DAVID DIMBLEBY AND THE PANDAS OF DOOM

Thursday 23 December 2010, 16:53

Adam Curtis Adam Curtis

Tagged with:

Here are two films for the holiday.

One is a film made by a young David Dimbleby about a group of 500 British ballroom dancers on an ocean cruise in the summer of 1973.

The second film tells the history of how pandas got involved with power politics in the 20th Century - and the strange consequences for politicians in the West.

There is no connection between the two films.

Dimbleby's film is wonderful. It is beautifully shot - the images of the dancers rehearsing on deck under the grey skies of the Atlantic are great.

But underneath Dimbleby also cleverly uses the film to analyse the relationship between eroticism, friendship between men and women, and sex.

It is also very funny and affectionate.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.

I have always thought that pandas, in evolutionary terms, are the most sophisticated animals in the world.

They cannot look after themselves, they are useless at reproducing. But to compensate they have managed to persuade the most advanced creatures on the planet - human beings - to care for their every need.

Here is a film made in 1976 called Very Important Pandas. It is the history of our relationship to pandas which not only explains how they came to have such a grip on our imaginations, but it also shows what happens when pandas get involved in power politics.

As the presenter points out - any world leader who was given a pair of pandas in the 1970s fell from power pretty soon afterwards.

Richard Nixon and Ling Ling and Hsing Hsing

Edward Heath and Chia Chia and Ching Ching

And Prime Minister Tanaka of Japan who was found guilty of accepting bribes from the US Lockheed Corporation - pictured below with his pandas, Lan Lan and Kang Kang

And, as if to prove the film's point, the same year it was transmitted, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, who had helped make the pandas famous, was also found guilty of accepting bribes from Lockheed.

Prince Bernhard had been one of the co-founders of the World Wildlife fund in 1961. The fund had decided to make the panda its international logo. It was an act that made pandas the top "charismatic mega fauna" of the world.

Prince Bernhard tried to claim he had taken the money for the pandas. But noone believed him - and he was stripped of his title, his uniform, and forced to resign.

The second part of Very Important Pandas is a film made by the People's Republic of China in 1975 about the pandas and their environment in south-east China.

It is beautiful and strange. It has a great mood and pacing - and sometimes looks like the work of Jeff Koons. And there is a lovely section about the birth of a baby panda.

The Chinese film also tries to put the odd evolution of the useless panda into a revolutionary socialist perspective. The narrator quotes Friedrich Engels:

"F. Engels points out that each advance in organic evolution is at the same time a regression"

David Attenborough couldn't have put it better.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.

Tagged with:

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    dear mr curtis

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    Dear Mr Curtis

    Another great enlightening post. Keep them coming, I marvel at your ability to inform and engage your multiple fans with your narrative that weave between text, image and sound. You are one of the few (dare I say it) journalists who actually unearths new information and presents it in a honest and informative manner.

    Hopefully 2011 will bring us more great postings and exposes of what the majority of the mainstream media fail to cover. Maybe a new documentary? Thoughts on the next Mad Men series? Something resembling an expose on Rupert Murdoch's efforts to continually assail media laws and regulations in the UK - his distortion of the mass media and his renewed efforts to have even a larger slice of the media market. There must be some interesting archive footage of the old badger that would make for interesting viewing.

    Please, please keep this blog updated - and maybe could you post your documentary "An Ocean Apart"? Its impossible to find online at the moment? Happy Christmas...

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    Not related to this particular post, but I'd be interested to hear your take on this: http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=the-line-between-science-and-journa-2010-12-20

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    According to a documentary I heard on the BBC's own Radio 4 recently, the panda as a species is roughly 20 million years old. Modern humans have been recognised as appearing between 200 000 and 50 000 years ago, depending on how you measure humanity. So who was looking after the panda before we came along? Perhaps it's not quite so useless as Mr Curtis suggests. On the matter of reproduction, the same documentary said that in the wild the female becomes pregnant pretty much every time she mates, so only being fertile once a year for a brief period of time makes good evolutionary sense. It seems that it's only when you lock them up in small concrete cages that they don't breed very well, but I expect the same could be said of humans.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    Arguably the best titled post yet, nice one Adam. The film about the dancing cruise is really charming.

    @Patrick Crenshaw - that's very interesting, thank you for posting. I'd also be interested to see what Adam and others think of this.

 

Comments 5 of 14

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Share this page

More Posts

Previous
WICKED LEAKS

Friday 17 December 2010, 13:47

Next
RUPERT MURDOCH - A PORTRAIT OF SATAN

Sunday 30 January 2011, 11:51

About this Blog

This is a website expressing my personal views – through a selection of opinionated observations and arguments. I’ll be including stories I like, ideas I find fascinating, work in progress and a selection of material from the BBC archives.

Blog Updates

Stay updated with the latest posts from the blog.

Subscribe using:

What are feeds?