Frost/Nixon: History As It Wasn't
The film Frost/Nixon has just come out in the U.S. to rave reviews and it will be in UK cinemas next month. All this builds on the triumph of the play which was brilliantly staged and engrossing entertainment.
But one left the theatre feeling that events as portrayed weren't quite as one remembered, three decades on, the Frost-Nixon interviews on which the play/film is based.
In the play/film David Frost struggles through a series of encounters with Richard Nixon before finally getting the disgraced former president to crack and effectively confess in front of the cameras. It's all nicely dramatic and rather satisfying.
But wasn't Frost perceived at the time as having blown his opportunity? Hadn't Nixon evaded any real confession of wrongdoing? Weren't we television viewers of the 1970s left feeling a bit cheated and, dare I say, bored by the interview saga?
Of course Frost, during that period, was the butt of criticism from the media, particularly in the UK, which could be attributed to professional jealousy (Frost - "good evening and welcome" - had been a regular target since rising without trace on That Was The Week That Was). And yet Nixon was an interviewee vulnerable in so many areas and we needed the catharsis of seeing him own up to crimes in the White House. He didn't.
Here is Elizabeth Drew's take on Frost/Nixon.

~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~48~RS~)