BBC BLOGS - Neil Reynolds
« Previous | Main | Next »

Tom Brady is quarterback of the noughties

Post categories:

Neil Reynolds | 09:30 UK time, Tuesday, 29 December 2009

Lounging around the house, playing with my children and attempting to eat my own body weight in chocolates has given me a great deal of time to think over Christmas.

And being a true NFL anorak, it hasn't taken long for my thoughts to turn to the latest news and views from across the pond. One subject has really caught my attention as the decade draws to a close with a thrilling 2009 campaign.

The NFL will soon be announcing their Team of the Decade for the noughties and it will be fascinating to see who gets the nod at quarterback.

Usually, you can find a clear winner, but not this time. Peyton Manning, of the Indianapolis Colts, and Tom Brady, of the New England Patriots, are not only the dominant quarterbacks of the past 10 years, they are among the very best in NFL history.

Separating these two outstanding players is going to be very difficult. I could make a strong argument for both. I think whoever wins will be justified in taking such a coveted prize but the loser can also feel pretty aggrieved not to have been selected. And they will probably wonder what more they could have done.

In terms of pure passing yardage, touchdown strikes and the artistry of throwing the football, Manning is head and shoulders above his contemporaries and ranks right up there with the likes of Dan Marino in delivering pass after dynamic pass right on the numbers.

A first round draft pick in 1998, Manning has been an ever-present in the Colts line-up and has earned a reputation as a strong-armed passer with a quick release designed to frustrate the speediest of defensive linemen.

But he brings much more than physical skills to the table. Manning has earned a reputation as one of the most cerebral quarterbacks in the game's history. No other quarterback in the NFL today has as much freedom as number 18 when at the line of scrimmage.

Peyton Manning and Tom BradyManning and Brady have won four Super Bowls between them

The Colts often call three plays in the huddle and then let Manning decide which one to run when he sees how the defence is lined up. That kind of freedom is not afforded to many quarterbacks in the NFL - even the likes of Brady, Brett Favre and Drew Brees tend to be guided by their coaches and coordinators.

In terms of numbers, Manning has the decade pretty much sewn up. He has played 10 seasons and thrown for 42,159 yards, 314 touchdowns and 137 interceptions. He has been voted to eight Pro Bowls, picked up three NFL Most Valuable Player awards, one Super Bowl ring and one Super Bowl MVP crown.

Not a bad decade of work.

Brady has only played eight seasons. He took over from the injured Drew Bledsoe one game into the 2001 campaign and played the opening quarter of the 2008 season before having that year wiped out through a knee injury.

So Brady was always going to fall behind on the numbers. Still, he has thrown for 30,658 yards, 225 touchdowns and 98 interceptions. Brady has been voted to five Pro Bowls, won one NFL Most Valuable Player award and set the single season record for touchdown passes with 50 in 2007, breaking a mark of 49 set by Manning in 2004.

But it's what Brady has done in big games and during the playoffs that makes me think he will have a shot at the All-Decade Team, even with inferior regular season numbers when compared to Manning.

Brady has a record of 14 wins and three losses in the post-season, has won three Super Bowls and lost another thanks to a once-in-a-lifetime fourth down catch inside the game's final minute, is a two-time Super Bowl MVP and has saved some of the best performances of his career for the playoffs.

Manning has won a Super Bowl but he has also played some of the worst football of his career when the stakes have been at their highest in the playoffs. He has a distinctly average record of seven wins and seven losses in the playoffs. He even posted a quarterback rating of 31.2 during a miserable 41-0 playoff loss at the hands of the New York Jets in 2002. The Colts have also been knocked out of the playoffs twice by Brady's Patriots (in 2004 and 2005) and have been eliminated at the first attempt during the 2005, 2007 and 2008 seasons.

Brady's play in the post-season has seen him compared to arguably the greatest quarterback in NFL history, San Francisco 49ers legend Joe Montana. He has twice led New England on game-winning drives late in Super Bowls and he set an NFL record with 10 playoff wins in a row. No quarterback in NFL history has completed more Super Bowl passes than number 12.

Some of his greatest performances have also been in the playoffs. Brady threw for 312 yards in a blizzard to defeat the Oakland Raiders and in the 2004 AFC Championship Game he faced a tough test on the road against the Pittsburgh Steelers, who boasted the league's top defence. Brady shredded them to pieces and posted a passer rating of 130.5 en route to a 41-27 victory.

In terms of supporting casts, I would also say that Brady has done more with less.

Manning spent large parts of the noughties working with two future Hall of Fame running backs in Marshall Faulk and Edgerrin James. And his receiving trio of Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark could all end up in Canton, Ohio, some day.

Brady handed off to Antowain Smith and a well-past-his-prime Corey Dillon in New England. And the receiving corps of David Givens, David Patten, Deion Branch, Reche Caldwell, Troy Brown and Jabbar Gaffney was particularly average.

Much is made of the duo of Randy Moss and Wes Welker, but it should be pointed out that Brady has only enjoyed those guys as targets since 2007 and won his three Super Bowls with the journeymen mentioned above.

What the arrival of Moss did once and for all was end the talk that Brady could not throw the deep ball. Anyone who saw that pair in 2007 will recall that Tom is just fine at airing it out downfield.

Brady also has the edge in the meetings between the two quarterbacks. The pair have stepped on the field 11 times and Brady has won seven, although Manning has won four of the last five games, including a 35-24 thriller in Week 10 of this season.

Like most other quarterbacks in the NFL, Brady cannot come close to matching the numbers Manning has posted in the noughties and if it comes down to statistics and pure passing skill, Peyton will get the nod.

But I think playing quarterback is about much more than just posting big numbers. It is about playing your best football at the most important time of the year - the playoffs. Brady wins games, pure and simple. He has the best winning percentage of any quarterback with 100 starts or more in the Super Bowl era and he delivered three titles in four years in a supposed era of parity.

I don't get a vote, but if I did, I would cast it in favour of Tom Brady.


  • Comment number 1.

    Neil, hope you are enjoying this time with your family, and nicepost here on this team of the decade.

    Despite being a massive Pats fan, I can't decide if Brady should crack the nod for QB of the decade. And mainly for the reason you cite, around Manning being as much an offensive co-ordinator as he is a QB. You take away that game-management aspect, and Brady wins hands-down. But with it, Manning becomes the freakish machine he is, a QB the likes of which we have never seen.

    But if forced to, in my unbiased mind, I would still go with Brady. He is the ultimate clutch QB, no-one else you would want orchestrate a final game-winning drive irrespective of the other skill players on the field.

    (Just one thing I disagree with you on - Corey Dillon had one "prime" year in New England. In his first season he broke the Pats' single season rushing record, and was a huge reason they went on to with Superbowl 39. After that, definitely, age caught up with him.)

    Will however be interested to see the whole team, and not just the QB... would confidently reckon that LT will be the running back, but that's about all I'd be prepared to guess on!

    Ps. A typo in the column - Colts-Pats this year was 35-34.

  • Comment number 2.

    Neil - Seasons greetings, another good blog.
    I've not been following this 'team of the decade' but I assume it's those within the game that get the vote ?
    I do hope so, if left to the public it would likely end up in farce similar to the diabolical voting we've seen in the pro-bowl.
    As for the QB I guess I'd have to go along with Brady, he has done it more often than not when it matters most

  • Comment number 3.

    James isnt going to the hall of fame, four pro bowls and no ring? Its considerably less stellar than Terrell Davis' achievements and he isnt going in.

  • Comment number 4.

    Hi Neil! hope you had a merry Christmas.

    the sad thing about these sort of "team of..." events very quickly become media inspired popularity contests and a lot of the players who played the best football in the early part of the decade will be forgotten for the current media "darlings".

    i would like to see players who at one point reached the cusp of excellence at one point during the decade. Sean Taylor (RIP) i would think deserves to be mentioned for his outstanding play, before his tragic death, yet is likley to be forgotten as he is no longer a current player and the media over the pond have moved onto new idols; such is their short attention span. (media not americans)

    From my team i would really expect DT Warren Sapp to be their as he completely changed how the DT plays in the NFL, and is surely on his way to Canton.

    Maybe next to (swallows back sour taste in mouth)Jullius Peppers of the Kitties.

    Derek Brooks in at OLB would be nice, but i'm realistic enough to know their are other contenders out there like James Harrison of the steelers.

    CB i would also expect to see Ronde Barber in there with 25 sacks, 37 INT (7 of those taken back to the house, ie NFCCG against Philly) and 11 career Defensive TD's.

    MLB i would say no-one in my opinion comes close to Brian Urlacher of the Bears. OK he's dropped off in this season but know one could match his reading of the game.

    just my opinion but i'd be suprised if i didn't see any of these names on the defensive side of the ball.

    p.s. sorry to all you Saints fans but history does show any team beaten by the Bucs does not win the superbowl! maybe next year hey? ;)

  • Comment number 5.

    Just checked out the Pro-Bowl choices and amazingly, no Bungles. Their offensive line and their whole defense have been extremely good this year, and yet... It does remind me of the Giants from two seasons back who had no pro-bowlers and used this as extra motivation to go on and win the Superbowl. Who knows where this and "doing it for Chris Henry" could lead.

  • Comment number 6.

    Brilliant though Tom Brady is, I disagree with you. Tom Brady may be the central part of the Patriots, Peyton Manning IS the Colts. And although they have fewer Superbowls to boast of than the Pats, they´ve always been there or thereabouts.

  • Comment number 7.

    @ badcomputerkarma

    i think what you say pretty much sums it up!

    without manning the colts are, at best, an average .500 team or worse.
    the Pats struggled without Brady but still looked good and in the long run i think it's the colts that would struggle most if Manning and Brady ran off to a desert island together

  • Comment number 8.

    badcomputerkarma is exactly right, peyton manning is the colts, they fly through the regular season torching all before them and then tighten up when faced with real, post season challenges.

    Manning in the regular season, Brady when it matters.

  • Comment number 9.

    here's and idea... Brady and Manning in the Wild-Cat formation with, say LT in the back field with them?

    any defence would be terrified of that possible combination :p


BBC navigation

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.