Advertisement
« Previous | Main | Next »

"It's clear that Burgess was a louche, hard drinking, dishevelled, outrageous man."

Post categories:

Paul Murphy Paul Murphy | 15:31 UK time, Tuesday, 18 August 2009

image of Guy Burgess sunbathing
So says BBC Historian Jean Seaton of the picture that emerges of Cambridge spy Guy Burgess from previously unreleased documents published by BBC Archive. The memos, letters and expenses claims are from Burgess's early career while employed at the BBC.

While the documents touch on things like Burgess's unhappiness with his salary and the questioning of his expenses, they also paint a picture of a long-gone much more genteel office world of tea trolleys and unreturned library books.

BBC Archive's other new collection, The Cambridge Spies, covers the gradual exposure of the Cambridge spies over four decades through a fascinating selection of TV and radio programmes.


Paul Murphy is the Editor of the Internet Blog.

Comments

or register to comment.

  • 1. At 7:23pm on 18 Aug 2009, ReginaldJeeves wrote:

    "It's clear that Burgess was a louche, hard drinking, dishevelled, outrageous man."

    Good. We need more people like him employed by the BBC, instead of the "namby-pamby leftest wenches" we have now.

    Complain about this comment

  • 2. At 8:43pm on 18 Aug 2009, Boilerplated wrote:

    #1

    "Good. We need more people like him [Guy Burgess] employed by the BBC, instead of the "namby-pamby leftest wenches" we have now."

    I really am not sure if that was meant to be a highly ironic comment or just a comment from someone who doesn't actually know who Guy Burgess was (not completely clear from the blog above if people don't already know, "Cambridge spy" doesn't really tell half the story)!...

    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 1:02pm on 19 Aug 2009, ReginaldJeeves wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 4. At 1:46pm on 19 Aug 2009, Boilerplated wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 5. At 1:25pm on 20 Aug 2009, hackerjack wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 6. At 8:17pm on 21 Aug 2009, ReginaldJeeves wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 7. At 12:25pm on 22 Aug 2009, Boilerplated wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 8. At 5:46pm on 22 Aug 2009, kettleclad wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 9. At 6:10pm on 22 Aug 2009, kettleclad wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 10. At 10:23am on 23 Aug 2009, Boilerplated wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 11. At 10:52am on 23 Aug 2009, kettleclad wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 12. At 11:20am on 23 Aug 2009, Boilerplated wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 13. At 6:06pm on 23 Aug 2009, kettleclad wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

  • 14. At 08:02am on 02 Sep 2009, wwdlu101 wrote:

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.

View these comments in RSS

More from this blog...

Explore the BBC

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.