Advertisement
BBC BLOGS - Newsnight: Peter Marshall

Archives for October 2008

McCain Suckered By Obama Over The Big Bucks

Peter Marshall | 19:27 UK time, Wednesday, 22 October 2008

Comments (6)

Even while he claims to relish unfavourable odds, John McCain must surely regret how he was suckered by Obama over campaign funding.

Back in June the Democrat suddenly reversed an earlier promise to use the federal funding system - where each candidate is limited to spending $80 million on the general election - if McCain would do the same. McCain duly committed to using the public money only to see Obama, buoyed by record breaking private donations, change his mind.

Last month alone Obama raised a breathtaking $150 million. It means in crucial states across the country you can barely turn on your TV without seeing an Obama campaign ad. McCain is being swamped. And there's far more to come: on October 29 Obama will air a 30 minute advertising special on the major networks, including Fox, where he's usually portrayed as the Anti American incarnate.

It's a coup for the front runner, apparently achieved by breaking his word over funding. Obama concedes he wasn't born in a manger. But one wonders why, amid all their failing jibes about Obama's "socialism" and "palling with terrorists" the McCain-Palin camp haven't called him harder on this.

Stone's 'W' Is Hollow Man. And Condi Is A Cyborg

Peter Marshall | 00:26 UK time, Tuesday, 21 October 2008

Comments (5)

I know some will disagree - and a few reviewers here have been quite scathing - but, having feared the worst about Oliver Stone's 'W', I think it's a reasonable picture. Josh Brolin is excellent as the man himself and Stone's take on the 43rd president (oedipus, the urge to compete with/satisfy dad, the 41st president) may not be original but that doesn't make it any the less plausible.

Indeed Stone's Bush is remarkably similar to the "hollow man" I identified in the 1999 election campaign, a characterisation which so annoyed the then Texas governor that for a while he refused to speak to the BBC. He is a man with a drink problem who'd failed in various ventures, reached 40, found God and resolved to join the family business: running the country. At the time it was gratifying for one's critique to be noticed by the candidate - and also rather worrying. If he were to be so distracted by a foreign correspondent's personal analysis, how would he cope with the slings, arrows and barbs that inevitably befall any inhabitant of the White House?

Well now we know. He can't take criticism and, in a politician, criticism is part of the climate. You can't change it; you live through it and get on with things. Otherwise you'll go under. Of course I concede that I may approve of Stone's interpretation precisely because it coincides with my own.

Most of the other characters in 'W' - his cabinet - tend to be caricatures, running through their best known 'bits' (Powell's initial resistance to the Iraq war, Rumsfeld's blithe disregard for Powell and military realities) while Bush himself replays some of his greatest hits, the Bushisms, in altered contexts. For example "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me (pauses, confused, and then grasps at a phrase which seems to chime) .........you won't get fooled again". That is delivered not in a public speech but in cabinet. It remains wonderfully funny.

Richard Dreyfuss's Dick Cheney is saturnine, the Dark Force in the White House. But my favourite character is Condi Rice (Thandie Newton). Somehow she plays her as a cyborg, ultra-loyal to W because that's how she has been programmed. She has no doubts, no opinions and her only emotions revolve around serving her mentor. It rings true.

Beauty, the Bear and McCain's LFC strategy. Having a laugh?

Peter Marshall | 00:36 UK time, Sunday, 19 October 2008

Comments (2)

One of the best things about covering U.S. elections is the timing: they're fixed for November. It means those of us traipsing around the campaign trail get the chance to see the country in its autumnal glory. The Fall offers the very best of American beauty. The browns, reds, yellow and gold of the maple and oak promised an almost edible scene as we drove through Pennsylvania en route to meet an old military colleague of John McCain (interview to be broadcast soon - it's intriguing, particularly on the matter of discipline).

Just outside Meyersdale, at a point where one was edging towards blasé about yet another sensational vista, we saw a bear on the road. Now even in this land of opportunity you don't spot a bear every day. But there he was, on all fours, with us bearing down in our Dodge. After no more than seconds, as we registered him and he clocked us, he rose onto two legs, up to perhaps six of his seven foot height, and wheeled off and away into the woods, presumably there to do what bears reputedly do, in the woods.

At any rate Pete the American sheepfarmer, who's a regular travelling companion and authority on U.S. nature, insists the bear would have been shaken by the experience. Apparently black bears fear humans whereas brown bears - the grizzlies - will take your head off, just for the heck of it. But they're over in the western states so we should be safe enough. Indoors.

My own knowledge of nature is somewhat limited, but I'm fascinated by Senator McCain's current electoral posture: is he playing possum like a, er, possum? That's what he seems to be suggesting by his insistence that, averaging six points behind Obama in the polls, he's got his opponent "exactly where we want him." As David Brooks the conservative commentator asked, does this mean he'd be even happier if he were twelve points behind?

McCain is perhaps inspired by Liverpool FC's recent performances in what the Americans call the EPL (English Premier League). Today, via satellite in Arlington, I enjoyed yet another spectacular Liverpool comeback. Two - one down with ten minutes to go, the increasingly Mighty Reds scored twice more to win. It's the fifth time this season they've fallen behind only to secure splendid victories in the dying minutes. This will of course be infuriating to some, but for myself and my new American Koppite chums it was the ideal start to a Fall weekend.

Tonight Senator. McCain will be hoping for assistance from his winking, maverick sidekick, Governor Palin. After being satirised for weeks by Tina Fey and the comedians of Saturday Night Live, Sarah Palin is to appear on the show alongside her doppelganger. Politicians love these opportunities to send themselves up, showing they're real people with a real sense of humour. SNL may not be the game changer the pundits say the Republican ticket needs, but it can surely do them no harm.

Humour, or the right kind joke, is always helpful. In the past 48 hours, John McCain has put in a nicely pitched piece of self deprecation on Letterman, while McCain and Obama swapped jokes at a charity dinner in Manhattan. I 'll leave you with chunks from both candidates' speeches. Whoever wrote them, they're hilarious. If only they could deliver this sort of material on the stump...

Read the rest of this entry

Country music lovers, Christmas has come early

Peter Marshall | 17:59 UK time, Thursday, 16 October 2008

Comments (1)

Here, below in full, is that Hank Williams Jnr performance of The McCain-Palin tradition. (See my post Nationalising the Banks and Censoring Hank Jnr. Doggone!)

It's the Richmond version, so the watering down process has begun - "terrorist" has become "radical". Note that the lyrics the party distributed were even more bowdlerised than I'd thought.

Read the rest of this entry

McCain Steals Baby! Rocks Stones!

Peter Marshall | 20:56 UK time, Wednesday, 15 October 2008

Comments (6)


This time John McCain has gone too far. Last night on Newsnight our film on the changing tone of the McCain campaign closed with shots of a McCain rally in Bluebell, Pennsylvania. We showed the candidate leaving the arena while the Republican faithful rocked to the sounds of the Rolling Stones` "Start Me Up". (Their last half-decent single).

Today the Stones' management in London called Newsnight in a state of distress. Had we simply dubbed the Stones onto the pictures? No of course not. Who do they think we are? Sad old rockers with no imagination and a reckless disregard for copyright? The music was played at the scene, up there in Bluebell by the McCain campaign "to energise the base", as they say.

All the campaigns play 1970s rock, usually at annoyingly loud volume and often through excruciatingly distorting speakers. It's tougher than you think on the campaign trail. In 2000 George W's folks were playing through Gary Glitter's canon. Presumably no one had registered Gary's 1999 conviction for child porn although, at the time, one thought Mr Bush may have been applying some of his compassionate conservatism and had resolved to hate the sin but forgive the sinner.

As for the Stones and McCain, I'm led to believe neither Mick nor Keith will be impressed. They've already had to warn off the German Chancellor Angela Merkel for using their "Angie" (a plaintive tune to soothe the fatherland's CDU footsoldier base). And some years ago Keith took exception to Snickers chocolate bars` expropriation of "Satisfaction".

"All my songs are my babies," he said, "and I'm sure as hell not going to let anyone use them." The trouble is the Stones were powerless because all their pre-1971 material is the property of Allen Klein, their former manager with whom they had an expensive falling out. (The Beatles then followed suit with Mr Klein. The only known instance of the Fabs following the Stones in anything, ever. Mick and his southern pals were of course forever aping the Liverpool geniuses. Hence once the Beatles broke up, the Stones got stuck in a groove which eventually became a rut. And there they've remained for the last 38 years.)

Today adverts around the world are soundtracked with the Stones` 60s material. "She Comes in Colours" is used rather effectively in a phone ad. Good song. Big steal from "Sergeant Pepper". Mick and Keith get to trouser the cash but they've no control over usage.

But the Stones aren't entirely opposed to hiring out their babies. Indeed they licensed the riff from "Start Me Up" - McCain's favourite - to Bill Gates for Windows 95. The money was too good to turn down. I'm assured the Rolling Stones' objections to McCain deploying the same song aren't ideological. It's simply that they won't want to be tied to any particular candidate or party.

Of course, if they came out for McCain (now that might change this election) they'd alienate millions of Democrats. And that could cost them money. And Mick is still a bread head.

Tip for McCain: Why not pinch a track from the Stones` best two albums, 1968`s Beggars Banquet or 69's Let it Bleed? Or why not delve back still further and go for "The Last Time", another Jagger Richards composition they don't control. Or "It's All Over Now" (written by Womack and Womack). What, the lyric?Ok, suit yourself.......

Muzzling the pitbull

Peter Marshall | 17:02 UK time, Wednesday, 15 October 2008

Comments (0)

I've been in Virginia to witness the first Republican rally where the McCain campaign appear to have muzzled the pitbull aggression of Sarah Palin. Watch my report here.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions

Nationalising the Banks and Censoring Hank Jnr . Doggone!

Peter Marshall | 01:08 UK time, Wednesday, 15 October 2008

Comments (5)

You can't get much more UnAmerican than part-nationalising the likes of Citygroup, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. But that's what George Bush has announced to stabilise the sector. The U.S. Government, Uncle Sam, is putting 250 billion dollars in. "It's not to take over the free market but to preserve it," said Mr Bush. A few days ago Hank Paulson, the treasury secretary, said it would never happen. Who'd have thunk it?

Mr Paulson sometimes seems to be challenging the President for the title of Man Who Gets Most Things As Publically and Catastrophically Wrong As Possible. Brave effort Hank, but at this stage of the game it's really no contest.

As to the men who are vying to inherit this mess, they've been coming up with their own economic rescue plans. On Monday Barack Obama revealed his "economic rescue plan for the middle class". So on Tuesday, John McCain was in a familiar position: in his wake. McCain proposed 52.4 billion dollars of tax cuts for the middle class. At first sight - "do the math!" - that looks some seven billion dollars less costly than Obama's scheme. But at this stratospheric level of public figures and finance , who's counting? (On past performance, no one. That's why we're in the hole.)

We've been following the McCain campaign's apparently abrupt change in style and approach. Down in Virginia we saw the rally where Sarah Palin, if she is, as she claims, a pit bull, was more or less muzzled. The scene was Richmond Nascar track and the devotees turned up in their thousands, dressed in Republican red, eager for more of that raw, red meat, anti Obama aggression.

But it was not to be. The first sign that things would be different was when the country star, Hank Williams Jnr, softened his pitch. Two hours earlier, down the road in Virginia Beach, he sang an adaptation of his "Family Tradition" song. The original, for those of you who aren't down with the country music thang, celebrates a life of liquor and dope.

That's not quite on message for Palin's professed values. So his new, campaign rally version, entitled The McCain- Palin Tradition, extolled McCain and Sarah and, by implication, Alaska's First Dude, Todd Palin, with the line: "They don't have terrorist friends to whom their careers are linked." That was a reference to the line the Republicans have pushed in attempting to tie Obama to the 1960s radical, William Ayers. Terrorist? By the 1990s, when he sat on a charity committee with Obama, Ayers had been named Chicago's Man of the Year. He lectures on education. George Bush's Texas schools use his work.

By the time the Palins and Hank Jnr reached Richmond the terrorist friends line was transmuted into radical friends. And, hilariously, by the time the Republican party were issuing the lyrics to the "left wing liberal media" (the target of the first verse) the verse itself had completely disappeared. America is nationalising the banks and censoring the country singers!

And Sarah Palin, the self proclaimed pitbull? At Richmond she was the model of restraint, Sarah Palid. The worst she could say of the Democrats was "They look to the past because that's where you find blame. We're joining you and looking to the future because that's where you find solutions." It wasn't hard hitting. It wasn't much of anything.

So why the anodyne approach? The view, from all sides, seems to be that the anti-Obama attacks have been running out of control and Virginia makes that case. At the weekend Jeffrey Frederick, the chairman of Virginia's Republican Party, compared Obama to Osama, saying both have friends who've bombed the Pentagon.

Frederick is just the latest Virginian Republican to go over the top with personal attacks on Obama. In recent days the McCain campaign has felt obliged to repudiate the Virginian party leadership on three separate occasions. Hence Sarah Palin's toned down approach. We must assume it will all have been vetted and personally approved by John McCain.

But this raises the question, posed by angry dog owners ( the angry owners of angry dogs) on both sides of the Atlantic: what's the point of having a pitbull if you don't let it bite? What's the purpose of a tame Palin? McCain will be on his own in the final debate with Obama on Wednesday night. Will McCain release his own, inner pitbull? Will he let it off the leash by challenging Obama face to face about terrorist friends? In song?

Here, for Senator McCain, country music lovers and all those who enjoy a fine lyric, is the McCain-Palin Tradition as sung by Hank Williams Jnr (and censored by the Republican Party). Enjoy y'all!

The McCain-Palin Tradition

The left wing liberal media have
Always been a real close knit family
But, most of the American People
Don't believe 'em anyway ya see
Stop and think it over
Before you make your decision
If they smell something
They're gonna come down strong
It's a McCain - Palin tradition

Now this old Union's got problems
That is plain to see
The Democrats bankrupted Fannie Mae N Freddie Mac
Just like 1, 2, 3
The bankers didn't want to make all those bad loans,
But Bill Clinton said you got to
Now they want a bailout, what I'm talking about
Is a Democrat liberal who do

CHORUS:
John N Sarah tell ya
Just what they think
And they're not gonna blink
And they're gonna fix this country
Cause they're just like you N ole Hank
Yes John is a maverick
And Sarah fixed Alaska's broken condition
They're gonna go just fine
We're headed for better times
It's a McCain-Palin tradition

I am very proud of America's name
Bu no society is perfect
And we have had our stains
If I'm down at the coffee shop and
Somebody wants to give our flag friction
We say please move on
Cause we're standing strong
That's an old John McCain tradition

Repeat Chorus

Some are bound to tell you I'm
Preaching to the choir
And that is very true
And we are going even higher
Like a mama bear in Idaho
She'll protect your family's condition
If you mess with her cubs
She's gonna take off the gloves
It's an American female tradition

Repeat Chorus

Defections, temptation and bouncing in the RFK

Peter Marshall | 21:52 UK time, Sunday, 12 October 2008

Comments (0)

USA 6 Cuba 1

Poor old Cuba. It doesn't help when two of your squad defect on the eve of the game. One of them, the midfielder, Pedro Faife, spent the matchday shopping for shoes and clothes and celebrating freedom , according to his aunt, a U.S. resident.

But Cuban TV saw things differently: "Cuban footballers Reynier Alcantara and Pedro Faife betrayed the unity of their team and gave in to the temptations of the empire's money. As always, the team will go out to defend the colours of the national flag, rising above the traitors' mud.''

They may have defended the flag but they couldn't defend their own goal. The empire were bigger, better, faster, and stronger. The USA scored six and could have had sixteen. The Cubans didn't put together more than three consecutive passes. The goal they did score was a fluke - a toepoke out of the blue which left the Evertonian keeper, Tim Howard, flatfooted and bemused.

This was the first time in four years that the USA have played in Washington's JFK Stadium and the ground shook, literally. Tim Howard had said pre match that it was "cool" the way the stands bounce up and down "like a mattress". Cool? It's certainly disconcerting and a sloppy place to drink. What feat of American engineering allows a concrete sport stadium to move up and down by feet at a time?

But the 20,000 crowd - almost all U.S. supporters - enjoyed themselves and provided a good natured simulation of the way traditional soccer fans express their passion. When the U.S. brought on Jose Francisco Torres for his debut in the second half they adapted Liverpool's Fernando Torres song, with much amusement at the "Bounce!" injunction in the bouncing JFK.

As for defections, Cuba's coach said they were a fact of life. "It is always a problem for the Cuba team. We have security, but you can't handcuff them to their rooms." Indeed seven of Cuba's Under 23 side defected only a few months ago in Tampa, Florida.

It seems a little otiose (a word favoured by Tim Gardam, a former Newsnight editor), given that America is going all socialist, what with the U.S. government buying into the banks. We did get to witness Fidel's anthem sung here in the heart of the empire. The words translate as "hasten brave ones to battle". Yet even as Yankee gold supposedly runs short, there's still much here to tempt the young soccer players of Cuba.

Nobody loves you when you're down and out

Peter Marshall | 23:52 UK time, Thursday, 9 October 2008

Comments (8)

A new Bretton Woods? A global agreement on new rules for the world's finances? Paul Mason is blogging on this in great and insightful detail. I'll just add that economists I've spoken to here in Washington - from right across the spectrum - believe it's not going to happen. Not yet.

First, they say the world isn't ready, nations are too mistrustful of neighbours/competitors and in the midst of the current crisis mutual suspicion can only grow.

There's also the argument that while we're trapped in the middle of the burning building the priority has to be putting the fire out. Only then can we look at the longer term insurance policies.

But the real bugbear could be the messenger who's pushing this notion of a new Bretton Woods. The IMF's bigwigs and the World Bank bosses are all calling for "new architecture" for the globalised economy of the 21st century. But these days few in the developing world have any time for the IMF.

They believe when they were down (Argentina, Asia) the IMF was needlessly severe with its big stick and strictures. The feeling is that U.S. has always ignored the IMF except when it could serve as its catspaw, so why should anyone else heed a near redundant body now just because the old paymaster is in the mire.

We're not in the world of the 1940s. Back then America was rescuing nations from war and offering the promise of future prosperity. Who wouldn't embrace whatever agenda they could offer? But today many nations - perhaps unfairly but no less angrily for that - believe themselves to be victims of Wall Street's greed and Washington's reckless failure to notice or care what was going on.

In comparative terms it's still 1929. It took 15 years, the Great Depression and a world war before the nations buried their differences last time. Let's hope we don't have a complete repeat.

John Lennon would have been 68 today, October 9. As he put it, " Nobody loves you when you're down and out........"

It's All Relateable

Peter Marshall | 01:24 UK time, Thursday, 9 October 2008

Comments (4)

Travelling through Ohio you not only get a clear sense of the real issue at stake in this election - the economy stoopid! - but you also get to hear a fair bit of the background noise that some seem to hope will muddy the voters' minds.

The self-professed rich man in a poor man's shirt, The Boss, Bruce Springsteen, in his concert for the Democrats' registration drive in Columbus, spoke of America as "a House of Dreams which a thousand George Bushes and a thousand Dick Cheneys can't tear down but will leave in a terrible state of disrepair."

The audience of course were in full agreement but what's striking is that there would be little dissent from Springsteen's view in the more rural, Republican areas of Ohio, like Muskingham County.

Read the rest of this entry

Explore the BBC

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.