The BBC must apply usual journalistic standards to race stories

Monday 23 January 2012, 14:55

Hugh Muir Hugh Muir

Tagged with:

First, the pat on the back. When the BBC asks "Are we doing as well as we ought in terms of covering race and immigration?" it distinguishes itself as one of the few media organisations in this country that would bother to raise the question. Perhaps this arises as a consequence of its statutory remit. But if it didn't seek to police itself in this area would anyone else perform that function? Probably not.

So how is it doing? A mixed picture. There are very fine journalists within the Corporation -correspondents, both regional and national, who do a fantastic job covering the big stories on this patch. Mark Easton, the Home editor, has given himself the task of chronicling "the story of changing Britain". He is an excellent journalist and has an obvious feel for the subject. More power to him.

But the Corporation also suffers from the affliction that ails the rest of the media. The country is changing fast but the assumptions that underpin our journalism are not keeping pace. We operate from a default position that says our primary focus should be the majority communities.

Witness the exchange I had with a BBC interviewer the other day in the wake of the Stephen Lawrence verdict. Many say political correctness has gone too far, she said. We are getting a lot of emails from our ordinary listeners about that. Who are these "ordinary listeners?" I asked her. Does that include us?

The default position is not even all of the majority white communities. The dominating concern is 'middle England'. Anything else we choose to focus on at any particular time is an add-on extra.

And the consequence is that we don't invest the time in stories about race, immigration or society and its dynamics that we should. Too often we don't cover these stories with the care and sophistication applied to other subject areas.

One small example: Migrationwatch was given airtime on the Today programme the other day, having released a report which said youth unemployment might be linked to east European immigration. "We can't prove statistically that immigration has had some impact on youth unemployment," the group said. They called the report 'More Than a Coincidence.' So here's a question? Would something as woolly as that have made it onto the Today programme if the subject was the economy, or political polling or crime stats? Probably not.

Our coverage of what's happening in our country - the varying achievements of different communities, the inflows, the outflows and the impacts - deserves better than that. That's not a call for censorship. All sections of society and all views merit a hearing on the BBC. But when we report on matters of such societal importance it's vital that we do so with the professionalism and rigour so evident in other areas of our journalism. And it's important that we accept that all sections merit recognition and respect.

What does that mean in practice? It means taking the time to find people who can articulate points of view in a way that generates light and not just heat, and certainly not just cheap entertainment.

It means making connections with communities away from our default position. They too form part of the fabric. Why do we only notice them when there is a crisis?

It means looking again at our newsrooms. Are they best equipped to cover this story of changing Britain? How do they look in terms of race, religion and, yes, class.

Above all, it means applying the same standards to our evaluation of stories concerning race and immigration as we apply to everything else. If in doubt, take race out of the thought process for a moment. Consider how that story would be handled if the issue were de-racialised. What was the Stephen Lawrence case? Essentially a story about a blameless, aspirational teenager murdered without justification by a group of youths who then evaded justice and were able to cock a snook at wider society because the police didn't do their jobs. In the background was a family and two grieving parents fighting without pause to bring the culprits to justice, and campaigners who said this case bore the hallmarks of previous cases. The elements meet any journalistic test, even without the infusion of race.

What are we saying when we run stories about disproportionate stop and search? That sections of our society - taxpayers - are being unfairly targeted and perhaps criminalised by the very people we expect to protect them. Again, the elements, shorn of race, have journalistic value.

Changing the mindset represents a challenge for us all, but in this, as in so many things, the BBC has the greatest responsibility by dint of its role and place in our national life. If it can't blaze a trail, who will?

Hugh Muir writes the Hideously Diverse Britain column in The Guardian.

He recently took part in a College of Journalism event about the reporting of race.

His fellow panellist, Max Wind-Cowie, has also written a blog about his views on the reporting of race.

Tagged with:

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    RE: Changing Britain

    I know a (white) teacher who teaches at a (majority asian) primary school in London (I think East Ham?) - who tried to cover this subject with her pupils.

    They all saw themselves (and the asian community) as British - and thought that all white people were polish immigrants (including the teacher from Devon).

    There are still far too many areas like this where a 'monoculture' prevails - the failure of British multiculturalism is that even after 40 years people still live divided by ethnicity.

 
 

This entry is now closed for comments

Share this page

More Posts

Previous
We need more nuanced reporting of race from the BBC

Monday 23 January 2012, 11:46

Next
Event: Deepening Crisis in Syria

Monday 23 January 2012, 17:08

About this Blog

A blog for the College of Journalism at the BBC Academy, discussing current technical, ethical, production and craft issues in journalism.

Blog Updates

Stay updated with the latest posts from the blog.

Subscribe using:

What are feeds?

Follow us on Twitter

New twitter image News and comment about journalism and interaction with the College:

@BBCCollege

Also from the College

 

Expert tips for finding people online by Paul Myers

Searching for people online

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How to shoot video on a smartphone by Marc Settle

Marc Settle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finding original stories locally by Hayley Brewer

Hayley Brewer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Work in a multimedia newsroom at BBC London

Multimedia newsroom

Blogroll

Other great places to follow debates about journalism and media:

George Brock: thoughts on journalism past, present and future from City University's head of journalism

The Media Blog: lively and often funny topical detail about UK media output

British Journalism Review: selected pieces from the authoritative quarterly journal

MediaShift: PBS monitoring of the changing media world from a US perspective

Arts & Letters Daily: more interesting ideas and good writing than you will ever have time to read

Alltop Journalism: links to the most recent posts on many journalism blogs

About the BBC: varied BBC blog about all things BBC-ish

Columbia Journalism Review: US academic perspectives

Facebook + Journalists: Facebook's own guide to its use by journalists

Jon Slattery: UK media news from the former deputy editor of Press Gazette

Meeja Law: Judith Townend's guide to media and legal issues 

Roy Greenslade: Guardian blog by the former Mirror editor now journalism prof

Wannabee Hacks: information and experiences from aspiring journalists.