointing this year. With neither Sanders nor Ohurougu lining up the 400 will be quite drab. Maybe we should adopt a harsher line saying that if you dont have a legitimate reason to miss your event in the trials you dont go to the olympics, then maybe athletes will give the punters their moneys worth
Complain about this comment
'...although i dont think you are behind baddeley's success'
I don't think Steve is trying to claim credit for Andy Baddeley's success - that is down to hard work by the athlete himself - but merely pointing out that criticism of the 1500m athletes in general made Baddeley re-evaluate his attitude.
I'll be a spectator at the trials tomorrow and it will be interesting to see what sort of reaction Dwain Chambers gets and how the other 100m respond. I for one will not be cheering him.
Good luck to Rachel Felton in the women's 1500m!
Complain about this comment
So If Ohorogu isnt doing the 400m, does that mean she wont be in the Olympics 400m?
Complain about this comment
For someone who complains frequently about Dwain Chambers in nearly every article you write (BBC + Guardian) and when you are on TV (e.g. throughout the World Indoors), it seems somewhat hypocritical that you often state that he takes attention away from other athletes. Indeed, he seems to be your pet topic and you appear to give him more attention than anyone.
Complain about this comment
I'd like to echo the view of Harpod11 above. Steve Cram never stops sniping at Dwain in both his BBC and Guardian contributions and, at the same time, complains about Dwain dominating the media coverage. It's difficult to see how Steve can have it both ways, when he is making Dwain the focus of his own media contributions again and again.
I think many runners share my view that Dwain has been singled out unfairly as the root of all evil in British athletics by Steve and others. Nobody condones what Dwain did, but no one likes bullying either, and I feel he has been bullied enough. Dwain has conducted himself admirably in the face of great provocation. The Court will decide on the legality of the BOA policy on Wednesday. I wish him every success at the trials in the meantime.
Complain about this comment
I am absolutely furious listening to Steve Cram's commentary after Duane Chambers' deserved victory today.
I really am not interested in his opinion around the DC matter - this will be determined by those qualified to judge very soon.
Despite DC not having contravened any policies since his ban, the stench of self-rightous invective from Cramm and some of his colleages is intolerable.
The BBC should remember its duty to represent all matters fairly and even handedly. We, and they, are all imperfect. Cramm was second best 25 years ago, some are lapsed christians, others hurdle the lifesyle divide. We don't comment on .these matters - they should conduct the commentary, not the witchhunt.
If DC goes to Beijing, then they shouldn't.
Complain about this comment
I've got a question for you Mr Cram.
Indeed to ask this question I have specifically registered. So you've certainly provoked comment.
What I want to know is since when did you position of commentator on these events (on television) give you the right to use it as a vehicle to air your views on Dwain Chambers time and time again.
Your comments at the finish of the 100m final were disgraceful. I don't care what you think about Chambers. I want to hear about the race, not that you don't support him. You changed your tone to that of a disappointe child and you made a collosal error of judgement and ruined your integrity as a sports commentator of any value.
I for one will never listen or watch another event which you are commentating on. You should be ashamed of yourself. You're a commentator, not a preacher.
Complain about this comment
Shame on you Steve. My husband and I have always enjoyed watching athletics and enjoyed listening to the BBC commentary. No longer. Personal opinions should not be part of a commentator's role. Has Sue Barker shared her personal comments on Dwain Chambers? No, she hasn't.
Complain about this comment
Steve Cram is bitter, fickle, attention seeking, childish and not very bright. It both amazes and angers me that he is given such a platform for his views. Go back and read some of his other blogs. The most mind numbingly boring and irrelevant blogs you could have the misfortune to read. Cram, no one cares about your stupid opinions, please realise this. I actually think you have some sort of mental problem as your opinions are so wildly fluctuating, paranoid and confused.
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS