5 live review: Nightmare on Elm Street

Friday 7 May 2010, 11:51

Mark Kermode Mark Kermode

Tagged with:

5 live's resident movie critic Dr Mark Kermode reviews Nightmare on Elm Street.

Go to Mark on 5 Live for more reviews and film debate.

(Please note this content is only available to UK viewers)

Tagged with:

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    I think as soon as Dr. K saw Mr Bay on the credits this movie was dead in the water without redemption.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    ...so you didn't like it then?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.


    Dr K. at his flappy armed, ranting, shouty best!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    There were so many brilliantly unnerving and inventive touches in the original film. A dog with a mans face, a goat running down a school corridor (well it scared me), a staircase made of marshmallow, Freddy's scissor hand emerging from the bath water. Like the Evil Dead the black humour never detracts from the horror but heightens it. Almost a perfect horror film.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    I might see this, actually. Apparently, Judith Hoag of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles fame stars - I recall being impressed with her in that (she played reporter April O'Neil). Good movie, too!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    I wish Dr. K would get off the fence and have an opinion. The review was a bit wishy-washy for me. Now I'm not sure whether I ought to see the remake; or not.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    I don't know when the UK annexed Ireland, but I'm seeing this just fine in Dublin ... 8)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    I thought you were pretty scathing in this film review but then I heard the Doctor's opinion of The Back-Up Plan.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    They are re-making "I Spit On Your Grave" a rather low budget video nasty from the 80's. Why, why oh why? Why don't they just go on and re-make the godfather part 2 and be done with it. Then re-make the re-makes. Is there a writers strike?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 10.

    That Robert Englund sounds like it must have been interesting. I saw the original Nightmare on Elm Street on videotape during a sleepover at the tender age of six. We were all too terrified to sleep after so one of my cousins created a makeshift Freddy glove by taping knives to his fingers (always safe) and we played hide-and-seek for several hours.

    I went to see the new Nightmare remake on Tuesday and while the rest of the theater appeared to enjoy it, I simply grew more and more frustrated as the film plodded along to it's inevitable end. There's not a single creative spark in it. Even the death scenes are unimaginative, forgoing the strangeness of the original for just a lot of hacking and slashing. I've seen other movies with that orange and teal tint to them before now as digital color grading has become more popular, but with this movie somehow they've reached the point where they've managed to exclude ALL OTHER COLORS. Do all people dream in orange and teal now? I must have missed that news break.

    At first I thought it was just nostalgia getting the better of me, but no. The movie is indeed a steaming pile and you could have a better time slamming your head in a door for two hours.

    Great review (but FYI - we Americans do know what a "bogeyman" is!)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 11.

    "Robert Englund interview" is what I intended to write. Sorry about that.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 12.

    I agree, the film could have been a lot better... But Mark is a bit too bias against anything in which Michael Bay is involved in.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    Go Dr K!!!
    I love having a visual version of your film reviews!
    The original movie was and still is terrifying. Orthodoxcaveman mentioned some of the classic scary moments (the Freddies's knife covered glove coming out of the bath water - Shudder!)
    I clearly remember this movie being a big deal at the time, and trying unsuccessfully to convince the box office staff that I was old enough to see it. Had to wait until it came out on video (which was a lot longer in those days!) and watch it at a friends house!

    Dr K's analysis of the surrealist aspects was on the money too. So many interesting horror movies at this time, that weren't just about the gore.
    An American Werewolf in London, The Evil Dead, Creepshow, The Thing, Videodrome, The Company of Wolves, Fright Night, Re-animator, The Fly, Hellraiser, Parents, Dead Ringers, and of course Wes Craven's other great movie that came a bit later, The People under the Stairs.

    It was a good time for horror and I have many fond memories of going to late night horror shows in the early 90's at my local theatre.
    They don't make'em like they used too!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 14.

    What's the betting Bay's got his eye on remaking The Exorcist but in 3D.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 15.

    I saw NOES and it wasn't a great film, but not in way the stinker Kermode made it out to be. I have not seen the original, so I probably didn't have an image of what the film should have been like.

    Films should be judged to what is on the screen, not to a preconception which could have been favoured by the original, or book or play which might have come first.

    Not that I am sticking up for NOES the remake, it wasn't a great film. The mighty John Landis said that he wasn't against remakes in the slightest bit, as it makes the original directors a lot of money. So if this shoddy remake made Wes Craven a lot of money which I imagine it did, then that's awesome. That's something to not feel guilty about if you are watching this film...

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 16.

    I'm someone has commented on the colour of these horror remakes. They all look the same, dark and grey.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 17.

    Perfect review. You are 100% right. Damn!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 18.

    As a fan of the originals, I was really looking forward to this. I'd read all the negative reviews, so I went in with low expectations. So, what did I learn / think? . . .

    1) It ain't that bad really. Yes, there are plot holes, yes the acting is a little variable, but I've certainly seen worse.

    2) It was scary in places, and creepy too - given the subject matter, proper creepy. There were plenty of jumps to be had.

    3) Jackie Earle Haley's Freddy was interesting. Not sure about the voice, but the mannerisms, the sheer level of threat and leeriness - this is NOT a character you want to root for, and I mean that in a positive way for the film.

    4) This film would have benefited massively from being in 3D (and looking at some of the shots, part of me thinks the director did too). It is a concept that would have perfectly leant itself to the dream world / reality shift aspect.

    It's not perfect, and Englund remains the defining Krueger. But, I think it largely worked, and with improvements, I think part 2 (there will be!) could be very good.

    7/10

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 19.

    they're remaking 'i spit on your grave'? damn, they should AT LEAST release an uncut version of the original before doing a morally ambiguous, watered down remake.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 20.

    Question. Most people here seem to hate horror remakes and opin that they cannot be as great as the orginals.

    So why are you going to see them?

    You KNOW what Platinum Dunes do, so you cannot say you were not warned . . .

 

Page 1 of 2

This entry is now closed for comments

Share this page

More Posts

Previous
One from the Heartless

Tuesday 4 May 2010, 16:23

Next
How many actors does it take to make a great movie?

Friday 7 May 2010, 11:33

About this Blog

Outspoken, opinionated and never lost for words, Mark is the UK's leading film critic.

This twice-weekly video blog is the place where he airs his personal views on the things that most fire him up about cinema - and invites you to give your own opinions.

Blog Updates

Stay updated with the latest posts from the blog.

Subscribe using:

What are feeds?