There have been some stories in the papers in the last few days that have suggested that the BBC is embarking on a new strategy in which we are asking programme makers to 'commercialise' some of our news and current affairs programming with a view to making money.

It has been said that staff are being asked to exploit commercial opportunities at the expense of focussing on the programmes themselves. Questions are being raised about whether profit is being put before programme integrity. Surely, the critics say, that's not what the BBC and its staff are there to do? The answer to this is of course an emphatic no.

The BBC exists, as it always has, to make programmes that audiences love - "to inform, educate, entertain and make a profit" is certainly not the new mantra for all our programme makers.

But it has long been the case in UK public service programme making that we have benefited from revenue generated by the commercial sale of CDs, DVDs, books and other activity linked to programmes which have helped to supplement programme budgets.

The History Of The World in 100 Objects books and CBeebies Live events are just two examples of activity that have delivered profits to the BBC that have in turn gone back into programme budgets. These are the kinds of ideas we look for - ideas that complement not compromise or change the shape of our programmes.

BBC News, whether it's domestic TV, radio or online, is of course funded by the Licence Fee and is not subject to any commercial pressures. It's a different story with BBC World News, the live TV news channel broadcast outside the UK, which is a commercial operation funded through advertising and distribution deals. And it is in this commercial area that we can always use as many good ideas as possible to help generate additional income that can be invested back into the network.

It is also worth saying that any ideas we do come up with have to undergo the intense scrutiny of our editorial guidelines and the sharp eye of the BBC Trust whose role in part is to ensure that the BBC is not compromising its position in any way. Editorial integrity remains, as it always has, the unassailable core of what we do and we undermine that at our peril.

I am also happy to reassure NUJ General Secretary Michelle Stanistreet that we would never consider introducing profit targets for programme makers across the BBC. So yes we will always seek to find appropriate ways in which we can raise commercial revenue that will support licence fee funding for our programmes but never at the expense of the core programme values. And so I am afraid we are unlikely to be seeing a range of Paxman dolls anytime soon.

Caroline Thomson is Chief Operating Officer

Tagged with:

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments.

  • Comment number 7. Posted by peasants_for_ever

    on 4 Jul 2012 19:51

    I always miss the OLD BBC Radio World news via short wave ! I DO NOT HAVE ANY NORTH AMERICAN short wave much programming coverage at all ! WHEN A SATELLITE IS DOWN OR ALL, I WONDER IF THEY WILL DECIDE TO USE RADIO'S AGAIN ?!

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 7: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 7: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 6. Posted by Tramp

    on 4 Jul 2012 19:48

    As if integrity is what the BBC most values. What rubbish. Thomson was at the forefront of attempts to close 6music and never mentioned programme integrity then, it was all pounds, shilling and pence.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 6: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 6: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 5. Posted by peasants_for_ever

    on 4 Jul 2012 19:48

    I always love any "crisp" up-todate news of BBC, especially if it has to do, with Dawkins, Darwin, Anglicans, Landlords, peasants, or the Queen E2 and Parliament ...! IT IS FASCINATING ! As to the latest stories of Venezuela or Vancouver , Canada, you seem to not be quite involved, or much interested in the specifics of "strange" happenings !

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 5: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 5: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 4. Posted by amir hamja

    on 1 Jul 2012 12:00

    This comment was removed because it broke the house rules. Explain

  • Comment number 3. Posted by jameswdcrawford

    on 30 Jun 2012 08:07

    While I would hate the BBC to change here in the UK I do wish that the BBC would be more commercially minded when operating in foreign markets.

    BBC World could have so much more content on it and whenever I go on sites like Reddit, there are large communities of people craving our TV. Especially our comedy. Surely this kind of commercial activity could be done without ruining journalistic integrity? Hopefully it could support the BBC's very high standard of journalism?

    Ok, so for the purpose of disclosure I should say that I run this PR agency so maybe I don't have the same journalistic standards and high moral fibre as you guys and we all know what the media thinks of PR people. However I am speaking as an advocate of public broadcasting here and I would love to see the BBC represent this country by promoting its best content harder abroad. This could further subsidise us licence fee payers here in the UK

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 3: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 3: 0
    Loading…
  • Comment number 2. Posted by Juliantelly

    on 29 Jun 2012 11:00

    From BBC Press Office - The BBC does not benefit in anyway. We use these platforms as a way of engaging with our audiences.

  • Comment number 1. Posted by Kit Green

    on 29 Jun 2012 10:29

    Does the BBC make any money from the relentless on air encouragement for us all to rush to Twitter and Facebook? This is as prevalent in news as much as elsewhere.

    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of positive ratings for comment 1: 0
    • This entry is now closed for comments. Number of negative ratings for comment 1: 0
    Loading…