'Fisked' by the international press corps

Tuesday 8 May 2012, 12:54

Stuart Hughes Stuart Hughes is a BBC World Affairs producer. Twitter: @stuartdhughes

Robert Fisk Robert Fisk Few journalists polarise opinion as sharply as Robert Fisk of The Independent.

For more than three decades, Fisk's impassioned writing on Middle Eastern affairs, and his sustained criticism of Israel and the United States, has won him many awards and many more critics.

Conservative commentators in particular have long dissected and rebutted his articles line by line - to the extent that "fisking" has become a term in its own right, defined as "the practice of savaging an argument and scattering the tattered remnants to the four corners of the internet."

Last weekend, Fisk (above) was in typically combative form. Instead of attacking Western foreign policy, however, he turned his ire (not for the first time) on another of his favoured targets - his fellow foreign correspondents.

Reflecting on recent news coverage from the Syrian city of Homs, Fisk made a number of claims. They included the accusations:

- That the "heroic myth" of the war correspondent has pervaded the public's consciousness to such an extent that journalists sent to cover conflicts now regard themselves as more important than the people on whom they are reporting.

- That an increasing awareness of safety in the news industry, and in particular the wearing of protective flak jackets, has created a sense that the lives of Western reporters are more valuable than those of 'foreign' civilians.

- That privileged and pampered members of the press, who jet into hostile environments and are able in Fisk's words to "fly home if the going gets too tough, business class with a glass of bubbly in their hands", can access counselling if they encounter psychological difficulties, whereas those left behind in war zones are forced to cope by themselves.

The article - published just over a week after the deaths in Homs of Marie Colvin and Remi Ochlik - provoked a furious response. Many senior and well-respected journalists voiced anger at what they regarded as Fisk's disrespectful, out-dated and even dangerous views.

"Fisk correctly identifies there are plenty in our profession with an over-healthy appreciation of their own ego," the BBC correspondent Gabriel Gatehouse told me in an email from Libya.

"He should know, for Fisk is one of the most egregious practitioners of this kind of journalism," Gatehouse added archly.

In a Facebook group for foreign correspondents and aid workers, Lourdes Garcia-Navarro from National Public Radio in the US dismissed the article as "claptrap".

"It's dangerous and patronising after YEARS of getting organisations to acknowledge and treat PTSD to now say we are weak and self-obsessed to need and get help," she wrote.

The foreign editor of The Times, Richard Beeston, questioned why Fisk himself isn't doing more to cover the violence in Syria.

A colleague of Beeston's at The Times, Middle East correspondent James Hider, took issue with Fisk's criticism that the 13 activists who died in the operation to evacuate injured Western journalists from Homs have not been named. "In Syria, most activists don't want their names published, dead or alive, because the regime will kill their families," Hider explained.

But, despite the overwhelmingly negative reaction, a few brave souls did come to Robert Fisk's defence.

"I think Fisk (has) got a point," said writer and journalist Alfred Hackensberger.

"Right now there are... war refugees in Mali. No headlines."

Why, Hackensberger asked, are some wars more "attractive" to newsroom editors than others?

BBC producer Darius Bazargan suggested it was reporters like Fisk who inspired many of the current generation of foreign correspondents to enter the profession in the first place.

"However much you don't like his rather snotty self-aggrandising tone, he has worked the hard yards in the past," Bazargan wrote.

"In his day, he was brilliant."

Marie Colvin Marie Colvin

In November 2010, Marie Colvin gave a speech (above) in which she spoke of the risks and rewards of reporting conflict.

"We go to remote war zones to report what is happening," she said.

"The public have a right to know what our government, and our armed forces, are doing in our name. Our mission is to speak the truth to power."

"We can and do make a difference in exposing the horrors of war and especially the atrocities that befall civilians."

For many of the journalists who are left to follow in Colvin's brave footsteps, it is this calling, and not the 'heroic' war correspondent myth of which Robert Fisk is so scathing, that drives them to put themselves in harm's way.

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    The snooty comments are the ones being made in an attempt to attack Fisk. Fisk is more of a foreign correspondent, still, than all the narcissistic detractors together who have attacked him since his perfectly reasonable comments on his 'contemporaries'. I am one of many who are sick of the narrative 'here we are heroically bringing you the story that the US military is helping us to bring you...'. Fisk has always plied his trade in a matter of fact, logical and 'un-emebedded' fashion. Unlike many of his detractors who aren't fit to polish his keyboard.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    Your opening quote in the list you provide is inaccurate, and as you base much of the tenor of the rest of your article upon this false premise, I have to say I disagree with your opinion.

    You attribute Fisk with the claim: - "That the "heroic myth" of the war correspondent has pervaded the public's consciousness to such an extent that journalists sent to cover conflicts now regard themselves as more important than the people on whom they are reporting."

    In his original article Fisk claims no such thing as far as I can see. He mentions nothing about journalists "regarding themselves as more important" .

    He clearly says:

    "We have grown so used to the devil-may-care heroics of the movie version of "war" correspondents that they somehow become more important than the people about whom they report. "

    That is an entirely different thing.

    My understanding of Fisk's comment is that it is the system within which he works 'the media' that has elevated the war correspondent to mythical status.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    A general comment would be that the attack on Fisk betrays the ego that he complains of. It also shows an unwarranted assumption of judgemental capacity.

    Concerning Homs, an honest journalist would also interview Syrian citizens who stayed and who welcomed the restoration of government.

    When it deigns to answer criticism of its one-sidedness, the BBC glibly asserts "they wont let us in". The facts are available for those who seek them.
    It does appear that the BBC follows the Foreign Office agenda and functions as a propaganda medium for projects important to the Foreign Office.

    Can BBC "journalists" see the implications of such conduct?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    I heard Fisk on Desert Island Discs. His rants about Israel were embarrassing.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    But Fisk he is right about Marie Colvin, prancing around with her eye patch like a a campaign medal, then all the luvvies cooing about how brave she was and what a tragedy her death was when 5,000 pensioners die every year in the UK because they can't afford to heat their homes.

 
 

This entry is now closed for comments

Share this page

More Posts

Previous
Google's new privacy policy: where's the real debate?

Tuesday 8 May 2012, 11:53

Next
The Falklands for journalists: the ultimate embed experience

Tuesday 8 May 2012, 11:54

About this Blog

A blog for the College of Journalism at the BBC Academy, discussing current technical, ethical, production and craft issues in journalism.

Blog Updates

Stay updated with the latest posts from the blog.

Subscribe using:

What are feeds?

Follow us on Twitter

New twitter image News and comment about journalism and interaction with the College:

@BBCCollege

Also from the College

 

Expert tips for finding people online by Paul Myers

Searching for people online

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How to shoot video on a smartphone by Marc Settle

Marc Settle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finding original stories locally by Hayley Brewer

Hayley Brewer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Work in a multimedia newsroom at BBC London

Multimedia newsroom

Blogroll

Other great places to follow debates about journalism and media:

George Brock: thoughts on journalism past, present and future from City University's head of journalism

The Media Blog: lively and often funny topical detail about UK media output

British Journalism Review: selected pieces from the authoritative quarterly journal

MediaShift: PBS monitoring of the changing media world from a US perspective

Arts & Letters Daily: more interesting ideas and good writing than you will ever have time to read

Alltop Journalism: links to the most recent posts on many journalism blogs

About the BBC: varied BBC blog about all things BBC-ish

Columbia Journalism Review: US academic perspectives

Facebook + Journalists: Facebook's own guide to its use by journalists

Jon Slattery: UK media news from the former deputy editor of Press Gazette

Meeja Law: Judith Townend's guide to media and legal issues 

Roy Greenslade: Guardian blog by the former Mirror editor now journalism prof

Wannabee Hacks: information and experiences from aspiring journalists.