iPlayer Radio What's New?

Is The Archers going to get 'darker and bigger? No.

Wednesday 6 June 2012, 10:51

John Yorke John Yorke Controller Drama Production

Tagged with:

Vanessa Whitburn and John Yorke

Has recent press coverage made you worried that The Archers is going to take a lurch into EastEnders territority? Well, worry not, because it isn't. Acting Archers editor John Yorke explains the truth about this story.

A few months ago I was asked by a national newspaper if EastEnders would ever consider doing a live stage musical. I answered with a categorical 'No'. Two weeks later, I was slightly taken aback to read: 'EastEnders to stage musical'.

Perhaps I shouldn't have been shocked then to read a flurry of headlines yesterday, cataloging my plans to smash up Ambridge like some bloated property developer and turn it into Albert Square...

It's a great story - but it isn't true. The source was a fairly innocuous interview with Radio Times about what's coming up on the show.

A few months ago, Radio 4 had very kindly asked me if I'd consider looking after the programme for four months while its long standing editor Vanessa Whitburn was away. I agreed straight away - on one condition - that it stayed exactly as it was and that I didn't have to change anything.

The Archers has been in my family for three generations. It's as perfect as long running drama gets; why would I want to change a hair? Apart from anything else my Mum would probably kill me.

The comment that was picked up was very clearly a specific reference to one storyline - the intimidation of Ruth and David. Ironically, this story was planned long before I joined the show.

It is dark but in the very best traditions of a programme not scared to kill its leading lady in a barn fire, and it fits snugly I hope alongside everything Ambridge does best.

Joe's ferrets, Lynda's hay-fever and cliffhangers built on whether Clarrie will finish her jubilee cake in time; all will remain and I hope live for as long as The Archers draws breath.

John Yorke is the acting editor of The Archers

Picture shows Archers editor Vanessa Whitburn and acting editor John Yorke. Vanessa returns in July after a period of long service leave

Tagged with:

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    Pleased to hear this.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    I am so glad to hear that the press reports about changing the Archers were incorrect.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    Well that's a relief.
    Just Rooth & Daveed, Pip & Josh then ( please leave cool Josh alive to carry the dynasty forward) and the badger-creature from the black slurry tank.
    Major shocks still too close to Nigel's scream though, serial murder just not Ambridge. BTW as more than 30% of farmers in UK have installed renewable energy generation as an additional income stream isn't it time for the Archers to catch up - much better option than Brian installing a Fracking Mine on the doorstep.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    Major relief. The Archers is a drama/soap which has worked well for years because of the listeners being able to escape from life for the short time they listen to it daily - that can hardly be said of the TV soaps

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    I'm pleased to hear it, especially as the "will be getting darker" story is still featured on the Entertainment section of the BBC website....

    We don't want "Eastenders on Am", thank you very much. You'll lose as many listeners (including me) as you may gain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    I like your Mum John.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    I'll be relieved to keep TA at the pace it which it currently moves. I don't want to listen to despair and depression all the time (I have BBC News for that), and it is nice to have something interesting and entertaining on R4 that does not involve Sue Perkins.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    Well, I'm relieved to read this disclaimer, but, as it happens, I have been a little worried about The Archers in recent weeks. I associate Eastenders (which I gave up watching regularly about 20 years ago but of which I occasionally catch a glimpse when I'm channel-surfing) with inarticulate, angry, often not very bright people feuding and yelling at each other. And lately, all this angst seems to be on The Archers. In just one week, I heard deranged Amy rowing with Usha, Brenda being nasty about Vicky and even Nic snapping at Will. I wonder if the 'Eastenders' influence is more insidious than you realise?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    Thank goodness John Yorke has clarified the situation and revealed that The Archers is not going all "East End". TA does replicate something of daily life, and is relatively credible - except for the ridiculous situation regarding Amy who is far too sensible to still think he really loved/loves her (absurd!). But Eastenders...thankfully this doesn't replicate most daily life - but unfortunately many young people who are being brought up on a daily diet of Eastenders think that it portrays a way of life they should replicate.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 10.

    Thank goodness!!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 11.

    Rapid rebutal unit activated....

    Me thinks you protest too much....

    It's already halfway there

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 12.

    The Archers's strength lies in the fact that it's informative and well researched. Preserving those qualities is so crucial in this world of mass media drivel!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    Being in an EastEnders frame of mind when I read this, when you mentioned Joe's ferrets, my mind immediately went to that time when he smashed their heads in with a lump hammer (or whatever implement it was). Given that your next examples were Lynda's hayfever and Clarrie's cake I take it that you weren't thinking in a similar vein. We've all been so worried about EE contaminating TA we haven't considered the cross fertilisation going the other way. Can we expect to see a Flower & Produce show in Albert Square in the near future?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 14.

    I stopped watching Eastenders long ago becauseI don't want to hear people argueing, see them fighting or have unlikely gruesome things happen to them. Perhaps John should take note and make the Eastenders more like the Archers - a welcome interlude in the stress of every-day life.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 15.

    I do hope this means that The Archers will mainly stay as a warm, friendly story of countryfolk. Its strength is its traditionalism. No sensationalism please - leave that for TV soaps (I don't watch any). Radio is the best medium. Thank you, I am an Archers listener since the 1950s.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 16.

    Was very disturbed to hear the Archers might be going the same way as EastEnders
    which I now find so depressing it is unwatchable, so was very relieved to find that thing are going to stay the same, long may it be the case

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 17.

    'The Archers's strength lies in the fact that it's informative and well researched'

    You are joking I hope. Terrible lack of research and continuity. Rather than darker stories I would like more realistic ones. There is no way that Bridge Farm would have recovered from ecoli damage in the middle of a recession where organic producers are already feeling the pinch. This is an example of not only poor research but a lack of reflection of real life.

    Less Amy twaddle and magical babies curing madwomen and more reality please.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 18.

    Oh, let's not have too much "reality!" The Archers is a drama, after all, not a documentary, and as such, has to be structured according to the demands of drama as well as reflecting facts about agricultural life. It would be very dull if it didn't offer a balance between the two. I think that many of us who enjoy The Archers suspect that there may not be such a perfect village as Ambridge and like just a tinge of bucolic escapism, with the cricket on the Green, the pantos, all the interesting characters etc. Yes, there have been some plots that have strained credibility (a rural vicar married to a Hindu), but I assume it's all true about hay thefts, badgers etc.!

    Good luck to Mr Yorke, hope he listens to his mum's advice!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 19.

    When Ed reached in to the ancient baler, while Ruth and David sipped cold beer contentedly nearby... I was anticipating industrial accidents. Actually not sure if I was relieved or disappointed with the ending.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 20.

    Thrilled to hear this. Was poised to coordinate a letter of complaint from listeners in our village - not dissimilar to Ambridge. The Archers is at its best when it does drama, not melodrama. That's why the Amy story is inauthentic. She is behaving out of character because the writers have been told to milk it for the aggro rather than her acting like the good daughter of a vicar that she is, who would by now being feeling stupid and depressed at herself, not continuing to take it out on her stepmother.

 

Page 1 of 2

This entry is now closed for comments

Share this page

More Posts

Previous
"GROW UP, AMY & ALAN!" - listener discussions to 16 May 2012

Tuesday 22 May 2012, 16:10

Next
Vaccinating badgers against TB

Thursday 7 June 2012, 12:30

About this Blog

Backstage news and insight into The Archers. Curated by Keri Davies.

Blog Updates

Stay updated with the latest posts from the blog.

Subscribe using:

What are feeds?

The Archers tweets