Sheffield standoff - Lib Dems face the music at spring conference

Nick Clegg ponders the future for the LibDems
What a difference a year makes.
In Sheffield this week Liberal Democrats will have to make their way through street protestors; deep ranks of police and a six foot high steel security fence to get into their spring conference at the City Hall.
Twelve months ago, for the same event, I strolled through the quiet streets of Birmingham and slipped quietly into the city's International Convention Centre after a cursory security check from the equivalent of the laughing policeman.
In Birmingham I was slotted in to record an interview with Nick Clegg with ease.
In Sheffield requests, in writing, are being considered.
A year ago Liberal Democrats would expect to be in with a shout of winning any Parliamentary by-election.
But then the party could count on the those fed up with Government and looking for an alternative party to give their "protest" vote.
As a party of government Liberal Democrats are rapidly finding that by-elections are a different ball game.
In January Labour surged ahead in Oldham East and Saddleworth.
Last week, Barnsley Central saw the Liberal Democrats humiliated. The party received fewer votes then an unemployed local miner who stood as an independent.
The Lib Dem candidate finished in 6th place and went home without his deposit.
So where is the "I agree with Nick" surge that boosted the party in the days before the General Election?
Nick Clegg's adept handling of the other party leaders in the televised debates made his face recognisable to millions across the country.
But it was a face that made not a single appearance throughout the entire Barnsley Central election campaign.
In fact it did not appear on any of the party literature I saw being handed out in the street either.
It did appear somewhere. It was in the middle of a rather cheeky Labour spoof "wanted" poster.
Spoof poster published by Labour
David Cameron featured on the same poster as he did not turn up to support the Conservative candidate either.
Yet as Nick Clegg's personal popularity has dimmed the party itself has hardly fallen to bits.
On the whole Liberal Democrats 57 MPs have followed his unwavering support for the speed and depth of the Conservative-led reductions in public spending.
But cracks have appeared.
The biggest opposition came over his U-turn on an election promise not to increase student tuition fees.
Leeds North West MP Greg Mulholland, together with 20 others from his party, trooped into the opposition lobby. A further eight abstained.
David Ward, the new Bradford East MP, has consistently joined a small group of Liberal Democrats voting against Coalition plans to turn more state schools into independently managed Academies.
But the internal opposition seems to be on an issue-by-issue basis rather than the start of a leadership coup.
David Ward told me on an edition of the Politics Show for Yorkshire and Lincolnshire in January that despite his voting record he still firmly "agrees with Nick".
The problem is that the public opinion polls seem to show that many tens of thousands of ordinary voters now have a different view of the Liberal Democrats and the party leader from just 10 months ago at the General Election.
So far that has led to relatively little damage.
The party's poor by-election performance has been in traditional Labour seats.
Just a few weeks after the conference the Local Government elections will see Liberal Democrat administrations in Sheffield, Hull and York put under severe pressure.
Few expect all three of these major Yorkshire councils to be in Liberal Democrat hands after the polls in May.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~05~RS~)

I'm Len Tingle, the Political Editor for BBC Yorkshire. You can see me most Sunday lunchtimes when I hit the road with the Politics Show's live satellite truck. I also reflect the region's politics on Look North, the BBC's local radio stations and our web pages. Welcome to my blog.
Comments
Sign in or register to comment.
If I agreed with Nick we would both be wrong.
If AV means continuous coalition as we are witnessing then vote NO.
Complain about this comment
@terrysolihull
hate to worry you but we got this coalition under FPTP, in Australia there are less hung parliaments under AV than Britain
Complain about this comment
It does,nt worry me mate but I suspect the average Lib/Dem supporter will be worried. Has Australia had as many parliaments that went the distance as the UK. It would worry me if we had as many elections called as other nations.We have had 16 elections in the last 60 years how many as Australia had.
Complain about this comment
1. At 10:56am on 09 Mar 2011, terrysolihull wrote:
If I agreed with Nick we would both be wrong.
If AV means continuous coalition as we are witnessing then vote NO.
--------
A) Clegg wants his "miserable" AV
B) Cameron doesn't want Clegg's "miserable" AV
C) Labour Party line is vote Yes
A1) I want to kick Clegg to Kingdom come for supporting Cameron, who I detest!
A2) I detest Cameron
A3) I joined the LP at the age of 63 late last year
Could someone tell really tell me whether I should vote Yes or No, completely discounting A, B and C?!?!?
A lollipop to the one who comes back with a sensible solution for me!
Complain about this comment
Lib Dems are performing as any informed person over the past thirty years knew they would. They will say anything, do anything, put up with anything to gain power - even as the servile gophers for this worst of governments. Anyone who reads their literature in both local and national elections know that they will smear, misrepresent and lie about the other candidates. When they get power for themselves they always lurch to the right. Clegg won't be unseated because, even though a tiny portion of the eligible population voted for them, they got majorities in their MPs constituency. They will support 'localism' (the new version of petty provincialism) because they don't have to justify theirposition on a National level.
Complain about this comment
Giselle asked whether to vote YES or NO, well vote with your conscience at least we common or garden voters still have a conscience unlike any politicians. OR are we so brainwashed that this referendum is meaningless.
Complain about this comment
Not much difference between the Coalition or New Labour Party.
Lord Hutton report of Labour and his predecessors' outline what was planned for the Public Sector Workers and Unions unfortunately they are burying their heads in the sand as they did with the steel,mining and car workers that this country once had. Watch out you teachers' you are not invincible.
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS