Lee Rigby murder coverage: Important public interest ruling by Ofcom

Monday 6 January 2014, 17:11

Fran Unsworth Fran Unsworth is deputy director, BBC News and Current Affairs

Michael Adebolago justifying his murder of Lee Rigby on a mobile phone video Under the dry headline “Broadcast news coverage of the Woolwich incident on 22 May 2013”, Ofcom has published a robust defence of broadcasters’ rights to show some of the most distressing footage ever seen on UK television.

The Woolwich incident was of course the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby by Michael Adebolajo (above) and Michael Adebowale. Mobile phone video footage taken only minutes after the attack showed one of the killers, hands covered in blood, clutching a knife and a machete, speaking directly to camera. It was first shown by ITV at 6.20pm; on Channel 5 News a few minutes later; and on the BBC News Channel at 7.02pm. Sky and al-Jazeera also showed some of it.

Other footage showed the victim lying on the ground, helicopter shots of the scene and the police arresting the killers. Ofcom received nearly 680 complaints that the material was too graphic and distressing, insensitive and disrespectful to the family of Fusilier Rigby, and gave one of the attackers a platform to explain and justify his actions. Many of the complaints expressed concern at the effect on children watching.

You can see a summary of the finding, but it’s the powerful and principled arguments that Ofcom lists for doing what we all did that every journalist should remember: “It is important that broadcast journalists can report the news of what has occurred as freely as possible…” and “…we considered we should take particular note of the significance of the right to freedom of expression in this case…”, and “Ofcom considers it a fundamental duty of news programmes to inform the public on matters of public importance, so that informed debate can take place.”

Of course we have to think carefully about the context. The public interest in reporting terrorism on the streets of Britain doesn’t mean we can just set aside the horrific nature of the pictures. The incident happened in the afternoon and we were covering it at the most sensitive time of day.

What are the audience expectations of our programmes? Have we appropriately limited what we are showing bearing in mind this is pre-watershed programming, on air at a time when children are home from school? And, vitally, have we warned viewers that what they are about to see might shock and distress them, and have we done that adequately?

Ofcom says that all the broadcasters, TV and radio, did do enough in their pre-watershed programming to ensure their output complied with the Broadcasting Code. And it saw no need to consider any complaints about post-watershed output. But it went on to issue some guidance encouraging us to use explicit warnings before broadcasting such distressing material in future.

Finally, the regulator looked at complains about BBC News at Six two days later, when it carried a report showing newly emerged footage of the arrest of the two attackers. They had been shot in the legs - the sound of the gunshots could be heard clearly - and were seen surrounded by police officers. The Six used the shaky mobile phone material taken from high above the scene as a headline, and showed it again both at normal speed and slowed right down in the package five minutes later.

Once again Ofcom considered that the audience expected the news to be reported fully and that the material was of public interest, so no code breach.  The warning before the package was enough, but Ofcom issued guidance reminding us that headlines, which by their nature can’t include a warning, need to be carefully chosen. These are welcome findings, showing that our regulator supports responsible journalism in the public interest.

 

Ofcom clears news coverage of Lee Rigby murder

Lee Rigby murder: How events in Woolwich unfolded

Over to you: Reporting Woolwich

BBC values

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
 
 

Share this page

More Posts

Previous
Burma’s media in transition but self-censorship still strong

Thursday 2 January 2014, 10:11

Next
Reporting Roma tensions in Sheffield with Benjamin Zephaniah

Tuesday 7 January 2014, 11:11

About this Blog

A blog for the College of Journalism at the BBC Academy, discussing current technical, ethical, production and craft issues in journalism.

Blog Updates

Stay updated with the latest posts from the blog.

Subscribe using:

What are feeds?

Follow us on Twitter

New twitter image News and comment about journalism and interaction with the College:

@BBCCollege

Also from the College

 

Expert tips for finding people online by Paul Myers

Searching for people online

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How to shoot video on a smartphone by Marc Settle

Marc Settle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finding original stories locally by Hayley Brewer

Hayley Brewer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Work in a multimedia newsroom at BBC London

Multimedia newsroom

Blogroll

Other great places to follow debates about journalism and media:

George Brock: thoughts on journalism past, present and future from City University's head of journalism

The Media Blog: lively and often funny topical detail about UK media output

British Journalism Review: selected pieces from the authoritative quarterly journal

MediaShift: PBS monitoring of the changing media world from a US perspective

Arts & Letters Daily: more interesting ideas and good writing than you will ever have time to read

Alltop Journalism: links to the most recent posts on many journalism blogs

About the BBC: varied BBC blog about all things BBC-ish

Columbia Journalism Review: US academic perspectives

Facebook + Journalists: Facebook's own guide to its use by journalists

Jon Slattery: UK media news from the former deputy editor of Press Gazette

Meeja Law: Judith Townend's guide to media and legal issues 

Roy Greenslade: Guardian blog by the former Mirror editor now journalism prof

Wannabee Hacks: information and experiences from aspiring journalists.