I've posted recently asking which films you would choose to re-edit and who would you cast in which role.

Here I pick out some of your best responses.

Related Content

Casting Call

Cut To The Chase

 

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments.

  • Comment number 12. Posted by Tim Scott

    on 21 May 2013 16:15

    Just as an addition to the re-editing films, I would re-edit the ending of Superman the Movie and the beginning of Superman 2. When Superman's too late to save Lois he reverses time to the sound of his father saying it is forbidden. After saving Lois in this new time frame his reckless actions of throwing that last missile into space would unleash Zod and therefore make his actions have consequences. And this would spill over into Superman 2.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 12: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 12: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 11. Posted by Mark Hudson

    on 14 May 2013 09:32

    That comment about Chitty Chitty Bang Bang is absolutely spot-on. My two-year-old son always yells 'Skip it!' when that scene comes on. It has no place in a children's film.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 11: 1
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 11: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 10. Posted by CORNISH DARREN FEWINS

    on 12 May 2013 12:15

    I wonder if "Run for your wife" could have been better with the right editor?

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 10: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 10: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 9. Posted by Rosko

    on 12 May 2013 06:27

    Great topic - regret missing this one the first time you posted it. As I heard the question about re-editing and re-casting I immediately thought of Francis Ford Coppola's Dracula - I can remember even thinking as a 12 year old, Keanu Reeves? What is that accent? Why is Ted Logan in a scarey gothic film? And why have they ended the film with a rediculous Carry-On in Transylvania chase ending, after such a brilliant build up? It was not Bram Stoker's story either, although most Dracula's are not. When you think about how brilliantly Coppola developed the look of the film and the good cast selections - particularly Gary Oldman, Wynoda Rider, Monica Bellucci, Tom Waits, Sadie Frost, Richard E. Grant - the actors that make it too hammy and break with the gothic mood of the film are clearly Keanu Reeves and Anthony Hopkins - one too dull & monotone and the other too lively and caricatured. It needed to develop that strange hallucinatory quality that it had more: As Jonathan Harker (bearing in mind they wanted a 'star' actor that would get it into cinemas everywhere) I would have gone with either River Phoenix, Johnny Depp or Ralph Fiennes, and as Van Helsing either Udo Kier or Klaus Kinski (I think he was still alive when Dracula was filmed). Cut out some of the superfluous who-done-it type dialogue in the manor house, then change the chase sequence near the end to emphasise how long it would take them to travel all that way and changes in scenery, from civilization to 'the wild' - one of the main themes in the book: time lapse footage and montages etc. then build the tension slowly towards a final confrontation in the chapel - throw in some local farmers and village people (as in Werner Herzog's version to create a sense of foreboding/warning). The colours and imagery in this film were just about the best I've seen in a horror film, but it was almost ruined by a slap-dash script/ending and casting in those two roles.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 9: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 9: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 8. Posted by information1st

    on 11 May 2013 11:04

    In terms of Editing: A lot of films could do with editing out the "dramatic + crescendo + classical + heart-strings/triumph + ending-on-a-high" MUSIC to hammer home to the audience how to emotionally respond.

    God almighty it ruins so many films and is so clumsy (confidence in the film's story/drama is evidently very low for someone making the bluedy film!).

    Eg LOTRs interminable soundtrack. Or the othernight a solid film Source Code's "5 minutes" of piano music at the end... such a let down.

    AUDIENCE = "CLAP!"

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 8: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 8: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 7. Posted by jayfurneaux

    on 11 May 2013 00:14

    Is there a good movie somewhere in Caligula?

    Power, ambition, murder, sex, madness, war and intrigue; it does make a good story; a pity Shakespeare never tackled it. I imagine that Vidal also wanted to compare Rome’s decadence with (his) modern day Washington.

    A remake of ‘I Claudius’ - as Robert Graves wrote it - could make a very good film.

    The TV series was a good adaptation (and John Hurt was much better than McDowell in conveying Caligula’s madness) and better than the Brass movie (and also had to hint at the incest, murder and bloodletting of Graves book); a serious attempt to film ‘I Claudius’ could do the story justice.

    The only two directors that come to mind that could have made a decent job of this, and captured the decadence, double standards and violence of the period are – each in their own way - Ken Russell and Andrzej Wajda (both too old now).

    Neither director shied away from being explicit, but always to make a point. Think of Russell’s The Devils or Wajda’s The Promised Land.

    Nowadays; US & European cinema plays too safe; possibly a director from Korea or Japan could do it. But then they have their own countries stories to tell.

    And, as no one else mentions it… Helen ‘kit off; Mirren. Now one of our national treasures.

    Will any director be as brave as Russell was in 'Women in Love', to do a good, very serious movie complete with full frontal nudity (Bates, Reed, Jackskon etc).

    And no Lars Von Wotsit, you’re not in their league.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 7: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 7: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 6. Posted by R E ffolkes

    on 10 May 2013 23:31

    I thought there were a number of edits of Caligula available already and not just because of censorship issues. I'm sure Arrow or some such put out a dvd with multiple versions a few years back.
    Its got quite a cast of luvvies and for that alone it certainly has a curiosity value if you can stomach its excesses !

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 6: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 6: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 5. Posted by PinkyGreen

    on 10 May 2013 19:28

    I agree with that Trainspotting comment. Its a great film but i would have liked Kelly Macdonald to be in it more as theres not much in the way of female characters in it. It doesnt ruin it but does seem a little one sided.
    In fact once, after reading a critical evaluation of the novels of Philip Roth and how some feel he doesnt really incorporate or represent women into his stories, i was looking through my dvd collection pondering how many of these films can really boast a significant female role and not just a character to expose the male lead's dilemna. I have to be honest, i couldnt come up with many where the male and female characters shared equal screen time and an equal ammount of character exposition to drive the narrative. But now you come to mention it, perhaps thats the appeal of Titanic.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 5: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 5: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 4. Posted by Phud

    on 10 May 2013 17:38

    BO-wee - his ground-breaking LP from 76 is called LOW does not rhyme with cow. Nick Lowe had en EP in 77 called Bowi - as a pun on his name! Please pass this info on to David Hepworth and any other suburban Londoners with weird, semi-cockney annunciation problems.

    Think like that bloke Mr Smoketoomuch who couldn't pronounce the letter C in that Python sketch - replace all your 'ow's (cry of pain) with 'oh's (cry of delight), simple, non?

    How (rhymes with cow) hard can it be?

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 4: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 4: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 3. Posted by Cat

    on 10 May 2013 16:51

    You mispronounced Bowie... ! Bowie as in "snowy" is how he says it himself.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 3: 2
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 3: 0
    Loading…
More comments

More Posts

Previous

Next