The Jubilee Line & the trains that can't reverse?

I was stuck in the mess last Friday and it was ugly. Even with the unprecendented refund given to commuters at Canary Wharf, there were a lot of angry people.
It's all due to glitches in the new signalling system. The signalling and the train systems sometimes don't communicate and when that happens the whole system has to be rebooted.
You can imagine the response the IT helpdesk gets when they tell control : "Turn it off and back on again."
For a more detailed techincal analysis try this excellent website.
But let's not forget why we're putting up with this Jubilee Line upgrade which is now reaching its final stages.
Capacity will increase by a third as trains will be able to run closer together with automatic driving.
Transport for London took over what was already a flawed signalling upgrade from Tube Lines and they believe the system is improving.
If you believe them, they inherited a number of mistakes that included a lack of testing on the systems. However they did know what they were getting themselves into - and if they didn't - perhaps they should have.
Here is just one crazy bonkers example I've discovered about the "new" Jubilee Line.
The new signalling system doesn't allow trains to switch lines and go against the flow or "reverse" up the adjacent line, for example to clear an obstruction.
That means there is a huge lack of resilience in this new system if something goes wrong.
Failed trains (which inevitably you will get as the system beds in) can get blocked in on one part of the track and can't be put into sidings.
One LU manager said to me:
"Tubelines deleted the ability to run both ways on each track from the signalling system when they specified it, despite LU's objections. So when something goes wrong now, you can't run trains around an obstruction. If we could have done that on Friday, we'd have saved a lot of hassle for people."
So who' s paying for TfL to try to "sort" this upgrade out?
Probably all of us in taxes and higher fares and efficiencies in other services. (TfL will also say they have saved millions on lawyers fees buying out Tube Lines)
So we can probably chalk this up as another victory for the scandal that was the PPP and add it to the hundreds of millions of pounds that were wasted.
Of course, the sobering thought is we have at least 10 more years of tube upgrades.
The hope is they will be done much quicker and better than the Jubilee.
The more worrying wider picture for Transport for London is that it seems many of the travelling public have already lost faith in these upgrades just as the benefits start to materialise.
And that is an issue they have to address quickly.
Update 1400:
Just had the TfL press department on the phone. They want to clarify the reversing train issue. The Jubilee line trains can still be put into reverse manually if you override the automatic system.
So, technically you can reverse back into a platform if the safety checks are carried out and the driver switches from one end of the train to the other. (Is that still reversing??)
The real problem arises when you try to reverse the train onto an adjacent track to clear the line for example. Then the computer says no.
The point still being it still seems rather ridiculous and inflexible....and the client, LU, didn't get the system it wanted.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~52~RS~)

Comments
Sign in or register to comment.
I think you sum it up correctly, "another victory for the scandal that was the PPP".
This was New Labour's answer to bringing LU infrastructure into good repair and providing much needed capacity. It was an epic fail (or to quote John Bull, an "epic Thale"). The hundreds of millions of pounds of tax-payers money wasted in sorting out the PPP mess is the price Londoners must pay every day when there is yet another train fault or signal failure.
Yet curiously the RMT somehow blame this on Tory cuts and LUL management, not the root cause - the horrible legacy of the PPP introduced from the former Labour government!
Complain about this comment
Bi-directional signalling (which I think is what your rambling, overwrought screed refers to) is a fairly exotic feature that no other underground line has, and is only present on a few parts of National Rail. You seem to be trying to make a scandal out of nothing here, as per usual.
Complain about this comment
I agree entirely with the comment on bi-directional signalling.
As for the comment "we have at least 10 more years of tube upgrades" this is nonsense. The current plans may be there for a ten year timescale but tube upgrades should go on forever.
There should be, as a matter of good housekeeping, a constant rolling programme to keep everything well maintained and modernised. It is the piecemeal approach over the last thirty or forty years of the 20th century that led to backlogs we are now seeing addressed.
In addition there will be more work to bring capacity improvements as required. Better new build planning must happen as well. The Jubilee Line extension has only been open for eleven years! The DLR carried more passengers in its first year than the business case expected in the tenth year! Where is the planning?
Complain about this comment
When I moved to Willesden Green, admittedly over 25 years ago, the Jubilee line provided a superb service.
It's never worked properly since it was extended to terminate at Stratford instead of Charing Cross. The mad rush to get the then PM from Westminster to the Millennium Dome has imposed a bitter cost on ordinary commuters. And now it looks as though the mad rush to upgrade a still faulty system for the Olympic Games will makes us suffer even more.
Complain about this comment
Regarding the comments about bi-directional signalling, there is some truth in these in that conventionally signalled underground lines are not signalled for bi-directional running.
However, this overlooks an important point: As a driver on a manually driven, conventionally signalled tube line, in emergency situations (person under a train/broken down train, etc, etc) we are able to carry out a wrong directional move. Which basically means (following strict safety guidelines) that trains are able to travel in the "wrong" direction down a track. If the Jubilee system does not allow for this then, as the report says, it is indeed greatly lacking in operational resilience.
Complain about this comment
This will please the current mayor:
http://railwayeye.blogspot.com/2011/02/ken-livingstone-wins-european-railway.html
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS