iPlayer Radio What's New?

5 live Review - The Hangover part II

Tuesday 31 May 2011, 17:09

Mark Kermode Mark Kermode

Tagged with:

5 live's resident movie critic Dr Mark Kermode reviews The Hangover part II.

Go to Mark on 5 live for more reviews and film debate.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.

You can hear Mark talk about the latest films on Kermode & Mayo's Film Review on BBC Radio 5 live every Friday 2pm-4pm. The programme is also available as a podcast.

Tagged with:


Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    I saw this film today, and I did not think it was great. I (unlike Dr Kermode) did enjoy the first film - it was crass and pretty foul-mouthed, but there was plenty to laugh at. I agree that the sequel is sadly treading on the same exact ground with seriously diminished returns. It is not a film I would recommend.
    That said, I think the good Doctor may be over-egging it by saying the film is racist and homophobic. The crazy chinese gangster is not a figure of ridicule because he's chinese, it's because he is a coked up nutbar. Again, I don't think it's a comedy masterclass, but it is not racist. All the Thai characters (fiancee, father in law, brother in law, ladyboy, monks - everyone) come off way better than the hungover (american) protagonists.
    And I'm not sure that homophobia is right either - there's a pretty crass (surprise!) sequence in the film, but I don't think it is anti-gay (a character who self-identifies as heterosexual regrets a homosexual experience he had whilst he was drunk - is that necessarily homophobic?). The accusation that the film has no active female characters is probably right, but is it missing the point when the film is about a stag night gone wrong?
    I can't believe I'm posting to defend a profoundly mediocre film, but I just think that accusing the film of racism and homophobia is unnecessarily harsh - I certainly don't think that homophobia and racism permeate the entire film. Did anyone else agree with Dr Kermode - I'd be interested to hear why, and am willing to admit that I might not be being sensitive enough.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    I seriously doubt that Todd Phillips is a homophobe or a racist. If you ever see an interview with Todd Phillips, I recommend the Awards Oscar Roundtable from 2010, you will be very surprised with just how intelligent he is.

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    i can't believe you didn't make the sex in the city 2 comparison.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    Edwin Hubble was intelligent also, but apparently he was racist and misogynistic.

    I haven't seen the movie so I can't judge. But the format for "The Hangover" seems to be: (Dude, wheres my car? + Dumb and Dumberer) - Citizen Kane.

    It might be great

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Further proof that Mark Kermode is the best film critic on the planet. Very insightful and funny as heck... unlike both movies in this rotten franchise.
    Kudos, Dr. Kermode.

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    I happen to agree completely 100% with Minshg.

  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    I wish sometimes I woud read posts before pressing post comment button. Though I am sure you get my point I am sure it is not grammatically correct.

  • rate this

    Comment number 8.

    American "comedy" these days is about as funny as a miscarriage. I am sorry, but there is just something distinctly mean-spirited, vindictive and downright nasty about some parts of American society - dare I say more so than any other nation - which comes through quite plainly in this endless stream of vomit masquerading as comedy. They are made primarily for American consumption; for the kinds of people who laugh at roadkill. Look at the films like EAT, PRAY, LOVE (Americans so insular and ignorant they think Italians eating pasta is actually a revelation); and TAKEN, which contain almost every damn worldly racial stereotype imaginable (including a French policeman with a baguette under his arm - HO HO HO, so funny), and the bloody Yanks love it. Given that abysmal backdrop, are films such as HANGOVER2 really that surprising?

    From the heights of Frasier (I can't remember anything more recent) to this drivel. That's quite an achievement. Oh, and why did it take a couple of Brits to make a film about the genius Bill Hicks? There's your answer; they'd rather be watching a Wayans Brothers film.

  • rate this

    Comment number 9.

    Having heard Mark's review of the film describing it as racist and homophobic I'm thinking he must have been watching a different film. I don't think any of the Thai people were portrayed in a racist light and if anything the American's seemed to be shown in the poorer light while the Thai people have to suffer their drunken shenanigans.

    Similarly so Ed Helm has a Homosexual encounter whilst Drunk yet Mark somehow thinks it's a Homophobic scene. The Homosexual dancer wasn't played in a negative light so I'm wondering where Mark got the idea it was homophobic



This entry is now closed for comments

Share this page

More Posts

Ten Years After

Thursday 26 May 2011, 16:52

Me And My Big Mouth Organ

Tuesday 31 May 2011, 16:52

About this Blog

Outspoken, opinionated and never lost for words, Mark is the UK's leading film critic.

This twice-weekly video blog is the place where he airs his personal views on the things that most fire him up about cinema - and invites you to give your own opinions.

Blog Updates

Stay updated with the latest posts from the blog.

Subscribe using:

What are feeds?