Supporting media: what works and why?

Friday 7 September 2012, 14:54

Mary Myers Mary Myers Media and development specialist

Tagged with:

Cambodian man and camera BBC Media Action’s support for media reports cover Cambodia, Syria, South Sudan, Uganda and Bangladesh. I've just finished writing a synthesis report about how media can be supported in countries where media freedoms and rights are constrained. It was commissioned by BBC Media Action who asked me to bring together the findings of five case studies covering Bangladesh, Cambodia, Syria, South Sudan and Uganda, commissioned from five other writers.  The finished report is entitled What Works and Why? and can be found here.  

My first reaction to the task was sceptical – would it be possible to find any workable strategies to support good quality media and journalism across five very different societies?  Although some of the countries chosen were not closed autocracies, journalists in all five countries are under all sorts of threats and stress, and the right to free expression remains a cause for international concern in all five.  I was curious to see what initiatives donors were supporting under such difficult circumstances.  

To my surprise I was able to extract quite a long list of workable strategies which are being carried out by courageous people from both outside and inside these five countries.

It was heartening to discover the experiences of community radio activists in Cambodia, such as Beehive Radio, which survive despite the odds.  It was humbling to write about the BBC camera operator in Syria who was imprisoned for three days and tortured for trying to record a more balanced story than the Assad government wants the world to see.  It was inspiring to write about the amazing popularity of UN radio in South Sudan, Radio Miraya, despite government crackdowns.

There are many strategies that can work – even in constrained environments.  These include avoiding government controls by broadcasting media content via short-wave radio, satellite or the internet from outside the country, or working online to support and train journalism and activists. 

It is possible to work from inside a country even when its government clamps down on the media.  These include working carefully with the state - with the state broadcaster, for example - and supporting local press freedom groups, such as local chapters of Transparency International, as in Bangladesh.  I found several examples of support for local media advocacy groups, and for the relay of foreign media content by local media outlets.  Many different types of capacity building are possible, such as focusing on topics that are either neutral (like business training) or of 'public interest' (such as health or environmental topics) in order to be seen as non-political. Where conditions permit, there are examples of capacity building for local media houses, especially with carefully selected independent or community outlets. This strategy has worked very well in Uganda. Developing pre-packaged content and programming is sometimes necessary when live media reporting of contentious issues is limited by arbitrary restrictions. 

I invite you to read my synthesis study but especially to go to the case studies from the five countries themselves (available here), to discover all the fascinating and inspiring detail of what is possible, even in really difficult circumstances.  

Related links

In fear of stepping on Museveni’s tail

Journalism in today’s Syria: an insider’s view

The full series of country case studies:

Syria 

South Sudan

Bangladesh 

Cambodia 

Uganda 

Go back to BBC Media Action

Tagged with:

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    Freedom of the press is not fearing to step on Museveni's tail to avoid being harrased by the corridors of power. There is nothing more leathal than a newspaper as the saying goes because the written word (the spoken one too) can spread like bushfire to mobilise the masses whose rights are being trampled on. Fear less the truth, journalists are the eye openers of these very masses who toil daily to pay taxes that are used to run the state affairs. Critical journalism is healthy for checking and controling misuse of power. It is indeed sad to learn that Uganda is among the countries who entrench in media rights with limited freedom of the press.

 
 

This entry is now closed for comments

Share this page

More Posts

Previous
Breaking the silence: cholera in Sierra Leone

Tuesday 28 August 2012, 15:56

Next
In fear of stepping on Museveni’s tail

Tuesday 11 September 2012, 13:30

About this Blog

We believe in the power of media and communication to help reduce poverty and support people in understanding their rights. Find out more at BBC Media Action

Registered charity in England & Wales 1076235.

Blog Updates

Stay updated with the latest posts from the blog.

Subscribe using:

What are feeds?