« Previous | Main | Next »

Southern Sudan: birth of a nation?

Post categories:

Robin Lustig | 10:40 UK time, Friday, 7 January 2011

The trumpets will sound; the drums will beat; the flags will flutter proudly. After a referendum to be held on Sunday, a new nation will be born on the continent of Africa - and great will be the rejoicing.

Well, I'm sorry, but maybe not so fast. For the people of southern Sudan, yes, after decades of war and hardship, it will indeed seem that there is much to celebrate. They have fought long and hard for their independence, and they will be sure that they have earned the right to celebrate.

But my task this weekend is to draw your attention to a few other recent occasions when people celebrated the birth of new nations - and to ask whether perhaps some of their celebrations were just a tad premature.

You may be surprised to learn that over the past 20 years, more than 30 new nations have appeared on the face of the globe. Nearly half of them emerged from the wreckage that used to be the Soviet Union (all the way, alphabetically if not geographically, from Armenia to Uzbekistan).

Seven have emerged from the former Yugoslavia (Bosnia, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia).

There's also Namibia, which broke away from South Africa in 1990; the Czech Republic and Slovakia which went their separate ways in 1993; and Eritrea, which split from Ethiopia, also in 1993. More recently, East Timor (Timor-Leste) won its independence in 2002, after 27 years of Indonesian occupation - and of course Kosovo declared itself independent of Serbia in 2008.

Some of these countries are doing well enough: Namibia, Slovenia, the Baltic states of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania. But others - Eritrea, East Timor, Kosovo - are not (yet?) great success stories.

So the people of Southern Sudan would be wise to be cautious. There is, admittedly, no good reason why the lines drawn on a map by 19th century British colonialists should be set in stone - yet the landlocked south will need more than its fair share of good luck to become a viable independent state.

Its substantial oil reserves could turn out to be a curse as much as a blessing. There are likely to be months of bitter arguments over how to divide up the revenues from oil sales; and the north will want generous terms in return for allowing the oil to travel through its territory in the already existing pipelines.

But the people of the north (mainly Muslim) and the people of the south (mainly Christian) have never had much in common - and what unites them now is a shared wish not to return to war. That, at least, is a positive sign.

Until very recently, there were real doubts whether this referendum would be held on schedule. President Omar el-Bashir was thought to be deeply reluctant to authorise a poll that he knew would result in secession. And when he was indicted by the International Criminal Court in connection with war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed in Darfur, it seemed he had little incentive to bow to the will of the West.

But US diplomats have been heavily engaged in Sudan for several months now; and if the referendum goes well - and if the secession of the South takes place without major problems - Washington will have good reason to be pleased.

Some commentators have taken to referrring to Sudan as "Obama's Rwanda", a reference to Bill Clinton's known regret that he didn't do more to prevent the genocide in Rwanda in 1994.

Remember, Sudan is the biggest country in Africa. It's of major strategic importance and is a key trading partner for China. Its president is the only serving head of state ever to have been indicted as a war criminal.

The stakes on Sunday are high. The omens are a lot better than they looked just a matter of months ago. But there are still many hurdles to be surmounted before the new nation of Southern Sudan can confidently take its place as the newest kid on the United Nations block.

Comments

  • 1. At 00:57am on 08 Jan 2011, quietoaktree wrote:

    Yet another country who will suffer from the `divide and rule´of the British Empire up to the Sudanese 1956 independence.

    South Sudan has little to look forward to.

    Complain about this comment

  • 2. At 4:14pm on 11 Jan 2011, John_from_Hendon wrote:

    #1. quietoaktree wrote:

    "South Sudan has little to look forward to."

    So an end to 20 years of Civil War is nothing then?

    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 6:28pm on 11 Jan 2011, seated wrote:

    God is the one dividing Sudan Himself,that's why the division must be a success.The poem below gives you the details;

    Upon the peak of man's creative power,
    Was born the world's greatest tower.
    Born, that the world may one name share;
    Alas! the heavens, rain'd a current'l "tear".

    (tear = division)

    Complain about this comment

  • 4. At 5:17pm on 13 Jan 2011, quietoaktree wrote:

    #2 John_from_Hendon

    The hate will still exist and the oil wealth is far from settled.

    The amount of International aid required is immense-- and any promises of help are only promises. It appears they have 60 miles of paved road (or Km?)

    -- I spoke of the future -- and not of the past.





    Complain about this comment

  • 5. At 9:11pm on 14 Jan 2011, James P wrote:

    It will be great.. congratulations to the people of Southern Sudan.. God bless you. and may you have peace with your northern neighbours.

    Complain about this comment

  • 6. At 12:08pm on 17 Jan 2011, seated wrote:

    With respect to the conflict in Sudan...there seems to be a feeling in some parts of the world that the United Nations is“our last and best hope”, basically in the light of her conservative approach on issues related to fundamental human rights. But what would be the fate of mankind if this great institution as UN will one day collapse under her peace building capacity based on the rate of conflicts around the today? This sounds unimaginable; but I consider it a question every human being with the consciousness of life should be able to find an answer to.

    Complain about this comment

  • 7. At 5:08pm on 17 Jan 2011, GeoffWard wrote:


    South Sudan will become a country

    but it takes more than that to become a nation.

    There is SO far to go, and climate change will render uninhabitable too much of the new country.

    I have little hope that South Sudan's drought-stricken and environmentally-disposessed migrants will be well received at the new border.

    Complain about this comment

View these comments in RSS

BBC iD

Sign in

BBC navigation

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.