Advertisement
rounded corners top
606
606 SPORT FORUM

Adebayor's started so well for Man City
5 live
Sat 05 September 15:00 Scotland v Macedonia
5 live sports extra
Fri 25 Sep, 10.55
Formula 1
1st Practice - Singapore
rounded corners bottom
« Previous | Main | Next »

Is cutting benefit fair?

Post categories:

Richard Jackson | 07:33 UK time, Monday, 5 October 2009

Is it fair to cut benefits?

The Tories say they'll reduce more than half a million people's incapacity benefit by 25 pounds to force them back to work. But, with unemployment at the highest level in 14 years, is this the right thing to do?

We'll be discussing this on the 5 live Phone-in at 9. You can get involved in many ways:

And you can follow the debate live between 9 and 10 with 5 live Now, which pulls together you contributions in one page. Find out more about 5 live Now.

Comments

or register to comment.

  • 1. At 09:00am on 05 Oct 2009, steelpulse wrote:

    I have no idea. Does that help?
    But I watched David Cameron not answwer a question from Andrew Marr about his own financial status - several times and thought hmmmm.
    I was also intrigued by a report this AM about a sort of kicking something allegedly into the Law Courts long grass over in the Czech Republic - and a report of an earlier missive (and unadmitted to of its contents) written by someone to the same places Leader.
    My hmmm became what on earth? But then that is me. I am all for proper discussion with Euro Sceptics - I am for the Union but I want it all done openly.
    Can I say in full disclosure I receive No Benefit Currently so feel free to cut mine Mr Cameron's Party. No offence.

    Complain about this comment

  • 2. At 09:07am on 05 Oct 2009, zeldalicious wrote:

    Something MUST be done to cut the wefare bill but I predict a programme this morning full of people with their own sob stories.



    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 10:20am on 05 Oct 2009, Belchard Farticus wrote:

    zeldalicious wrote:
    Something MUST be done to cut the wefare bill but I predict a programme this morning full of people with their own sob stories.

    I agree, an elysium for the workshy! Errr....especially incapacity benefit.

    Complain about this comment

  • 4. At 10:27am on 05 Oct 2009, JohnJ wrote:

    I didn't hear "sob stories" (that phrase implies a degree of manipulation or even dishonesty), but rather the genuine fears of some people on IB.

    Complain about this comment

  • 5. At 10:52am on 05 Oct 2009, zeldalicious wrote:

    Genuine fears for many, especially those with 'bad back syndrome'. Hobble in to the surgery/consulation on crutches and when clear of the hospital ditch them then straight off shopping or down the pub. You have to live on planet Zog not to see what goes on here.

    They mayor of one town was found guilty of claiming DLA with the most outlandish claims. He was fined and lost the Mayorship.

    Complain about this comment

  • 6. At 11:23am on 05 Oct 2009, JohnJ wrote:

    Zelda, you're referring to the small dishonest minority on IB. Their fears can't really be described as genuine!

    Complain about this comment

  • 7. At 11:29am on 05 Oct 2009, zeldalicious wrote:

    The cheats are genuinely scared, scared they will get found out and their lifestyle will end. It IS widespread. The carers allowance is another one that is widely defrauded too.

    How can there be so many people incapable of working.

    Complain about this comment

  • 8. At 12:03pm on 05 Oct 2009, Belchard Farticus wrote:

    Is it fair to cut benefits?
    The Tories say they'll reduce more than half a million people's incapacity benefit by 25 pounds to force them back to work. But, with unemployment at the highest level in 14 years, is this the right thing to do?


    zeldalicious wrote:
    The cheats are genuinely scared, scared they will get found out and their lifestyle will end. It IS widespread. The carers allowance is another one that is widely defrauded too.

    How can there be so many people incapable of working.

    Are Labour that vapid? If they're fit enough to work why are they claiming incapacity benefit? For the Tories it's going to lose votes....especially on sink housing estates.

    Complain about this comment

  • 9. At 2:45pm on 05 Oct 2009, Tempus Fugit wrote:

    "If they're fit enough to work why are they claiming incapacity benefit? "

    Lazy? Idle? Gravy trainers...?

    Complain about this comment

  • 10. At 7:19pm on 05 Oct 2009, Tom Adustus wrote:

    If people are capable of work then they should not be on disability benefit. We all know that it has been used to reduce the registered unemployment statistics.

    By the way, the best place to discuss this would have been the old R5live Messageboard.

    Complain about this comment

  • 11. At 7:39pm on 05 Oct 2009, zeldalicious wrote:

    There would have a damn sight more than 10 replies on the message board too.

    Complain about this comment

  • 12. At 7:45pm on 05 Oct 2009, i.moore wrote:

    The brave new world of BBC blogging is really dire.

    Complain about this comment

  • 13. At 08:38am on 06 Oct 2009, MarinSolitaire wrote:

    Another fatuous question

    The subtext here of course is that all benefits are only available to the worthy while they need them and that they appear out of thin air

    In fact thy are a huge drain on the economy and are paid for by taxing business and people in work

    Not one penny should be paid to anyone that does not require it. And lets not kid ourselves about the ' I have to survive on £90 a week' issue - once you qualify for one benefit others like housing benefit, council tax relief etc kick in, worth £100s

    Labour has poured billions into the NHS yet there are more people apparently too ill to work than ever - anyone like to explain how this could be so?

    I believe Ian Duncan Smith is onto something - the whole benefits system needs to be simplified. And what is left needs to be policed rigorously but sensitively

    Once the fraudulent are kicked off, there might be extra money for the deserving - how about that?

    Complain about this comment

  • 14. At 09:29am on 06 Oct 2009, Tempus Fugit wrote:

    "The brave new world of BBC blogging is really dire."

    Despite what they tell us, I think that's the plan - too much off-message opinion being carried, you see...?!!

    Complain about this comment

  • 15. At 09:31am on 06 Oct 2009, Tempus Fugit wrote:

    "In fact thy are a huge drain on the economy and are paid for by taxing business and people in work."

    Indeed - and Tesco should be making a sizeable contribution this year. Oh, hang on - what's the betting they have a system to get away with paying next to no tax on their vast profits...?

    Complain about this comment

  • 16. At 11:16am on 06 Oct 2009, 2nd Earl of Itterby and Oole wrote:

    The society is wrong that provides no care for the elderly, but gives incentives to bastard bearers to have children!

    Complain about this comment

  • 17. At 11:27am on 06 Oct 2009, 2nd Earl of Itterby and Oole wrote:

    Re Tesco should be making a sizeable contribution this year

    Under whom hath the great monolith left our shores for tax purposes

    That shall be the Gorgon's then!

    Complain about this comment

  • 18. At 3:36pm on 06 Oct 2009, i_amGeorge123 wrote:

    As I understand it they are not cutting benefits. All they are doing is classifying people that could work into that category. This seems completely fair to me as long as the system is run fairly. For years people have been pushed onto disability in an attempt to lower the headline unemployment figures. The sooner we move to a economically inactive as an indicator the better.

    It is only unfair if it is pushing the genuinely needy onto a lower weekly wage as a cost cutting exercise.

    Iva

    Complain about this comment

  • 19. At 10:22pm on 06 Oct 2009, Nick Vinehill wrote:

    All capitalist governments, when their economy is in crisis will pick on cutting public spending to bail their system out and will use all sorts of divide and rule tactics in society to justify it.

    It sums up how hypocritical it is for both the Tories and New Labour (they may as well merge or be in coalition) to target benefits when it's been proved of late that the biggest benefit scroungers are the banks and the entire financial system which has been bailed out to the tune of £1.4 Trillion just to save the face and dignity of capitalism!

    Incidentally saw Cameron on the TV 'jogging' around Manchester before the conference of Toffs with of course numerous photographers following him and perhaps an overhead helicopter. Judging by his performance I would have thought the last party to attempt to cut incapacity benefit was his!

    Complain about this comment

  • 20. At 10:23am on 07 Oct 2009, JohnJ wrote:

    It's not true that once you qualify for IB, lots of other benefits "kick in". It all depends on your individual circumstances and those of your partner. For example, I'm on IB but don't qualify for housing benefit, council tax relief, or any other benefit!

    Complain about this comment

  • 21. At 2:47pm on 07 Oct 2009, Tempus Fugit wrote:

    "conference of Toffs"

    Hague wasn't born well-healed and went to the local comp. Does that make him a toff, then..,?

    Incidentally, Darling (loretto), Blair (Fettes), Harman (St. Pauls - the girls division of the same school Osborne attended) and a selection of others in the PLP from monied backgrounds all enjoyed the benefits of the exclusive education only wealth can bring - don't hear anyone calling them toffs, etc. for being born with a silver spoon up their backsides, though.

    Complain about this comment

  • 22. At 9:29pm on 07 Oct 2009, Nick Vinehill wrote:

    You don't hear anyone calling them toffs Tempus?

    Your'e obviously reading the wrong papers or listening to the wrong programmes!

    Complain about this comment

  • 23. At 00:54am on 08 Oct 2009, Tempus Fugit wrote:

    Well, when one relies on the BBC....

    Complain about this comment

  • 24. At 11:07am on 08 Oct 2009, Devon wrote:

    Modern working in the UK.
    Less manual work. Far better health and safety. Better protection for workers. Outcome 2.43 million on IB, obviously there is something very wrong. No doubt many are far too ill to do any form of work, though I bet there are many who could do some kind of work, or shorter hours, then there are the malingers.

    Get that number down to under a million where it should be.

    Complain about this comment

View these comments in RSS

Explore the BBC

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.