iPlayer Radio What's New?

Review: The Iron Lady

Wednesday 11 January 2012, 16:00

Mark Kermode Mark Kermode

Tagged with:

Here is my review of The Iron Lady from last Friday's Kermode and Mayo's Film Review show.

Meryl Streep's performance has received much praise, but is the film any good?

Also, if you've seen the film, let me know what you made of it.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash Installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content

Mark's reviews on 5 live
Take your pick from Mark's A-Z

Hear Mark Kermode review the week's new films every Friday from 2pm on BBC Radio 5 live. Kermode & Mayo's Film Review is also available as a free podcast to download and keep.

Tagged with:

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    Yes Mark, but there are so many interesting things to be said about Mrs Thatcher that they were never going to be adequately covered by one movie. Like you I would have been interested to see more about the politics and issues of her premiership but that's probably because we are roughly the same age and so have a predominant interest in the politics of our young adulthoods. Other people would have like to have seen more from the feminist standpoint or a better treatment of the subject of dementia.

    My greatest problem with the film (whilst admiring the impersonation) was that it took a voyeuristic interest in the suffering through ill health of a living person. If the disease had been cancer rather than dementia, would the film have been made? I find that aspect offensive, and would do whether the subject were famous or not.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    Brilliant performances from Meryl Streep and Olivia Coleman, but I wasn't sure why there were so many scenes of the elderly and confused Lady Thatcher talking to her cartoon-like departed husband. It perhaps fell between two stools and thus was nowhere near as good as the BBC2 TV film "Margaret" starring Lindsey Duncan.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    Not even the most hardened Thatcherite could deny that her policies, whether by design or accident, resulted in mass unemployment, poverty, fractured communities, shattered families and individual tragedies (including suicides). As someone who lived through it all I found that offensive. When she said "there is no such thing as society" I think she meant it.
    Any film about Margaret Thatcher which just glosses over all that is simply a work of fiction and that is how I will view The Iron Lady.
    All of that should take nothing away from Meryl Streep's fantastic work.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    Mark Kermode didn't do too bad out of Thatcher's Britain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    I really enjoyed this section of your radio show. As a regular listener I wish it had more of this type of in-depth polemic. It is so much more interesting than the show's ritualised pedantic baton-waving and the interviews with actors and directors, which, more often than not, descends into predictable celebrity sycophancy. Please invite some guests to (civilly) disagree with.

    As for the Iron Lady, if the film is not about politics but about forgetting and old age, then why the did it choose Thatcher as the protagonist in the first place? I can't help feeling that celebrity biopics are a lazy way to get attention to one's film project on account of the subject matter rather than quality.

    I have no intention of seeing the film, for the same reason I'm not interested in Oliver Stone's W. The film is a generation too early, as the memories are still too fresh. Why would I pay money to see a film about cringeworthy politicians who would make me change the channel as soon as possible every time they appeared on TV? I did watch Stone's Nixon because his career was before my time, an enviable era when politicians weren't pre-packaged and didn't dominate the news 24/7. In a perverse way I actually liked Nixon (the film, not the man).

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    I am going to give this film a wide miss. I know your stance Mr Kermode on not commenting on a film you have not seen, but I am not doing that. I am in fact going to say I am bored of this recent trend of films where Actors are now doing 'impressions' of other famous figures and being congratulated on such sterling performances.

    Will Smith (Ali), Helen Mirren (The Queen), Michelle Williams (My Week With Marilyn), Joaquin Pheonix (Walk The Line) etc, shall I go on?

    (Yes I will, Jamie Foxx - Ray)

    I have seen the trailer and, from that I will say, Meryl Streep deserves an Oscar for this about as much as John Culshaw does.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    This is like making a Hitler biopic and saying 'Right, well, we'll start by leaving out the Holocaust'. I'd love to see Loach's take.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    Mark; a little off topic (and assuming you read all the postings on this site)--I have just finished reading your The Good, the Bad and the Multiplex and greatly enjoyed it. Numerous passages marked for future teaching reference (I teach Film/Media Studies at the University of Waikato in New Zealand). In respect of your plea that more attention should be paid to the distribution and exhibition of local cinema, take a look at my website http://cinemasofnz.info, to see what I am attempting to do for the local in New Zealand.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    it's not a no holds barred heavyweight political biopic of thatcher, if you want that there are plenty of books on both sides of the agument about thatchers effect on britain (coming from the welsh valleys you can guess my opinion). That asside does it really have anything to say about the woman herself, is it a film about the most powerful and influencial woman in britain since budica, if it was about jane smith from swansea would it be a different film?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 10.

    Instead of being about a frail old lady being told off for wondering off to the local cornershop - This should have been give the Malcom X or The Last Emperor treatment and been a 3 hour epic. We are of course talking about the most powerful woman of her many of generations, where people talk about the Thatcher years like a war where they mildly rejoice in the fact that they got through it.

    Her achievements deserved better.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 11.

    I`m afraid i wont be seeing it as the mention of her name causes my blood pressure to rocket. I agree that a biopic of Thatcher without the politics is like a biopic of Santa without talking about Christmas. Santa is Christmas Thatcher is Politics with a capitol P. I hope it has her attempt to stop the BBC from broadcasting Nelson Mandelas 70th birthday celebrations from Wembley Stadium because in her words he was a convicted terrorist. Or the time she voted against sanctions against the Nazi all white South African goverment when all 50 other commonwealth countries voted for,saying they were ALL wrong. But my favourite is her attempt to protect and befriend Pinoche when under house arrest for extradition for crimes against humanity. Crimes like murdering a democratically elected president,cutting the fingers and toes off trade unionists then throwing them out of airplanes into the South Atlantic Ocean.I doubt inconvenient truths are in their though .

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 12.

    I totally agree with tel-x.
    She is a real figure who did real and very controversial things, this film tries to manipulate us, by glossing over her actions and presenting her as a person to pity. I really resent this. You cannot present her as a character without representing her political actions and their consequences. If you're not going to do that, then why make a film about her at all?

    The scenes of Thatcher's ill-health and vulnerability are offensive, and not just because of the insensitivity and voyeurism they represent, but also because in trying to 'humanise' her, they are also trying to make us more sympathetic to her. She is to be judged by her actions not by how sorry we would naturally feel for anyone suffering this illness.

    I also think any attempt to portray thatcher as a feminist is wrong-headed. I don't think Thatcher was a feminist, she was interested in personal power, but she did nothing for women during her terms in government, nor did she promote or encourage other female politicians. To portray her as a feminist icon is therefore inappropriate. It's her personal underdog story, but it isn't a feminist story.

    Luckily when I went to see this, we were the only people in the cinema, which was a relief because we could yell at the screen.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    What could have been a brave biopic ended up being a pointless film that takes a charismatic political figure that is reviled and loved by many and turned her into a one-dimensional character in a hilarious inept picture. You just cannot separate Thatcher from politics, and when politics do arise we get comments like Cameron being a smoothy, a sickening moment in cinema. Other than that there really isn't enough to get upset over, a terrible film that cannot be saved by Streep no matter how predictably brilliant she is.

    The sole highlight for me was the first unintentional belly laugh of the year. What should be a point of great drama and meaning ends up with Jim Broadbent emerging from a dusty room, crying "my shoes" with exploded shoes in hand. How I laughed, it’s one of those moments which jumps into my head every now and again that makes me laugh out of the blue. That's right; The Iron Lady turned me into one of those bus nutters!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 14.

    Tel-X How can you compare Thatcher to Hitler, there are plenty of powerful figures in world history, and you pick a person who committed genocide.

    Whatever your views you middle aged to old folks think of Thatcher, that comment is offensive.

    She was democratically elected three times, even though Murdoch gave her positive publicity in the newspapers, the general public did have chance to vote the other way, but they didn't.

    So what ever your left wing/socialist thoughts of her, the public back in the 70s/80s thought differently.

    When Labour came in to power, things didn't change, the manufacturing industry died, much like the coal industry did back in the 80s, people lost their homes, and instead of the IRA, or the Falklands, we now had an illegal war because of 9/11 and islamaphobe thanks to the right wing press, boom and bust, and then the economic collapse.

    So now we're back to square one, where the Tories have come back in, and tightening the screws again, and people are complaining because they can't afford to buy the latest iphone, or the brand new trainers.

    We were a consumerist society in the 80s, and it's never left. The Thatcher/Tories/Labour are not to blame, we are to blame, because we chose to become a materialistic society.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 15.

    I enjoyed the film very much, mainly because of Meryl Streep's amazing performance however the film isn't about Margaret Thatcher, it's instead about getting old, using Margaret Thatcher as a metaphor, showing that you can be the most powerful and significant person in the country but you still end up the same as everyone else in the end. I found the film told this perfectly as bits of the film reminded exactly of my Grandma which I found very moving and difficult to watch in some places.

    My problem is that I'm 15 and I wanted to see a film about Margaret Thatcher and learn about the effect she had on people. Did I get that? No. Did I still like the film? Yes. Would I have liked it more if the film had been made differently? I don't know, the film failed to answer that particular question...

    By the way, I find your comments about Phyllida Lloyd a bit harsh because (and I am ashamed to say it) I really like Mamma Mia.....

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 16.

    Sorry to be pedantic Stuart but Mrs T was never "democratically elected" - she was electd by first past the post which is not necessarily the same thing. So, for example, in 1979 the Tories got 43.9% of the vote but that gave them 53.4% of the seats in Parliament. Meanwhile Labour and the Liberals got 50.7% of the vote yet that gave them only 44.1% of the seats. Go figure, as our US cousins might say.
    Anyway, that's not the point. The point is that you cannot do a film about someone as controversial as Thatcher and just gloss over those controversies. It's disrespectful to all sides. If you just want to do a film about ageing and how the mighty fall when Old Father Time catches up why chose Thatcher, especially when she is still alive.
    As for Michael White's assertion that this is a "feminist movie" - cleary that could only have been written by a man!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 17.

    When are the Kenner Action Figures coming out? I'm sure the Houses of Parliment playset will the next Tracy Island hit toy for christmas 2012. "Relive all your favourite debates with exciting action sounds!!", " New for Summer Combat Maggie, tank not included"

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 18.

    Marnk, you really can't handle the fact that Margert Thatcher being portrayed as anything other than a 15 foot high glowing red demon with horns can you?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 19.

    Agree with 16/Hoomach -- but to add to 14/Stuart, I'm not making the comparison, but Hitler was democratically elected, so that part of your argument is weak. You can't blame all the actions of politicians on the electorate that voted them in. The Tory government rewarded materialism through their policies, if that was a reflection of the desires of the country, or the carrot that led the country in that direction is neither easy to answer, nor a basis for categorical statements.

    I'm not saying you're wrong, there's points I agree with, but if someone wants to make a comparison between two politicians, both loved and reviled, both who did exactly what they said they would do right or wrong, both who sent troops into unnecessary wars, I'd pretty much chalk it up to their opinion not something to take offence at, particularly in the context of this hotbed of political discussion. Although in the wisdom of one Meghan Fox, wasn't a certain Mr. Bay compared with Adolf? Who here was offended by that?

    Now let's take the question "Was Blair just Thatcher in drag?" Discuss....

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 20.

    The rage felt by those who lived through the Thatcher years at the "whitewashing" in The Iron Lady is akin to the rage felt by black Americans at the "whitewashing" in The Help.

    In both cases a significant segment of the viewing public declared that the movies have downplayed the reality of the suffering of the times. And in both cases other viewers who just don't get it (whites, in the case of The Help; those who weren't alive during the Thatcher years, in the case The Iron Lady) have contemptuously dismissed these concerns.

    I think we dismiss the misrepresentation of history at our peril and that moviemakers should be held to a high and ethical standard when they are telling allegedly "true" stories of the suffering of human beings. And there can be no doubt at all that the times depicted in The Help and The Iron Lady involved human suffering on an epic scale.

    My personal view is that Thatcher was not a feminist by any stretch of the imagination and that comparisons to Hitler or Stalin are apt. I have no doubt that if she thought she could have gotten away with rounding people up and putting them in gulags or concentration camps she wouldn't have hesitated for a minute.

 

Page 1 of 2

This entry is now closed for comments

Share this page

More Posts

Previous
The Crying Game

Tuesday 10 January 2012, 14:48

Next
Drive In?

Friday 13 January 2012, 10:39

About this Blog

Outspoken, opinionated and never lost for words, Mark is the UK's leading film critic.

This twice-weekly video blog is the place where he airs his personal views on the things that most fire him up about cinema - and invites you to give your own opinions.

Blog Updates

Stay updated with the latest posts from the blog.

Subscribe using:

What are feeds?